Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,429 Year: 3,686/9,624 Month: 557/974 Week: 170/276 Day: 10/34 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Modern Day Miracle Man - Establishes the Supernatural Realm
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 76 of 297 (525882)
09-25-2009 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by PaulK
09-25-2009 5:19 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
You sure have by adding your own thought to the phrase.
As I sated, all I did was offer an entirely reasonable idea of what Joshua meant. I did not use quote marks, and the words that YOU attributed to Joshua were clearly distinguished form the rest.
Its not reasonable, its not because there was no plane crash on the day you're alluding to. And you have only added the word so is seems like the prophecy failed.
I'm not making any false accusation, where did I make one please be specific.
You are falsely accusing me of twisting Joshua's words.
You did you added the word "last" and that's not in the original quote of TB Joshua.
Be truly honest - you just don't like the idea that Joshua meant the 24th April, because that makes the prophecy a failure. That is the ONLY reason for your accusation.
You would like that wouldn't you? I reject your theory based on the fact that nowhere does TB Joshua mention a date, he only gives a day, You have added a date. You have added to his words and that is suspicious. I have no reason to think that he meant Friday the 24th, especially when the crash didn't happen on that day, and also because TB Joshua doesn't mention 24 anywhere in his prophecy, all he offers us is the day Friday.
And anybody with eyes could see that I used bolding to distinguish MY word from Joshua's. Thus your accusation is false.
My accusation was that you added a word to the man's phrase and is adamant that that is what he meant, how can you be so sure that that is what he meant? Can you answer me please what great proof do you have that he meant Friday, the 24th of April when he doesn't even mention that date? Anyway my accusation is in line with what you have done, and is thus not false.
Only if you assume in advance that the "prophecy" is likely genuine. However to do so, begs the question. Since I am taking an honest, unbiased look at the evidence I cannot make that assumption.
Your actions speak louder than your claim. I will let our audience decide this one. It doesn't beg the question, TB Joshua gave a prophecy and his prophecy was fulfilled within a short amount of time. This should raise suspicion, what you want to do is brush all of this aside because you are terrified of the implications. And your argument has been nothing but biased. You have added to the prophets words and you base your entire argument on that addition you made, therefore your argument simply crumbles based on the fact that your addition isn't in the original document. All you have is, "it might have been there", that's poor really poor, I'm basing my argument on what TB Joshua actually said, your basing your argument on what he probably said. I think its getting clearer now.
Exactly as either of us knows, not as TB Joshua knows, since he uses the same phrase elsewhere only replacing "month" with "week" So the phrase is most likely deliberate, and not a mistake.
That is not a rational argument. It is just speculation.
"Its not a rational argument? another unsupported claim, where is the irrationality in my argument? Tb Joshua used the same wording elsewhere and therefore he probably knows what it means.
It is just speculation.
And what have you been doing this whole time? Giving facts. Hardly, your argument is based on an unsupported claim, namely that the prophet committed a word from his prophecy, and then you go so far as to declare what this word is, and thing that that somehow proves your point. Now that is what is known as begging the question.
That is obviously wrong. Just because I can make an entirely plausible suggestion as to what Joshua likely meant does not give you license to put up any change you like as if it were equally plausible. If you can offer evidence - real evidence that does not rely on begging the question, that Joshua DID mean 22nd May, now would be a good time to do it.
I have shown why you are obviously lying here. Your so called entirely plausible suggestion is not based on any evidence but on wishful thinking, "Friday of the month" could mean the "22th Friday of the May month" our additions have one thing in common, both are based on speculation, call it plausible speculation, its still speculation, and the word plausible doesn't give any more weight to speculation, as plausible things don't always happen. As an example its plausible that you might be wrong about this. If you claim that's not plausible than you must possess all truth to know that, because you must know what TB Joshua was thinking when he made that phrase. So therefore your argument is based on a shaky foundation, not evidence.
I on the other hand don't resort to speculations, I don't add words that I think should be there, I don't presume to know what TB Joshua meant, or anyone for that matter, because there is a BIG chance that I may be wrong.
The idea that the phrase is complete - when you have absolutely no evidence of that is implausible. The idea that Joshua meant to give a specific date rather than something like "last" or "fourth" is implausible.
I'm sick of your little word games frankly; do you think i'm an idiot , your date is just as specific as mine, when you say last Friday of the month, you are referring to the 24th of May, aren't you, that's the date you have been arguing for all along, right. So your addition also results in a specific date, therefore by your own admission, since you end up giving specific date your argument is implausible.
Because missing one word out is very easy. Missing out the whole date is more difficult.
Not if he deliberately left it out, on purpose.
You sure have as this post demonstrates.
Again you make a compeltely false accusation.
No I gave the evidence for that accusation in the paragraphs that preceded it. That is why I said "as this post demonstrates"
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminModulous, : edited quote tags to make them work. Take a look at how I nested them so you know how to do it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 5:19 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 6:26 AM Cedre has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 77 of 297 (525883)
09-25-2009 6:26 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Cedre
09-25-2009 6:05 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
quote:
Its not reasonable, its not because there was no plane crash on the day you're alluding to
In other words, your only reason for rejecting it is that it makes the prophecy a failure. That's just begging the question again.
quote:
You did you added the word "last" and that's not in the original quote of TB Joshua.
And I clearly distinguished it from the quote. As you know.
quote:
You would like that wouldn't you?
I certainly would like you to be honest.
quote:
"Its not a rational argument? another unsupported claim, where is the irrationality in my argument? Tb Joshua used the same wording elsewhere and therefore he probably knows what it means.
According to you he only uses a SIMILAR phrase elsewhere. And you haven't given ANY reason to connect that to your conclusion. THAT is why it is not a rational argument.
quote:
Giving facts. Hardly, your argument is based on an unsupported claim, namely that the prophet committed a word from his prophecy, and then you go so far as to declare what this word is, and thing that that somehow proves your point. Now that is what is known as begging the question
Again I am not simply offering speculation beased on what I owuld like to be the case. All I offered was a reasonable possiblity - better than any of the alternatives you have offered.. And your summary ignores - yet again - the other lines of evidence, which you have not yet answered.
quote:
I have shown why you are obviously lying here.
By which you mean that you call me a liar because you can't refute my arguments.
quote:
Your so called entirely plausible suggestion is not based on any evidence but on wishful thinking,
"last Friday of the month" is a meaningful phrase as we both know. There is other evidence that TB Joshua meant the 24th. Thuis it is a reasonable suggestion.
quote:
"Friday of the month" could mean the "22th Friday of the May month"
That would be an unusal phrase in English, it requires missing more elements. And it seems that Joshua did NOT know in advance that the crash would be on the 22nd May - since if he did he should have mentioned it again on the preceding Sunday (and if he did, you did not mention it).
quote:
I'm sick of your little word games frankly; do you think i'm an idiot
I shall restrict myself to pointing out that this is another false accusation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 6:05 AM Cedre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 6:40 AM PaulK has replied

  
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 78 of 297 (525884)
09-25-2009 6:27 AM


I'm not going to heed your speculations any longer, a blunt look at Tb Joshua's prophecy reveals the following things.
A crash will happen on a Friday. The crash involves a family plane, a particular kind of family family is involved in the crash.
This is what we get from a blunt unbiased look at the evidence, and lo and behold not long after this prophecy is made a plane meeting that description, not some jumbo jet, or airliner, crashes on the day stated in the prophecy, not on some Wednesday or Tuesday, a family meeting the description given in the prophecy are involved in the crash, not a gay couple, or childless couple.
This to me is a amazing, its just amazing.
Okay now I'm going to move away from this prophecy and give another prophecy that was fulfilled just as the previous one. I have noticed though that the other prophecy I presented hasn't been dealt with yet, I guess its way too specific to be questioned.
"PLANE CRASHES 17-28TH"
On Sunday, 11th January 2009, Prophet T.B. Joshua gave a prophetic warning concerning events that were to happen in the coming days within the same month of January. Here is the prophecy:
Those who are flying, please take Psalm 91. If you are going to fly: 17, 27, 28, in between 17, 27, 28. Write it down. Please, Psalm 91 and be in the Spirit because by the time you are in the Spirit and this Psalm, you observe it, there will be [a] mark in you. Even when you are about to be checked in, something will happen that you will not be able to go — if it is going to take your life. It’s either you miss your flight; it’s either something happens. 17, 27, 28. From that 17 — the whole thing from 17 to the end of the month. Please, in the air, take note and fast and pray. Use Psalm 91, verse 7, 8, 9. Take note of verse 7. ‘A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you. You will only observe with your eyes and see the punishment of the wicked. If you make the Most High your dwelling even the LORD, who is my refuge.’
In confirmation, the events foretold by Prophet T.B. Joshua began unfolding six days later, on Saturday, 17th January 2009, a military helicopter crashed in the African nation of Gabon, killing at least seven of the 10 soldiers onboard.
A final soldier remains missing. Searches are continuing," the French presidency said in a statement, adding the two survivors were out of danger.
There was no immediate information on the cause of the crash, but French President Nicolas Sarkozy has ordered a speedy inquiry, the presidency said.
Just as the man of God, Prophet T.B. Joshua prophesied, this event occurred on the 17th of January, the first date specified in the prophecy.
Ten days later, the prophetic message was further confirmed as a FedEx cargo plane crashed in Lubbock, Texas, on the 27th of January 2009, the second date specified in the prophetic message delivered by Prophet T.B. Joshua. Officials say the plane came down at the end of the runway, veered off and caught fire. Both crew members survived and walked away from the plane. They were then taken to hospital for examination.
Further confirmation came on Wednesday the 28th of January 2009, the final date mentioned by the man of God, Prophet T.B. Joshua in his prophetic message, when a red, single-engine Marchetti airplane carrying two men crashed at the west end of the runway in Santa Monica Airport, California, USA at about 5 pm local time. The plane crashed on the west end of the runway and caught fire, said Ian Gregor of the Federal Aviation Administration. The fire destroyed most of the plane. Friends of the two men identified them as the general manager of an aviation website and a world-travelling Internet business development consultant. Paulo Emanuele, believed to be 46, was the general manager of the airliners.net website. Martin Schaedel, believed to be about 23, was a consultant to FareCompare, an airline fare comparison website.
The confirmation continued through to the end of the month of January 2009 when a succession of three plane crashes occurred in the USA and Colombia. The first of these consecutive incidents took place on Thursday 29th January 2008, at about 3pm local time, when a small plane crashed in an open pasture near Anahuac, about 30 miles east of Houston, Texas, USA, killing all three people onboard.
Another plane crash that caught the world’s attention occurred on Thursday 29th 2009 — when a plane coming into land in Colombia completely flipped upside down when a strong gust of wind caught the back end. The passengers of a light aircraft which flipped on landing walked away with barely a scratch.
The next day on Friday 30th January 2009 at 1pm, a twin-engine plane crashed near Tri-State Airport, Kenova, West Virginia shortly after the pilot radioed that the aircraft was low on fuel. Three people were killed.
These three aviation crashes which took place on the last days on January 2009 confirm the words of prophecy given by Prophet TB Joshua who instructed the congregation and viewers to be in an attitude of prayer and fasting right to the end of the month of January.

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Richard Townsend, posted 09-25-2009 2:12 PM Cedre has replied
 Message 128 by Perdition, posted 09-25-2009 2:25 PM Cedre has replied

  
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 79 of 297 (525886)
09-25-2009 6:40 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by PaulK
09-25-2009 6:26 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
In other words, your only reason for rejecting it is that it makes the prophecy a failure. That's just begging the question again.
I gave more reasons. please read my posts in their entirety and not in bits and pieces. If you had read my post you would have sen that I give other evidence, word-for-word point out why my evidence doesn't make the cut.
According to you he only uses a SIMILAR phrase elsewhere. And you haven't given ANY reason to connect that to your conclusion. THAT is why it is not a rational argument.
show that I have failed to connect it to my conclusion, if he uses the same kind og\f wording more than once than he probably does it on purpose. show that this is possible. And why it is irrational.
Again I am not simply offering speculation beased on what I owuld like to be the case. All I offered was a reasonable possiblity - better than any of the alternatives you have offered.. And your summary ignores - yet again - the other lines of evidence, which you have not yet answered.
Again claims don't equal proofs. you have done more than offer a reasonable possibility you are adamant that it is the only possibility. And what have I ignored please be specific.
"Friday of the month" could mean the "22th Friday of the May month"
That would be an unusal phrase in English,
No it isn't, again you are neglecting the fact that this isn't an Englishman.
Please don't ignore the rest of my post answer it. your lack of reply to my post is indicative of your inability to answer it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 6:26 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 6:58 AM Cedre has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 80 of 297 (525888)
09-25-2009 6:58 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by Cedre
09-25-2009 6:40 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
quote:
I gave more reasons. please read my posts in their entirety and not in bits and pieces. If you had read my post you would have sen that I give other evidence, word-for-word point out why my evidence doesn't make the cut.
You gave no other evidence why it is unreasonable to think that Joshua may have meant the "last Friday of the month"
quote:
show that I have failed to connect it to my conclusion, if he uses the same kind og\f wording more than once than he probably does it on purpose. show that this is possible. And why it is irrational.
Err, it is up to you to supply the connection. Simply using a similar but different phrase occasionaly (which may also be a mistake) is hardly significant evidence. (The more so since you say that he meant a specific date - there is only one Friday in a week but at least 4 in a month. Which of these Fridays would "Friday of the month" mean and why ?)
quote:
Again claims don't equal proofs. you have done more than offer a reasonable possibility you are adamant that it is the only possibility.
You are misrepresenting my position. All I say about the choice of "last" is that is is a plausible possibility. I use other evidence to conclude that Joshua meant 24th April. If you disagree review my posts.
quote:
And what have I ignored please be specific
I gave a list of evidence in Message 48
He specifically asked for prayers to be said on the 24th April, and on no other Friday
On the 19th he issued a warning against traveling, but on no later day. (And if he had specifically meant the 22nd May he should have repeated the warning on the previous Sunday ! - the 17th May)
The "Friday of the Month" plausibly means the 24th April - and does NOT plausibly mean 22nd May, as a specific date.
While the reference on the 19th referred to it as a future event, the repeat on the 26th exclusively uses the past tense.
You have only attempted to answer the last two.
quote:
No it isn't, again you are neglecting the fact that this isn't an Englishman
No, I am not ignoring it. He is still speaking English and in the absence of any evidence that the phrase is used in Nigeria - and you have yet to offer any - the fact that it is unusual counts as evidence. As I say, if it really is a valid phrase all you have to do is offer the evidence.
quote:
Please don't ignore the rest of my post answer it. your lack of reply to my post is indicative of your inability to answer it.
If there is any important point I missed, please feel free to raise it again. I will answer it.
However, given your statement, I feel free to assume that YOU are unable to address the points in my post that YOU did not answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 6:40 AM Cedre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 7:35 AM PaulK has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 81 of 297 (525893)
09-25-2009 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Cedre
09-24-2009 2:40 PM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
"Friday of the Month" is not your typical way of speaking, but you must not overlook the fact that this man is not a Englishman, the bottom line is there is no missing word here you can view the video of the live broadcast or you can ask the many people who watched TB Joshua make this prophecy.
Do you have a link to this video? The only one I can find has a bunch of cuts in it, including one just before "Friday of the month.". The subtitles indicate this is the end of a sentence, but it doesn't make sense as a complete sentence, so I'm assuming there was something before it.
Unfortunately, this video was broadcast by Emmanuel TV, which was founded by TB Joshua so it is hardly impartial.

I predict that later today a Eurocopter will crash. I am getting a girls name beginning with a 'C', not quite but like a girls name maybe? It is definitely in the South. The helicopter will be associate with the letters 'N', 'A' and 'E' and the numbers 1,4 and 7 are coming through strongly. Three people will die, I feel there is a strong medical presence as if one of the fatally wounded is in medicine. Or maybe two of them are. One of them is definitely a pilot.
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Cedre, posted 09-24-2009 2:40 PM Cedre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 7:46 AM Modulous has replied

  
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 82 of 297 (525895)
09-25-2009 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by PaulK
09-25-2009 6:58 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
He specifically asked for prayers to be said on the 24th April, and on no other Friday
Yes he did this in his first prophecy he asked people to pray on 24 April, he didn't say the prophecy would be fulfilled on that day, he just asked his congregation to pray on that date. So I don't know what your point is with this one. But I'm sure its not evidence for anything.
On the 19th he issued a warning against traveling, but on no later day. (And if he had specifically meant the 22nd May he should have repeated the warning on the previous Sunday ! - the 17th May)
This isn't really an argument, he had already repeated the warning once plus his repetition of the prophecy was clear enough that a family would enter a plane and the plane would crash, therefore the prophecy in itself doubled up as a warning, and any family that was planning to go into a plane of late specifically on a Friday, and had heard the prophecy would have thought twice before getting into a plane on a Friday. So there was no need for TB Joshua to explicitly give a warning since the prophecy in itself was a warning. Therefore this doesn't serve as evidence for your argument.
The "Friday of the Month" plausibly means the 24th April - and does NOT plausibly mean 22nd May, as a specific date.
whichever one is the more plausible meaning, that's not important because according to you adding a specific date would be begging the question and create an implausible argument, here are your exact words concerning this:
The idea that Joshua meant to give a specific date rather than something like "last" or "fourth" is implausible.
and here was my reply to it
I'm sick of your little word games frankly; do you think i'm an idiot , your date is just as specific as mine, when you say last Friday of the month, you are referring to the 30th of May. So your addition also results in a specific date, therefore by your own admission, since you end up giving specific date your argument is implausible.
finally I have another suggestion, "Friday of the month" could also supposed to have said, (if something in fact was omitted) as "On a Friday of the next month" this is sounder English, and it is supported further by the fact that the crash did happen on a Friday of the next month.
I already dealt with your last so-called proof. So when all is said and done you don't have much of an argument left.
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 6:58 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Coragyps, posted 09-25-2009 7:50 AM Cedre has not replied
 Message 87 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 7:59 AM Cedre has replied

  
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 83 of 297 (525900)
09-25-2009 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by Modulous
09-25-2009 7:34 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
Unfortunately, this video was broadcast by Emmanuel TV, which was founded by TB Joshua so it is hardly impartial.
There is no reason to suggest that they are impartial just because they don't live up to your world view. I don't have any links to lead you to, however I will ask you to buy a proper dvd package detailing all of these prophecies from their web store on scoan.com. I would also like to mention that this dvd's are recordings of live Sunday broadcasts, seen in many parts of the world. Therefore not only is there video evidence, but there is also eye-witness evidence. Since thousands view this live broadcasts on Emmanuel TV in Africa and around the world there is amble evidence to confirm their legitimacy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Modulous, posted 09-25-2009 7:34 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Modulous, posted 09-25-2009 7:54 AM Cedre has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13018
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 84 of 297 (525901)
09-25-2009 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Rahvin
09-24-2009 12:32 PM


Moderator Advisory
Hi Rahvin, good points, but probably a bit over the top in a few places? Incivility has a way of escalating, please make the moderation task easy. Thanks.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Rahvin, posted 09-24-2009 12:32 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 85 of 297 (525902)
09-25-2009 7:50 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Cedre
09-25-2009 7:35 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
when you say last Friday of the month, you are referring to the 24th of May, aren't you, that's the date you have been arguing for all along, right.
I doubt that's what he means, since May has 31 days. If the 24th is a Friday, it's not the last Friday.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 7:35 AM Cedre has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 86 of 297 (525904)
09-25-2009 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 83 by Cedre
09-25-2009 7:46 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
There is no reason to suggest that they are impartial just because they don't live up to your world view.
Correct. I can suggest that they might not be impartial because they were founded by the man about whom they are reporting and that they might be tempted to cut out awkward parts because they might rely on funding and funding probably relies on a stream of believers.
I don't have any links to lead you to, however I will ask you to buy a proper dvd package detailing all of these prophecies from their web store on scoan.com.
I'm not going to fund their church, thanks. If it was a geniune prophecy I shouldn't need to pay to see it. So - is there an uncut version of the prophecy that I might view? You seem to indicate that there is not, or at least - I'll need to give money to the prophet to possibly receive one, maybe.
Therefore not only is there video evidence, but there is also eye-witness evidence.
Eye-witnesses are rubbish. I want to see the uncut video footage, thanks.
Since thousands view this live broadcasts on Emmanuel TV in Africa and around the world there is amble evidence to confirm their legitimacy.
And none of those thousands has a copy of the uncut broadcast that they've put online? Shame. Guess there is no uncut evidence for you to present.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 7:46 AM Cedre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 8:01 AM Modulous has replied
 Message 89 by greyseal, posted 09-25-2009 8:06 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 87 of 297 (525907)
09-25-2009 7:59 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Cedre
09-25-2009 7:35 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
quote:
Yes he did this in his first prophecy he asked people to pray on 24 April, he didn't say the prophecy would be fulfilled on that day, he just asked his congregation to pray on that date. So I don't know what your point is with this one. But I'm sure its not evidence for anything.
In other words you don't understand the point. Why ask them to pray on a specific day = and only ON A SPECIFIC DAY unless that were the day of the crash ?
quote:
This isn't really an argument, he had already repeated the warning once plus his repetition of the prophecy was clear enough that a family would enter a plane and the plane would crash, therefore the prophecy in itself doubled up as a warning, and any family that was planning to go into a plane of late specifically on a Friday, and heard the prophecy would have thought twice before getting into a plane on a Friday. So there was no need for TB Joshua to explicitly give a warning since the prophecy in itself was a warning. Therefore this doesn't serve as evidence for your argument.
If TB Joshua had known that the crash would happen on the 22nd May that in itself WOULD be a good reason to repeat the warning on the 17th May. It would remind people of the warning (given a month earlier) and reinforce it for the very day the crash was due to happen !
quote:
whichever ever one it means, that's not important because according to you adding a specific date would be begging the question and create an implausible argument, here are your exact words concerning this:
The idea that Joshua meant to give a specific date rather than something like "last" or "fourth" is implausible.

You aren't paying attention to the context again. That was said in discussing the exact words Joshua might have MEANT to say. So, I said that it is implausible that TB Joshua meant to SAY a specific date - rather than something like "last" of "fourth" and you take that as meaning that he could not have meant to say "last" or "fourth" because they are (IN CONTEXT) references to a specific date...
The obvious contradiction in your reading should have been a warning that you had got something wrong.
Also, I did not say that "giving a specific date" would be question-begging (arguing that he meant 22nd May BECAUSE the crash happened on the 22nd May IS question-begging !)
As for your reply:
quote:
I'm sick of your little word games frankly; do you think i'm an idiot , your date is just as specific as mine, when you say last Friday of the month, you are referring to the 24th of May, aren't you, that's the date you have been arguing for all along, right. So your addition also results in a specific date, therefore by your own admission, since you end up giving specific date your argument is implausible.
Don't you think that you should have actually understood what I was saying in context before indulging youerself in a nasty little rant ?
Edited to address the point Cedre added after I started to reply:
quote:
finally I have another suggestion, "Friday of the month" could also supposed to have said, (if something in fact was omitted) as "On a Friday of the next month" this is sounder English, and it is supported further by the fact that the crash did happen on a Friday of the next month.
Again this requires a much larger error than omitting a single word. It also contradicts your claim that "Friday of the month" referred to a specific day. And if the only "evidence" that he meant that is the fact that the crash happened on a Friday of the next month you are begging the question AGAIN.
Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 7:35 AM Cedre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 8:20 AM PaulK has replied

  
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 88 of 297 (525908)
09-25-2009 8:01 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by Modulous
09-25-2009 7:54 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
Correct. I can suggest that they might not be impartial because they were founded by the man about whom they are reporting and that they might be tempted to cut out awkward parts because they might rely on funding and funding probably relies on a stream of believers.
Interesting theory, but not likely, this prophecies are made during life broadcasts, and in front of skeptics, doubters and critics. Not everyone who goes to a SCOAN meeting is there for the word you know, and since thousands of random people attend the SCOAN from all over, to pull such a stunt is not only risky but foolish. If the recordings were messed with the thousands of people that were in attendance and were viewing live can point it out.
Eye-witnesses are rubbish. I want to see the uncut video footage, thanks.
What evidence can you provide for your claim. How do you know there were cuts. I have seen many SCOAN productions and their videos are of good sound and picture quality that footage you saw is probably of poor qaulity that is why I suggested you get a dvd version from the SCOAN.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Modulous, posted 09-25-2009 7:54 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Modulous, posted 09-25-2009 8:46 AM Cedre has replied

  
greyseal
Member (Idle past 3883 days)
Posts: 464
Joined: 08-11-2009


Message 89 of 297 (525910)
09-25-2009 8:06 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by Modulous
09-25-2009 7:54 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
And none of those thousands has a copy of the uncut broadcast that they've put online? Shame. Guess there is no uncut evidence for you to present.
let me guess, another faith healer prophet giving out prophecies which (even if manage to be "accurate"*) aren't anywhere near being useful?
there's a million of them, their claims all so far devolve into noise when looked at under the bright light of reason.
* "accurate" means that "something approximately of the same type of general thing happened in some generically plausible analogue of the place suggested to a somewhat similar group of people who may or may not be anywhere near the general area suggested by the words this 'prophet' used"**
** meaning he's got the whole world to base his predictions in. I could give you a million of them and be right.
I bet at this moment (and pray with me my sons and daughters) there is a man (or he may be a boy, or a girl, or a manly woman, or a womanly man) and he probably has hair and maybe a beard. or just leg-hair. or just a really hairy back. And he is up a ladder, or a lift, near a building and that building is on fire! pray with me, then, pray that the fire is put out. hallelujah!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Modulous, posted 09-25-2009 7:54 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by Cedre, posted 09-25-2009 8:27 AM greyseal has replied

  
Cedre
Member (Idle past 1511 days)
Posts: 350
From: Russia
Joined: 01-30-2009


Message 90 of 297 (525913)
09-25-2009 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by PaulK
09-25-2009 7:59 AM


Re: An honest look at the evidence
Yes he did this in his first prophecy he asked people to pray on 24 April, he didn't say the prophecy would be fulfilled on that day, he just asked his congregation to pray on that date. So I don't know what your point is with this one. But I'm sure its not evidence for anything.
In other words you don't understand the point. Why ask them to pray on a specific day = and only ON A SPECIFIC DAY unless that were the day of the crash ?
Hahaha, God isn't limited by time, it doesn't matter on what date the prayer was held, you are trying to imply that the prayer would only have been effective if it was said on the day of the accident. The prophet merely gave the people a date on which to pray. If you want to go into a discussion of what was the point of praying on any other day other than the day of the accident, we would begin speculating again. From the relevant passage its clear that 24 April was only the day on which the prayer was to be held, there is no indication in that passage that suggests that that was the day on which the prophecy would be fulfilled.
If TB Joshua had known that the crash would happen on the 22nd May that in itself WOULD be a good reason to repeat the warning on the 17th May. It would remind people of the warning (given a month earlier) and reinforce it for the very day the crash was due to happen !
This isn't a valid argument because like I already said the prophecy in itself is a warning and any family that was planning to travel during that time would perceive if it as a warning. There is no need for him to be explicit. The prophecy serves as a warning it is saying what will happen if you board a claim on a Friday. The fact is there is nothing in there, in the statement that suggests that the thing had already happened.
You aren't paying attention to the context again.
Haha I think your ditching your former meaning because you know you made a blunder, lets take a look at what you said:
The idea that Joshua meant to give a specific date rather than something like "last" or "fourth" is implausible.
What could this statement possibly mean apart from what it says, its clear, and basic English that you have used.
Also, I did not say that "giving a specific date" would be question-begging (arguing that he meant 22nd May BECAUSE the crash happened on the 22nd May IS question-begging !)
arguing that he didn't mean 22nd May BECAUSE the crash happened on the 22nd May IS also question-begging !
Edited by Cedre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 7:59 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by PaulK, posted 09-25-2009 8:42 AM Cedre has replied
 Message 129 by SammyJean, posted 09-25-2009 3:31 PM Cedre has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024