|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
Message 1
|
|
|
3
|
bio evo (Message 3)
|
Message 2
|
|
|
4
|
Message 4
|
|
|
|
5
|
Message 5
|
Message 1
|
|
|
6
|
Message 6
|
Message 1
|
|
|
7
|
Message 7
|
Message 1
|
|
|
8
|
Message 8
|
Message 1
|
|
|
9
|
theology allowed here? (Message 9)
|
Message 6
|
|
|
10
|
Message 10
|
Message 8
|
|
|
11
|
huge mistake....propaganda (Message 11)
|
Message 8
|
|
|
12
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 12)
|
huge mistake....propaganda (Message 11)
|
|
|
13
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 13)
|
huge mistake....propaganda (Message 11)
|
|
|
14
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 14)
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 13)
|
|
|
15
|
Message 15
|
Message 1
|
|
|
16
|
good evidence not "good" design (Message 16)
|
Message 15
|
|
|
17
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 17)
By PaulK
02-18-2006 3:00 AM
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 14)
|
|
|
18
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 18)
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 17)
By PaulK
02-18-2006 3:00 AM
|
|
|
19
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 19)
By PaulK
02-19-2006 5:21 AM
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 18)
|
|
|
20
|
Re: huge mistake....propaganda (Message 20)
|
huge mistake....propaganda (Message 11)
|
|
|
21
|
Re: good evidence not "good" design (Message 21)
By nator
02-19-2006 8:12 AM
|
good evidence not "good" design (Message 16)
|
|
|
22
|
You have misread the good Dr. Wise (Message 22)
|
good evidence not "good" design (Message 16)
|
|
|
23
|
Topic title modified a bit (Message 23)
|
|
|
|
24
|
Flagging a message as being a quality reply (Message 24)
|
Message 8
|
|
|
25
|
disagree very much (Message 25)
|
You have misread the good Dr. Wise (Message 22)
|
|
|
26
|
Re: disagree very much (Message 26)
|
disagree very much (Message 25)
|
|
|
27
|
Close Reading (Message 27)
|
disagree very much (Message 25)
|
|
|
28
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 28)
|
Close Reading (Message 27)
|
|
|
29
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 29)
By Gary
02-20-2006 10:58 AM
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 28)
|
|
|
30
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 30)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 29)
By Gary
02-20-2006 10:58 AM
|
|
|
31
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 31)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 28)
|
|
|
32
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 32)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 31)
|
|
|
33
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 33)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 32)
|
|
|
34
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 34)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 33)
|
|
|
35
|
Re: good evidence not "good" design (Message 35)
|
good evidence not "good" design (Message 16)
|
|
|
36
|
Re: good evidence not "good" design (Message 36)
|
Re: good evidence not "good" design (Message 35)
|
|
|
37
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 37)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 34)
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 38)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 37)
|
|
|
39
|
Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 39)
|
|
|
|
40
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 40)
|
Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 39)
|
|
|
41
|
"Take the stick out of your butt"? (Message 41)
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 40)
|
|
|
42
|
evidence of design etc (Message 42)
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 40)
|
|
|
43
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 43)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 28)
|
|
|
44
|
Re: good evidence not "good" design (Message 44)
|
Re: good evidence not "good" design (Message 36)
|
|
|
45
|
randman suspended for 24 hours. (Message 45)
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 38)
|
|
|
46
|
Some info for you. (Message 46)
By jar
02-20-2006 10:15 PM
|
Re: Close Reading (Message 38)
|
|
|
47
|
Valid design? (Message 47)
|
Some info for you. (Message 46)
By jar
02-20-2006 10:15 PM
|
|
|
48
|
more than meets the EYE (Message 48)
|
|
|
|
49
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 49)
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 40)
|
|
|
50
|
Re: Valid design? (Message 50)
By jar
02-24-2006 2:32 PM
|
Valid design? (Message 47)
|
|
|
51
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 51)
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 49)
|
|
|
52
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 52)
|
Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going (Message 51)
|
|
|
53
|
Re: Valid design? (Message 53)
|
Re: Valid design? (Message 50)
By jar
02-24-2006 2:32 PM
|
|
|
54
|
Re: Valid design? (Message 54)
By jar
02-24-2006 4:19 PM
|
Re: Valid design? (Message 53)
|
|
|
55
|
Re: theology allowed here? (Message 55)
|
theology allowed here? (Message 9)
|
|