Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,818 Year: 3,075/9,624 Month: 920/1,588 Week: 103/223 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Man in gods image... How ?
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 46 of 82 (438154)
12-03-2007 2:51 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by iceage
12-01-2007 4:37 PM


Re: The LORD is a man of war
quote:
In the Bible whenever the "spirit of the lord" came over Sampson what happened? Something or someone died.
The OT is the machinations of evolved primates don't confuse it with God - that is blasphemy.
Not when all deaths are attributed to God, and when there are also redeeming factors, such as being saved from slavery in Egypt. The samson story vouches for the negation of unjust death, than how you portrayed it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by iceage, posted 12-01-2007 4:37 PM iceage has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 47 of 82 (438155)
12-03-2007 2:55 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by iceage
11-30-2007 4:01 PM


Re: The LORD is Man o' War
You have gone astray.
'IN HIS IMAGE' - refers to 'speech'. This is a creationist implement, whereby genesis says there were no tools and elements when the universe was created, and it emerged via speech, namely with the utterence of a word/will/command/thought. That 'THE LORD *SAID* LET THERE BE LIGHT' refers to speech ['SAID'].
All of mankind's works are derived via speech - a Gdlike trait.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by iceage, posted 11-30-2007 4:01 PM iceage has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 48 of 82 (438156)
12-03-2007 3:01 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by iceage
11-30-2007 3:42 PM


Re: The LORD is a man of war
quote:
I have a difficulty understanding a vision of God that describes God like a super war lord. This is clearly a God made in man's image.
Even when its context is clearly embedded in the describing of an actual war situation!?
Lol - grammar was introduced in the OT, and there is no other example of an expressionism than that verse - and no other reading of it. It was stated by a cherished writer named Isiah, who's writings are emulated and utilised by the greatest of poets and writers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by iceage, posted 11-30-2007 3:42 PM iceage has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5915 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 49 of 82 (438157)
12-03-2007 4:09 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by IamJoseph
12-03-2007 2:48 AM


Re: The LORD is a man of war
iaj writes:
The variance with the greek/hellenism is pretty well illustrated in the OT laws, and in fact the basis for many wars with nations rejecting the premise of an invisibale, indescribable and unfathomable God.
This sentence is poorly constructed and I cannot understand what you are trying to say.
iaj writes:
The aspect of 'POWER' is one of the given attributes of the creator...
A supernova is POWER meddling in the tribal affairs of men is trifling.
iaj writes:
...along with such paradigms as TRUTH, MERCY, FORGIVENESS, etc.
The OT defies this description...
quote:
Ezekiel 9:5-7
"Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all - old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told."
No mercy and kill them all! The fact that this sounds like the philosophy of Al-Qaeda is no coincidence.
quote:
Jeremiah 51:20-26 "You are my battle-ax and sword," says the LORD. "With you I will shatter nations and destroy many kingdoms. With you I will shatter armies, destroying the horse and rider, the chariot and charioteer. With you I will shatter men and women, old people and children, young men and maidens. With you I will shatter shepherds and flocks, farmers and oxen, captains and rulers. "As you watch, I will repay Babylon and the people of Babylonia for all the wrong they have done to my people in Jerusalem," says the LORD. "Look, O mighty mountain, destroyer of the earth! I am your enemy," says the LORD. "I will raise my fist against you, to roll you down from the heights. When I am finished, you will be nothing but a heap of rubble. You will be desolate forever. Even your stones will never again be used for building. You will be completely wiped out," says the LORD.
A trash talking god? Just like WWF. Now why would the creator of the universe need holy hitmen to carry out his destruction? Is God incapable of doing his destruction?
And one of the more ludicrous rules by the creator of Galaxies...
quote:
(Deuteronomy 25:11-12) If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.
Let the boys play eh? and show her no pity. These are not the thoughts of God - but men.
iaj writes:
In a war scenario, the usage of God's help is reasnable and not as per the greek.
Greek gods get into the affairs of wars all the time.
iaj writes:
In the dispensing of justice, for example, we can say God is the judge, without alligning this to actual impersonification this factor is correctly an exressionism, denoted by its context of reference being within the realm of justice.
This sentence just does not make any sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by IamJoseph, posted 12-03-2007 2:48 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by IamJoseph, posted 12-03-2007 2:10 PM iceage has not replied
 Message 54 by bluescat48, posted 12-06-2007 1:35 PM iceage has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18262
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 50 of 82 (438163)
12-03-2007 6:50 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Zucadragon
06-30-2006 6:00 PM


The jabberwockian mind of Phat
Zucadragon writes:
Now we humans, we have searched, found, processed and created using techniques well beyond what our own bodies can do. Techniques half the world don't even understand.. But they come from thoughts and experiments.. We can truly create something out of nearly nothing (I say nearly, we can do a lot with little if needed, but we cant create out of nothing)..
This is a great philosophical topic, and my observations are entirely based on my own speculations and interpretations of Biblical wording.
Personally, I believe that God created us in His own imagination. The image of man is Jesus Christ. Jesus was in the beginning (with God as Gods character) Whether Jesus was only human while on Earth or whether Jesus had a dual nature, fully human and fully Son (in total communion with His Father) is irrelevant. What is relevant is that Jesus was in the beginning. He was not a created thing. He was not some afterthought of a monotheistic God. He was in the beginning with God and through Him all things were created.
(Yes these are unsupported beliefs, but allow me to express them, critics.)
As soon as humanity became symbolically (or literally aware) that we had a choice whether to remain in communion with God or to become independent and freethinking, we chose freethinking and thus were granted our own imaginations. Vain though we were, we grew and evolved slowly after that point in time. The symbolism of the Garden of Eden story shows that the serpent (who had also preceded us as an independent entity from the Heavenly Hosts) told humans that they would be as gods if they rose up and claimed their freedom of choice.
Two points:
1) God foreknew that Lucifer would rebel and become Satan. It was no news to Him that this happened. God never created evil directly. God merely created the possibility of evil which Lucifer then chose.
2) Fallen Angels could never repent and return to communion with God. Humans could have this choice.
Thus, there are two images. Two imaginations. Two realities.
We have:
1) Gods imagination
2) Human imagination.
We have a choice in life of accepting our own responsibility and either being accountable to God (through belief and profession, if not religion) or accountable to no one. (except ourselves)
Humanity has created many things. One could argue that there is nothing new under the Son (since He initially created reality itself and the very definition of everything seen and unseen.)
Humans are thus never actual creators. We are re creators. We discover that which has already been created (or at least conceptualized) within the mind of GOD.
Disclaimer: This post is a compilation of the personal beliefs of its author. No implication of truth is contained therein, except for the Truth of Christ. Everyone is free to challenge the assumptions contained therein, with the acknowledgment that none of us really know anything. The assumption that we do is to assume that we are somehow creative...apart from God or perhaps because of Him.

"All that we call human history--money, poverty, ambition, war, prostitution, classes, empires, slavery--[is] the long terrible story of man trying to find something other than God which will make him happy."--C.S.Lewis
* * * * * * * * * *
“The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.”--General Omar Bradley
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Homer Simpson: Sometimes, Marge, you just have to go with your gut!
Marge: You *always* go with your gut! How about for once you listen to your brain?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Zucadragon, posted 06-30-2006 6:00 PM Zucadragon has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by ringo, posted 12-03-2007 2:23 PM Phat has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 51 of 82 (438231)
12-03-2007 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by iceage
12-03-2007 4:09 AM


Re: The LORD is a man of war
quote:
iaj writes:
The variance with the greek/hellenism is pretty well illustrated in the OT laws, and in fact the basis for many wars with nations rejecting the premise of an invisibale, indescribable and unfathomable God.
This sentence is poorly constructed and I cannot understand what you are trying to say.
You see commonality of the OT with hellenism and its mythological dieties; I see the differences. The OT is based on the strickest form of Monotheism possible, while hellenism is based on blatant polytheism. If you read the criteria for monotheism, a premise introduced in the OT, no form of images are allowed for worship; here, the only exceptions are abstract factors, such as prayer, expressionism and metaphors - which are not graven images. I find your views selective and ommisive, resulting in the antithesis of your conclusion should be.
quote:
iaj writes:
The aspect of 'POWER' is one of the given attributes of the creator...
A supernova is POWER meddling in the tribal affairs of men is trifling.
Also in the affairs of virus and insects. This is the meaning of omnipotent.
quote:
iaj writes:
...along with such paradigms as TRUTH, MERCY, FORGIVENESS, etc.
The OT defies this description...
I don't see humanity surviving solely by its own deeds. We are propped up, despite being less than adequate, and in the midst of anything minute going wrong resulting in our demise. there is both forces in this realm, positive and negative, and it is very difficult to know which is which - we are not privy to the big picture.
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ezekiel 9:5-7
"Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all - old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No mercy and kill them all! The fact that this sounds like the philosophy of Al-Qaeda is no coincidence.
Normal, garden variety stuff 3000 years ago; this was a supersticious period, and in certain kinds of wars, no prisoners were taken. It is still better than the attrocities seen the last 300 years. The OT depicts truth - the reason it is believed. These forms of wars occured even a few 100 years ago - people were massacred upto 700 million when they refused enforced conversions. It is a humanity factor.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremiah 51:20-26 "You are my battle-ax and sword," says the LORD. "With you I will shatter nations and destroy many kingdoms. With you I will shatter armies, destroying the horse and rider, the chariot and charioteer. With you I will shatter men and women, old people and children, young men and maidens. With you I will shatter shepherds and flocks, farmers and oxen, captains and rulers. "As you watch, I will repay Babylon and the people of Babylonia for all the wrong they have done to my people in Jerusalem," says the LORD. "Look, O mighty mountain, destroyer of the earth! I am your enemy," says the LORD. "I will raise my fist against you, to roll you down from the heights. When I am finished, you will be nothing but a heap of rubble. You will be desolate forever. Even your stones will never again be used for building. You will be completely wiped out," says the LORD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A trash talking god? Just like WWF. Now why would the creator of the universe need holy hitmen to carry out his destruction? Is God incapable of doing his destruction?
And one of the more ludicrous rules by the creator of Galaxies...
This too is human improvisation. There are equivalent chants today on the net. It has nothing to do with your conclusion, and most probably it means something other than your views.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Deuteronomy 25:11-12) If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let the boys play eh? and show her no pity. These are not the thoughts of God - but men.
Do you know what is meant by 'reaches out and seizes him by his private parts'? These were different times, and this was a very grevious action then. The penalty today for any wrong doing is a variable, according to each generation's times - but the penalty must be appropriate to the crime. This week, a death sentence is demanded for a teacher who inadvertantly named a doll as Mohammed - so these are sensitivities of the ages, and only seen with surprise today. One can say, these are required evolutionary phases for humanity.
quote:
iaj writes:
In the dispensing of justice, for example, we can say God is the judge, without alligning this to actual impersonification this factor is correctly an exressionism, denoted by its context of reference being within the realm of justice.
This sentence just does not make any sense.
I'll translate. It refers to another example of an expressionism. By saying God is the 'judge', in the context of judgement - it cannot mean an actual judge with a silver toppee in a courtroom. The same applies to the notion of a man of war expressionism.: they are clearly contextual.
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by iceage, posted 12-03-2007 4:09 AM iceage has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 52 of 82 (438232)
12-03-2007 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Phat
12-03-2007 6:50 AM


Re: The jabberwockian mind of Phat
Phat writes:
Disclaimer: This post is a compilation of the personal beliefs of its author.
I guess make-it-up-as-you-go-along is the standard for the so-called "Bible Study" forum. Who needs actual reference to the Bible when one's beliefs are so firm and consistent?

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Phat, posted 12-03-2007 6:50 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by IamJoseph, posted 12-06-2007 12:16 PM ringo has replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 53 of 82 (438845)
12-06-2007 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by ringo
12-03-2007 2:23 PM


Re: The jabberwockian mind of Phat
It can be validated by a correct comprehension of the text. Grammar was introduced here: this says the most coherent path be taken. In this instant it is even made simpler, because there does not appear any other explanations to consider when taking other factors in the same source into consideration. Eg: 'NO MAN SHALL SEE ME AND LIVE'; 'GOD IS NOT LIKE MAN'; 'NO COMPARISON OF GOD WITH ANYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE'; ETC.
If you miss the signs, you end up driving in the wrong lane. Its got nothing to do with belief - its the texts!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by ringo, posted 12-03-2007 2:23 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by ringo, posted 12-06-2007 4:17 PM IamJoseph has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4190 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 54 of 82 (438881)
12-06-2007 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by iceage
12-03-2007 4:09 AM


Re: The LORD is a man of war
Ezekiel 9:5-7
"Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, "Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all - old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple." So they began by killing the seventy leaders. "Defile the Temple!" the LORD commanded. "Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!" So they went throughout the city and did as they were told."
No mercy and kill them all! The fact that this sounds like the philosophy of Al-Qaeda is no coincidence.
I wouldn't doubt that's where Al-Qaeda came up with this ridiculous philosophy.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by iceage, posted 12-03-2007 4:09 AM iceage has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by IamJoseph, posted 12-07-2007 1:41 AM bluescat48 has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 55 of 82 (438935)
12-06-2007 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by IamJoseph
12-06-2007 12:16 PM


Re: The jabberwockian mind of Phat
IamJoseph writes:
Grammar was introduced here: this says the most coherent path be taken.
There's nothing coherent in that line. Do you type your posts with an axe?
Please try to write one sentence in plain English.

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by IamJoseph, posted 12-06-2007 12:16 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by IamJoseph, posted 12-07-2007 1:52 AM ringo has replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 56 of 82 (439001)
12-07-2007 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by bluescat48
12-06-2007 1:35 PM


Re: The LORD is a man of war
Because Israel was given a direct, open and firsthand Revelation at Sinai - very little excuses are available for blatant, open and sustained sins ['And I will punish you sevenhold'; 'And I will set the hearts and the minds of the nations against you'; etc]. Much is at stake when commandments are desecrated in this regard, in Jerusalem, while the Temple stood, and one must consider the crimes commited in this instant, and what it means when it is not responded to in kind. We know the OT is constant - Sodom was destroyed entirely, making this not an unusual situation; an entire region was destroyed by a flood [Noah]; Moses was forbidden from entering the Promised Land; etc.
There is a difference is commiting a crime before a friend, kin, king - and when the first temple stood - which manifested open revelation [as opposed the 2nd temple]. The severity decreases when further from such a spiritual arena. Justice here is a terrifying paradign ['But my justice shall not suffer'], and thankfully, justice is listed as the last of the 13 Attributes, coming after the abuse of mercy, forgiveness, kindness, truth, etc. If the kitchen is too hot - leave the room: 'KNOW BEFORE WHOM YOU YOU ARE STANDING'.
> 4 And the LORD said unto him: 'Go through the midst of the city, through> the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that> sigh and that cry for all the abominations that are done in the midst> thereof.'
That is, put a sign on the righteous, who were sorrowful for the sinsof the city! Similarly, God put a sign on Cain TO PROTECT him (unlikethe common misunderstanding there). Those marked with God's sign aremarked for protection.
> 5 And to the others He said in my hearing: 'Go ye through the> city after him, and smite; let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity;
That the unrighteous should be slaughtered.
6> slay utterly the old man, the young man and the maiden, and little> children and women; but come not near any man upon whom is the mark;
Don't slay the marked as righteous, but all the unrighteous of allages.
and> begin at My sanctuary.'
Where idol worship had defiled the holy Temple of God.
> Then they began at the elders that were before the> house.
These were the corrupt leaders.
7 And He said unto them: 'Defile the house, and fill the courts>
with the slain; go ye forth.'
And they went forth, and smote in the city. The house of Idols, which should have been the house of God, was to beturned into a house full of dead bodies, unworthy of even idol worship.
> 8 And it came to pass, while they were smiting, and I was left, that I> fell upon my face, and cried, and said: 'Ah Lord GOD! wilt Thou destroy> all the residue of Israel in Thy pouring out of Thy fury upon Jerusalem?'
The prophet fears that few if any will be left under such conditions.
> 9 Then said He unto me: 'The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is> exceeding great, and the land is full of blood, and the city full of> wresting of judgment; for they say: The LORD hath forsaken the land, and> the LORD seeth not. 10 And as for Me also, Mine eye shall not spare,> neither will I have pity, but I will bring their way upon their head.'
11 God commands that it be done all the same!
> And, behold, the man clothed in linen, who had the inkhorn on his side,> reported, saying: 'I have done according to all that Thou hast commanded> me.' {P}
It was done.
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by bluescat48, posted 12-06-2007 1:35 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 57 of 82 (439005)
12-07-2007 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by ringo
12-06-2007 4:17 PM


Re: The jabberwockian mind of Phat
quote:
IamJoseph writes:
Grammar was introduced here: this says the most coherent path be taken.
---------------
There's nothing coherent in that line. Do you type your posts with an axe?
Please try to write one sentence in plain English.
Those are the rules of Grammar. If you check, this faculty reaches its epitomy here, namely in the OT texts. The OT writings are contextual, which must be precedent of chronology in correct grammar. IOW, first finish the point being made, then qualify with extra factors. Second, that the interpretation by the reader must take the coherent path, not an incoherent path: and the coherent path is affirmed by other usages elsewhere - the writings are all intergrated, meaning the contradiction of another sector is NOT the correct path.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by ringo, posted 12-06-2007 4:17 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by ringo, posted 12-07-2007 11:35 AM IamJoseph has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 58 of 82 (439100)
12-07-2007 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by IamJoseph
12-07-2007 1:52 AM


IamJoseph writes:
quote:
Please try to write one sentence in plain English.
Those are the rules of Grammar. If you check, this faculty reaches its epitomy here, namely in the OT texts. The OT writings are contextual, which must be precedent of chronology in correct grammar.
Clearly, you're well beyond the epitome.
The topic is "Man in God's image". Are you trying to demonstrate that God is a blithering idiot?

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by IamJoseph, posted 12-07-2007 1:52 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by IamJoseph, posted 12-07-2007 1:09 PM ringo has replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 59 of 82 (439135)
12-07-2007 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by ringo
12-07-2007 11:35 AM


quote:
Clearly, you're well beyond the epitome.
The topic is "Man in God's image". Are you trying to demonstrate that God is a blithering idiot?
No. Just to re-state, where you have more than one possible meaning, the most coherent one should be taken. Specially so, when it is affirmed by the text elsewhere which is the correct meaning: there are numerous laws in the OT which clearly dispell any notion of divine personification. Grammar is logic based, and the OT is using valid forms of expressionism, of the most contextual kind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by ringo, posted 12-07-2007 11:35 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by ringo, posted 12-07-2007 1:55 PM IamJoseph has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 60 of 82 (439146)
12-07-2007 1:55 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by IamJoseph
12-07-2007 1:09 PM


IamJoseph writes:
... there are numerous laws in the OT which clearly dispell any notion of divine personification.
Since this is the Bible Study forum, please cite (and preferably quote) those passages.

Disclaimer: The above statement is without a doubt, the most LUDICROUS, IDIOTIC AND PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WILLFUL STUPIDITY, THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN OR HEARD.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by IamJoseph, posted 12-07-2007 1:09 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by IamJoseph, posted 12-07-2007 2:22 PM ringo has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024