Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How Bad is Fast Food?
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 46 of 66 (226112)
07-25-2005 4:47 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by lfen
07-22-2005 2:11 PM


Athletes aren't noted for their long lifespans.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by lfen, posted 07-22-2005 2:11 PM lfen has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 47 of 66 (226142)
07-25-2005 8:57 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by lfen
07-22-2005 2:11 PM


quote:
Pumping harder doesn't lead to heart attacks it's leads to a stronger heart. Consider athletes.
Doesn't that depend upon why the heart is pumping harder?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by lfen, posted 07-22-2005 2:11 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by lfen, posted 07-25-2005 12:23 PM nator has replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4705 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 48 of 66 (226223)
07-25-2005 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by nator
07-25-2005 8:57 AM


for Mr. Jack and Schraf about the heart
Well, yes, but the heart is a muscle and a healthy heart if it has to work a little harder develops like any other muscle.
Working harder does that mean high blood pressure? high pulse rate? Is there a correlation between those things and height? I'm not saying Mr. Jack is wrong but on the face of it his reason doesn't seem adequate to me, which is why I'm asking for a study. Can it be shown that there is a correlation between survival and heigth? I know studies show this for weight. And if there is a correlation does it implicate some sort of heart malfunction?
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by nator, posted 07-25-2005 8:57 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nator, posted 07-26-2005 7:49 AM lfen has replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 66 (226331)
07-25-2005 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Parasomnium
07-20-2005 10:18 AM


Re: Eggs.
As I understand it, margarin (trans-fat) is the worse thing to fry with or to use as a topping...olive oil is, IIRC, quite good for the body -- cholesterol-wise.
But I think I have read that it is the heating of oils that makes them bad for you -- IOW, frying/sauteing = bad for you (especially deep-frying).
(ABE: but after reading a few more of your posts...I doubt that the olive oil vs margarin debate is news to you)
Real butter (sweet cream)...especially whipped-and-unsalted...I can just eat it right by itself.
--Jason
This message has been edited by TheLiteralist, 07-25-2005 10:36 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Parasomnium, posted 07-20-2005 10:18 AM Parasomnium has not replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 66 (226332)
07-25-2005 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by JustinC
07-20-2005 2:52 AM


fast foods = chemicals & processed
I work at a fast food restaurant. This does not make me an expert in the contents of our foods, though.
But other reading prior to my working there gives me a little insight.
At least one of our foods -- breakfast sausage patties -- contain MSG. MSG is extremely unhealthy and can have ill effects on you no matter whether you work out or eat fruits and vegetables.
You should try to read/study about the benefits of eating organic foods. Refined foods (white sugar/white flour) are devoid of nutrition.
White flour -- before the "eight essential" vitamins added back (in meager amounts, I might add) -- was responsible for causing rampant birth defects (due to the utter lack of one of the B vitamins). The FDA requires the B vitamin be added back...this stops a horrible consequence (birth defects), but adding a few vitamins back to prevent the most horrible of consequences is really stupid.
(NOTE--it's stupid in that it is still sold to us...it's so horrible that they had to mitigate the very worst of the consequences...what other not-so-noticeable ill health effects does white flour plague our society with...and realize that white flour products usually advertise the adding-back (a small percentage of the nutrition that was stripped from the grain during processing) as a major health benefit......"FORTIFIED WITH EIGHT ESSENTIAL VITAMINS"...oh, good, now at least we won't give birth to deformed children when we eat your wretched products...how thoughtful and considerate of you)
Whole wheat (esp. organically grown) is a nutrition power house. As is brown rice (organically grown). Natural, unprocessed foods are very nutritious.
If you can (it's hard...esp. if you WORK at a fast food restaurant), cut the fast food out as much as possible...especially the sugary sodas. Frozen TV dinners are worse than fast food. Drink lots of water. I would take it easy on the sports drinks.
--Jason
This message has been edited by TheLiteralist, 07-25-2005 10:19 PM
This message has been edited by TheLiteralist, 07-25-2005 10:25 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JustinC, posted 07-20-2005 2:52 AM JustinC has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by nator, posted 07-26-2005 8:07 AM TheLiteralist has replied
 Message 56 by Dr Jack, posted 07-26-2005 8:24 AM TheLiteralist has replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 66 (226333)
07-25-2005 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Parasomnium
07-21-2005 9:43 AM


Re: Eggs.
Bet them are tasty eggs, too. From the ages of about 9 to 14, my family lived in a rural area and we raised rabbits (not for eggs, mind you) and chickens (for eggs and meat). Home-grown egg yolks have a much richer color and flavor than the store bought white ones.
I never became so familiar with our chickens that I could know which hen laid which egg by egg-shape, though...and ours were kept in a coop. Our ducks were "free-range" though because they could fly.
I have been wanting to try some "free-range" beef...but haven't gotten around to it...the stores that sell such things not being as convenient and ubiquitous as the wal-marts and winn-dixies.
--Jason

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Parasomnium, posted 07-21-2005 9:43 AM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Parasomnium, posted 07-26-2005 2:39 AM TheLiteralist has not replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 66 (226334)
07-25-2005 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by JustinC
07-20-2005 2:52 AM


White Flour
Here's a good article about the horrors of white flour:
http://www.newstarget.com/000976.html
--Jason

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JustinC, posted 07-20-2005 2:52 AM JustinC has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 53 of 66 (226360)
07-26-2005 2:39 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by TheLiteralist
07-25-2005 10:34 PM


Re: Eggs.
TheLiteralist writes:
Bet them are tasty eggs, too. [...] Home-grown egg yolks have a much richer color and flavor than the store bought white ones.
I can certainly confirm this. Everyone who tastes my eggs, says they taste better.
TheLiteralist writes:
I never became so familiar with our chickens that I could know which hen laid which egg by egg-shape, though...and ours were kept in a coop.
Well, I've only got three egg-laying chickens so far, so it isn't such a terribly difficult task. One advantage of knowing which hen laid which egg is that if you miss an egg, you know which chicken hasn't laid. It might be that it is laying its eggs somewhere else in the garden, and this way you know which one to keep an eye on.
TheLiteralist writes:
Our ducks were "free-range" though because they could fly.
Our chickens can fly too - though not terribly well. But I guess that for them home is where those two people with the chicken feed are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-25-2005 10:34 PM TheLiteralist has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 54 of 66 (226417)
07-26-2005 7:49 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by lfen
07-25-2005 12:23 PM


Re: for Mr. Jack and Schraf about the heart
Well, I've found the following study results. Let me know if you want to see the links to the abstracts.
Short stature is associated with coronary heart disease in men.
Tall people of a given BMI get more cancer than short people in general.
And this:
Why is height related to risk of disease? This question seems to have been given little attention or study. There is some indication that taller men have lower general coronary risk factors such as blood pressure and cholesterol. Height of course is strongly related to weight, and weight via the BMI is recognized as an important risk factor for both heart diseases and cancer. But a taller person of a given BMI has heavier body that does a shorter person and enjoys a bit lower - and not higher - risk of cardiovascular disease. A taller person requires a larger energy load on the heart to pump blood though the body when standing, and this should produce a modestly more cardiofit heart and cardiovascular system.
The larger body mass of the taller person may contribute further to the increased risk of cancer, similar to that produced by weight at a given height via the BMI.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by lfen, posted 07-25-2005 12:23 PM lfen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by lfen, posted 07-26-2005 12:07 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 55 of 66 (226418)
07-26-2005 8:07 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by TheLiteralist
07-25-2005 10:18 PM


Re: fast foods = chemicals & processed
quote:
At least one of our foods -- breakfast sausage patties -- contain MSG. MSG is extremely unhealthy and can have ill effects on you no matter whether you work out or eat fruits and vegetables.
Monosodium Glutamate is a substance that has received a lot of negative press in recent years. There may be a small percentage of the population who reacts badly to it, but it is not at all the big bad monster everyone thinks it is. Most people who say they're allergic do not show any reaction when fed the stuff in controlled experimental conditions.
To paraprase food writer Jeffery Steingarten, "If it was so terrible for people, why doesn't everyone in China (where added MSG is liberally used in everything) have a headache all the time?"
Did you know that MSG is produced naturally in many foods? For example, Parmesan cheese is loaded with it. So I guess we can ask why northern Italians don't all have headaches?
Here's a good short essay which provides the facts. I've pasted a couple of exerpts:
link
Here’s something you may not have realized: the menu postscript NO MSG is really a shorthand for WE INAPPROPRIATELY SEASON OUR FOOD TO CATER TO THE BASELESS PHOBIAS OF SKITTISH WESTERNERS.
The smug little boast also happens to be a lie. The menu postscript should read NO ADDED MSG, because so many foods are naturally loaded with the substance. Delicious foods in particular, such as parmesan cheese. Reportedly the average Italian takeout meal has more MSG than a typical dish in a Chinese restaurant.
I understand that the term monosodium glutamate sounds scary. Table salt would sound scary too if we insisted on calling it monosodium chlorinate. Trust me that you wouldn’t want to eat at a restaurant advertising NO NaCl.
MSG mostly comes from plants, although it is also found in animal products (including human breast milk, surely not a poisonous substance). It isn’t a byproduct of a sinister laboratory process or nuclear fission. Usually it is distilled from molasses. Glutamate is just an amino acid. Sodium is, well, sodium.
But what about the infamous Chinese Restaurant Syndrome? It’s a myth. Most people who think they have an allergy to MSG show no reaction to the chemical in controlled studies.
One can plausibly argue that MSG is actually good for you, because it takes the place of more harmful food additives. As one of the anti-MSG web sites says, More than just a seasoning, MSG is a flavor enhancer. This means it intensifies the existing taste of something rather than altering it. This is a role normally played by salt and fat.
A very small percentage of the population may have real MSG allergies. You don’t belong to that percentage of the population. How do I know? Unless you’ve been struggling for years with mysterious headaches, stomach problems, chest pains, and burning sensations in your limbs, you have nothing to be worried about. So load up the MSG.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 07-26-2005 08:10 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-25-2005 10:18 PM TheLiteralist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-26-2005 8:46 AM nator has replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 56 of 66 (226421)
07-26-2005 8:24 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by TheLiteralist
07-25-2005 10:18 PM


A Rant
ALL food is made from chemicals. All of it. Every last effin' little bit. Will people PLEASE stop talking about chemicals as if they were something evil and bad!
... and breath...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-25-2005 10:18 PM TheLiteralist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-26-2005 8:57 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 66 (226423)
07-26-2005 8:46 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by nator
07-26-2005 8:07 AM


Re: fast foods = chemicals & processed
Well, monosodium chlorinate (table salt) should be used only in moderation, or so I've heard.
The MSG is not naturally occuring in our sausage patties because it is listed as an ingredient in addition to the sausage itself.
"Load up on the MSG?"
There is a sodium/potassium balance to be maintained, I thought. Adding sodium to the diet with all abandon might not be the most adviseable thing, but in processed foods sodium is ubiquitous -- in various forms (mostly salt and MSG).
--Jason

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by nator, posted 07-26-2005 8:07 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 07-26-2005 9:19 AM TheLiteralist has replied
 Message 63 by MangyTiger, posted 07-26-2005 9:10 PM TheLiteralist has replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 66 (226426)
07-26-2005 8:57 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Dr Jack
07-26-2005 8:24 AM


chemicals
Well, forgive my poor word choice, then.
But not all chemicals are equally good for human consumption.
--Jason

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Dr Jack, posted 07-26-2005 8:24 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 59 of 66 (226428)
07-26-2005 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by TheLiteralist
07-26-2005 8:46 AM


Re: fast foods = chemicals & processed
quote:
Well, monosodium chlorinate (table salt) should be used only in moderation, or so I've heard.
Sure.
Too much of any one thing is not good.
The point is, though, that MSG in specific is not the nutritional boogeyman that people think it is.
quote:
The MSG is not naturally occuring in our sausage patties because it is listed as an ingredient in addition to the sausage itself.
Yeah, but so what?
What if they added kombu seaweed or parmesan cheese to the sausage?
The sausage is still loaded with MSG via seaweed and cheese.
quote:
"Load up on the MSG?"
There is a sodium/potassium balance to be maintained, I thought.
Indeed, and the body is very good at that, particularly the kidneys.
People who have a history of having problems metabolizing salt or who have other health problems that salt exacterbates are one thing. People with normal kidney function can probably handle a sausage patty every once in a while.
quote:
Adding sodium to the diet with all abandon might not be the most adviseable thing, but in processed foods sodium is ubiquitous -- in various forms (mostly salt and MSG).
Right.
Eat a variety of real (not processed) food, heavy on fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish and lean protein the majority of the time and you will probably be fine.
MSG isn't a "bad" substance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-26-2005 8:46 AM TheLiteralist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by TheLiteralist, posted 07-26-2005 9:37 AM nator has replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 66 (226433)
07-26-2005 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by nator
07-26-2005 9:19 AM


Re: fast foods = chemicals & processed
"MSG isn't 'bad'"
Well, I won't continue to say that it is -- not unless I go do further research, of course.
At least you are not saying that fast food is as good for a person as is whole grains, fruits-n-vegies, etc.
--Jason

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 07-26-2005 9:19 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by nator, posted 07-26-2005 9:42 AM TheLiteralist has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024