Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8896 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-24-2019 5:56 AM
42 online now:
caffeine (1 member, 41 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,612 Year: 3,649/19,786 Month: 644/1,087 Week: 13/221 Day: 13/36 Hour: 2/2

EvC Forum All Forums Science Forums Is It Science? Creation science II

Key: Answered, Noted, Unanswered
Originator: Coyote, 03-07-2009 2:00 PM
  Msg
Num
Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By Coyote
03-07-2009 2:00 PM
 
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
Topic's mood 2 Message 2
By Admin
03-07-2009 2:22 PM
   
Topic's mood 3 Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
Message 1
By Coyote
03-07-2009 2:00 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 5)
By shalamabobbi
03-07-2009 3:22 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 6)
By lyx2no
03-07-2009 3:27 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 7)
By Coyote
03-07-2009 3:39 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 8)
By JonF
03-07-2009 3:40 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 9)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 3:45 PM
Topic's mood 4 Message 4
By Capt Stormfield
03-07-2009 3:12 PM
 
still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
Topic's mood 5 Re: Creationists (Message 5)
By shalamabobbi
03-07-2009 3:22 PM
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
 
Topic's mood 6 Re: Creationists (Message 6)
By lyx2no
03-07-2009 3:27 PM
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 11)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:02 PM
Topic's mood 7 Re: Creationists (Message 7)
By Coyote
03-07-2009 3:39 PM
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
Topic's mood 8 Re: Creationists (Message 8)
By JonF
03-07-2009 3:40 PM
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
This is false (Message 13)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:11 PM
Topic's mood 9 Re: Creationists (Message 9)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 3:45 PM
Creationists (Message 3)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 2:59 PM
Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
Topic's mood 10 still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
Message 4
By Capt Stormfield
03-07-2009 3:12 PM
No, Your Not , Are You (Message 19)
By lyx2no
03-07-2009 4:31 PM
Re: still not getting it... (Message 23)
By shalamabobbi
03-07-2009 7:53 PM
Topic's mood 11 It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 11)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:02 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 6)
By lyx2no
03-07-2009 3:27 PM
Re: It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 16)
By Granny Magda
03-07-2009 4:23 PM
Topic's mood 12 This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 7)
By Coyote
03-07-2009 3:39 PM
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 15)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:16 PM
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 26)
By anglagard
03-08-2009 1:16 AM
Topic's mood 13 This is false (Message 13)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:11 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 8)
By JonF
03-07-2009 3:40 PM
Re: This is false (Message 22)
By JonF
03-07-2009 7:50 PM
Topic's mood 14 Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
Re: Creationists (Message 9)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 3:45 PM
Re: Oh please.. (Message 18)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:25 PM
Re: Oh please.. (Message 24)
By JonF
03-07-2009 8:10 PM
Topic's mood 15 Re: This is so exhausting (Message 15)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:16 PM
This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
Topic's mood 16 Re: It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 16)
By Granny Magda
03-07-2009 4:23 PM
It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 11)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:02 PM
In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 54)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:29 AM
Topic's mood 17 What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 15)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:16 PM
Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 20)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:31 PM
Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 21)
By Admin
03-07-2009 5:23 PM
Topic's mood 18 Re: Oh please.. (Message 18)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:25 PM
Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
 
Topic's mood 19 No, Your Not , Are You (Message 19)
By lyx2no
03-07-2009 4:31 PM
still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
 
Topic's mood 20 Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 20)
By Coragyps
03-07-2009 4:31 PM
What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
 
Topic's mood 21 Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 21)
By Admin
03-07-2009 5:23 PM
What planet are you talking about? (Message 17)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:24 PM
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
Topic's mood 22 Re: This is false (Message 22)
By JonF
03-07-2009 7:50 PM
This is false (Message 13)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:11 PM
 
Topic's mood 23 Re: still not getting it... (Message 23)
By shalamabobbi
03-07-2009 7:53 PM
still not getting it... (Message 10)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 3:55 PM
Re: still not getting it... (Message 29)
By rueh
03-08-2009 11:29 AM
Topic's mood 24 Re: Oh please.. (Message 24)
By JonF
03-07-2009 8:10 PM
Oh please.. (Message 14)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:14 PM
 
Topic's mood 25 Smoke and Mirrors (Message 25)
By Sarawak
03-07-2009 10:21 PM
   
Topic's mood 26 Re: This is so exhausting (Message 26)
By anglagard
03-08-2009 1:16 AM
This is so exhausting (Message 12)
By Kelly
03-07-2009 4:07 PM
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 27)
By subbie
03-08-2009 1:29 AM
Topic's mood 27 Re: This is so exhausting (Message 27)
By subbie
03-08-2009 1:29 AM
Re: This is so exhausting (Message 26)
By anglagard
03-08-2009 1:16 AM
 
Topic's mood 28 Morris and Creation Science (Message 28)
By Lithodid-Man
03-08-2009 3:33 AM
 
Taken them to the cleaners (Message 30)
By Modulous
03-08-2009 11:38 AM
Topic's mood 29 Re: still not getting it... (Message 29)
By rueh
03-08-2009 11:29 AM
Re: still not getting it... (Message 23)
By shalamabobbi
03-07-2009 7:53 PM
 
Topic's mood 30 Taken them to the cleaners (Message 30)
By Modulous
03-08-2009 11:38 AM
Morris and Creation Science (Message 28)
By Lithodid-Man
03-08-2009 3:33 AM
 
Topic's mood 31 Message 31
By Sarawak
03-08-2009 11:43 AM
 
The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
Topic's mood 32 Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
Re: What planet are you talking about? (Message 21)
By Admin
03-07-2009 5:23 PM
Answers (Message 33)
By AdminModulous
03-08-2009 3:47 PM
Taking Time (Message 35)
By AdminNosy
03-08-2009 4:37 PM
Re: Lol, seriously. (Message 38)
By Admin
03-08-2009 6:35 PM
Re: Lol, seriously. (Message 44)
By Capt Stormfield
03-08-2009 11:07 PM
Topic's mood 33 Answers (Message 33)
By AdminModulous
03-08-2009 3:47 PM
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 34 The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
Message 31
By Sarawak
03-08-2009 11:43 AM
Re: The point of my list (Message 36)
By Coyote
03-08-2009 4:51 PM
Re: The point of my list (Message 37)
By Granny Magda
03-08-2009 5:01 PM
Topic's mood 35 Taking Time (Message 35)
By AdminNosy
03-08-2009 4:37 PM
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 36 Re: The point of my list (Message 36)
By Coyote
03-08-2009 4:51 PM
The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
Topic's mood 37 Re: The point of my list (Message 37)
By Granny Magda
03-08-2009 5:01 PM
The point of my list (Message 34)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 4:15 PM
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
Topic's mood 38 Re: Lol, seriously. (Message 38)
By Admin
03-08-2009 6:35 PM
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 39 I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
Re: The point of my list (Message 37)
By Granny Magda
03-08-2009 5:01 PM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 40)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 8:47 PM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 43)
By Granny Magda
03-08-2009 10:35 PM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 46)
By Blue Jay
03-09-2009 2:15 AM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 47)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 4:29 AM
Topic's mood 40 Re: I think it makes sense (Message 40)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 8:47 PM
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
defining terms (Message 41)
By NosyNed
03-08-2009 9:27 PM
Topic's mood 41 defining terms (Message 41)
By NosyNed
03-08-2009 9:27 PM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 40)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 8:47 PM
Re: defining terms (Message 42)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 10:05 PM
Topic's mood 42 Re: defining terms (Message 42)
By ICANT
03-08-2009 10:05 PM
defining terms (Message 41)
By NosyNed
03-08-2009 9:27 PM
 
Topic's mood 43 Re: I think it makes sense (Message 43)
By Granny Magda
03-08-2009 10:35 PM
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 45)
By Coyote
03-08-2009 11:07 PM
Topic's mood 44 Re: Lol, seriously. (Message 44)
By Capt Stormfield
03-08-2009 11:07 PM
Lol, seriously. (Message 32)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 3:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 45 Re: I think it makes sense (Message 45)
By Coyote
03-08-2009 11:07 PM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 43)
By Granny Magda
03-08-2009 10:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 46 Re: I think it makes sense (Message 46)
By Blue Jay
03-09-2009 2:15 AM
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
Topic's mood 47 Re: I think it makes sense (Message 47)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 4:29 AM
I think it makes sense (Message 39)
By Kelly
03-08-2009 8:37 PM
 
Topic's mood 48 Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
Re: I think it makes sense (Message 46)
By Blue Jay
03-09-2009 2:15 AM
Re: Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 51)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:02 AM
Re: Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 53)
By bluescat48
03-09-2009 10:11 AM
"A process was involved!" (Message 100)
By Blue Jay
03-10-2009 1:36 AM
Topic's mood 49 Message 49
By ichatfilipina
03-09-2009 9:52 AM
   
Topic's mood 50 Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
Re: The point of my list (Message 36)
By Coyote
03-08-2009 4:51 PM
Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 52)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:10 AM
Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 56)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 10:38 AM
Topic's mood 51 Re: Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 51)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:02 AM
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 52 Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 52)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:10 AM
Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
 
Topic's mood 53 Re: Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 53)
By bluescat48
03-09-2009 10:11 AM
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 54 In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 54)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:29 AM
Re: It is ridiculous to try and limit this discussion (Message 16)
By Granny Magda
03-07-2009 4:23 PM
Re: In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 55)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:32 AM
Topic's mood 55 Re: In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 55)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:32 AM
In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 54)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:29 AM
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
Topic's mood 56 Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 56)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 10:38 AM
Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 50)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:57 AM
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
Topic's mood 57 I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
Re: In spite of the discrimination against creation scientists (Message 55)
By Percy
03-09-2009 10:32 AM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 58)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 11:07 AM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 59)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 11:13 AM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 60)
By Percy
03-09-2009 11:20 AM
Topic's mood 58 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 58)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 11:07 AM
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
 
Topic's mood 59 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 59)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 11:13 AM
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
Topic's mood 60 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 60)
By Percy
03-09-2009 11:20 AM
I am interested only in first showing (Message 57)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 10:50 AM
 
Topic's mood 61 Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
Re: Do you think that evolutionists are any different? (Message 56)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 10:38 AM
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 62)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 11:51 AM
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 63)
By Dman
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 65)
By Percy
03-09-2009 12:08 PM
Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 86)
By bluescat48
03-09-2009 4:08 PM
A mark for creation science.. (Message 87)
By shalamabobbi
03-09-2009 4:11 PM
Topic's mood 62 Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 62)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 11:51 AM
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
 
Topic's mood 63 Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 63)
By Dman
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
 
Topic's mood 64 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 59)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 11:13 AM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 66)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 12:13 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 67)
By Huntard
03-09-2009 12:28 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 68)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 12:48 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 72)
By Rahvin
03-09-2009 1:07 PM
Topic's mood 65 Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 65)
By Percy
03-09-2009 12:08 PM
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
 
Topic's mood 66 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 66)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 12:13 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
 
Topic's mood 67 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 67)
By Huntard
03-09-2009 12:28 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
Topic's mood 68 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 68)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 12:48 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
 
Topic's mood 69 I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 67)
By Huntard
03-09-2009 12:28 PM
A plague on both your houses! (Message 71)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 1:06 PM
Re: I am sorry (Message 73)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 1:19 PM
Re: I am sorry (Message 74)
By Percy
03-09-2009 1:30 PM
Re: I am sorry (Message 76)
By Huntard
03-09-2009 1:34 PM
Topic's mood 70 extinct species (Message 70)
By olivortex
03-09-2009 1:02 PM
   
Topic's mood 71 A plague on both your houses! (Message 71)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 1:06 PM
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
Topic's mood 72 Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 72)
By Rahvin
03-09-2009 1:07 PM
Re: I am interested only in first showing (Message 64)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:00 PM
 
Topic's mood 73 Re: I am sorry (Message 73)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 1:19 PM
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
 
Topic's mood 74 Re: I am sorry (Message 74)
By Percy
03-09-2009 1:30 PM
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
Topic's mood 75 Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
A plague on both your houses! (Message 71)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 1:06 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 77)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 1:45 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 79)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 2:25 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 94)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:08 PM
Topic's mood 76 Re: I am sorry (Message 76)
By Huntard
03-09-2009 1:34 PM
I am sorry (Message 69)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 12:58 PM
 
Topic's mood 77 Re: Very good Modulous (Message 77)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 1:45 PM
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
 
Topic's mood 78 Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
Re: I am sorry (Message 74)
By Percy
03-09-2009 1:30 PM
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 80)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 2:26 PM
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 82)
By Coyote
03-09-2009 2:39 PM
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
Topic's mood 79 Re: Very good Modulous (Message 79)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 2:25 PM
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
Topic's mood 80 Re: Thanks Percy (Message 80)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 2:26 PM
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
 
Topic's mood 81 If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 79)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 2:25 PM
Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 83)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 2:44 PM
Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 84)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 3:05 PM
Topic's mood 82 Re: Thanks Percy (Message 82)
By Coyote
03-09-2009 2:39 PM
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
 
Topic's mood 83 Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 83)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 2:44 PM
If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
Topic's mood 84 Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 84)
By Dr Adequate
03-09-2009 3:05 PM
If you say so, Modulous (Message 81)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:31 PM
 
Topic's mood 85 Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
Thanks Percy (Message 78)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 2:00 PM
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 89)
By Richard Townsend
03-09-2009 5:36 PM
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
Topic's mood 86 Re: Radiocarbon dating (Message 86)
By bluescat48
03-09-2009 4:08 PM
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
 
Topic's mood 87 A mark for creation science.. (Message 87)
By shalamabobbi
03-09-2009 4:11 PM
Radiocarbon dating (Message 61)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 11:39 AM
 
Topic's mood 88 misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
Re: If you say so, Modulous (Message 83)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 2:44 PM
Simplton Representation (Message 90)
By lyx2no
03-09-2009 6:24 PM
Re: misrepresentation (Message 95)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 9:12 PM
Re: misrepresentation (Message 96)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 9:14 PM
Re: misrepresentation (Message 102)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 5:41 AM
You continue to use arguments you have been shown to be false (Message 120)
By Theodoric
03-10-2009 12:36 PM
Topic's mood 89 Re: Thanks Percy (Message 89)
By Richard Townsend
03-09-2009 5:36 PM
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
 
Topic's mood 90 Simplton Representation (Message 90)
By lyx2no
03-09-2009 6:24 PM
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 91 No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
Re: Thanks Percy (Message 85)
By Percy
03-09-2009 3:09 PM
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 92)
By shalamabobbi
03-09-2009 7:03 PM
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 93)
By Percy
03-09-2009 8:31 PM
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 101)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 5:34 AM
Topic's mood 92 Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 92)
By shalamabobbi
03-09-2009 7:03 PM
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 93 Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 93)
By Percy
03-09-2009 8:31 PM
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
Topic's mood 94 Re: Very good Modulous (Message 94)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:08 PM
Very good Modulous (Message 75)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 1:33 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 97)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 9:20 PM
Topic's mood 95 Re: misrepresentation (Message 95)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 9:12 PM
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 96 Re: misrepresentation (Message 96)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 9:14 PM
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
Topic's mood 97 Re: Very good Modulous (Message 97)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 9:20 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 94)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:08 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 98)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:29 PM
Topic's mood 98 Re: Very good Modulous (Message 98)
By Taq
03-09-2009 9:29 PM
Re: Very good Modulous (Message 97)
By dwise1
03-09-2009 9:20 PM
 
Topic's mood 99 Message 99
By Sarawak
03-10-2009 12:35 AM
   
Topic's mood 100 "A process was involved!" (Message 100)
By Blue Jay
03-10-2009 1:36 AM
Creatioists are not trying to prove or even figure out (Message 48)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 9:13 AM
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
Topic's mood 101 Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 101)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 5:34 AM
No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 91)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 6:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 102 Re: misrepresentation (Message 102)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 5:41 AM
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 103 I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
Re: misrepresentation (Message 96)
By Modulous
03-09-2009 9:14 PM
To be a misconception it has to be wrong (Message 104)
By Dr Jack
03-10-2009 9:03 AM
Science is more than pointing at evidence and saying "See?" (Message 105)
By Modulous
03-10-2009 9:14 AM
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 108)
By Larni
03-10-2009 9:40 AM
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 132)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 3:48 PM
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 138)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 4:09 AM
Topic's mood 104 To be a misconception it has to be wrong (Message 104)
By Dr Jack
03-10-2009 9:03 AM
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
 
Topic's mood 105 Science is more than pointing at evidence and saying "See?" (Message 105)
By Modulous
03-10-2009 9:14 AM
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
 
Topic's mood 106 Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
 
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 115)
By Coyote
03-10-2009 11:19 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
Topic's mood 107 Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
"A process was involved!" (Message 100)
By Blue Jay
03-10-2009 1:36 AM
In the Beginning... (Message 113)
By Blue Jay
03-10-2009 10:59 AM
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 139)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 4:20 AM
Topic's mood 108 Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 108)
By Larni
03-10-2009 9:40 AM
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
 
Topic's mood 109 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 111)
By Modulous
03-10-2009 10:42 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 112)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 10:53 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 124)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 1:18 PM
Topic's mood 110 Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
Re: No, actually it is based on discrimination (Message 93)
By Percy
03-09-2009 8:31 PM
Re: Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 119)
By dwise1
03-10-2009 12:33 PM
Re: Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 133)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 3:58 PM
Topic's mood 111 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 111)
By Modulous
03-10-2009 10:42 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
 
Topic's mood 112 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 112)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 10:53 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
This is all arguable, debatable (Message 114)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 11:01 AM
Topic's mood 113 In the Beginning... (Message 113)
By Blue Jay
03-10-2009 10:59 AM
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
 
Topic's mood 114 This is all arguable, debatable (Message 114)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 11:01 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 112)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 10:53 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 134)
By Taq
03-10-2009 6:04 PM
Topic's mood 115 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 115)
By Coyote
03-10-2009 11:19 AM
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 126)
By Percy
03-10-2009 1:55 PM
Topic's mood 116 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 106)
By Percy
03-10-2009 9:16 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 117)
By Coyote
03-10-2009 11:46 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 127)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:05 PM
Topic's mood 117 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 117)
By Coyote
03-10-2009 11:46 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 118)
By Stile
03-10-2009 12:01 PM
Topic's mood 118 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 118)
By Stile
03-10-2009 12:01 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 117)
By Coyote
03-10-2009 11:46 AM
 
Topic's mood 119 Re: Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 119)
By dwise1
03-10-2009 12:33 PM
Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
 
Topic's mood 120 You continue to use arguments you have been shown to be false (Message 120)
By Theodoric
03-10-2009 12:36 PM
misrepresentation (Message 88)
By Kelly
03-09-2009 5:35 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 121)
By AdminModulous
03-10-2009 12:42 PM
Topic's mood 121 Re: LIAR (Message 121)
By AdminModulous
03-10-2009 12:42 PM
You continue to use arguments you have been shown to be false (Message 120)
By Theodoric
03-10-2009 12:36 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 122)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 1:14 PM
Topic's mood 122 Re: LIAR (Message 122)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 1:14 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 121)
By AdminModulous
03-10-2009 12:42 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 123)
By Dr Jack
03-10-2009 1:14 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 125)
By Theodoric
03-10-2009 1:49 PM
Topic's mood 123 Re: LIAR (Message 123)
By Dr Jack
03-10-2009 1:14 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 122)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 1:14 PM
 
Topic's mood 124 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 124)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 1:18 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 109)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:01 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 129)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:21 PM
Topic's mood 125 Re: LIAR (Message 125)
By Theodoric
03-10-2009 1:49 PM
Re: LIAR (Message 122)
By NosyNed
03-10-2009 1:14 PM
 
Topic's mood 126 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 126)
By Percy
03-10-2009 1:55 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 115)
By Coyote
03-10-2009 11:19 AM
 
Topic's mood 127 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 127)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:05 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 116)
By Stile
03-10-2009 11:30 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 128)
By Stile
03-10-2009 2:18 PM
Topic's mood 128 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 128)
By Stile
03-10-2009 2:18 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 127)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:05 PM
 
Topic's mood 129 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 129)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:21 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 124)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 1:18 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 3:09 PM
Topic's mood 130 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 3:09 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 129)
By Percy
03-10-2009 2:21 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 131)
By Percy
03-10-2009 3:34 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
Topic's mood 131 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 131)
By Percy
03-10-2009 3:34 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 3:09 PM
 
Topic's mood 132 Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 132)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 3:48 PM
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
 
Topic's mood 133 Re: Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 133)
By Dr Adequate
03-10-2009 3:58 PM
Not ignoring anything Percy, (Message 110)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 10:34 AM
 
Topic's mood 134 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 134)
By Taq
03-10-2009 6:04 PM
This is all arguable, debatable (Message 114)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 11:01 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 135)
By olivortex
03-10-2009 6:52 PM
Topic's mood 135 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 135)
By olivortex
03-10-2009 6:52 PM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 134)
By Taq
03-10-2009 6:04 PM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
By Capt Stormfield
03-10-2009 8:38 PM
Topic's mood 136 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
By Capt Stormfield
03-10-2009 8:38 PM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 135)
By olivortex
03-10-2009 6:52 PM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 137)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 1:20 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 140)
By olivortex
03-11-2009 4:32 AM
Topic's mood 137 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 137)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 1:20 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
By Capt Stormfield
03-10-2009 8:38 PM
 
Topic's mood 138 Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 138)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 4:09 AM
I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 103)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 8:52 AM
AMA Approved (Message 142)
By lyx2no
03-11-2009 8:33 AM
Topic's mood 139 Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 139)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 4:20 AM
Re: "A process was involved!" (Message 107)
By Kelly
03-10-2009 9:38 AM
 
Topic's mood 140 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 140)
By olivortex
03-11-2009 4:32 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 136)
By Capt Stormfield
03-10-2009 8:38 PM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 141)
By Son
03-11-2009 6:13 AM
Topic's mood 141 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 141)
By Son
03-11-2009 6:13 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 140)
By olivortex
03-11-2009 4:32 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 145)
By Capt Stormfield
03-11-2009 9:48 AM
Topic's mood 142 AMA Approved (Message 142)
By lyx2no
03-11-2009 8:33 AM
Re: I just wanted to correct the misconception (Message 138)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 4:09 AM
 
Topic's mood 143 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 130)
By Rahvin
03-10-2009 3:09 PM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 144)
By Dr Jack
03-11-2009 9:14 AM
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
Topic's mood 144 Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 144)
By Dr Jack
03-11-2009 9:14 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
 
Topic's mood 145 Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 145)
By Capt Stormfield
03-11-2009 9:48 AM
Re: This is all arguable, debatable (Message 141)
By Son
03-11-2009 6:13 AM
 
Topic's mood 146 Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
Re: Radiometric Dating is Unreliable (Message 143)
By Percy
03-11-2009 8:40 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 147)
By Percy
03-11-2009 9:58 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 148)
By Huntard
03-11-2009 10:08 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 149)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:11 AM
Comparing the two Models (Message 152)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:30 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 185)
By shalamabobbi
03-11-2009 2:29 PM
Topic's mood 147 Re: Is it Science? (Message 147)
By Percy
03-11-2009 9:58 AM
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
 
Topic's mood 148 Re: Is it Science? (Message 148)
By Huntard
03-11-2009 10:08 AM
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
Topic's mood 149 Re: Is it Science? (Message 149)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:11 AM
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
Topic's mood 150 Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 148)
By Huntard
03-11-2009 10:08 AM
Re: Creation Science (Message 151)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:25 AM
Creastion Science -- details (Message 153)
By NosyNed
03-11-2009 10:32 AM
Re: Creation Science (Message 155)
By Huntard
03-11-2009 10:37 AM
Re: Creation Science (Message 160)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 11:58 AM
Re: Creation Science (Message 161)
By Dman
03-11-2009 12:02 PM
Topic's mood 151 Re: Creation Science (Message 151)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:25 AM
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
 
Topic's mood 152 Comparing the two Models (Message 152)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:30 AM
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
 
Topic's mood 153 Creastion Science -- details (Message 153)
By NosyNed
03-11-2009 10:32 AM
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
Re: Creastion Science -- details (Message 156)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 10:46 AM
Topic's mood 154 Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 149)
By Son
03-11-2009 10:11 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 157)
By Coragyps
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 165)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 12:20 PM
Topic's mood 155 Re: Creation Science (Message 155)
By Huntard
03-11-2009 10:37 AM
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
 
Topic's mood 156 Re: Creastion Science -- details (Message 156)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 10:46 AM
Creastion Science -- details (Message 153)
By NosyNed
03-11-2009 10:32 AM
 
Topic's mood 157 Re: Is it Science? (Message 157)
By Coragyps
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
 
Topic's mood 158 Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
Topic's mood 159 Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 163)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:09 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 164)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 12:11 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 170)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 12:39 PM
Topic's mood 160 Re: Creation Science (Message 160)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 11:58 AM
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
 
Topic's mood 161 Re: Creation Science (Message 161)
By Dman
03-11-2009 12:02 PM
Creation Science (Message 150)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:17 AM
 
Topic's mood 162 Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 158)
By Stile
03-11-2009 10:58 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 166)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 12:21 PM
Very Nice! (Message 168)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:28 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 172)
By Coyote
03-11-2009 1:08 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 173)
By Taq
03-11-2009 1:13 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 186)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 2:41 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 188)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 4:06 PM
Topic's mood 163 Re: Is it Science? (Message 163)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:09 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
Topic's mood 164 Re: Is it Science? (Message 164)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 12:11 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
 
Topic's mood 165 Re: Is it Science? (Message 165)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 12:20 PM
Is it Science? (Message 154)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 10:36 AM
That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
Topic's mood 166 Re: Is it Science? (Message 166)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 12:21 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
 
Topic's mood 167 That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 165)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 12:20 PM
Re: That's a good question (Message 169)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 12:32 PM
Re: That's a good question (Message 179)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 1:46 PM
Topic's mood 168 Very Nice! (Message 168)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:28 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
Topic's mood 169 Re: That's a good question (Message 169)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 12:32 PM
That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
 
Topic's mood 170 Re: Is it Science? (Message 170)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 12:39 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 159)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 11:46 AM
 
Topic's mood 171 lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
Very Nice! (Message 168)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:28 PM
Re: lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 174)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 1:26 PM
What happened to honesty? (Message 181)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
Reiteration of site rules. (Message 183)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 1:59 PM
Topic's mood 172 Re: Is it Science? (Message 172)
By Coyote
03-11-2009 1:08 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
Topic's mood 173 Re: Is it Science? (Message 173)
By Taq
03-11-2009 1:13 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
 
Topic's mood 174 Re: lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 174)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 1:26 PM
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
 
Topic's mood 175 Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 172)
By Coyote
03-11-2009 1:08 PM
I've had enough witnessing (Message 177)
By Coyote
03-11-2009 1:36 PM
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 178)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:37 PM
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 187)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 2:43 PM
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 189)
By Taq
03-11-2009 4:25 PM
Topic's mood 176 back to the topic (Message 176)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:33 PM
 
Re: back to the topic (Message 182)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:55 PM
Topic's mood 177 I've had enough witnessing (Message 177)
By Coyote
03-11-2009 1:36 PM
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
 
Topic's mood 178 Re: Nice arrangement (Message 178)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:37 PM
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 180)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
Topic's mood 179 Re: That's a good question (Message 179)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 1:46 PM
That's a good question (Message 167)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:27 PM
 
Topic's mood 180 Re: Nice arrangement (Message 180)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 178)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:37 PM
 
Topic's mood 181 What happened to honesty? (Message 181)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
copyright (Message 184)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 2:25 PM
Topic's mood 182 Re: back to the topic (Message 182)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:55 PM
back to the topic (Message 176)
By Son
03-11-2009 1:33 PM
 
Topic's mood 183 Reiteration of site rules. (Message 183)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 1:59 PM
lol! nice artistict rendition (Message 171)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:06 PM
Two things... (Message 191)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 4:41 PM
Topic's mood 184 copyright (Message 184)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 2:25 PM
What happened to honesty? (Message 181)
By Stile
03-11-2009 1:47 PM
 
Topic's mood 185 Re: Is it Science? (Message 185)
By shalamabobbi
03-11-2009 2:29 PM
Is it Science? (Message 146)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 9:49 AM
 
Topic's mood 186 Re: Is it Science? (Message 186)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 2:41 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
 
Topic's mood 187 Re: Nice arrangement (Message 187)
By Dr Adequate
03-11-2009 2:43 PM
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
 
Topic's mood 188 Re: Is it Science? (Message 188)
By dwise1
03-11-2009 4:06 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 162)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 12:08 PM
 
Topic's mood 189 Re: Nice arrangement (Message 189)
By Taq
03-11-2009 4:25 PM
Nice arrangement (Message 175)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 1:29 PM
No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
Topic's mood 190 Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 163)
By Stile
03-11-2009 12:09 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 192)
By Capt Stormfield
03-11-2009 4:54 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 201)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:07 PM
Topic's mood 191 Two things... (Message 191)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 4:41 PM
Reiteration of site rules. (Message 183)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 1:59 PM
Re: Two things... (Message 194)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 5:07 PM
Topic's mood 192 Re: Is it Science? (Message 192)
By Capt Stormfield
03-11-2009 4:54 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
 
Topic's mood 193 No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
Re: Nice arrangement (Message 189)
By Taq
03-11-2009 4:25 PM
Re: No need to go on.. (Message 195)
By Granny Magda
03-11-2009 5:18 PM
Re: No need to go on.. (Message 199)
By Taq
03-11-2009 5:30 PM
Topic's mood 194 Re: Two things... (Message 194)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 5:07 PM
Two things... (Message 191)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 4:41 PM
Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
Topic's mood 195 Re: No need to go on.. (Message 195)
By Granny Magda
03-11-2009 5:18 PM
No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
 
Topic's mood 196 Suspensions will follow this message (Message 196)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 5:20 PM
   
Topic's mood 197 Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
Re: Two things... (Message 194)
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 5:07 PM
Re: Thanks Modulous (Message 198)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 5:26 PM
Re: Thanks Modulous (Message 200)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:03 PM
Topic's mood 198 Re: Thanks Modulous (Message 198)
By Jester4kicks
03-11-2009 5:26 PM
Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 199 Re: No need to go on.. (Message 199)
By Taq
03-11-2009 5:30 PM
No need to go on.. (Message 193)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:03 PM
bingo! (Message 202)
By grandfather raven
03-11-2009 6:15 PM
Topic's mood 200 Re: Thanks Modulous (Message 200)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:03 PM
Thanks Modulous (Message 197)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 5:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 201 Re: Is it Science? (Message 201)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:07 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 190)
By ICANT
03-11-2009 4:35 PM
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
Topic's mood 202 bingo! (Message 202)
By grandfather raven
03-11-2009 6:15 PM
Re: No need to go on.. (Message 199)
By Taq
03-11-2009 5:30 PM
 
Topic's mood 203 When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
Re: Is it Science? (Message 201)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:07 PM
Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 204)
By lyx2no
03-11-2009 6:57 PM
Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 205)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:57 PM
Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 206)
By Granny Magda
03-11-2009 7:01 PM
Topic's mood 204 Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 204)
By lyx2no
03-11-2009 6:57 PM
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
 
Topic's mood 205 Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 205)
By Taq
03-11-2009 6:57 PM
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
 
Topic's mood 206 Re: When it comes to historical science (Message 206)
By Granny Magda
03-11-2009 7:01 PM
When it comes to historical science (Message 203)
By Kelly
03-11-2009 6:44 PM
 
Topic's mood 207 Message 207
By AdminModulous
03-11-2009 7:08 PM
   

Thread is open and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is open and has recent unread messages.
Thread is open and very active, but has no unread messages.
Thread is open, very active, and has unread messages.
Thread is closed and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is closed and has recent unread messages.
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019