Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,498 Year: 3,755/9,624 Month: 626/974 Week: 239/276 Day: 11/68 Hour: 5/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The bible and homosexuality: Round 3
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 306 (118166)
06-24-2004 4:02 AM


to truthlover
In the earlier thread, truthlover wrote:
quote:
Saying that I had a faulty memory on this subject is accurate, but in my own defense, the reason I didn't remember and the reason I didn't know what you were trying to rebut is that I never intended to assert such a thing, so I didn't realize I had said something that sounded like that.
Wow! I wish we had straightened that out sooner. I had originally intended to explore your idea that Paul meant 'cowardice' when he said 'effeminacy' but we could never get beyond this.
Before I go any further I want to mention that I don't really hold to any consistent view of the bible. I use whatever polemic is available in refuting whatever passage is being discussed. I'm likely to use different arguments to refute the same passage, depending on the requirements of the discussion at hand. I do this because my overall aim is to refute biblical innerancy. That stupid doctrine is at the root of nearly every argument that takes place on these boards. It is also at the root of almost all intolerance.
quote:
I was simply pointing to a pattern, and the thought in my mind for that pattern was mostly Revelations' statement that the cowardly won't enter the holy city. It lists fearfulness first, as a matter of fact (Rev 21:8).
We've gone from 'effeminacy' to 'cowardice' to 'fearfullness'. I don't see these three words as synonyms. Are you basing your opinion on translation issues? If so, I'll grant you may be right because, except for a little Latin, English is the only language I know. However, if this is your basis, can you explain precisely what is being interpreted and why you feel justified in equating 'effeminacy' with 'cowardice'?
quote:
Since you appear to be saying (I hope I'm getting this right this time) that since the writer of Genesis doesn't condemn Lot for his actions, then the Scriptures don't have a pattern of being against cowardice...
Close. I go a little further, though; not only does the writer of Genesis not condemn the blatantly obvious cowardice of Lot, neither does any other passage in scripture, yet in the NT Lot is praised as a just and rightous man. Mind you that this paragon of virtue had not only committed the unconscionable act of offering his virgin daughters to be gang raped, he also got drunk and screwed both of his virgin daughters almost immediately after his wife was struck dead by God for being nosy. How is it that Lot gets to be "just" and "rightous" according to a book that supposedly condemns cowardice? Further, what is it about us homosexuals that makes us so "unjust" and "unrightous"? Who the hell are we hurting? We're not pimps and we don't impregnate young virgin relatives! We're better than Lot, dammit! If God can't see this then what the hell is God worth?
quote:
On the other hand, I'm not in any way sure that's what he meant. The Greek theater in his day, according to several of the early fathers, involved teaching boys to live effeminately and homosexually so they could play women in the plays. I've never researched the truth of that...
Yes it's true, it was common practice in theatre until the 17th century. All of Shakespeare's female roles were played by boys during his lifetime. The boys weren't necessarily taught to live effeminately, though; I think those that were good actors took male roles once they got beyond puberty.
quote:
I don't imagine you'd like our code of morals any better than Paul's, because we believe homosexuality is against God's morals, too...
It's okay to believe that, it's not okay to deny rights to others who may feel differently. So long as your neighbor isn't hurting you, it's none of your business how moral he or she is. You have no right to deny to him or her the same rights and privileges you enjoy under the law.
I hope we can agree on this much.

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Zachariah, posted 07-01-2004 2:15 AM berberry has replied

Zachariah
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 306 (120566)
07-01-2004 2:15 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by berberry
06-24-2004 4:02 AM


Re: to truthlover
if your neighbor isn't hurting you it doesn't matter how moral he or she is...
If my neighbor is not feeding his cats but I don't see it is it still wrong? I am not comparing starving animals to homosexuality. What I am doing is showing you that it is wrong for you to say that in ones house anything goes.
I, Zachariah, understand that you were talking about things that are "legal" but if I view your skinny cat as being what I consider too skinny and call the cops you still have to face up to the accusations. Just because one group says its okay doesn't mean that it is.
If they give homosexuals the right to marry that effects everyone. People that believe it to be wrong won't get a choice anymore. They will HAVE to live with it no matter what. So you say it's okay as long as the gays get treated fairly even though others are being treated unfairly in there view of things. When it is all said and done someone is going to be treated unfairly in there view. If the marriages are legalized throughout then they will have to change the textbooks to show the new families even though they make up 2-4% of the population. Talk about MINORITY RULE. If they took a vote of the entire country I bet over 75 percent of the country would be against it. This is forcing views onto people. At least the "christians" ask you to consider what they have said, not YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE THIS. Some may do that, but not many. If you ask nicely I'll give you some stats about homosexuals and rape. (getting back to the pediphile talk we had going on the other thread.) -Z
This message has been edited by Zachariah, 07-01-2004 01:16 AM
This message has been edited by Zachariah, 07-01-2004 01:22 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by berberry, posted 06-24-2004 4:02 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 07-01-2004 2:22 AM Zachariah has replied
 Message 23 by coffee_addict, posted 07-01-2004 3:08 AM Zachariah has replied
 Message 28 by berberry, posted 07-02-2004 3:49 AM Zachariah has not replied
 Message 201 by nator, posted 11-10-2004 9:47 AM Zachariah has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 18 of 306 (120567)
07-01-2004 2:22 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Zachariah
07-01-2004 2:15 AM


To Zachariah
If your neighbor is not feeding his cats and you do not know it, is it harming the cats?
On the other hand, is that harming you?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Zachariah, posted 07-01-2004 2:15 AM Zachariah has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Zachariah, posted 07-01-2004 2:25 AM jar has replied

Zachariah
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 306 (120568)
07-01-2004 2:25 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by jar
07-01-2004 2:22 AM


Re: To Zachariah
Answering my question with a question is no answer. -Z

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 07-01-2004 2:22 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by jar, posted 07-01-2004 2:45 AM Zachariah has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 20 of 306 (120575)
07-01-2004 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Zachariah
07-01-2004 2:25 AM


Re: To Zachariah
It is a path.
Please give it a try?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Zachariah, posted 07-01-2004 2:25 AM Zachariah has not replied

custard
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 306 (120581)
07-01-2004 3:00 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by jar
06-23-2004 2:56 PM


Re: You pays your nickle and takes your pick.
9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God?
Actually, I didn't know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 06-23-2004 2:56 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 07-01-2004 3:03 AM custard has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 22 of 306 (120582)
07-01-2004 3:03 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by custard
07-01-2004 3:00 AM


Re: You pays your nickle and takes your pick.
Actually, I didn't know.
Wasn't that a Jimi Hendrix song?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by custard, posted 07-01-2004 3:00 AM custard has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 499 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 23 of 306 (120585)
07-01-2004 3:08 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Zachariah
07-01-2004 2:15 AM


Re: to truthlover
What the fugue does that have to do with the bible and homosexuality? If you don't have anything from the bible to justify your prejudice, shut the heaven up.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Zachariah, posted 07-01-2004 2:15 AM Zachariah has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Zachariah, posted 07-03-2004 1:42 PM coffee_addict has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 499 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 24 of 306 (120921)
07-01-2004 5:50 PM


Bump
Be warned fundies, I am giving this thread another day or so and then I will draw a conclusion from this thread, round 2, and round 1. Basically, not a single fundi have presented something from the bible that definitively condemns homosexuality. I am very close to drawing the conclusion that you people don't know what the hell you're talking about everytime you say "god condemns homosexuality".
After the conclusion is drawn, you can challenge it if you want. If not, I don't ever want to hear a "god condemns homosexuality" in any anti-gay comment ever again. If you object to this, you can kiss my gay arse.

The Laminator

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by arachnophilia, posted 07-01-2004 10:21 PM coffee_addict has not replied

MexicanHotChocolate
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 306 (120922)
07-01-2004 5:51 PM


i think the word homosexual in the mentioned passage is an incorrect translation since the concept of a homosexual didn't exist until the 1800s and the development of psychoanalysis. the bible seems fairly neutral on what we would consider consentual homosexual relationships.

Our loyalties are to the species and the planet. We speak for Earth. Our obligation to survive is owed not just to ourselves but also to that Cosmos, ancient and vast, from which we spring.
--Carl Sagan, 1934-1996

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by arachnophilia, posted 07-01-2004 10:19 PM MexicanHotChocolate has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 26 of 306 (121015)
07-01-2004 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by MexicanHotChocolate
07-01-2004 5:51 PM


eh, sort of. homosexual relationships certainly existed long before that, but they tended to be of a very different sort.
anywho, here's some info on the word paul uses: http://www.geocities.com/pharsea/Greeks.html
although, i am find with him intending the word to mean homosexuals. paul is a woman and jew-hating bastard anyways, and i tend to ignore what he says because of this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by MexicanHotChocolate, posted 07-01-2004 5:51 PM MexicanHotChocolate has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1366 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 27 of 306 (121019)
07-01-2004 10:21 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by coffee_addict
07-01-2004 5:50 PM


Re: Bump
Be warned fundies, I am giving this thread another day or so and then I will draw a conclusion from this thread, round 2, and round 1. Basically, not a single fundi have presented something from the bible that definitively condemns homosexuality. I am very close to drawing the conclusion that you people don't know what the hell you're talking about everytime you say "god condemns homosexuality".
i haven't been paying attention. they covered the leviticus verse, right?
did anyone point out that god condemns red lobster too? http://godhatesshrimp.com/

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by coffee_addict, posted 07-01-2004 5:50 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-02-2004 1:40 PM arachnophilia has not replied

berberry
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 306 (121104)
07-02-2004 3:49 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Zachariah
07-01-2004 2:15 AM


Re: to truthlover
Zachariah writes:
quote:
If my neighbor is not feeding his cats but I don't see it is it still wrong?
Of course it's still wrong; you're quibbling. Perhaps I should have said "so long as your neighbor isn't hurting you or anyone else, including pets and other animals and plants". Would that have been clearer for you?
You're deliberately missing the point: so long as your neighbor is not infringing on your rights or anyone else's rights, you have no right to infringe on his or hers.
quote:
If they give homosexuals the right to marry that effects everyone.
No it doesn't. The lives of heterosexuals will not be changed in any way. How are the marriages of heterosexuals endangered by the prospect of gay marriage? Are you scared that you might be seduced by a man if gay marriage is legalized? Do you feel that a law preventing you from marrying a member of your own sex is the only thing sustaining your manhood?
If you'll take a look at your arguments, you'll find that they are purely ad hominem. This begs the question: why do you get so emotional when the topic of homosexuality is raised? Is this a very personal subject for you?
quote:
People that believe it to be wrong won't get a choice anymore.
What? This is senseless. What "choice"? "People who believe it to be wrong" don't have to do anything they feel is wrong and they will continue to not have to do anything they feel is wrong if gay marriage is legalized. They can continue to "choose" to live their lives as heterosexuals for as long as they wish, right up until the day they die even. Where's the problem?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Zachariah, posted 07-01-2004 2:15 AM Zachariah has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 29 of 306 (121147)
07-02-2004 7:32 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by coffee_addict
06-22-2004 7:21 PM


Message 190 of 276
05-29-2004 07:40 PM
Re: Still looking for specifics.
Yes, I like this verse.
But for Adam [8] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs [9] and closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib [10] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said,
"This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called 'woman, [11] '
for she was taken out of man."
24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
This cleary shows Gods intention for man to be with woman, and be united as one.
Even though at the begining of this thread, it was said not to mention
Leviticus, that scripture pretty much sums it up. I see no need for any others.
But here is some more,
Judges
20 "You are welcome at my house," the old man said. "Let me supply whatever you need. Only don't spend the night in the square." 21 So he took him into his house and fed his donkeys. After they had washed their feet, they had something to eat and drink.
22 While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, "Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him."
23 The owner of the house went outside and said to them, "No, my friends, don't be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don't do this disgraceful thing. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But to this man, don't do such a disgraceful thing."
Disgraceful and vile.
We won't mention how many times the New testament mentions not to be sexually immoral.
That would include man with man, and woman with woman according to the OT by which the New testament was based on.
Romans
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
Thou shall not commit adultry.
Since man and woman were created to be as one, adultry could only be if man left woman, or woman left man.
Webster defines adultry as:
Main Entry: adultery
Pronunciation: &-'d&l-t(&-)rE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -teries
Etymology: Middle English, alteration of avoutrie, from Middle French, from Latin adulterium, from adulter adulterer, back-formation from adulterare
: voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or between a married woman and someone other than her husband; also : an act of adultery
Jude 1:7
In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
We all know what happened there.
1 Corinthians 6
8Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers.
9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
I am by no means a bible expert, but this is what I came up with. I would have to conclude that it is against God according to the bible.
I already gave that explaination.
I can't help it if you don't read your own threads.
And here are some more exapmles of the bible speaking against sexual immorality. I already proved that it is sexually immoral to be gay.
Numbers 25:1
While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women,
(Whole Chapter: Numbers 25 In context: Numbers 25:1-2)
Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander.
(Whole Chapter: Matthew 15 In context: Matthew 15:18-20)
Mark 7:21
For from within, out of men's hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery,
(Whole Chapter: Mark 7 In context: Mark 7:20-22)
Acts 15:20
Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood.
(Whole Chapter: Acts 15 In context: Acts 15:19-21)
Acts 15:29
You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things. Farewell.
(Whole Chapter: Acts 15 In context: Acts 15:28-30)
Acts 21:25
As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality."
(Whole Chapter: Acts 21 In context: Acts 21:24-26)
Romans 13:13
Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy.
(Whole Chapter: Romans 13 In context: Romans 13:12-14)
1 Corinthians 5:1
It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father's wife.
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 5 In context: 1 Corinthians 5:1-2)
1 Corinthians 5:9
I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people—
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 5 In context: 1 Corinthians 5:8-10)
1 Corinthians 5:11
But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 5 In context: 1 Corinthians 5:10-12)
1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 6 In context: 1 Corinthians 6:8-10)
1 Corinthians 6:12
"Everything is permissible for me"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"—but I will not be mastered by anything.
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 6 In context: 1 Corinthians 6:11-13)
1 Corinthians 6:13
"Food for the stomach and the stomach for food"—but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 6 In context: 1 Corinthians 6:12-14)
1 Corinthians 6:18
Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 6 In context: 1 Corinthians 6:17-19)
1 Corinthians 10:8
We should not commit sexual immorality, as some of them did—and in one day twentythree thousand of them died.
(Whole Chapter: 1 Corinthians 10 In context: 1 Corinthians 10:7-9)
Galatians 5:19
The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery;
(Whole Chapter: Galatians 5 In context: Galatians 5:18-20)
Ephesians 5:3
But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people.
(Whole Chapter: Ephesians 5 In context: Ephesians 5:2-4)
Colossians 3:5
Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.
(Whole Chapter: Colossians 3 In context: Colossians 3:4-6)
1 Thessalonians 4:3
It is God's will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality;
(Whole Chapter: 1 Thessalonians 4 In context: 1 Thessalonians 4:2-4)
Hebrews 12:16
See that no one is sexually immoral, or is godless like Esau, who for a single meal sold his inheritance rights as the oldest son.
(Whole Chapter: Hebrews 12 In context: Hebrews 12:15-17)
Hebrews 13:4
Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.
(Whole Chapter: Hebrews 13 In context: Hebrews 13:3-5)
Jude 1:7
In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
(Whole Chapter: Jude 1 In context: Jude 1:6-8)
Revelation 2:14
Nevertheless, I have a few things against you: You have people there who hold to the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to entice the Israelites to sin by eating food sacrificed to idols and by committing sexual immorality.
(Whole Chapter: Revelation 2 In context: Revelation 2:13-15)
Revelation 2:20
Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols.
(Whole Chapter: Revelation 2 In context: Revelation 2:19-21)
Revelation 9:21
Nor did they repent of their murders, their magic arts, their sexual immorality or their thefts.
(Whole Chapter: Revelation 9 In context: Revelation 9:20-22)
What more do you want?
If it says in the law books that it is illegal to go through a stop sign without stopping only once, is it in fact illegal to go through a stop sign without stopping?
Why would you need anything more than leviticus to tell you its against God to be gay. Its not what he created us for period.
As a matter of fact, I am going to propse a new topic. I want one good reason why I should accept being gay as ok.
*Disclaimer for the under privelaged, I do not hate gay people, I only do not agree with the act of being gay.*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by coffee_addict, posted 06-22-2004 7:21 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by coffee_addict, posted 07-02-2004 12:27 PM riVeRraT has replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 499 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 30 of 306 (121197)
07-02-2004 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by riVeRraT
07-02-2004 7:32 AM


the rat writes:
24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
This cleary shows Gods intention for man to be with woman, and be united as one.
What does this have anything to do with homosexuality? This is like pointing out passages mentioning horses and chariots and say that god doesn't want people to use cars.
Even though at the begining of this thread, it was said not to mention
Leviticus, that scripture pretty much sums it up. I see no need for any others.
We already showed you why leviticus can't be taken seriously. If you want to give us an explanation to why you want to use leviticus and not be out there burning people to death, I am all eyes.
Judges
20 "You are welcome at my house," the old man said. "Let me supply whatever you need. Only don't spend the night in the square." 21 So he took him into his house and fed his donkeys. After they had washed their feet, they had something to eat and drink.
22 While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, "Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him."
23 The owner of the house went outside and said to them, "No, my friends, don't be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don't do this disgraceful thing. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But to this man, don't do such a disgraceful thing."
Ever occurred to you that this could be interpreted as the men of the city wanting to humiliate the stranger? In the old days, to humiliate your enemies, regardless if they are men or women, people used a kind of rape to humiliate them.
We won't mention how many times the New testament mentions not to be sexually immoral.
That would include man with man, and woman with woman according to the OT by which the New testament was based on.
How is this not picking and choosing what you want to hear? There are plenty of things in the old testament that tells you to go out and burn the wicked and all that crap, why aren't you out there doing any of these things?
Romans
Refer to Message 6 and Message 10 for all your needs.
Thou shall not commit adultry.
Since man and woman were created to be as one, adultry could only be if man left woman, or woman left man.
What the hell does adultery have anything to do with homosexuality?
Jude 1:7
In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
We all know what happened there.
No, we don't. The bible says sexual immorality but it doesn't specifically say what.
I am by no means a bible expert, but this is what I came up with. I would have to conclude that it is against God according to the bible.
The reason I ignored this post before was because we already covered all of this. You never bothered to read other posts on this so I felt justified to ignore yours.
And here are some more exapmles of the bible speaking against sexual immorality. I already proved that it is sexually immoral to be gay.
Um, no, you haven't proven anything. Try to stay on topic, please. We are talking about homosexuality and somehow you are pointing out adultery. Can you keep a coherent thought for once?
Numbers 25:1
While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women,
(Whole Chapter: Numbers 25 In context: Numbers 25:1-2)
Hahahahahahahaha. So, being hetero is immoral after all.
Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander.
(Whole Chapter: Matthew 15 In context: Matthew 15:18-20)
Nothing there that indicates homosexuality.
And so on and so forth...
You haven't given anything that can't be explained or interpreted to mean other things. Keep trying, though.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by riVeRraT, posted 07-02-2004 7:32 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by riVeRraT, posted 07-02-2004 11:39 PM coffee_addict has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024