|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
teen15m6 Inactive Member |
ok
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
teen15m6 Inactive Member |
if we came from monkeys, how come there r still monkeys running around?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 477 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
quote: For one thing, that supposed footprint have never been confirmed by mainstream science. For all we know, it could be nothing more than a rock that shaped similarly but bigger than the human foot. I have often found rocks that have the same shape as the states. It doesn't mean anything. By the way, science doesn't prove anything. It only present logical and consistent evidence for people to come up with theories. Science *ain't* math or philosophy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
coffee_addict Member (Idle past 477 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
quote: Wanna tell me where you got that totally unscientific information?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
teen15m6 Inactive Member |
lol
i g2g thnks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
i know for a fact that fossilized human footprints were found right next to dinosaur foot prints You don't know that for a fact, because it's not true. The footprint you've seen isn't a human foot. It doesn't even look like a footprint! You're misinformed, I hate to tell you. There are no instances of human and dinosaur co-habitation because dinosaurs died out 65 million years before the dawn of man.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andya Primanda Inactive Member |
if I am my mother's descendant, why is she still running around?
Answer: Derivation of a creature from another does not imply the extinction of its ancestor.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andya Primanda Inactive Member |
quote: Uh-hum. There are quite a few fossils of ancient men... Australopithecus, Homo erectus, Neanderthals...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
Not that hardly anyone's going to see this message, before it gets buried... But for the record I consider this topic to be a babble-fest.
It could go to the "Misc. Topics", or it could go to the "Free For All", but I've going to let it pile up right where it is. Maybe tommorrow I'll get on the hip boots, to check things out. Triumph the Dog would love this topic. Cheers,Adminnemooseus |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rand Al'Thor Inactive Member |
Sounds like a hit and run creo.
*shrug*Maybe he will come back later with a slightly more.... intellectual argument against evolution than the good old monkey existance question. [This message has been edited by Rand Al'Thor, 04-02-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hitchy Member (Idle past 5118 days) Posts: 215 From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh Joined: |
Ok, so who is trying to play the joke?
Anyway, the footprints that were seen as "human" were merely eroded dinosaur footprints and parts of dinosaur prints. The stride was too long to be from a man (or woman). "But these are the giants of old from Genesis"! Ok, so this is the only evidence of these giants? Granted, this was in Texas so maybe all the evidence was burned as a low-energy, high-pollution cheap source of fuel! Interesting...some of the fossilized footprints were actually vandalized. I mean, someone took a chisel and attempted to make some of the footprints look more human!?! I never ceases to amaze me how some christians have no problem breaking one of their commandments (thou shalt not bear false witness) in order to save the others and their religious viewpoints. It is amazing our society has made it this far. I am just waiting for the witch burnings and blood-letting to come back. Anyone else up for a new Inquisition?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1405 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
attempted to make some of the footprints look more human!?! I never ceases to amaze me how some christians have no problem breaking one of their commandments (thou shalt not bear false witness)
This is jumping the gun a bit. My understanding is that a fair bit of (admitted) "improving" of the footprints was done in the (first) depression to lure the gullible tourist and bring money to the {locals not necessarily christian} we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4752 From: u.k Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
teen15m6 Inactive Member |
ok, the neanderthal man turned out to be an old guy wit arthritis, the homo erectus, wich one would that be? the peking man? the piltdown man? the nebraska man? the hieldelberg man? all proven to be fakes, were did i get that we came from monkeys? evolution! u dissagree? what did we evolve from? if u dissagree then u are against the very thing u r defending, and as far as those footprints go they went on for a very long ways, and the stride was too big because the human was too big, u say they r deformed dinosaur footprints? y arent the dinosaur footprints right beside them deformed?
evolution, one thing to another is a fair definition, evolution is when an error occurs in the gene pool, no error could ever occur to cahnge it from one thing to another, mutations are found all over, 2 headed snakes, three legged horses, even in humans, there heads could be joined together, but no matter the error, it will never become anything other than what it allready is, take the new rat they found, can they prove it wasnt there all along? and just what is it that stops it from mating wit other rats? just because it looks diferent, acts diferent, is bigger, is stronger, does not make it a new specie, are blacks a diferent specie from us? they look diferent, they act diferent, because of circumstances, the chinese, were they a new specie when we discovered them? or were we a new specie when they discovered us? no.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17822 Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Neandertals are not all old guys with arthritis.
Homo erectus is represented by a good many specimens including Peking Man. Nebraska Man was a short-lived mistake, not a fake Heidelberg Man is a genuine fossil. Look if you want some real facts why not start here: Fossil Hominids: the evidence for human evolution You've been fed a lot of misinformation
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024