Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8951 total)
334 online now:
dwise1, Faith, PaulK, Tangle (4 members, 330 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 866,749 Year: 21,785/19,786 Month: 348/1,834 Week: 348/315 Day: 26/78 Hour: 2/6

EvC Forum All Forums Science Forums Is It Science?

Refereed (peer reviewed) Journals: Do They Insure Quality or Enforce Orthodoxy?

Key: Answered, Noted, Unanswered
Originator: randman, 01-31-2008 12:53 AM
  Msg
Num
Message Details Reply To Replies
Topic's mood 1 Message 1
By randman
01-31-2008 12:53 AM
 
Message 3
By PaulK
01-31-2008 1:53 AM
What's the Alternative Then? (Message 9)
By Granny Magda
01-31-2008 6:23 AM
Message 12
By Dr Adequate
01-31-2008 3:52 PM
Message 15
By nator
01-31-2008 5:21 PM
Topic's mood 2 Message 2
By Adminnemooseus
01-31-2008 1:40 AM
   
Topic's mood 3 Message 3
By PaulK
01-31-2008 1:53 AM
Message 1
By randman
01-31-2008 12:53 AM
did you read the article? (Message 4)
By randman
01-31-2008 1:58 AM
I agree with Randman's message 4 (Message 5)
By Adminnemooseus
01-31-2008 2:24 AM
Topic's mood 4 did you read the article? (Message 4)
By randman
01-31-2008 1:58 AM
Message 3
By PaulK
01-31-2008 1:53 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 6)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 2:28 AM
Topic's mood 5 I agree with Randman's message 4 (Message 5)
By Adminnemooseus
01-31-2008 2:24 AM
Message 3
By PaulK
01-31-2008 1:53 AM
 
Topic's mood 6 Re: did you read the article? (Message 6)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 2:28 AM
did you read the article? (Message 4)
By randman
01-31-2008 1:58 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 7)
By randman
01-31-2008 2:46 AM
Topic's mood 7 Re: did you read the article? (Message 7)
By randman
01-31-2008 2:46 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 6)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 2:28 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 8)
By Rrhain
01-31-2008 3:34 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 10)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 7:41 AM
Topic's mood 8 Re: did you read the article? (Message 8)
By Rrhain
01-31-2008 3:34 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 7)
By randman
01-31-2008 2:46 AM
 
Topic's mood 9 What's the Alternative Then? (Message 9)
By Granny Magda
01-31-2008 6:23 AM
Message 1
By randman
01-31-2008 12:53 AM
 
Topic's mood 10 Re: did you read the article? (Message 10)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 7:41 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 7)
By randman
01-31-2008 2:46 AM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 11)
By randman
01-31-2008 3:31 PM
Topic's mood 11 Re: did you read the article? (Message 11)
By randman
01-31-2008 3:31 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 10)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 7:41 AM
conservatism (Message 13)
By Modulous
01-31-2008 4:39 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 16)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 5:21 PM
Topic's mood 12 Message 12
By Dr Adequate
01-31-2008 3:52 PM
Message 1
By randman
01-31-2008 12:53 AM
nice civil response (Message 14)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:09 PM
Topic's mood 13 conservatism (Message 13)
By Modulous
01-31-2008 4:39 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 11)
By randman
01-31-2008 3:31 PM
 
Topic's mood 14 nice civil response (Message 14)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:09 PM
Message 12
By Dr Adequate
01-31-2008 3:52 PM
Re: nice civil response (Message 22)
By nator
02-01-2008 7:33 PM
Topic's mood 15 Message 15
By nator
01-31-2008 5:21 PM
Message 1
By randman
01-31-2008 12:53 AM
wrong (Message 18)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:37 PM
Topic's mood 16 Re: did you read the article? (Message 16)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 5:21 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 11)
By randman
01-31-2008 3:31 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 17)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:35 PM
Topic's mood 17 Re: did you read the article? (Message 17)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:35 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 16)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 5:21 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 19)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 5:42 PM
Topic's mood 18 wrong (Message 18)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:37 PM
Message 15
By nator
01-31-2008 5:21 PM
 
Topic's mood 19 Re: did you read the article? (Message 19)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 5:42 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 17)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:35 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 20)
By randman
01-31-2008 6:31 PM
Topic's mood 20 Re: did you read the article? (Message 20)
By randman
01-31-2008 6:31 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 19)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 5:42 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 21)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 6:37 PM
Topic's mood 21 Re: did you read the article? (Message 21)
By PaulK
01-31-2008 6:37 PM
Re: did you read the article? (Message 20)
By randman
01-31-2008 6:31 PM
 
Topic's mood 22 Re: nice civil response (Message 22)
By nator
02-01-2008 7:33 PM
nice civil response (Message 14)
By randman
01-31-2008 5:09 PM
Re: nice civil response (Message 23)
By randman
02-02-2008 12:18 AM
Topic's mood 23 Re: nice civil response (Message 23)
By randman
02-02-2008 12:18 AM
Re: nice civil response (Message 22)
By nator
02-01-2008 7:33 PM
Re: nice civil response (Message 24)
By nator
02-02-2008 7:43 AM
Topic's mood 24 Re: nice civil response (Message 24)
By nator
02-02-2008 7:43 AM
Re: nice civil response (Message 23)
By randman
02-02-2008 12:18 AM
 

Thread is open and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is open and has recent unread messages.
Thread is open and very active, but has no unread messages.
Thread is open, very active, and has unread messages.
Thread is closed and has no recent unread messages.
Thread is closed and has recent unread messages.
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019