Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pat Robertson shows again why the Christian Right is such a laughingstock
Phat
Member
Posts: 18310
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 31 of 232 (236429)
08-24-2005 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Chiroptera
08-24-2005 9:27 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
Of course I start these types of arguments merely to stir up controversy! As a Christian, I would never support Pat Robertson or any political Christians in any degree! What I AM suggesting is that realistically, America is on a downward decline economically and many of the middle and upper middle class conservatives are scared that they are taking the brunt of the economic shift.
As a grocery worker who has toiled for fifteen years to make $16.00 an hour, I shudder at the prospect of wealthy corporate cost cutters combined with consumer demands for a labor force more along the lines of $8.00-$9.00 an hour---hardly a liveable wage.
The blame is of course the wealthy Capitalists on one hand, but it is futile to fight them. They will always have money. Collective anger, consequently, is on the masses of Third world humanity that want a piece of the action.
Chiroptera writes:
Well, South America is not ours, it is the South Americans. The South Americans have first dibs on their natural resources to improve their lives. If we were true capitalists we should be willing to pay a fair price for the use of those natural resources; we have no god given right to such a mind-boggling degree of wealth.
Yes, this is correct. But what does it mean? If the Third World gets to develop all of their stuff, we will soon be a second or third rate economic power that will be wallowing in our debts and struggling to compete with these eager foreigners. (Part of the reason for the current Iraq War!) The typical liberal response is that we need to use our educational system and remain competitive that way. Many of us are too busy and/or too reluctant to go back to school. We want our uneducated blue collar jobs to remain at high standards...not lost to hungry and eager third world workers.
Yes...what WOULD Jesus do? He would tell us that life does not consist of the things that one possesses. Right Wing American "Christians" are a spoiled and pampered bunch. They will never take the prospect of a diminishing economy as anything that Jesus ever mean't to happen to us...the center of His benevolance!! Like Chris Porteus says, a revolution is coming...and it won't be pretty to the conservatives. The liberals will survive it because they are more open to socialist solutions aimed at the wealthy eliists....the very group that the conservatives somehow want to protect. I doubt, however, that the people will be able to easily pry the 90% wealth out of the 2% elitists without a total economic collapse. It is easier to just collectively bully the wealth out of the masses....a very unchristian solution that Jesus DOES NOT like!
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 08-24-2005 10:05 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Chiroptera, posted 08-24-2005 9:27 AM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Trump won, posted 08-24-2005 10:28 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 100 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 7:58 AM Phat has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5699 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 32 of 232 (236431)
08-24-2005 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Silent H
08-24-2005 11:33 AM


Re: "Extremist Cleric" revisited
He also suggested someone should put a bomb in the state department
I didn't know he said that. He should be prosecuted for terrorism.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Silent H, posted 08-24-2005 11:33 AM Silent H has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5699 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 33 of 232 (236432)
08-24-2005 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Silent H
08-24-2005 11:30 AM


Re: Let's see why the liberal left is a laughing stock
Don't confuse political statements you don't like with "outrageous" politcial statements.
"dicks not death" is about as outrageous as it gets.
Remind me what patently illegal action they were recommending the US to engage in.
Where did I say they promoting anything illegal?
Of course, what they did is illegal, but we'll give them a pass.
For example I don't think we should leave Iraq at this point. Someone arguing that we should leave immediately would be wrong in my opinion, but not making some "outrageous" comment.
I agree with you and that may indeed be there point, but signs like "dicks not draft" doesn't really articulate anything. They are just using nudity for shock value.
Do you think they are swaying any minds with this? Are they winning in the arena of ideas?

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Silent H, posted 08-24-2005 11:30 AM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Admin, posted 08-24-2005 12:15 PM Tal has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13023
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 34 of 232 (236434)
08-24-2005 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Tal
08-24-2005 12:12 PM


Signature Concerns
Just noticed your signature. It might be a bit over the top. What do you think?

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Tal, posted 08-24-2005 12:12 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Tal, posted 08-24-2005 12:35 PM Admin has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9143
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 35 of 232 (236435)
08-24-2005 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
08-24-2005 2:53 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
is it not in our best national interests to prevent leftist ideology from infringing South America?
Why?
What is wrong with leftist ideology?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 08-24-2005 2:53 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 12:43 PM Theodoric has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 232 (236438)
08-24-2005 12:33 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by berberry
08-24-2005 10:43 AM


I'm appalled at Pat Robertson's latest outrageous remarks
Pat Robertson continues his descent into madness. I wonder if he isn't suffering from some form of mental defect or disease, seriously folks. Talking about assassinating a foreign leader, despite the reason, is at the very least, irresponsible. It goes with saying that such actions if taken by our government would be unlawful and in terms of Christian conduct, sinful. His rhetoric in the past few years, with regard to his comments regarding hurricanes & tsunamis being inflicted by a vengeful God to punish the wicked, are those of a sick mind & leave me bewildered as to why someone within his organization has taken him off the air. I don't know anyone in my circle of "the Christian Community" giving him a pass. We all think he's gone completely mental. None of us agree with his outrageous interpretations of the natural disasters that have befallen our fellow world citizens. Frankly, we think he should take up a new residence, preferably in a padded cell.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by berberry, posted 08-24-2005 10:43 AM berberry has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Faith, posted 08-24-2005 7:53 PM FairWitness has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5699 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 37 of 232 (236439)
08-24-2005 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Admin
08-24-2005 12:15 PM


Re: Signature Concerns
Just noticed your signature. It might be a bit over the top. What do you think?
I will change it.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Admin, posted 08-24-2005 12:15 PM Admin has not replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 232 (236443)
08-24-2005 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Theodoric
08-24-2005 12:16 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
Leftist ideology, as a theory reads like poetry. When practically applied to life, it fails miserably in every country it's been implemented. It robs the human spirit of the will to excel & achieve, it robs the gains of those who work hard & gives those gains to the idle, etc., etc., etc. Bottom line: IT DOES NOT WORK.
However, that being said, there are other ways of defeating Mr. Chavez, that don't involve assassination, which also doesn't work. That is a heinous act for which only evil will follow. The USA cannot engage in such evil & I am appalled at Rev. Robertson for calling for his death. Unacceptable & Mr. Robertson should apologize, retract his statement & then resign in disgrace.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Theodoric, posted 08-24-2005 12:16 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 12:47 PM FairWitness has not replied
 Message 40 by Theodoric, posted 08-24-2005 12:51 PM FairWitness has not replied
 Message 43 by Yaro, posted 08-24-2005 1:05 PM FairWitness has replied
 Message 90 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 1:33 AM FairWitness has not replied
 Message 102 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:02 AM FairWitness has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 232 (236445)
08-24-2005 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by FairWitness
08-24-2005 12:43 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
In calling for this assassination, Rev. Robertson has made himself appear to look no better than all the fanatical mullahs in the Middle East issuing fatwas calling for Jihad against us & our President. Shame on him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 12:43 PM FairWitness has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9143
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 40 of 232 (236447)
08-24-2005 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by FairWitness
08-24-2005 12:43 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
And strict rightist philosphy gets us what?
The Chile of Pinochet? Remember USA had Allende assinated.
Papa Doc in Haiti
Support of Suddam Hussein for years
Need I mention what rightist philosophy has done to africa.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 12:43 PM FairWitness has not replied

Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 41 of 232 (236449)
08-24-2005 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by berberry
08-24-2005 10:43 AM


Another excellent post from you, and again I agree with most of it.
Thanks berb
One thing that gets me about conservative reaction to him is the fact that he gets a pass whenever he works with liberal human rights groups, which he does from time to time. Why isn't that ever used against him? Cindy Sheehan is allied with a number of liberal groups, including human rights groups, and this is taken as a sign that she's nuts.
Well, I think he may get a pass because, after all, as a preacher it is expected for him to be concerned with advocating human rights, its the christian thing to do. So I think when he is involved with those type of orgs, conservatives tend to think of it as a humanitarian cause and not a "liberal" cause.
Now when it comes to Sheehan. The criticism is founded in her far left vitriole. Sure, left leaning orgs like MoveOn.org have supported and promoted her and they have received criticism from the right for it. But those orgs would receive criticism regardless of who they supported, (of course it would rarely be a conservative cause). So in the case of Sheehan, its a two-fold situation. There is her statements which are off the deep end + her affiliations which are far left. Its the combination that has brought on the more critical attacks.
I doubt that the criticism would be as severe if she was a quietly greiving mother supported by left leaning orgs. I'm not saying she should be quiet, I'm just explaining the reaction.
Conservatives never seem to get upset when Pat suggests that god sends hurricanes to punish people who tolerate homosexuality, or that he sends tsunami to punish people who don't worship him properly (or whatever stupid reason he gave for god sending that wave - I've forgotten what it was now).
I don't like statements like that either. I find it distasteful for someone to publicly announce they know why God does or does not do certain things. It feeds the sterotype of righteous Christian superiority. I'm guessing here, but I think that you don't hear a lot of conservative outcry in situations like this mainly because those in the media who lean left do such a fine job of attacking that it hardly seems worthwhile to throw gas on the fire. I might add that the same holds for the left when one of your own is spouting nonesense. The voices of the rightous right are loud enough to drown the concerned objections from the rank and file on the left.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by berberry, posted 08-24-2005 10:43 AM berberry has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:10 AM Monk has not replied

Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 42 of 232 (236450)
08-24-2005 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
08-23-2005 10:16 PM


Retraction?
BTW, I was running some errands a while ago this morning and I heard on the radio a sound bite from Robertson where he said the quote by the AP was incorrect. He said he never advocated assasination, he said Chavez should not be their leader. The implication I got from him is that it's up to the people of Venezeula to do something about it, not the US.
Sugar coating the heat?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 08-23-2005 10:16 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Yaro, posted 08-24-2005 1:32 PM Monk has not replied
 Message 45 by vossy, posted 08-24-2005 1:33 PM Monk has replied
 Message 46 by Zhimbo, posted 08-24-2005 1:34 PM Monk has not replied
 Message 47 by FliesOnly, posted 08-24-2005 1:35 PM Monk has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6518 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 43 of 232 (236451)
08-24-2005 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by FairWitness
08-24-2005 12:43 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
What's wrong with Chavez?
He's popular, the people love him, and they support him. Is it so wrong to have a president that is well regarded/supported by the people?
What buisiness is it of ours what social policy a democratic leader, in another country, want's to implement? A social democracy is hardly "Leftist Ideology", Europe is largely socialist.
ABE: Arg... well, I know socialisim is usualy percived is on the left. But the way folks talk about this guy makes him out to be a total comunist or something.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 08-24-2005 01:16 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 12:43 PM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 7:07 PM Yaro has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6518 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 44 of 232 (236458)
08-24-2005 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Monk
08-24-2005 1:04 PM


Re: Retraction?
Sugar coating the heat?
Ya. I heard the whole segment on the radio, Robertson clearly advocates assasination.
Here is the transcript: 'Christian' Pat Robertson calls for the assassination of Venezuela's President Chavez
In a direct transcript of his August 22 The 700 Club broadcast Robertson clearly says:
There was a popular coup that overthrew him [Chavez]. And what did the United States State Department do about it? Virtually nothing. And as a result, within about 48 hours that coup was broken; Chavez was back in power, but we had a chance to move in. He has destroyed the Venezuelan economy, and he's going to make that a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism all over the continent.
You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it.
It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... and I don't think any oil shipments will stop. But this man is a terrific danger and the United ... this is in our sphere of influence, so we can't let this happen.
We have the Monroe Doctrine, we have other doctrines that we have announced. And without question, this is a dangerous enemy to our south, controlling a huge pool of oil, that could hurt us very badly.
We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability.
We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Monk, posted 08-24-2005 1:04 PM Monk has not replied

vossy
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 232 (236459)
08-24-2005 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Monk
08-24-2005 1:04 PM


Re: Retraction?
Monk writes:
Sugar coating the heat?
A whole bowl-ful of Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs...
"I didn't say 'assassination.' I said our special forces should 'take him out.' And 'take him out' can be a number of things, including kidnapping; there are a number of ways to take out a dictator from power besides killing him. I was misinterpreted by the AP [Associated Press], but that happens all the time," Robertson said on "The 700 Club" program.
He's also lying. Here's what he said yesterday, per CNN:
"If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think we really ought to go ahead and do it," said Robertson on Monday's program. "It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war."
Though, technically, he didn't say "assassination" verbatim
ABE: Crap, late by about 30 seconds. Just when I had something to add to a thread...
This message has been edited by vossy, 08-24-2005 12:35 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Monk, posted 08-24-2005 1:04 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Monk, posted 08-24-2005 2:05 PM vossy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024