|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Needs lots of work. (Message 2)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
3
|
Message 3
|
Message 1
|
|
|
4
|
Re: Needs lots of work. (Message 4)
|
Needs lots of work. (Message 2)
|
|
|
5
|
More than enough to start with (Message 5)
|
|
|
|
6
|
An actual definition (Message 6)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
7
|
Message 7
|
Message 1
|
|
|
8
|
Message 8
By nwr
02-13-2006 4:22 PM
|
Message 1
|
|
|
9
|
Message 9
By Gary
02-13-2006 4:31 PM
|
Message 1
|
|
|
10
|
Pink Or Teal Moths (Message 10)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
11
|
Message 11
|
Message 1
|
|
|
12
|
Message 12
|
Message 1
|
|
|
13
|
Message 13
By Percy
02-13-2006 8:11 PM
|
Message 1
|
|
|
14
|
Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 14)
|
Message 13
By Percy
02-13-2006 8:11 PM
|
|
|
15
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 15)
By Percy
02-13-2006 9:28 PM
|
Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 14)
|
|
|
16
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 16)
By lfen
02-13-2006 11:25 PM
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 15)
By Percy
02-13-2006 9:28 PM
|
|
|
17
|
Message 17
|
Message 7
|
|
|
18
|
Message 18
|
Message 17
|
|
|
19
|
Message 19
|
Message 8
By nwr
02-13-2006 4:22 PM
|
|
|
20
|
Message 20
|
Message 19
|
|
|
21
|
Message 21
|
Message 19
|
|
|
22
|
Specified complexity (Message 22)
|
Message 17
|
|
|
23
|
Message 23
By Percy
02-14-2006 11:12 AM
|
Message 17
|
|
|
24
|
Message 24
|
Message 17
|
|
|
25
|
Definition of information (Message 25)
|
Message 19
|
|
|
26
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 26)
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 16)
By lfen
02-13-2006 11:25 PM
|
|
|
27
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 27)
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 26)
|
|
|
28
|
Message 28
By Percy
02-14-2006 11:34 AM
|
Message 19
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 29)
By Percy
02-14-2006 11:37 AM
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 26)
|
|
|
30
|
Message 30
|
Message 24
|
|
|
31
|
Message 31
|
Message 28
By Percy
02-14-2006 11:34 AM
|
|
|
32
|
Message 32
|
Message 30
|
|
|
33
|
Message 33
By Percy
02-14-2006 12:06 PM
|
Message 31
|
|
|
34
|
logical? (Message 34)
|
Message 28
By Percy
02-14-2006 11:34 AM
|
|
|
35
|
Message 35
|
Message 30
|
|
|
36
|
evo hypocrisy (Message 36)
|
Message 31
|
|
|
37
|
Quantifying Information Content (Message 37)
|
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 38)
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 27)
|
|
|
39
|
Message 39
|
Message 35
|
|
|
40
|
Message 40
|
Message 35
|
|
|
41
|
Re: logical? (Message 41)
By Percy
02-14-2006 12:17 PM
|
logical? (Message 34)
|
|
|
42
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 42)
|
Re: Not the "right" defintion of "information", Percy (Message 38)
|
|
|
43
|
Message 43
|
Message 39
|
|
|
44
|
Message 44
|
Message 40
|
|
|
45
|
New genes and alleles (Message 45)
|
Message 40
|
|
|
46
|
Re: logical? (Message 46)
|
Re: logical? (Message 41)
By Percy
02-14-2006 12:17 PM
|
|
|
47
|
Re: logical? (Message 47)
|
Re: logical? (Message 41)
By Percy
02-14-2006 12:17 PM
|
|
|
48
|
OK, ....but (Message 48)
|
Message 44
|
|
|
49
|
Information Test (Message 49)
|
|
|
|
50
|
Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 50)
|
Quantifying Information Content (Message 37)
|
|
|
51
|
Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 51)
By lfen
02-14-2006 1:10 PM
|
Message 30
|
|
|
52
|
Re: Information Test (Message 52)
|
Information Test (Message 49)
|
|
|
53
|
Re: Information Test (Message 53)
|
Information Test (Message 49)
|
|
|
54
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 54)
|
Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 51)
By lfen
02-14-2006 1:10 PM
|
|
|
55
|
Re: Information Test (Message 55)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 52)
|
|
|
56
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 56)
|
Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 50)
|
|
|
57
|
Re: Information Test (Message 57)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 55)
|
|
|
58
|
Re: Information Test (Message 58)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 52)
|
|
|
59
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 59)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 56)
|
|
|
60
|
Terrible Analogy (Message 60)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 56)
|
|
|
61
|
Re: Information Test (Message 61)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 58)
|
|
|
62
|
Re: Information Test (Message 62)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 57)
|
|
|
63
|
a clarification (Message 63)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 61)
|
|
|
64
|
Re: a clarification (Message 64)
|
a clarification (Message 63)
|
|
|
65
|
Re: Information Test (Message 65)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 62)
|
|
|
66
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 66)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 59)
|
|
|
67
|
Re: a clarification (Message 67)
|
Re: a clarification (Message 64)
|
|
|
68
|
Re: Information Test (Message 68)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 58)
|
|
|
69
|
Re: a clarification (Message 69)
|
Re: a clarification (Message 64)
|
|
|
70
|
Re: Information Test (Message 70)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 68)
|
|
|
71
|
Message 71
|
Message 39
|
|
|
72
|
Message 72
|
Message 20
|
|
|
73
|
Re: Information Test (Message 73)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 70)
|
|
|
74
|
Re: Information Test (Message 74)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 73)
|
|
|
75
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 75)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 56)
|
|
|
76
|
You have no idea what you are talking about (Message 76)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 68)
|
|
|
77
|
Re: Information Test (Message 77)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 65)
|
|
|
78
|
new information (Message 78)
|
Message 20
|
|
|
79
|
Re: new information (Message 79)
|
new information (Message 78)
|
|
|
80
|
Good question Rand (Message 80)
|
new information (Message 78)
|
|
|
81
|
Good definition (Message 81)
|
Re: new information (Message 79)
|
|
|
82
|
Re: new information (Message 82)
|
Re: new information (Message 79)
|
|
|
83
|
Re: logical? (Message 83)
By Percy
02-14-2006 2:53 PM
|
Re: logical? (Message 47)
|
|
|
84
|
Re: Information Test (Message 84)
|
Re: Information Test (Message 65)
|
|
|
85
|
Message 85
|
Message 20
|
|
|
86
|
definition (Message 86)
|
Re: new information (Message 82)
|
|
|
87
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 87)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 66)
|
|
|
88
|
A defintion I found (Message 88)
|
|
|
|
89
|
Re: definition (Message 89)
|
definition (Message 86)
|
|
|
90
|
Message 90
|
Message 31
|
|
|
91
|
Re: Good definition (Message 91)
|
Good definition (Message 81)
|
|
|
92
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 92)
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 54)
|
|
|
93
|
Re: Good question Rand (Message 93)
|
Good question Rand (Message 80)
|
|
|
94
|
Re: logical? (Message 94)
|
logical? (Message 34)
|
|
|
95
|
what's good for the goose... (Message 95)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 87)
|
|
|
96
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 96)
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 92)
|
|
|
97
|
Re: Good question Rand (Message 97)
|
Re: Good question Rand (Message 93)
|
|
|
98
|
Re: Information Test (Message 98)
By Percy
02-14-2006 3:30 PM
|
Re: Information Test (Message 68)
|
|
|
99
|
Re: logical? (Message 99)
|
Re: logical? (Message 94)
|
|
|
100
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 100)
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 96)
|
|
|
101
|
Message 101
|
Message 85
|
|
|
102
|
Calculate "meaning" (Message 102)
|
Re: Creationist and their misuse of "information" (Message 56)
|
|
|
103
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 103)
By Percy
02-14-2006 3:35 PM
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 96)
|
|
|
104
|
Here we go (Message 104)
|
Re: Is information responsible for snowflake complexity also? (Message 96)
|
|
|
105
|
Re: logical? (Message 105)
|
Re: logical? (Message 99)
|
|
|
106
|
Re: An actual definition (Message 106)
|
An actual definition (Message 6)
|
|
|
107
|
T o p i c ! -- note to Randman (Message 107)
|
|
|
|
108
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 108)
|
what's good for the goose... (Message 95)
|
|
|
109
|
aka (Message 109)
|
Re: An actual definition (Message 106)
|
|
|
110
|
T o p i c ! (Message 110)
|
Re: a clarification (Message 67)
|
|
|
111
|
Message 111
|
Message 9
By Gary
02-13-2006 4:31 PM
|
|
|
112
|
Re: aka (Message 112)
|
aka (Message 109)
|
|
|
113
|
T o p i c ! (Message 113)
|
Re: logical? (Message 99)
|
|
|
114
|
Message 114
By Gary
02-14-2006 3:48 PM
|
Message 111
|
|
|
115
|
Heads up. (Message 115)
|
Message 111
|
|
|
116
|
Huh? (Message 116)
|
T o p i c ! (Message 110)
|
|
|
117
|
A reminder for Garrett (Message 117)
|
Message 111
|
|
|
118
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 118)
By Percy
02-14-2006 3:56 PM
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 108)
|
|
|
119
|
Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 119)
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 118)
By Percy
02-14-2006 3:56 PM
|
|
|
120
|
Back on Topic (Message 120)
|
|
|
|
121
|
OT: qu? (Message 121)
By JonF
02-14-2006 4:07 PM
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 118)
By Percy
02-14-2006 3:56 PM
|
|
|
122
|
Re: Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 122)
By Percy
02-14-2006 4:14 PM
|
Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 119)
|
|
|
123
|
Re: A reminder for Garrett (Message 123)
|
A reminder for Garrett (Message 117)
|
|
|
124
|
Re: OT: qu? (Message 124)
By Percy
02-14-2006 4:15 PM
|
OT: qu? (Message 121)
By JonF
02-14-2006 4:07 PM
|
|
|
125
|
Message 125
|
|
|
|
126
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 126)
|
Re: what's good for the goose... (Message 118)
By Percy
02-14-2006 3:56 PM
|
|
|
127
|
Message 127
|
Message 125
|
|
|
128
|
W e l c o m e ! (Message 128)
|
Message 125
|
|
|
129
|
Re: W e l c o m e ! (Message 129)
|
W e l c o m e ! (Message 128)
|
|
|
130
|
Re: new information (Message 130)
|
Re: new information (Message 82)
|
|
|
131
|
one thing at a time (Message 131)
|
Re: W e l c o m e ! (Message 129)
|
|
|
132
|
Message 132
|
Message 85
|
|
|
133
|
See how easy. (Message 133)
|
Re: new information (Message 130)
|
|
|
134
|
Re: See how easy. (Message 134)
|
See how easy. (Message 133)
|
|
|
135
|
Quantification of SC (Message 135)
|
Re: See how easy. (Message 134)
|
|
|
136
|
Message 136
|
|
|
|
137
|
Message 137
|
|
|
|
138
|
Re: Quantification of SC (Message 138)
|
Quantification of SC (Message 135)
|
|
|
139
|
SC (my bad for calling it CS) (Message 139)
|
Message 136
|
|
|
140
|
Message 140
By nwr
02-14-2006 10:41 PM
|
Message 19
|
|
|
141
|
Re: Information Test (Message 141)
By lfen
02-14-2006 10:46 PM
|
Re: Information Test (Message 57)
|
|
|
142
|
Re: Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 142)
By lfen
02-14-2006 11:08 PM
|
Re: Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 122)
By Percy
02-14-2006 4:14 PM
|
|
|
143
|
Re: Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 143)
|
Re: Randomness and THE TOPIC (Message 142)
By lfen
02-14-2006 11:08 PM
|
|
|
144
|
Re: new information (Message 144)
|
Re: new information (Message 130)
|
|
|
145
|
Clarify some please? (Message 145)
|
Re: new information (Message 144)
|
|
|
146
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 146)
|
Clarify some please? (Message 145)
|
|
|
147
|
Re: new information (Message 147)
|
Re: new information (Message 144)
|
|
|
148
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 148)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 146)
|
|
|
149
|
Re: new information (Message 149)
|
Re: new information (Message 147)
|
|
|
150
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 150)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 146)
|
|
|
151
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 151)
By nwr
02-15-2006 12:05 AM
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 146)
|
|
|
152
|
Re: new information (Message 152)
|
Re: new information (Message 149)
|
|
|
153
|
rewinding history (Message 153)
|
Re: new information (Message 149)
|
|
|
154
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 154)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 148)
|
|
|
155
|
Re: rewinding history (Message 155)
|
rewinding history (Message 153)
|
|
|
156
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 156)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 151)
By nwr
02-15-2006 12:05 AM
|
|
|
157
|
random? (Message 157)
|
Re: new information (Message 149)
|
|
|
158
|
Sane conclusion (Message 158)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 154)
|
|
|
159
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 159)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 154)
|
|
|
160
|
Re: random? (Message 160)
|
random? (Message 157)
|
|
|
161
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 161)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 159)
|
|
|
162
|
an unproven claim (Message 162)
|
Re: rewinding history (Message 155)
|
|
|
163
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 163)
By nwr
02-15-2006 12:23 AM
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 156)
|
|
|
164
|
guided? (Message 164)
|
Re: random? (Message 160)
|
|
|
165
|
Listen to the audio.... (Message 165)
|
an unproven claim (Message 162)
|
|
|
166
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 166)
By nwr
02-15-2006 12:33 AM
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 156)
|
|
|
167
|
Re: Listen to the audio.... (Message 167)
|
Listen to the audio.... (Message 165)
|
|
|
168
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 168)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 161)
|
|
|
169
|
The trick to an honest dice game (Message 169)
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 161)
|
|
|
170
|
Re: The trick to an honest dice game (Message 170)
|
The trick to an honest dice game (Message 169)
|
|
|
171
|
Fine agree with jar, it makes no difference to where we go next (Message 171)
|
Re: The trick to an honest dice game (Message 170)
|
|
|
172
|
Final definition (Message 172)
|
|
|
|
173
|
Re: random? (Message 173)
|
Re: random? (Message 160)
|
|
|
174
|
Re: Final definition (Message 174)
|
Final definition (Message 172)
|
|
|
175
|
Re: random? (Message 175)
|
Re: random? (Message 173)
|
|
|
176
|
Re: random? (Message 176)
|
Re: random? (Message 175)
|
|
|
177
|
Re: Final definition (Message 177)
|
Re: Final definition (Message 174)
|
|
|
178
|
Re: Final definition (Message 178)
By nwr
02-15-2006 9:14 AM
|
Re: Final definition (Message 174)
|
|
|
179
|
Message 179
By Percy
02-15-2006 9:24 AM
|
|
|
|
180
|
SUSPENSION WARNING! No further discussion of randomness (Message 180)
|
Message 179
By Percy
02-15-2006 9:24 AM
|
|
|
181
|
Message 181
|
Message 179
By Percy
02-15-2006 9:24 AM
|
|
|
182
|
Message 182
By Percy
02-15-2006 11:07 AM
|
Message 181
|
|
|
183
|
Measuring specified complexity (Message 183)
|
Message 182
By Percy
02-15-2006 11:07 AM
|
|
|
184
|
some links to specified complexity (Message 184)
|
|
|
|
185
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 185)
|
some links to specified complexity (Message 184)
|
|
|
186
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 186)
|
some links to specified complexity (Message 184)
|
|
|
187
|
Hitting the target (Message 187)
|
some links to specified complexity (Message 184)
|
|
|
188
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 188)
By PaulK
02-15-2006 12:13 PM
|
some links to specified complexity (Message 184)
|
|
|
189
|
Re: random? (Message 189)
|
Re: random? (Message 175)
|
|
|
190
|
SUSPENSION WARNING! No further discussion of randomness (Message 190)
|
Re: random? (Message 189)
|
|
|
191
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 191)
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 185)
|
|
|
192
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 192)
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 191)
|
|
|
193
|
Specified complexity is irrelevant to information increase in the genome (Message 193)
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 192)
|
|
|
194
|
Question outstanding! (Message 194)
|
|
|
|
195
|
Re: Specified complexity is irrelevant to information increase in the genome (Message 195)
|
Specified complexity is irrelevant to information increase in the genome (Message 193)
|
|
|
196
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 196)
By Percy
02-15-2006 1:37 PM
|
Question outstanding! (Message 194)
|
|
|
197
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 197)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 196)
By Percy
02-15-2006 1:37 PM
|
|
|
198
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 198)
|
Question outstanding! (Message 194)
|
|
|
199
|
Re: W e l c o m e ! (Message 199)
|
W e l c o m e ! (Message 128)
|
|
|
200
|
Re: W e l c o m e ! (Message 200)
|
Re: W e l c o m e ! (Message 199)
|
|
|
201
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 201)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 198)
|
|
|
202
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 202)
By lfen
02-15-2006 2:31 PM
|
Re: Clarify some please? (Message 161)
|
|
|
203
|
How to measure complexity (Message 203)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 201)
|
|
|
204
|
Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 204)
|
|
|
|
205
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 205)
|
Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 204)
|
|
|
206
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 206)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 205)
|
|
|
207
|
Re: some links to specified complexity (Message 207)
|
some links to specified complexity (Message 184)
|
|
|
208
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 208)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 197)
|
|
|
209
|
Not confirmed yet or ...? (Message 209)
|
Re: W e l c o m e ! (Message 199)
|
|
|
210
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 210)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 205)
|
|
|
211
|
Re: Not confirmed yet or ...? (Message 211)
|
Not confirmed yet or ...? (Message 209)
|
|
|
212
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 212)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 206)
|
|
|
213
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 213)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 208)
|
|
|
214
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 214)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 208)
|
|
|
215
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 215)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 213)
|
|
|
216
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 216)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 210)
|
|
|
217
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 217)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 216)
|
|
|
218
|
Garret made the statement but .... (Message 218)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 208)
|
|
|
219
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 219)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 215)
|
|
|
220
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 220)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 217)
|
|
|
221
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 221)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 215)
|
|
|
222
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 222)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 217)
|
|
|
223
|
Re: Garret made the statement but .... (Message 223)
|
Garret made the statement but .... (Message 218)
|
|
|
224
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 224)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 222)
|
|
|
225
|
Small tiny changes (Message 225)
|
Re: Garret made the statement but .... (Message 223)
|
|
|
226
|
Re: Garret made the statement but .... (Message 226)
|
Re: Garret made the statement but .... (Message 223)
|
|
|
227
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 227)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 224)
|
|
|
228
|
Language!!!! (Message 228)
|
Re: Cul-de-sac and Ratchet (Message 227)
|
|
|
229
|
Re: Language!!!! (Message 229)
|
Language!!!! (Message 228)
|
|
|
230
|
Re: Language!!!! (Message 230)
|
Re: Language!!!! (Message 229)
|
|
|
231
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 231)
|
How to measure complexity (Message 203)
|
|
|
232
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 232)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 231)
|
|
|
233
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 233)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 231)
|
|
|
234
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 234)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 231)
|
|
|
235
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 235)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 234)
|
|
|
236
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 236)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 235)
|
|
|
237
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 237)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 221)
|
|
|
238
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 238)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 235)
|
|
|
239
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 239)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 237)
|
|
|
240
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 240)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 237)
|
|
|
241
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 241)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 237)
|
|
|
242
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 242)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 239)
|
|
|
243
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 243)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 241)
|
|
|
244
|
drifting off topic, but... (Message 244)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 243)
|
|
|
245
|
Re: drifting off topic, but... (Message 245)
|
drifting off topic, but... (Message 244)
|
|
|
246
|
Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 246)
|
|
|
|
247
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 247)
|
Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 246)
|
|
|
248
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 248)
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 247)
|
|
|
249
|
ADMIN IRRITATION: Put it back on-topic (Message 249)
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 248)
|
|
|
250
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 250)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 242)
|
|
|
251
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 251)
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 247)
|
|
|
252
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 252)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 250)
|
|
|
253
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 253)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 250)
|
|
|
254
|
How absolutely silly. (Message 254)
By jar
02-17-2006 11:31 AM
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 251)
|
|
|
255
|
Garrett Goes to Time-Out Corner (Message 255)
|
Re: Why don't the "commoners" get it? (Message 251)
|
|
|
256
|
Topic Drift Warning (Message 256)
By Admin
02-17-2006 11:47 AM
|
|
|
|
257
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 257)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 241)
|
|
|
258
|
Excellent suggestion by Modulous! (Message 258)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 243)
|
|
|
259
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 259)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 252)
|
|
|
260
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 260)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 253)
|
|
|
261
|
Classifications (Message 261)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 253)
|
|
|
262
|
Transitional forms are NOT the topic (Message 262)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 253)
|
|
|
263
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 263)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 257)
|
|
|
264
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 264)
|
Re: How to measure complexity (Message 236)
|
|
|
265
|
Re: Transitional forms are NOT the topic (Message 265)
By Percy
02-17-2006 3:34 PM
|
Transitional forms are NOT the topic (Message 262)
|
|
|
266
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 266)
By Percy
02-17-2006 3:46 PM
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 263)
|
|
|
267
|
I disagree, but defer (Message 267)
|
Re: Transitional forms are NOT the topic (Message 265)
By Percy
02-17-2006 3:34 PM
|
|
|
268
|
Message 268
|
|
|
|
269
|
banning the effective creationist? (Message 269)
|
|
|
|
270
|
fundamentally erroneous (Message 270)
|
Message 268
|
|
|
271
|
evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 271)
|
fundamentally erroneous (Message 270)
|
|
|
272
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 272)
|
evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 271)
|
|
|
273
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 273)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 272)
|
|
|
274
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 274)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 272)
|
|
|
275
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 275)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 274)
|
|
|
276
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 276)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 275)
|
|
|
277
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 277)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 274)
|
|
|
278
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 278)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 277)
|
|
|
279
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 279)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 278)
|
|
|
280
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 280)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 279)
|
|
|
281
|
Topic and thank you -- CLOSING (Message 281)
|
Re: evolution science vs randman's nefarious world of evos (Message 280)
|
|
|
282
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 282)
|
Re: Question outstanding! (Message 266)
By Percy
02-17-2006 3:46 PM
|
|
|
283
|
Definition of terms does matter (Message 283)
|
|
|
|
284
|
Welcome (Message 284)
|
Definition of terms does matter (Message 283)
|
|
|
285
|
Re: banning the effective creationist? (Message 285)
|
banning the effective creationist? (Message 269)
|
|
|
286
|
Re: banning the effective creationist? (Message 286)
|
banning the effective creationist? (Message 269)
|
|
|
287
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 287)
|
Definition of terms does matter (Message 283)
|
|
|
288
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 288)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 287)
|
|
|
289
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 289)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 288)
|
|
|
290
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 290)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 288)
|
|
|
291
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 291)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 290)
|
|
|
292
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 292)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 290)
|
|
|
293
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 293)
By Faith
02-19-2006 11:04 AM
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 292)
|
|
|
294
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 294)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 293)
By Faith
02-19-2006 11:04 AM
|
|
|
295
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 295)
|
Definition of terms does matter (Message 283)
|
|
|
296
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 296)
By Faith
02-20-2006 11:24 AM
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 294)
|
|
|
297
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 297)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 289)
|
|
|
298
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 298)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 297)
|
|
|
299
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 299)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 298)
|
|
|
300
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 300)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 299)
|
|
|
301
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 301)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 300)
|
|
|
302
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 302)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 301)
|
|
|
303
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 303)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 302)
|
|
|
304
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 304)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 303)
|
|
|
305
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 305)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 304)
|
|
|
306
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 306)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 304)
|
|
|
307
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 307)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 306)
|
|
|
308
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 308)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 307)
|
|
|
309
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 309)
|
Re: Definition of terms does matter (Message 308)
|
|
|
310
|
Witching hour (Message 310)
|
|
|