The inclusion of Logic as a science, would greatly enhance the understanding of ID as a science, if it is understood in its prpoer context and usage. In my discusions with those on the PBS discussion, it was never offered with a simple yes or no, as to wheather Logic constituted a Scientific Method. I heard much about how useful logic was in the formation of arguments and how it was not stricly a science, but was never offered any valid reasons as to why it was not. I purpose this discussion to demonstrate its value for this expressed purpose. In my view it is not only the starting point of any science but the ending and refining of it as well. It in and of iteself can establish the validity of a designer or the possibility of a designer. And Of course this is the crux of the issue, wheather a mechanism can be established through a method of scientific endeavours to establish ID. the other arguments for the design as offered by Behe and others, in my view only enhance the Logic proposition proposed here. Thank yyou.
D Bertot
D Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : An edit was necessary do to the fact that I did not realize a more detailed discussion was initally required.
™ Version 4.2