Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who Are The Xians? What Is Xmas?
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 91 of 301 (266628)
12-07-2005 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by Buzsaw
12-07-2005 10:53 PM


randman v. buzsaw
*gets the popcorn*
this should be interesting.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Buzsaw, posted 12-07-2005 10:53 PM Buzsaw has not replied

MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6375 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 92 of 301 (266633)
12-07-2005 11:17 PM


Historical usage - anybody near a decent library?
Google thows up numerous sites that state that the Oxford English Dictionary says that using 'Xian' or 'Xtian' for Christian dates back to at least the 1600s (and the 1500s for 'Xmas').
I don't have a complete OED - or the shelf space to store all 20 volumes! - and my poor health precludes me going to a library myself.
However if anybody here can get to a library with a complete OED then maybe they at least tell buz that Xmas and Xian have been around for at least 4 or 500 years.
Or maybe they will find that all those web sites are lying after all

I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by nwr, posted 12-07-2005 11:49 PM MangyTiger has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3949 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 93 of 301 (266641)
12-07-2005 11:33 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Buzsaw
12-07-2005 9:30 PM


Re: still doesn't make sense.
oh horsefucking X.
really buz. lay off the eggnog. you're making me wanna spork myself in the eye. for real.
i was raised in a presbyterian church. my mother was raised in a presbyterian church. my father was raised in a baptist church. my grandparents... well i dunno which churches they went to, but half of my family is scottish so chances are....
now maybe since i'm scottish, i'm biased towards the X. but. i've known from early childhood that the fishy sign was adopted by the early church because it was close enough to the X to be significant to those who knew, but far away enough that those who didn't wouldn't kill them for quickly drawing it in the sand with a toe and then erasing it just as easily. it came from when christians were not so popular.
i have always known that the X was a reference to christ. and you are being ignorant and blasting the rest of us with your idiocy. i'm not you and neither are the rest of us. (shall we have a poll mods?)
however, i have never liked the look of the abbreviation and i don't like the way people use it. it always feels to me like they're brushing me aside as quickly as they pass over the one word that makes me different from everyone else out there.
buz. relax. really. if nothing else, remember this.
there are two ways to bring light into the world. one is to create it, and one is to reflect it. you're doing neither. think a moment. what are you reflecting when you do this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Buzsaw, posted 12-07-2005 9:30 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by joshua221, posted 12-08-2005 10:24 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 94 of 301 (266653)
12-07-2005 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by MangyTiger
12-07-2005 11:17 PM


Re: Historical usage - anybody near a decent library?
Google thows up numerous sites that state that the Oxford English Dictionary says that using 'Xian' or 'Xtian' for Christian dates back to at least the 1600s (and the 1500s for 'Xmas').
I'm not seeing an entry for "Xian" nor for "Xtian". But there are entries for Xmas. Oldest is from 1551 in E. Lodge "Illustrated British History.
Hmm, under "X" (meaning 6), it give roughly what many have discussed above (short for Christ). Oldest reference is 1100. Spellings were a bit different at that time. With a recent spelling, I see a 1634 reference for "Xtianity", 1685 reference for "Xstened".
I don't have shelf space for 20 volumes either. I have the 2-volume set. That's the one where you need a microscope to read it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by MangyTiger, posted 12-07-2005 11:17 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by arachnophilia, posted 12-07-2005 11:58 PM nwr has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 95 of 301 (266664)
12-07-2005 11:58 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by nwr
12-07-2005 11:49 PM


Re: Historical usage - anybody near a decent library?
keep in mind that that's just english, not the oldest usage in any language.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by nwr, posted 12-07-2005 11:49 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by nwr, posted 12-08-2005 12:04 AM arachnophilia has not replied
 Message 98 by MangyTiger, posted 12-08-2005 12:21 AM arachnophilia has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 96 of 301 (266667)
12-08-2005 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by arachnophilia
12-07-2005 11:58 PM


Re: Historical usage - anybody near a decent library?
keep in mind that that's just english, not the oldest usage in any language.
Of course. But buzsaw didn't respect examples in other languages.
He probably won't be impressed with the English examples either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by arachnophilia, posted 12-07-2005 11:58 PM arachnophilia has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 97 of 301 (266673)
12-08-2005 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by Buzsaw
12-07-2005 10:53 PM


Re: maybe a little sensitive
Buzzsaw, some years back in the 80s I thought the same thing as this trend was just getting started as it coincided with the whole Happy Holidays thing, but when I talked with some people back then about it, they pointed out that the X had Christian roots. You know that you and I agree on a whole lot on this forum, and I am basically on your side in despising the whole secularization of Christmas, but that was my experience nonetheless.
I think the tone of many on the other side here at the forum is offensive, and certainly some of the posts in this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Buzsaw, posted 12-07-2005 10:53 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by arachnophilia, posted 12-08-2005 12:31 AM randman has not replied

MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6375 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 98 of 301 (266679)
12-08-2005 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by arachnophilia
12-07-2005 11:58 PM


Re: Historical usage - anybody near a decent library?
It may only be English but that's what buzsaw was complaining about remember!
So now we have historic references indicating X being used as a shorthand for Christ over 300 years ago and not in a disrespectful way (the 1600s was a time when you really didn't want to casually cause religious offence).
Surely now that's the end of the issue?
Thanks to nwr for the info by the way.

I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by arachnophilia, posted 12-07-2005 11:58 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by arachnophilia, posted 12-08-2005 12:32 AM MangyTiger has not replied
 Message 110 by Omnivorous, posted 12-08-2005 11:13 PM MangyTiger has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 99 of 301 (266682)
12-08-2005 12:31 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by randman
12-08-2005 12:12 AM


Re: maybe a little sensitive
and I am basically on your side in despising the whole secularization of Christmas
i'm actually on your side, here. i kind of wish the overriding pagan traditions (trees, a date in december, etc) weren't so ingrained. maybe we should just let go of christmas as an overly pagan holiday, and hold a small respectful service in april to really celebrate the birth of our lord and saviour.
I think the tone of many on the other side here at the forum is offensive, and certainly some of the posts in this thread.
mine, i'm sure. you like taking offense at my posts and i like getting frustrated at yours. but you're kind of hitting the nail on the head here and not realizing it: it IS about tone. anything can be said in an offensive tone, including "Xian."

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by randman, posted 12-08-2005 12:12 AM randman has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 100 of 301 (266684)
12-08-2005 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by MangyTiger
12-08-2005 12:21 AM


Re: Historical usage - anybody near a decent library?
It may only be English but that's what buzsaw was complaining about remember!
yeah, i know. that was more of a note for buz to see, actually, noting that the non-english tradition goes back even further.
Surely now that's the end of the issue?
yeah, right. the oed lies, i tell you! it's part of an evilushunist plot!

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by MangyTiger, posted 12-08-2005 12:21 AM MangyTiger has not replied

Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 101 of 301 (266685)
12-08-2005 1:01 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Buzsaw
12-06-2005 11:24 PM


Examples
Here are two excerpts from separate 18th Century works:
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~funkaloyd/files/1.gif
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~funkaloyd/files/2.gif
Excuse the large size; I wanted to make them nice and clear.
The first is from The Art of Reading and Writing English, written by one Isaac Watts in 1753. The second is a from an appendix of a collection of sermons, compiled by Sampson Letsome, also in 1753.
It should be clear from these examples that "Xian" and "Xmas" are but abbreviations, with no offensive connotations other than those which you yourself insert. The abbreviation may not have English roots, but so what? "Etc." doesn't either.
Now, on another note, when your eyes crossed "18th Century" above, did you read it as "eighteenth century" or "one eighth century"? The former, no doubt. If somebody were to read it as "one eighth century", whose fault would that be; where would the mistake lie?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2005 11:24 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 772 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 102 of 301 (266970)
12-08-2005 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Buzsaw
12-06-2005 11:24 PM


Donno if this has already been said yet, but...
You could even make the case that Xmas is more holy than Christmas...
The abbreviation of a name was a sign of great reverence and respect.
The Hebrews abbreviated the name of God. Likewise, early Christians abbreviated Christ with the Greek letter X as a sign of reverence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2005 11:24 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by crashfrog, posted 12-08-2005 7:17 PM Hangdawg13 has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 103 of 301 (266974)
12-08-2005 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Hangdawg13
12-08-2005 7:13 PM


Hangdog, why do you hate Christ and Christians so much?!!?!?!?!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Hangdawg13, posted 12-08-2005 7:13 PM Hangdawg13 has not replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 104 of 301 (267028)
12-08-2005 10:22 PM


X is a letter in the English alphabet, stop trying to be cool using greek to say Christians. Christians don't like it, including me. It's just lazy, and stupid, ugly, and lame. So whatever, noone can stop you, but everytime you use it you look dumb.
(Oh but, its the opposite really, prophex, you see it shows you know Christian History... Predicted.)
In English, it has a negative connotation for some reason to see Xmas, or Xians, instead of Christians, noone understands the greek language in America, so stop trying to use terms not to get a point across, but to rather annoy, and feel more intelligent. It's not working...
I think it annoyed buz so much that he started a thread about it. I don't blame him. Call us ignorant and stoopid for not enjoying the cleverness in it, but it doesn't change the fact that we are speaking english.

these walls are paper thin
and everyone hears every little sound.

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Asgara, posted 12-08-2005 10:27 PM joshua221 has replied
 Message 133 by nator, posted 12-09-2005 6:41 AM joshua221 has replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 105 of 301 (267029)
12-08-2005 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by macaroniandcheese
12-07-2005 11:33 PM


Re: still doesn't make sense.
quote:
there are two ways to bring light into the world. one is to create it, and one is to reflect it. you're doing neither. think a moment. what are you reflecting when you do this?
Niether are you. Frankly it seems like you joined the masses of evc opinion to hate on buz here.

these walls are paper thin
and everyone hears every little sound.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-07-2005 11:33 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-08-2005 11:33 PM joshua221 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024