Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheist Appreciation of Biblical Wisdom and Inspiration
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 61 of 105 (589718)
11-04-2010 12:38 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
11-03-2010 2:20 PM


Re: James
An example would be the Athenian Greeks alluded to in the book of Acts and other Gentiles.
Except for the fact that the Athenian Greeks weren't Atheists.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 11-03-2010 2:20 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2010 11:01 AM bluescat48 has seen this message but not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 105 (589759)
11-04-2010 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by bluescat48
11-04-2010 12:38 AM


Re: James
bluescat writes:
Except for the fact that the Athenian Greeks weren't Atheists.
Yah, you're right. Most were pagan and likely some agnostics, having a statue to the unknown god, according to the Apostle Paul in the NT book of Acts.
Perhaps, though, what might inspire pagans and agnostics Biblically might be the same cited scriptures applying to athiests, including the Proverbs and the prophecies, etc.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by bluescat48, posted 11-04-2010 12:38 AM bluescat48 has seen this message but not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1962 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 63 of 105 (589929)
11-05-2010 5:41 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
10-29-2010 1:05 PM


With or without You
I'd second Buzz' suggestion that Proverbs is a possible place for you to go. I suspect however, that much of its wisdom will, on reflection, strike you as something you already know and that you'll recognise your 'trouble' as lying in the lack of wherewithal to apply that wisdom consistantly.
Take the following proverb for example (often cited, incidently, as an example of the bible contradicting itself).
quote:
Proverbs 26:
4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you become like him.
5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.
Combined, the proverb tells you that you that whilst it's wise to contend with a persons foolishness, it is unwise to utilise foolishness yourself in doing so. So when an EvC opponant pours scorn through the device of a strawman, by all means answer that foolishness - but just not through the device of a strawman (nor through any other foolish means). - otherwise you become a fool yourself. I don't know if you follow jaywill at all but if you do you'll see a polished practioner of this proverb.
The wisdom is plain enough but the application of same the tricky point. Which brings me to the irrelevancy of the bible for the unbeliever.
You point to the impact the bible has had on forming Western culture* but I think it would be more correct to point to the application of biblical principles which has had the impact. The welfare systems, hospitals, orphanages, educational systems, human rights activities, charities, etc. that have arisen as a result of the application of biblical principles have (those who were behind them would tell you) occurred because of the empowerment supplied to the individual by God. Without being plugged into that source, the wisdom would be stripped of it's motive power, and would struggle to rise above wishful thinking, New Year resolutions and sentimentality.
Jesus warned that lusting after a woman was tantamount to adultery. His pinpointing such thoughts to be the thin end of a thick, destructive wedge is a wisdom most can, with a little experience in lusting, acknowledge. Without his motive power however, a knowledge of that wisdom leaves you lusting and being battered by the knowledge that it is a foolish, damaging activity.
The bibles wisdom is wisdom without power for the unbeliever, wisdom with the power of God for the believer.
*I'm taking the positive aspects of the bibles application for illustrations sake only.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 10-29-2010 1:05 PM Straggler has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Dogmafood, posted 11-05-2010 6:33 AM iano has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 64 of 105 (589934)
11-05-2010 6:33 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by iano
11-05-2010 5:41 AM


Re: With or without You
The welfare systems, hospitals, orphanages, educational systems, human rights activities, charities, etc. that have arisen as a result of the application of biblical principles have (those who were behind them would tell you) occurred because of the empowerment supplied to the individual by God. Without being plugged into that source, the wisdom would be stripped of it's motive power, and would struggle to rise above wishful thinking, New Year resolutions and sentimentality.
Compassion, generosity, kindness and curiosity are human qualities that existed long before they were noted in the bible. They would continue to exist without the bible. The bible is a result of them not a cause.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by iano, posted 11-05-2010 5:41 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by purpledawn, posted 11-05-2010 6:56 AM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied
 Message 66 by iano, posted 11-05-2010 7:22 AM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 65 of 105 (589935)
11-05-2010 6:56 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Dogmafood
11-05-2010 6:33 AM


Wisdom
quote:
Compassion, generosity, kindness and curiosity are human qualities that existed long before they were noted in the bible. They would continue to exist without the bible. The bible is a result of them not a cause.
Not the point of the thread. No one is saying the Bible is the cause of these behaviors in people. This thread is asking about what wisdom is contained in the pages of the Bible.
Yes, we can find wisdom in many writings of various cultures, but that isn't the issue. This thread is specifically asking about what wisdom is contained within the Bible. Please keep to the topic.
Here is another one I like.
Palm 4:4
In your anger do not sin; when you are on your beds, search your hearts and be silent.
Ephesians 4:26-27
"In your anger do not sin": Do not let the sun go down while you are still angry, and do not give the devil a foothold.
Some teach we should never get angry, but the verse doesn't really say that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Dogmafood, posted 11-05-2010 6:33 AM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1962 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 66 of 105 (589937)
11-05-2010 7:22 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Dogmafood
11-05-2010 6:33 AM


Re: With or without You
dogmafood writes:
Compassion, generosity, kindness and curiosity are human qualities that existed long before they were noted in the bible. They would continue to exist without the bible. The bible is a result of them not a cause.
The point being made was that examples of these human characteristics writ societal in scale (such a welfare systems, abolition of slavery, child labour, universal education, public hospitals and health systems, charities, etc) was something birthed in the West as a result of people being influenced by the Bible.
Societies where the Bible was absent lagged behind in these regards (although there is no suggestion that the human qualities listed were absent)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Dogmafood, posted 11-05-2010 6:33 AM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2010 7:32 AM iano has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 67 of 105 (589939)
11-05-2010 7:32 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by iano
11-05-2010 7:22 AM


Re: With or without You
The point being made was that examples of these human characteristics writ societal in scale (such a welfare systems, abolition of slavery, child labour, universal education, public hospitals and health systems, charities, etc) was something birthed in the West as a result of people being influenced by the Bible.
Despite practically none of that being in the Bible.
Why not say instead that it was the result of the Enlightenment? Of the birth of secular thought and secular government?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by iano, posted 11-05-2010 7:22 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by purpledawn, posted 11-05-2010 8:33 AM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 69 by iano, posted 11-05-2010 11:51 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 68 of 105 (589948)
11-05-2010 8:33 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by Dr Adequate
11-05-2010 7:32 AM


Re: With or without You
quote:
Despite practically none of that being in the Bible.
Why not say instead that it was the result of the Enlightenment? Of the birth of secular thought and secular government?
So show that these things were because of enlightenment or secular thought only as opposed to being inspired by anything written in Bible. Odds are many things influenced those who fashioned our culture. That doesn't mean the Bible writings didn't provide some wisdom and inspiration.
Uncle Tom's Cabin written by Harriet Beecher Stowe is an anti-slavery novel.
Stowe's puritanical religious beliefs show up in the novel's final, over-arching theme, which is the exploration of the nature of Christianity[3] and how she feels Christian theology is fundamentally incompatible with slavery.[37] This theme is most evident when Tom urges St. Clare to "look away to Jesus" after the death of St. Clare's beloved daughter Eva. After Tom dies, George Shelby eulogizes Tom by saying, "What a thing it is to be a Christian."[38] Because Christian themes play such a large role in Uncle Tom's Cabinand because of Stowe's frequent use of direct authorial interjections on religion and faiththe novel often takes the "form of a sermon."[39]
In this thread we are talking about the wisdom and inspiration that can be gleaned from the Bible. It isn't about whether it is the only source of wisdom and inspiration.
I'm not sure why some participants feel the need to keep pointing out that the Bible isn't the only source of wisdom and inspiration. So far no one has implied that it is. We are discussing the Bible, not any other writing. So opinions are concerning what Bible wisdom has influenced or inspired.
Do we really have to keep posting a disclaimer that our opinions are only concerning the Bible and not any other book that may have contributed to wisdom and inspiration of humanity?
Interesting that no one has disagreed with the actual verses yet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2010 7:32 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2010 12:13 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 72 by ringo, posted 11-05-2010 1:16 PM purpledawn has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1962 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 69 of 105 (589996)
11-05-2010 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by Dr Adequate
11-05-2010 7:32 AM


Re: With or without You
Dr. Adequate writes:
Despite practically none of that being in the Bible.
I'm dealing with an OP who would agree that it is. If not in letter (anymore that the decrying of internet sex is there in letter) then in spirit. And it is the spirit which guided so many to do so much.
Why not say instead that it was the result of the Enlightenment? Of the birth of secular thought and secular government?
Because I'm dealing with someone who appears to accept the Western values have been very significantly impacted by the the Bible. That is not to exclude the contribution of anything else.
Which is all a bit beside the point. The point was that the doing of so many was through what they believed to be empowerment by God. Which limits the value of the wisdom unempowered so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2010 7:32 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2010 12:08 PM iano has not replied
 Message 82 by NoNukes, posted 11-07-2010 12:09 PM iano has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 70 of 105 (589998)
11-05-2010 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by iano
11-05-2010 11:51 AM


Re: With or without You
Um ... the OP was written by "Straggler". I do not wish to presume to speak for him, but my impression is that he loathes religion.
And even if he didn't, I don't see why that would be an excuse for you not to talk candidly to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by iano, posted 11-05-2010 11:51 AM iano has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 71 of 105 (590000)
11-05-2010 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by purpledawn
11-05-2010 8:33 AM


Re: With or without You
So show that these things were because of enlightenment or secular thought only as opposed to being inspired by anything written in Bible.
Why? I didn't say that they were. I merely pointed out that this would be an alternative hypothesis.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by purpledawn, posted 11-05-2010 8:33 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by purpledawn, posted 11-05-2010 2:01 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 72 of 105 (590015)
11-05-2010 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by purpledawn
11-05-2010 8:33 AM


Re: With or without You
purpledawn writes:
Interesting that no one has disagreed with the actual verses yet.
There's a difference between wisdom and inspiration. For me, at least, most of the inspiration in the Bible comes from the presentation, not the content - style over substance. The proverbs, etc. make good sound bites even if the content is trite.
Nobody is likely to disagree with content that is trivially true.
But the real wisdom, in my opinion, is in the ideas that are not "common sense", ideas like loving your enemies or turning the other cheek.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by purpledawn, posted 11-05-2010 8:33 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by purpledawn, posted 11-06-2010 8:34 AM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 73 of 105 (590031)
11-05-2010 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Dr Adequate
11-05-2010 12:13 PM


Dishonest With Little
quote:
Why? I didn't say that they were. I merely pointed out that this would be an alternative hypothesis.
So it was useless concerning the topic, which is about the wisdom from the Bible and didn't serve to move the discussion forward.
All you've provided is another one-liner that doesn't help move the discussion forward.
Your alternative hypothesis is irrelevant to the topic. If you can't curb the urge to correct or provide an alternative hypothesis that has nothing to do with moving the topic forward, please try to at least add something that is pertinent to the topic and will help to move it forward.
For example:
Luke 16:10
Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever
is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much.
There is one parable in Matthew and two in Luke with this same sentiment. (Matthew 25: 21 & 23) (Luke 19:17)
This verse comes to mind when people want me to give them more responsibility or money.
This allows participants to at least respond to the portion of the post that is on topic.
I find it mind boggling that Christians haven't taken this opportunity to fill this thread with verses of wisdom, lessons, or inspiration for daily living.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-05-2010 12:13 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Straggler, posted 11-06-2010 8:29 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 74 of 105 (590132)
11-06-2010 8:29 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by purpledawn
11-05-2010 2:01 PM


Re: Dishonest With Little
PD writes:
I find it mind boggling that Christians haven't taken this opportunity to fill this thread with verses of wisdom, lessons, or inspiration for daily living.
That was more what I had in mind.
But even as things stand I have been reading with interest even if not actually contributing to this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by purpledawn, posted 11-05-2010 2:01 PM purpledawn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Buzsaw, posted 11-06-2010 6:02 PM Straggler has replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 75 of 105 (590133)
11-06-2010 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by ringo
11-05-2010 1:16 PM


Common Sense
quote:
But the real wisdom, in my opinion, is in the ideas that are not "common sense", ideas like loving your enemies or turning the other cheek.
Unfortunately, not everyone has common sense.
Good that even common sense stuff is written down to see what has been common sense through the ages.
Loving one's enemies and turning the other cheek may not seem like common sense today, but they may have been common sense for survival back then. Given that Israel was occupied off and on, to survive it is best not to irritate the people in power.
Generally today the expression "turn the other cheek" means to refrain from responding to an aggressor with violence, not seeking revenge. (Matthew 5:39, Luke 6:29 )
The same comment is made in Lamentations 3:30 and suggest a form of submission to oppressors, with the hope of being spared.
Let him offer his cheek to one who would strike him, and let him be filled with disgrace.
For an occupied land, this would be common sense for survival.
The author of Matthew (not Luke) contrasted the comment with the "an eye for an eye" phrase which people take to mean retaliation. In Judaism it doesn't carry that meaning. It refers to appropriate punishment or monetary compensation for physical injuries. This is done through the legal system, not necessarily the individual. (Makes me think of the satire issue I have with the Book of Matthew.)
The idea of equitable compensation for loss is good. I feel today our legal system has lost the spirit of that idea.
Sometimes the wisdom we glean from a verse isn't necessarily the wisdom the author was presenting. It is interesting to see the difference between what was probably understood by the original audience and what we understand today.

The Savior said There is no sin, but it is you who make sin when you do the things that are like the nature of adultery, which is called sin. --Gospel of Mary

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by ringo, posted 11-05-2010 1:16 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024