Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,485 Year: 3,742/9,624 Month: 613/974 Week: 226/276 Day: 2/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Three Questions for the Evolutionist and Creationist
halcyonwaters
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 7 (15246)
08-12-2002 2:19 AM


#1 Do you respect the other side?
#2 Do you believe they make any good points?
#3 Are there any weaknesses in your belief/model that you wish you had a better answer for?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Tranquility Base, posted 08-12-2002 2:28 AM halcyonwaters has not replied
 Message 3 by blitz77, posted 08-12-2002 3:38 AM halcyonwaters has not replied
 Message 4 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 3:47 AM halcyonwaters has replied
 Message 7 by TrueCreation, posted 08-12-2002 10:27 PM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 7 (15247)
08-12-2002 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by halcyonwaters
08-12-2002 2:19 AM


YES
YES
YES - eg fossil order

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 2:19 AM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
blitz77
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 7 (15253)
08-12-2002 3:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by halcyonwaters
08-12-2002 2:19 AM


1--yes
2--yes
3--how to prove something is "designed"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 2:19 AM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
halcyonwaters
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 7 (15254)
08-12-2002 3:47 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by halcyonwaters
08-12-2002 2:19 AM


1 - Of course
2 - Yes
3 - Explaining the corroboration of dating methods

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 2:19 AM halcyonwaters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 6:18 PM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
halcyonwaters
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 7 (15311)
08-12-2002 6:18 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by halcyonwaters
08-12-2002 3:47 AM


I know that I didn't respect the YEC'ers and I wasn't even an evolutionist -- so I was hoping to hear what they thought.
Oh well, I thought it would be interesting
David

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 3:47 AM halcyonwaters has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Jeff, posted 08-12-2002 7:43 PM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
Jeff
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 7 (15312)
08-12-2002 7:43 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by halcyonwaters
08-12-2002 6:18 PM


1. It depends. The "They" in the question is too broad for a single response.
However, Do I have respect for any group that attempts to stifle science with a narrow religious view - which has failed again and again to establish a scientific basis , and resorts to political leverage to pervert the science taught in public schools...
NOPE. No respect for that or those who would perpetrate it.
2. Again, it depends. Any challenge put to a theory can only serve Everyone's benefit. Either the theory will be falsified, or supported yet again.
But when religious zealots ignore HOW their objections were ackowledged, addressed and demonstrated as falacious - and they continue to roll out long discredited obejections, then we find ourselves in an Anti-Intellectual endeavor to reclaim ground that has already been established. Can't we move on ? Must science continually re-invent the wheel because some square-sided individuals can't 'Roll with the Changes' ?
3. Nothing that time and peer review won't weed out - if allowed to step past the attempts at politicizing science.
------------------
"Freedom of Religion" equates to Freedom -FROM- those religions we find unbelievable.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 6:18 PM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 7 (15325)
08-12-2002 10:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by halcyonwaters
08-12-2002 2:19 AM


"#1 Do you respect the other side?"
--I respect the individual who is worthy of it without bias or prejudice.
"#2 Do you believe they make any good points?"
--Of course.
"#3 Are there any weaknesses in your belief/model that you wish you had a better answer for?"
--Geophysics Modeling of stress & flexure strength behaviour of Oceanic Crusts in a catastrophic manor. Physics of Radioisotopic decay in heat transfer & according to the Earths isotopic Distribution. Modeling for Early Earth differentiation in Chemical fractionation of various elements in accordance to their locus of tending concentration & other properties to take into account. Accelerated decay (?). General Geologic depositional models & formation evolution. All of which I enjoy the continuing research required to find the answers to the questions. Not all listed are 'problems' but are topics I would like to further develop in my understanding of the mechanics.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-12-2002 2:19 AM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024