Is natural selection enough to explain

the complexities and diversities of life on earth?

Welcome to EvC interrelation. I hope you stay and enjoy chatting with us.However, this is not enough to start a new thread. It requires more effort on your part.As it stands you might get two posts in reply, one "yes", one "no".If you want to start a discussion you have to put the effort in to starting it.You should give your answer to the question and give at least some of your reasons and the facts on which you base them.(as an aside, no it isn't. The evolutionary processes which can explain the complexities and diversities (what, exactly is the difference between them) of life on earth involve more than just natural selection.)I worry that by asking the question you show that you don't really know enough to discuss this with some of the people here. You might want to join in some existing threads for awhile first.If you want to continue with this edit your opening post (OP) and reply to this post to let some admin know you want to be considered again.

Thanks.The reason why I am asking this is that I wanted to know your input about it. I had my own theory in biology, it is the Interrelation Theory. The Interrelation Theory argues that in the preservation of life, I think that in real world, the natural selection as mechanism of TOE is not sufficient enough to explain all the facts and evidences that we are witnessing in nature. And eventhopugh we use all the mechanisms in TOE, I think we will be having a wrong conclusion.

Stating that you don't think the mechanisms are not enough just doesn't cut it.Since many 1,000's have examined those mechanisms in great detail and have shown how they can, in fact, produce the diversity we see you will have to supply a lot more than "I think". RAZD has kindly pointed you at thread where you can discuss this.You may want to give details of your interrelation theory here if you are really prepared to defend it. Warning! There are many here who are very good at pulling something apart if it is not well founded.

Yeah, I knew it. I'm prepared to the test of time about my theory. If they would like to pull it apart, if they can, then, they can. I think that I can defend it.Edited by interrelation, : No reason given.

If you wish help from people here willing to subject your ideas to an acid test you should start by articulating your ideas in the opening post of this thread. Then we can promote it for discussion.Good luck.

Yeah, how should I do it?

Huh?In the opening post use 2 or 3 paragraphs to explain the main ideas. Then give the 3 or so main facts that you use to back up your ideas.Why do you have to ask me how to explain your hypothosis?

I ask you how to post it not how to use my hyphotesis.

You edit the Opening Post (message 1) to make it a clear exposition of your ideas and reply to me to let us know you are ready for another review.