|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
Message 1
|
|
|
3
|
Message 3
|
Message 2
|
|
|
4
|
Message 4
|
Message 1
|
|
|
5
|
Message 5
By edge
01-12-2003 10:31 PM
|
Message 3
|
|
|
6
|
Message 6
By edge
01-12-2003 10:38 PM
|
Message 4
|
|
|
7
|
Message 7
|
|
|
|
8
|
Message 8
|
Message 7
|
|
|
9
|
Message 9
|
Message 5
By edge
01-12-2003 10:31 PM
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
By edge
01-13-2003 7:41 PM
|
Message 8
|
|
|
11
|
Message 11
|
Message 10
By edge
01-13-2003 7:41 PM
|
|
|
12
|
Message 12
|
Message 8
|
|
|
13
|
Message 13
|
Message 12
|
|
|
14
|
Message 14
|
Message 8
|
|
|
15
|
Message 15
|
Message 14
|
|
|
16
|
Message 16
|
Message 15
|
|
|
17
|
Message 17
|
Message 16
|
|
|
18
|
Message 18
|
Message 17
|
|
|
19
|
found one - moving argument here (Message 19)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 12:41 PM
|
|
|
|
20
|
Primodial Polonium Poppycock (post history) (Message 20)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 1:34 PM
|
|
|
|
21
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Poppycock (Message 21)
By Admin
09-27-2008 2:00 PM
|
Primodial Polonium Poppycock (post history) (Message 20)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 1:34 PM
|
|
|
22
|
Primodial Polonium Poppycock (Message 22)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 2:08 PM
|
Primodial Polonium Poppycock (post history) (Message 20)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 1:34 PM
|
|
|
23
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Young Earth! (Message 23)
|
Primodial Polonium Poppycock (Message 22)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 2:08 PM
|
|
|
24
|
Poking Holes in Primodial Polonium Halos (Message 24)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 5:18 PM
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Young Earth! (Message 23)
|
|
|
25
|
Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 25)
|
Poking Holes in Primodial Polonium Halos (Message 24)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 5:18 PM
|
|
|
26
|
Poppycock, Primodial Polonium Halos, and Publications (Message 26)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 8:08 PM
|
Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 25)
|
|
|
27
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 27)
|
Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 25)
|
|
|
28
|
Primodial Polonium Halos, Young Earth!!!!!!!! (Message 28)
|
Poppycock, Primodial Polonium Halos, and Publications (Message 26)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 8:08 PM
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 29)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 27)
|
|
|
30
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 30)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos and a Young Earth! (Message 29)
|
|
|
31
|
Primodial Polonium Halos Proven Poppycock (Message 31)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 10:51 PM
|
Primodial Polonium Halos, Young Earth!!!!!!!! (Message 28)
|
|
|
32
|
Forum Guidelines Reminder (Message 32)
By Admin
09-28-2008 6:31 AM
|
|
|
|
33
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos Young Earth! (Message 33)
|
Primodial Polonium Halos Proven Poppycock (Message 31)
By RAZD
09-27-2008 10:51 PM
|
|
|
34
|
Popping the Primodial Polonium Poppycock Halo (Message 34)
By RAZD
09-28-2008 4:26 PM
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halos Young Earth! (Message 33)
|
|
|
35
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo and a Young Earth! (Message 35)
|
Popping the Primodial Polonium Poppycock Halo (Message 34)
By RAZD
09-28-2008 4:26 PM
|
|
|
36
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo and a Young Earth! (Message 36)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo and a Young Earth! (Message 35)
|
|
|
37
|
Proposed Primodial Polonium Halo Proved Preposterous Poppycock (Message 37)
By RAZD
09-28-2008 11:59 PM
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo and a Young Earth! (Message 35)
|
|
|
38
|
Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 38)
|
Proposed Primodial Polonium Halo Proved Preposterous Poppycock (Message 37)
By RAZD
09-28-2008 11:59 PM
|
|
|
39
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 39)
|
Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 38)
|
|
|
40
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 40)
|
Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 38)
|
|
|
41
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 41)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 40)
|
|
|
42
|
Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium Prevalence Provide no Proof not Poppycock (Message 42)
By RAZD
09-30-2008 10:02 PM
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 39)
|
|
|
43
|
Young Earth !!!!!!! (Message 43)
|
Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium Prevalence Provide no Proof not Poppycock (Message 42)
By RAZD
09-30-2008 10:02 PM
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 44)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 41)
|
|
|
45
|
Bose-Einstein condensates are way off-topic (Message 45)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 41)
|
|
|
46
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 46)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 44)
|
|
|
47
|
Delete your messages content or get suspended (Message 47)
|
Re: Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 46)
|
|
|
48
|
Problems with Primal Polonium argument: no OTHER Primal halos (Message 48)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 12:40 AM
|
Young Earth !!!!!!! (Message 43)
|
|
|
49
|
Primodial Polonium Halo Young Earth! (Message 49)
|
Problems with Primal Polonium argument: no OTHER Primal halos (Message 48)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 12:40 AM
|
|
|
50
|
Re: Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium Prevalence Provide no Proof not Poppycock (Message 50)
|
Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium Prevalence Provide no Proof not Poppycock (Message 42)
By RAZD
09-30-2008 10:02 PM
|
|
|
51
|
Previous Proof Provided Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium is Poppycock (Message 51)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 11:58 PM
|
Re: Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium Prevalence Provide no Proof not Poppycock (Message 50)
|
|
|
52
|
Re: Previous Proof Provided Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium is Poppycock (Message 52)
|
Previous Proof Provided Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium is Poppycock (Message 51)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 11:58 PM
|
|
|
53
|
Previous Proof falls on its face (Message 53)
|
Previous Proof Provided Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium is Poppycock (Message 51)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 11:58 PM
|
|
|
54
|
More spurious citations (Message 54)
|
Previous Proof Provided Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium is Poppycock (Message 51)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 11:58 PM
|
|
|
55
|
Poppycock Substantiated! (Message 55)
|
Previous Proof Provided Pompous Pronouncements of Primal Polonium is Poppycock (Message 51)
By RAZD
10-01-2008 11:58 PM
|
|
|
56
|
Poppycock is still Poppycock 20 to 30 years later ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
10-02-2008 7:42 PM
|
Poppycock Substantiated! (Message 55)
|
|
|
57
|
Why does "instantly created" equate to "young"? (Message 57)
|
Poppycock is still Poppycock 20 to 30 years later ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
10-02-2008 7:42 PM
|
|
|
58
|
Re: Why does "instantly created" equate to "young"? (Message 58)
By RAZD
10-02-2008 9:10 PM
|
Why does "instantly created" equate to "young"? (Message 57)
|
|
|
59
|
Re: Why does "instantly created" equate to "young"? (Message 59)
|
Why does "instantly created" equate to "young"? (Message 57)
|
|
|
60
|
Poppycock is Radon 222 theories (Message 60)
|
Poppycock is still Poppycock 20 to 30 years later ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
10-02-2008 7:42 PM
|
|
|
61
|
Re: Poppycock is Radon 222 theories (Message 61)
By Joe T
10-03-2008 3:59 PM
|
Poppycock is Radon 222 theories (Message 60)
|
|
|
62
|
More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 62)
By RAZD
10-03-2008 8:56 PM
|
Poppycock is Radon 222 theories (Message 60)
|
|
|
63
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 63)
|
More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 62)
By RAZD
10-03-2008 8:56 PM
|
|
|
64
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 64)
By RAZD
10-04-2008 1:16 PM
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 63)
|
|
|
65
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 65)
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 64)
By RAZD
10-04-2008 1:16 PM
|
|
|
66
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 66)
By RAZD
10-04-2008 9:19 PM
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 65)
|
|
|
67
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 67)
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 66)
By RAZD
10-04-2008 9:19 PM
|
|
|
68
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 68)
By Admin
10-05-2008 8:06 AM
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 67)
|
|
|
69
|
The case against polonium halos and primal creation (Message 69)
By RAZD
10-05-2008 6:39 PM
|
Re: More Poppycock Palaver ! (Message 67)
|
|
|
70
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 70)
|
More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 62)
By RAZD
10-03-2008 8:56 PM
|
|
|
71
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 71)
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 70)
|
|
|
72
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 72)
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 70)
|
|
|
73
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 73)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 12:31 AM
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 70)
|
|
|
74
|
More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 74)
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 73)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 12:31 AM
|
|
|
75
|
Re: More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 75)
By Joe T
10-08-2008 4:14 PM
|
More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 74)
|
|
|
76
|
Re: More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 76)
|
Re: More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 75)
By Joe T
10-08-2008 4:14 PM
|
|
|
77
|
ad hominem much? (Message 77)
|
Re: More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 76)
|
|
|
78
|
If the shoe fits ... ? (Message 78)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 9:27 PM
|
More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 74)
|
|
|
79
|
Re: ad hominem much? (Message 79)
|
ad hominem much? (Message 77)
|
|
|
80
|
The Mistaken Miracle Theology (not a theory) (Message 80)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 9:38 PM
|
More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 74)
|
|
|
81
|
Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 81)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 9:57 PM
|
Re: More Evo Babble scriptures (Message 76)
|
|
|
82
|
Re: Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 82)
|
Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 81)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 9:57 PM
|
|
|
83
|
Re: Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 83)
By RAZD
10-10-2008 11:38 PM
|
Re: Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 82)
|
|
|
84
|
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy, was he? (Message 84)
|
Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 81)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 9:57 PM
|
|
|
85
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 85)
|
Re: More Polonium Poppycock Palaver ... no rebuttals of mobile Radon, just denial (Message 70)
|
|
|
86
|
More Rn222 Magic! (Message 86)
|
Back to the issue of "Primordial Polonium" being Primarily Poppycock Palaver (Message 81)
By RAZD
10-08-2008 9:57 PM
|
|
|
87
|
Still Fuzzy on the Concepts of Primal Polonium Poppycock (Message 87)
By RAZD
10-11-2008 3:51 PM
|
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy, was he? (Message 84)
|
|
|
88
|
The Uranium Decay Chain (Message 88)
By RAZD
10-11-2008 9:50 PM
|
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy, was he? (Message 84)
|
|
|
89
|
Uranium Halo Addendum (Message 89)
By RAZD
10-12-2008 10:33 PM
|
The Uranium Decay Chain (Message 88)
By RAZD
10-11-2008 9:50 PM
|
|
|
90
|
Let's clear up your fuzziness from W(F)akefield (Message 90)
|
Still Fuzzy on the Concepts of Primal Polonium Poppycock (Message 87)
By RAZD
10-11-2008 3:51 PM
|
|
|
91
|
Just a question? (Message 91)
|
Uranium Halo Addendum (Message 89)
By RAZD
10-12-2008 10:33 PM
|
|
|
92
|
changing the rules as we go? (Message 92)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 7:29 PM
|
Let's clear up your fuzziness from W(F)akefield (Message 90)
|
|
|
93
|
Re: Just a question? (Message 93)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 8:04 PM
|
Just a question? (Message 91)
|
|
|
94
|
Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 94)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 8:20 PM
|
Let's clear up your fuzziness from W(F)akefield (Message 90)
|
|
|
95
|
Re: Just a question? (Message 95)
|
Re: Just a question? (Message 93)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 8:04 PM
|
|
|
96
|
Re: Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 96)
|
Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 94)
By RAZD
10-13-2008 8:20 PM
|
|
|
97
|
Forum Guideline Reminder (Message 97)
By Admin
10-14-2008 9:38 AM
|
Re: Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 96)
|
|
|
98
|
Re: Forum Guideline Reminder (Message 98)
|
Forum Guideline Reminder (Message 97)
By Admin
10-14-2008 9:38 AM
|
|
|
99
|
Re: Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 99)
By RAZD
10-14-2008 6:41 PM
|
Re: Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 96)
|
|
|
100
|
Groundwork (Message 100)
By RAZD
10-14-2008 7:43 PM
|
Re: Just a question? (Message 95)
|
|
|
101
|
So you can understand... (Message 101)
|
Re: Let's clear up your form before the admins do. (Message 99)
By RAZD
10-14-2008 6:41 PM
|
|
|
102
|
Re: Groundwork (Message 102)
|
Groundwork (Message 100)
By RAZD
10-14-2008 7:43 PM
|
|
|
103
|
Re: So you can understand... (Message 103)
By RAZD
10-15-2008 8:16 PM
|
So you can understand... (Message 101)
|
|
|
104
|
Moderator Request (Message 104)
By Admin
10-15-2008 9:23 PM
|
|
|
|
105
|
The evidence, phase 1: a 1976 publication ... NOT Gentry. (Message 105)
By RAZD
10-15-2008 11:58 PM
|
So you can understand... (Message 101)
|
|
|
106
|
Re: Moderator Request (Message 106)
|
Moderator Request (Message 104)
By Admin
10-15-2008 9:23 PM
|
|
|
107
|
On Vacation (Message 107)
|
|
|
|
108
|
Re: On Vacation - enjoy. (Message 108)
By RAZD
10-16-2008 9:46 PM
|
On Vacation (Message 107)
|
|
|
109
|
Re: Moderator Request (Message 109)
By Admin
10-17-2008 6:28 AM
|
Re: Moderator Request (Message 106)
|
|
|
110
|
The evidence for Radon grows: 206Pb/207Pb levels (Message 110)
By RAZD
10-18-2008 5:59 PM
|
So you can understand... (Message 101)
|
|
|
111
|
Differentiating 222Rn from 210Po bands (Message 111)
By RAZD
10-20-2008 9:42 PM
|
So you can understand... (Message 101)
|
|
|
112
|
Re: Differentiating 222Rn from 210Po bands (Message 112)
|
Differentiating 222Rn from 210Po bands (Message 111)
By RAZD
10-20-2008 9:42 PM
|
|
|
113
|
This is why Meiers was easily refuted by Gentry (Message 113)
|
The evidence, phase 1: a 1976 publication ... NOT Gentry. (Message 105)
By RAZD
10-15-2008 11:58 PM
|
|
|
114
|
Still missing: addressing the evidence for 222Rn (Message 114)
By RAZD
10-21-2008 8:51 PM
|
This is why Meiers was easily refuted by Gentry (Message 113)
|
|
|
115
|
Still missing any evidence for Rn222 (Message 115)
|
Still missing: addressing the evidence for 222Rn (Message 114)
By RAZD
10-21-2008 8:51 PM
|
|
|
116
|
Re: Still missing any refutation of the evidence for Rn222 (Message 116)
By RAZD
10-22-2008 9:41 PM
|
Still missing any evidence for Rn222 (Message 115)
|
|
|
117
|
Still Shooting Blanks - Still Zero evidence of Rn222 (Message 117)
|
Re: Still missing any refutation of the evidence for Rn222 (Message 116)
By RAZD
10-22-2008 9:41 PM
|
|
|
118
|
Re: Still Shooting Blanks - Still Zero evidence of Rn222 (Message 118)
|
Still Shooting Blanks - Still Zero evidence of Rn222 (Message 117)
|
|
|
119
|
Not trying to prove anything. (Message 119)
|
Re: Still Shooting Blanks - Still Zero evidence of Rn222 (Message 118)
|
|
|
120
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 120)
|
Not trying to prove anything. (Message 119)
|
|
|
121
|
The evidence is there. Making the pictures small doesn't hide the facts. (Message 121)
By RAZD
10-23-2008 11:44 PM
|
Still Shooting Blanks - Still Zero evidence of Rn222 (Message 117)
|
|
|
122
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 122)
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 120)
|
|
|
123
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 123)
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 122)
|
|
|
124
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 124)
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 123)
|
|
|
125
|
Your understanding of geology is close to Gentry's (Message 125)
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 124)
|
|
|
126
|
Your understanding of geology is close to firefighter Wakefield (Message 126)
|
Your understanding of geology is close to Gentry's (Message 125)
|
|
|
127
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 127)
|
Re: Not trying to prove anything. (Message 122)
|
|
|
128
|
You fail to realize how my questions are relevant (Message 128)
|
Your understanding of geology is close to firefighter Wakefield (Message 126)
|
|
|
129
|
Re: You fail to realize how my questions are relevant (Message 129)
|
You fail to realize how my questions are relevant (Message 128)
|
|
|
130
|
Before I respond..... (Message 130)
|
The evidence is there. Making the pictures small doesn't hide the facts. (Message 121)
By RAZD
10-23-2008 11:44 PM
|
|
|
131
|
ad hominems are not arguments (Message 131)
By RAZD
10-24-2008 9:48 PM
|
You fail to realize how my questions are relevant (Message 128)
|
|
|
132
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 132)
By RAZD
10-24-2008 10:25 PM
|
Before I respond..... (Message 130)
|
|
|
133
|
Banned at HerbalLure (Message 133)
By RAZD
10-26-2008 11:43 AM
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 132)
By RAZD
10-24-2008 10:25 PM
|
|
|
134
|
Your evidence is as bad as Haekel's Embryos (Message 134)
|
The evidence is there. Making the pictures small doesn't hide the facts. (Message 121)
By RAZD
10-23-2008 11:44 PM
|
|
|
135
|
More Fraud (Message 135)
|
The evidence is there. Making the pictures small doesn't hide the facts. (Message 121)
By RAZD
10-23-2008 11:44 PM
|
|
|
136
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 136)
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 132)
By RAZD
10-24-2008 10:25 PM
|
|
|
137
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 137)
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 136)
|
|
|
138
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 138)
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 137)
|
|
|
139
|
Gentry geology ....known to be bad (Message 139)
By RAZD
10-28-2008 7:36 AM
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 137)
|
|
|
140
|
Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 140)
By RAZD
10-28-2008 8:05 AM
|
Your evidence is as bad as Haekel's Embryos (Message 134)
|
|
|
141
|
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 141)
|
Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 140)
By RAZD
10-28-2008 8:05 AM
|
|
|
142
|
Watch your language (Message 142)
|
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 141)
|
|
|
143
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 143)
|
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 141)
|
|
|
144
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 144)
|
Re: Before I respond..... (Message 136)
|
|
|
145
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 145)
By Joe T
10-28-2008 4:17 PM
|
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 141)
|
|
|
146
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 146)
|
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 141)
|
|
|
147
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 147)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 145)
By Joe T
10-28-2008 4:17 PM
|
|
|
148
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 148)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 143)
|
|
|
149
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 149)
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 146)
|
|
|
150
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 150)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 148)
|
|
|
151
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 151)
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 149)
|
|
|
152
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 152)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 150)
|
|
|
153
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 153)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 152)
|
|
|
154
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 154)
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong[qs] (Message 151)
|
|
|
155
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 155)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 153)
|
|
|
156
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 156)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 155)
|
|
|
157
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 157)
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 155)
|
|
|
158
|
222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 158)
By RAZD
10-28-2008 11:40 PM
|
Re: Your (fudged) evidence is as bad as Haeckel's Embryos (Message 157)
|
|
|
159
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 159)
|
222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 158)
By RAZD
10-28-2008 11:40 PM
|
|
|
160
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 160)
|
222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 158)
By RAZD
10-28-2008 11:40 PM
|
|
|
161
|
Anecdotal Evidence (Message 161)
|
|
|
|
162
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 162)
|
Anecdotal Evidence (Message 161)
|
|
|
163
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 163)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 162)
|
|
|
164
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 164)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 163)
|
|
|
165
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 165)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 163)
|
|
|
166
|
More anecdotal Evidence (Message 166)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 165)
|
|
|
167
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 167)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 165)
|
|
|
168
|
Re: More anecdotal Evidence (Message 168)
|
More anecdotal Evidence (Message 166)
|
|
|
169
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 169)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 167)
|
|
|
170
|
Re: More anecdotal Evidence (Message 170)
|
Re: More anecdotal Evidence (Message 168)
|
|
|
171
|
Re: More anecdotal Evidence (Message 171)
|
Re: More anecdotal Evidence (Message 170)
|
|
|
172
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 172)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 169)
|
|
|
173
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 173)
|
Re: Anecdotal Evidence (Message 172)
|
|
|
174
|
Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 174)
|
Re: More anecdotal Evidence (Message 171)
|
|
|
175
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 175)
|
Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 174)
|
|
|
176
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 176)
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 175)
|
|
|
177
|
The Rings (Message 177)
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 176)
|
|
|
178
|
Re: The Rings (Message 178)
|
The Rings (Message 177)
|
|
|
179
|
Evidence (Message 179)
|
Re: The Rings (Message 178)
|
|
|
180
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 180)
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 176)
|
|
|
181
|
You still ignored the question (Message 181)
|
Re: Clearly ignorant of the definition (Message 180)
|
|
|
182
|
Re: Evidence (Message 182)
|
Evidence (Message 179)
|
|
|
183
|
Re: You still ignored the question (Message 183)
|
You still ignored the question (Message 181)
|
|
|
184
|
You still ignored the question (Message 184)
|
Re: You still ignored the question (Message 183)
|
|
|
185
|
Re: You still ignored the question (Message 185)
|
You still ignored the question (Message 184)
|
|
|
186
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 186)
By RAZD
10-29-2008 10:00 PM
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 160)
|
|
|
187
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 187)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 186)
By RAZD
10-29-2008 10:00 PM
|
|
|
188
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 188)
By RAZD
10-30-2008 7:56 AM
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 187)
|
|
|
189
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 189)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 187)
|
|
|
190
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 190)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 188)
By RAZD
10-30-2008 7:56 AM
|
|
|
191
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 191)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 189)
|
|
|
192
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 192)
By RAZD
10-31-2008 1:12 AM
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 190)
|
|
|
193
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 193)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 191)
|
|
|
194
|
Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 194)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 186)
By RAZD
10-29-2008 10:00 PM
|
|
|
195
|
Re: Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 195)
|
Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 194)
|
|
|
196
|
Re: Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 196)
|
Re: Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 195)
|
|
|
197
|
Re: Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 197)
|
Re: Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 195)
|
|
|
198
|
AOKid why not address the real issues? (Message 198)
|
Re: Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 197)
|
|
|
199
|
Stiil no evidence to keep Rn222 our of the halos (Message 199)
By RAZD
11-01-2008 3:53 PM
|
Stiil no evidence of Rn222 halos (Message 194)
|
|
|
200
|
isotope equilibriums and decay probabilities (Message 200)
By RAZD
11-01-2008 10:30 PM
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 190)
|
|
|
201
|
Re: isotope equilibriums and decay probabilities (Message 201)
|
isotope equilibriums and decay probabilities (Message 200)
By RAZD
11-01-2008 10:30 PM
|
|
|
202
|
Still no evidence of Rn222 decay (Message 202)
|
Stiil no evidence to keep Rn222 our of the halos (Message 199)
By RAZD
11-01-2008 3:53 PM
|
|
|
203
|
Re: Still no evidence of Rn222 decay (Message 203)
|
Still no evidence of Rn222 decay (Message 202)
|
|
|
204
|
Re: Still no evidence of Rn222 decay (Message 204)
By Joe T
11-03-2008 7:14 PM
|
Still no evidence of Rn222 decay (Message 202)
|
|
|
205
|
... a correction, and more on the evidence for 222Rn (Message 205)
By RAZD
11-03-2008 8:56 PM
|
Re: Still no evidence of Rn222 decay (Message 203)
|
|
|
206
|
Re: ... a correction, and more on the evidence for 222Rn (Message 206)
|
... a correction, and more on the evidence for 222Rn (Message 205)
By RAZD
11-03-2008 8:56 PM
|
|
|
207
|
Re: ... a correction, and more on the evidence for 222Rn (Message 207)
|
Re: ... a correction, and more on the evidence for 222Rn (Message 206)
|
|
|
208
|
mobility of 222Rn still the best explanation for halos (Message 208)
By RAZD
11-29-2008 3:50 PM
|
Re: isotope equilibriums and decay probabilities (Message 201)
|
|
|
209
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 209)
By RAZD
11-29-2008 4:06 PM
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 160)
|
|
|
210
|
Re: Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 210)
|
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong (Message 141)
|
|
|
211
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 211)
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 209)
By RAZD
11-29-2008 4:06 PM
|
|
|
212
|
Thanks, JG Brawley (Message 212)
By RAZD
11-30-2008 8:25 PM
|
Re: 222Rn found -- as predicted. (Message 211)
|
|
|
213
|
Re: Thanks, JG Brawley (Message 213)
|
Thanks, JG Brawley (Message 212)
By RAZD
11-30-2008 8:25 PM
|
|
|
214
|
Message 214
By Phydeaux
02-16-2009 6:25 PM
|
|
|
|
215
|
Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 215)
By RAZD
02-16-2009 11:21 PM
|
Message 214
By Phydeaux
02-16-2009 6:25 PM
|
|
|
216
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 216)
By Phydeaux
02-17-2009 1:35 AM
|
Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 215)
By RAZD
02-16-2009 11:21 PM
|
|
|
217
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 217)
By RAZD
02-17-2009 7:34 AM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 216)
By Phydeaux
02-17-2009 1:35 AM
|
|
|
218
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 218)
By Phydeaux
02-17-2009 10:55 AM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 217)
By RAZD
02-17-2009 7:34 AM
|
|
|
219
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 219)
By Phydeaux
02-17-2009 2:48 PM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 217)
By RAZD
02-17-2009 7:34 AM
|
|
|
220
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 220)
By RAZD
02-17-2009 8:52 PM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 219)
By Phydeaux
02-17-2009 2:48 PM
|
|
|
221
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 221)
By Phydeaux
02-18-2009 11:21 AM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 220)
By RAZD
02-17-2009 8:52 PM
|
|
|
222
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 222)
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 221)
By Phydeaux
02-18-2009 11:21 AM
|
|
|
223
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 223)
By Phydeaux
02-18-2009 5:53 PM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 222)
|
|
|
224
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 224)
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 223)
By Phydeaux
02-18-2009 5:53 PM
|
|
|
225
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 225)
By Phydeaux
02-18-2009 10:40 PM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 224)
|
|
|
226
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 226)
By RAZD
02-19-2009 12:20 AM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 221)
By Phydeaux
02-18-2009 11:21 AM
|
|
|
227
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 227)
By Phydeaux
02-19-2009 11:53 AM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 226)
By RAZD
02-19-2009 12:20 AM
|
|
|
228
|
Paging RAZD (Message 228)
By Admin
02-19-2009 6:23 PM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 226)
By RAZD
02-19-2009 12:20 AM
|
|
|
229
|
later (Message 229)
By RAZD
02-19-2009 8:51 PM
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 227)
By Phydeaux
02-19-2009 11:53 AM
|
|
|
230
|
Not Done Lurking (Message 230)
|
Re: Will you recognize when your argument is falsified? (Message 227)
By Phydeaux
02-19-2009 11:53 AM
|
|
|
231
|
Re: Not Done Lurking (Message 231)
By RAZD
02-20-2009 11:49 PM
|
Not Done Lurking (Message 230)
|
|
|
232
|
Re: Not Done Lurking (Message 232)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 1:19 AM
|
Not Done Lurking (Message 230)
|
|
|
233
|
What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 233)
|
Re: Not Done Lurking (Message 232)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 1:19 AM
|
|
|
234
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 234)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:01 AM
|
What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 233)
|
|
|
235
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 235)
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 234)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:01 AM
|
|
|
236
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 236)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:24 AM
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 235)
|
|
|
237
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 237)
By JonF
02-21-2009 9:06 AM
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 236)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:24 AM
|
|
|
238
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 238)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 9:48 AM
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 237)
By JonF
02-21-2009 9:06 AM
|
|
|
239
|
center (Message 239)
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 238)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 9:48 AM
|
|
|
240
|
The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 240)
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 238)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 9:48 AM
|
|
|
241
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 241)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 10:48 AM
|
The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 240)
|
|
|
242
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 242)
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 241)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 10:48 AM
|
|
|
243
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 243)
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 241)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 10:48 AM
|
|
|
244
|
The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 244)
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 241)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 10:48 AM
|
|
|
245
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 245)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:41 PM
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 242)
|
|
|
246
|
Re: The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 246)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:43 PM
|
The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 244)
|
|
|
247
|
That's Different Then (Message 247)
|
Re: The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 246)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:43 PM
|
|
|
248
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 248)
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 245)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:41 PM
|
|
|
249
|
Re: The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 249)
|
Re: The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 246)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:43 PM
|
|
|
250
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 250)
|
That's Different Then (Message 247)
|
|
|
251
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 251)
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 250)
|
|
|
252
|
Radon RIng Found Polonium Ring Gone? (Message 252)
|
Re: The Lord of Equal Darkness (Message 249)
|
|
|
253
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 253)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 11:12 PM
|
That's Different Then (Message 247)
|
|
|
254
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 254)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 11:19 PM
|
Re: The Lord Equal Darkness (Message 248)
|
|
|
255
|
Fresh Pictures using Gentry Radii (Message 255)
By RAZD
02-22-2009 2:01 AM
|
Re: What is that first thing they teach in statistics? (Message 236)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 4:24 AM
|
|
|
256
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 256)
By JonF
02-22-2009 9:07 AM
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 253)
By Phydeaux
02-21-2009 11:12 PM
|
|
|
257
|
Message 257
By Phydeaux
02-22-2009 5:11 PM
|
|
|
|
258
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 258)
By Phydeaux
02-22-2009 5:14 PM
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 256)
By JonF
02-22-2009 9:07 AM
|
|
|
259
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 259)
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 258)
By Phydeaux
02-22-2009 5:14 PM
|
|
|
260
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 260)
By Phydeaux
02-22-2009 5:39 PM
|
Re: That's Different Then (Message 259)
|
|
|
261
|
Message 261
By RAZD
02-22-2009 9:02 PM
|
Message 257
By Phydeaux
02-22-2009 5:11 PM
|
|
|
262
|
Message 262
By Phydeaux
02-23-2009 1:32 AM
|
Message 261
By RAZD
02-22-2009 9:02 PM
|
|
|
263
|
Not surprised (Message 263)
By RAZD
02-23-2009 3:38 AM
|
Message 262
By Phydeaux
02-23-2009 1:32 AM
|
|
|
264
|
Re: Not surprised (Message 264)
By Phydeaux
02-23-2009 10:57 AM
|
Not surprised (Message 263)
By RAZD
02-23-2009 3:38 AM
|
|
|
265
|
You may make me an edge believer ... (Message 265)
By RAZD
02-23-2009 10:19 PM
|
Re: Not surprised (Message 264)
By Phydeaux
02-23-2009 10:57 AM
|
|