|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
|
|
|
3
|
What is a fact; what is truth? (Message 3)
By nwr
03-15-2006 10:06 AM
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
4
|
Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 4)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:24 AM
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
5
|
Message 5
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
6
|
Fact versus Theory (Message 6)
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
7
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 7)
|
Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 4)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:24 AM
|
|
|
8
|
Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 8)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 12:15 PM
|
Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 4)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:24 AM
|
|
|
9
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 9)
|
Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 4)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:24 AM
|
|
|
10
|
PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 10)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM
|
Message 5
|
|
|
11
|
Re: Fact versus Theory (Message 11)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:45 PM
|
Fact versus Theory (Message 6)
|
|
|
12
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 12)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:46 PM
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 7)
|
|
|
13
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 13)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:48 PM
|
Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 8)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 12:15 PM
|
|
|
14
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 14)
|
PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 10)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM
|
|
|
15
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 15)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:50 PM
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 9)
|
|
|
16
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 16)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:52 PM
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 14)
|
|
|
17
|
Re: Fact versus Theory (Message 17)
|
Re: Fact versus Theory (Message 11)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:45 PM
|
|
|
18
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 18)
|
PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 10)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM
|
|
|
19
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 19)
|
PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 10)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM
|
|
|
20
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 20)
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 16)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:52 PM
|
|
|
21
|
Re: Fact versus Theory (Message 21)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:15 PM
|
Re: Fact versus Theory (Message 17)
|
|
|
22
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 22)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:17 PM
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 20)
|
|
|
23
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 23)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:18 PM
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 18)
|
|
|
24
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 24)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:20 PM
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 19)
|
|
|
25
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 25)
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 23)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:18 PM
|
|
|
26
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 26)
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 22)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:17 PM
|
|
|
27
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 27)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 3:53 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 13)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:48 PM
|
|
|
28
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 28)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:57 PM
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 26)
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 29)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:59 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 27)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 3:53 PM
|
|
|
30
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 30)
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 15)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:50 PM
|
|
|
31
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 31)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:09 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 29)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:59 PM
|
|
|
32
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 32)
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 29)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:59 PM
|
|
|
33
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 33)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:24 PM
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 30)
|
|
|
34
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 34)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:24 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 31)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:09 PM
|
|
|
35
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 35)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:30 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 34)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:24 PM
|
|
|
36
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 36)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:33 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 35)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:30 PM
|
|
|
37
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 37)
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 35)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:30 PM
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 38)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:49 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 36)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:33 PM
|
|
|
39
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 39)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:51 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 36)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:33 PM
|
|
|
40
|
You are more than welcome to join us (Message 40)
By jar
03-15-2006 4:53 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 35)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:30 PM
|
|
|
41
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 41)
By Faith
03-15-2006 5:03 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 38)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:49 PM
|
|
|
42
|
Yes it was rediculous (Message 42)
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 24)
By Faith
03-15-2006 3:20 PM
|
|
|
43
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 43)
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 41)
By Faith
03-15-2006 5:03 PM
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Yes it was rediculous (Message 44)
By Faith
03-15-2006 5:42 PM
|
Yes it was rediculous (Message 42)
|
|
|
45
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 45)
By Faith
03-15-2006 5:43 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 43)
|
|
|
46
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 46)
By Faith
03-15-2006 6:01 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 38)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 4:49 PM
|
|
|
47
|
conjecture vs simplified description (Message 47)
|
Re: Posts moved from Grand Canyon thread (Message 33)
By Faith
03-15-2006 4:24 PM
|
|
|
48
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 48)
By Faith
03-15-2006 6:30 PM
|
conjecture vs simplified description (Message 47)
|
|
|
49
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 49)
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 48)
By Faith
03-15-2006 6:30 PM
|
|
|
50
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 50)
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 45)
By Faith
03-15-2006 5:43 PM
|
|
|
51
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 51)
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 46)
By Faith
03-15-2006 6:01 PM
|
|
|
52
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 52)
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 48)
By Faith
03-15-2006 6:30 PM
|
|
|
53
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 53)
By Faith
03-15-2006 7:40 PM
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 52)
|
|
|
54
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 54)
By Faith
03-15-2006 7:40 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 51)
|
|
|
55
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 55)
By Faith
03-15-2006 7:42 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 50)
|
|
|
56
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 56)
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 55)
By Faith
03-15-2006 7:42 PM
|
|
|
57
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 57)
By Faith
03-15-2006 8:57 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 56)
|
|
|
58
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 58)
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 53)
By Faith
03-15-2006 7:40 PM
|
|
|
59
|
Finally something that can be tested. (Message 59)
By jar
03-15-2006 9:22 PM
|
Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues (Message 57)
By Faith
03-15-2006 8:57 PM
|
|
|
60
|
AND THE FLOOD PASSES THE TEST!!!! (Message 60)
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:34 PM
|
Finally something that can be tested. (Message 59)
By jar
03-15-2006 9:22 PM
|
|
|
61
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 61)
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:38 PM
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 58)
|
|
|
62
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 62)
By jar
03-15-2006 9:48 PM
|
AND THE FLOOD PASSES THE TEST!!!! (Message 60)
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:34 PM
|
|
|
63
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 63)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 10:19 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 62)
By jar
03-15-2006 9:48 PM
|
|
|
64
|
Nope, you proved the Flood for me (Message 64)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:26 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 62)
By jar
03-15-2006 9:48 PM
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 65)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:27 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 63)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 10:19 PM
|
|
|
66
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 66)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:28 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 63)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 10:19 PM
|
|
|
67
|
Re: Nope, you proved the Flood for me (Message 67)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:30 PM
|
Nope, you proved the Flood for me (Message 64)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:26 PM
|
|
|
68
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 68)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:30 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 66)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:28 PM
|
|
|
69
|
Re: Nope, you proved the Flood for me (Message 69)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:31 PM
|
Re: Nope, you proved the Flood for me (Message 67)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:30 PM
|
|
|
70
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 70)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:33 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 68)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:30 PM
|
|
|
71
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 71)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:35 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 70)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:33 PM
|
|
|
72
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 72)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:38 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 71)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:35 PM
|
|
|
73
|
Ach, admit it jar, just give up already (Message 73)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:47 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 72)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:38 PM
|
|
|
74
|
Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 74)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 10:58 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 65)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:27 PM
|
|
|
75
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 75)
|
Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 74)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 10:58 PM
|
|
|
76
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 76)
By Faith
03-15-2006 11:23 PM
|
Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 74)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 10:58 PM
|
|
|
77
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 77)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 11:48 PM
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 75)
|
|
|
78
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 78)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 11:49 PM
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 76)
By Faith
03-15-2006 11:23 PM
|
|
|
79
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 79)
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 77)
By Ratel
03-15-2006 11:48 PM
|
|
|
80
|
If Henry was King... (Message 80)
|
PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 10)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM
|
|
|
81
|
Good old confirmation bias (Message 81)
|
Nope, you proved the Flood for me (Message 64)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:26 PM
|
|
|
82
|
fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 82)
|
Re: Here's an issue both sides can interpret (Message 76)
By Faith
03-15-2006 11:23 PM
|
|
|
83
|
Scientific Interpretation for the Layman (Message 83)
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
84
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 84)
|
Re: conjecture vs simplified description (Message 61)
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:38 PM
|
|
|
85
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 85)
|
fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 82)
|
|
|
86
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 86)
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 85)
|
|
|
87
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 87)
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 86)
|
|
|
88
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 88)
|
PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 10)
By Faith
03-15-2006 2:39 PM
|
|
|
89
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 89)
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 72)
By jar
03-15-2006 10:38 PM
|
|
|
90
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 90)
By jar
03-16-2006 10:41 PM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 89)
|
|
|
91
|
New Topic on ICR video? (Message 91)
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 90)
By jar
03-16-2006 10:41 PM
|
|
|
92
|
Re: New Topic on ICR video? (Message 92)
By jar
03-16-2006 11:25 PM
|
New Topic on ICR video? (Message 91)
|
|
|
93
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 93)
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 87)
|
|
|
94
|
Now that you're in the ring... (Message 94)
|
Re: PulEEZE let's not hassle out such obvious stuff (Message 88)
|
|
|
95
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 95)
|
Re: fantasy scenario v theory based on lines of converging evidence (Message 93)
|
|
|
96
|
Re: Ach, admit it jar, just give up already (Message 96)
By Percy
03-17-2006 12:05 PM
|
Ach, admit it jar, just give up already (Message 73)
By Faith
03-15-2006 10:47 PM
|
|
|
97
|
Re: Ach, admit it jar, just give up already (Message 97)
By Faith
03-18-2006 12:49 AM
|
Re: Ach, admit it jar, just give up already (Message 96)
By Percy
03-17-2006 12:05 PM
|
|
|
98
|
Message 98
|
Re: Ach, admit it jar, just give up already (Message 97)
By Faith
03-18-2006 12:49 AM
|
|
|
99
|
how could the Flood do this? (Message 99)
By nator
03-18-2006 9:04 AM
|
Re: Finally something that can be tested. (Message 89)
|
|
|
100
|
Message 100
By Faith
03-18-2006 9:08 AM
|
Message 98
|
|
|
101
|
Re: how could the Flood do this? (Message 101)
By Faith
03-18-2006 9:10 AM
|
how could the Flood do this? (Message 99)
By nator
03-18-2006 9:04 AM
|
|
|
102
|
Message 102
By nator
03-18-2006 9:10 AM
|
Message 98
|
|
|
103
|
Message 103
By Faith
03-18-2006 9:12 AM
|
Message 102
By nator
03-18-2006 9:10 AM
|
|
|
104
|
Facts vs data (Message 104)
|
Message 100
By Faith
03-18-2006 9:08 AM
|
|
|
105
|
Message 105
|
Message 100
By Faith
03-18-2006 9:08 AM
|
|
|
106
|
Message 106
|
Message 100
By Faith
03-18-2006 9:08 AM
|
|
|
107
|
The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 107)
|
|
|
|
108
|
Re: The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 108)
By Faith
03-18-2006 11:46 AM
|
The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 107)
|
|
|
109
|
Re: The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 109)
By nwr
03-18-2006 12:39 PM
|
Re: The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 108)
By Faith
03-18-2006 11:46 AM
|
|
|
110
|
Re: The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 110)
|
Re: The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 108)
By Faith
03-18-2006 11:46 AM
|
|
|
111
|
what's the use? (Message 111)
|
Re: The point is it that it doesn't matter (Message 108)
By Faith
03-18-2006 11:46 AM
|
|
|
112
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 112)
By Faith
03-18-2006 11:35 PM
|
what's the use? (Message 111)
|
|
|
113
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 113)
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 112)
By Faith
03-18-2006 11:35 PM
|
|
|
114
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 114)
By Faith
03-19-2006 12:05 PM
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 113)
|
|
|
115
|
I guess the thread was over before it started (Message 115)
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 114)
By Faith
03-19-2006 12:05 PM
|
|
|
116
|
I would leave the thread open (Message 116)
|
I guess the thread was over before it started (Message 115)
|
|
|
117
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 117)
|
Re: what's the use for sure (Message 114)
By Faith
03-19-2006 12:05 PM
|
|
|
118
|
Interpretation as Fact (Message 118)
|
Message 1
By Faith
03-15-2006 9:51 AM
|
|
|
119
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 119)
By Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM
|
Interpretation as Fact (Message 118)
|
|
|
120
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 120)
By nator
03-19-2006 5:35 PM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 119)
By Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM
|
|
|
121
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 121)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 119)
By Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM
|
|
|
122
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 122)
By edge
03-19-2006 9:01 PM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 119)
By Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM
|
|
|
123
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 123)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 119)
By Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM
|
|
|
124
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 124)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:19 PM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 123)
|
|
|
125
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 125)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:22 PM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 122)
By edge
03-19-2006 9:01 PM
|
|
|
126
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 126)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 124)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:19 PM
|
|
|
127
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 127)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:31 PM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 126)
|
|
|
128
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 128)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 127)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:31 PM
|
|
|
129
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 129)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 127)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:31 PM
|
|
|
130
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 130)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 125)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:22 PM
|
|
|
131
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 131)
By Faith
03-20-2006 8:29 AM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 130)
|
|
|
132
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 132)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 125)
By Faith
03-19-2006 10:22 PM
|
|
|
133
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 133)
By Faith
03-20-2006 8:47 AM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 132)
|
|
|
134
|
Another hit against Faith thesis too (Message 134)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 130)
|
|
|
135
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 135)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 119)
By Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM
|
|
|
136
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 136)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 131)
By Faith
03-20-2006 8:29 AM
|
|
|
137
|
Re: Another hit against Faith thesis too (Message 137)
|
Another hit against Faith thesis too (Message 134)
|
|
|
138
|
Same "kind" so makes no difference. (Message 138)
|
Re: Another hit against Faith thesis too (Message 137)
|
|
|
139
|
Message 139
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 133)
By Faith
03-20-2006 8:47 AM
|
|
|
140
|
DNA evidence (Message 140)
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 123)
|
|
|
141
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 141)
By nator
03-20-2006 11:11 AM
|
Re: Interpretation as Fact (Message 131)
By Faith
03-20-2006 8:29 AM
|
|
|
142
|
Re: DNA evidence (Message 142)
|
DNA evidence (Message 140)
|
|
|
143
|
Following up on message 5 (Message 143)
|
Message 5
|
|
|
144
|
Re: Following up on message 5 (Message 144)
|
Following up on message 5 (Message 143)
|
|