|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,477 Year: 3,734/9,624 Month: 605/974 Week: 218/276 Day: 58/34 Hour: 1/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is: The Gospel According To You? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
You'll find I'm not much of a fan of quotemining. Paul must be read within the full context of his letters.
What do you consider to be a sin, does it have to be an action or could it be just a thought like the Bible says? Honestly I don't even much worry about sins, or what they are. Don't even really care. It goes back to what I've been saying all through this thread. Try to do what's right. Love GOD and love others as you love yourself. It really is as simple as that. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rainman2 Inactive Member |
gotta run....
quote: This message has been edited by Rainman2, 04-10-2006 09:52 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
That's a good example of quotemining and really taking things out of context. First Paul is but quoting what someone else said. In addition, Romans is one of Paul's longer letters, IIRC 15 or 16 Chapters in all. Romans 3 is mostly talking about the relationship between the original followers of Christ who were all Jews and the newer Greek and Roman converts. It even gets into the matter of Faith,
3What if some did not have faith? Will their lack of faith nullify God's faithfulness? 4Not at all! Let God be true, and every man a liar. As it is written: "So that you may be proved right when you speak and prevail when you judge." which supports the idea that all are saved, even those who have no faith in GOD or Jesus. See how easy quotemining is? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4081 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
There are lots of Christians that believe you have to succeed, but then just what does that mean? It means there will be a judgment--by God and not ourselves, as to whether we've succeeded--that we must prepare for and fear. "God will render to everyone according to their works; eternal life to those who, by patiently continuing to do good, pursue glory honor and immortality." "For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ, to receive the deeds done in the body, whether good or bad." This one's from Jesus: "The hour is coming when all who are in the graves shall hear the voice of the Son of God and come forth; those who have done good, to a resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to a resurrection of condemnation." Paul spent the whole first half of Romans talking about the problems humans have with trying. There's a starting over in the power of the Spirit that God offers, and that's the point of there being a Christianity. "For sin will not have power over you [any more], because you are not under the Law, but under grace." "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God has prepared in advance for us to do." "If any man be in Christ, he is a new creation. Old things have passed away, behold all things have become new." "Except a man be born again, he shall not enter the kingdom of heaven."
We're human. GOD knows that. We will fail. GOD knows that. Hence forgiveness. Hence forgiveness combined with POWER. "His divine power has given us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that has called us to glory and goodness. By these we are given great and precious promises, so that by them you may partake of DIVINE nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust." He wants us to do more than try. He wants us to diligently obtain the help we need--and we need help--to succeed. That's why the first and greatest commandment is to love the Lord with all your heart, mind, soul and strength. Only then will you find the power to love your neighbor as yourself. That's what I mean by success .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SuperNintendo Chalmers Member (Idle past 5856 days) Posts: 772 From: Bartlett, IL, USA Joined: |
Pat Robertson is a horrible, evil human being. He uses money donated to his church to run DIAMOND MINES in Africa.
Page Not Found - The Skeptic Tank http://www.rotten.com/...ligion/televangelists/pat-robertson http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article... Sucuri WebSite Firewall - Access Denied http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/7027/business.html Note: This is off-topic. I am only responding to your question of why I think he is evil. If you would like to discuss this evidence feel free to start and new thread and we can.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
iano writes: The question was to YOU as to what practical effect forgiveness-for-all had on the day of judgement.
jar writes: you will approach judgement from the position of innocent until proven guilty. iano writes: You say that everyone has been forgiven. If they had not been, what difference would that make when judgement takes place?
jar writes: You'd approach judgement from the position of Guilty until proven innocent. "Might" has left the stage. Fair enough. 2 people approach judgement, one who tried as hard as the other but who has not had this forgiveness. The only material difference between them appears to be that the one is presumed innocent and the other guilty. In what way would consideration of the evidence being examined differ so as to result in the guilty receiving a different judgement from the innocent? (It seems to me that presumption of innocence is a tool employed by human courts to give the benefit of the doubt - simply because all the facts cannot be known. But this judge will know all the facts. Hence my wondering what the practical effects are of presumption of innocence (forgiveness))
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JavaMan Member (Idle past 2341 days) Posts: 475 From: York, England Joined: |
I'm not so sure that morality is simple. It seems to me a thorny philosophical problem. How about we re-word the Golden Rule as follows: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, unless what you want done unto you is evil. To find out if what you want done to you is evil or not, consult the Bible passim. If you don't have time for that, check your conscience. Hmm...Somehow I don't think it'll catch on. The true mystery of the world is the visible, not the invisible
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Hmm...Somehow I don't think it'll catch on. Just goes to show you how difficult it is to formulate moral rules that apply in all cases.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
I know some people in here feel that all people are automatically saved. But I do not think that everyone is going to heaven. I do not agree with everyone is automatacally saved. I do believe that we do not know who will be saved or not. This is the gospel of Jesus.
Too many Christians focus on the verse John 3:16, and say that only those that believe in Jesus will go to heaven. When you put a sign on your lawn that says John 3:16, you take a verse out of it's context. John 3:16-21 were spoken together, and is a flowing thought. The gospel is about getting into heaven. I agree with John 3:16, but there is more to it than just 3:16. If anything I would elect John 3:21 as being more important.
quote: In verse 16-18, that is the case for Jesus. Verses 19-21 is the verdict. In verse 21, it says whoever llives by the truth. The Holy Spirit is truth, and dwells inside each and everyone of us. We tend to deny it sometimes, and rationalize it away. We also get tainted by the world, and cannot see it clearly. But if we live by this truth, then God will forgive us. It is all a matter of heart. When Jesus died, He came to life again, and told the disciples that He would be leaving again, but He will be sending His Holy Spirit.
quote: So to me it is possible that you may not be claiming the name Jesus, but you might be living by His truth. Love God with your heart, mind, and soul. Love others like yourself, is good. It is the core of how we should live. But who is God, and what is love? How do you love someone you don't know, and how do we experience His love, so that we may give this love to others?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
First, I don't get where you think "might" has left the stage. If you've bothered to read what I post here over the years, you should know that might is very much an absolute in my messages when speaking of things that cannot ever be proved like Theology or the existance of GOD or heaven or hell. When speaking of things like Evolution or Old Earth "might" may well leave the stage but when speaking of things like salvation or the existance of GOD, "might" is always present.
Also, you seem to discount the time folk spend living. You had said
- everyone is born with "destination Hell" stamped on their foreheads - before God we stink in sin - there is but one way: unpalatable and unreasonable and exclusive as that sounds and frankly, that sounds quite different from
Next you want to jump to judgement. How will things be different? you seem to think
2 people approach judgement, one who tried as hard as the other but who has not had this forgiveness. The only material difference between them appears to be that the one is presumed innocent and the other guilty. but I'm not sure that you have outlined my position there. Two people approach Judgement, one is an Atheist, the other a Christian. Both have tried equally hard to do what's right. My position is that they both come forward as innocent and will both be Judged based on their behavior. Being Christian or Athiest, Muslim or Jew, Hindu or Taoist, Pagan or Satanist, Wiccan or Agnostic, professing a belief in GOD or even denying the very existance of GOD will carry no weight. I believe that GOD will be the perfect Judge, knowing all. Where I think we might differ is that I doubt very much GOD really gives a damn about what folk profess to believe and will only look at what they actually did. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Legend Member (Idle past 5028 days) Posts: 1226 From: Wales, UK Joined: |
iano writes:
Irrelevant. I've pointed out sufficient aspects of his ministry which means (meant) anything but joy for him and a lot of other people. Whether Jesus himself had a joyful life or not doesn't alter the fact that he taught love, happiness and joy. Whether a lot of other people found it hard to follow his message, or didn't agree with it, doesn't alter the fact that he taught love, happiness and joy.
iano writes:
Yes, Jesus never said that it's easy to love god and your neighbour as yourself. What's that got to do with the fact that he taught love, happiness and joy ?
Heres another one for you: The narrow gate to salvation which few will take vs wide is the road that leads to destruction. iano writes: Do buy a red letter bible and read Jesus' words alone. Touchy feely it ain't I do read Jesus' words alone often. He speaks of love and doing good. He doesn't say it's easy but it nevertheless is a message of joy, love and happiness. The part where we're born in sin and live our worthless, self-loathing existence trying to justify ourselves to God didn't come from Jesus! "In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5930 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
Faith
Yes, the morality of preserving life comes from our Christian heritage, which is being rapidly eroded over the last few decades. I disagree with both these points. It appears to me that the moralty of preserving life is simply a matter of selfishness on the part of the individual. A selfishness that allows for the harnessing of the strength inherent in the many as opposed to the few. It is to the advantage of the individual to work to the adnvantage of the many. This is why I think the Inaugural Address of John Keneddy struck such a chord in the people of the world.
Ask not what your country can do for you: Ask what you can do for your country. What better way for an individual to ensure their needs than to focus their energies on others? Indeed, what better structuring of purpose can you think of? The Christian way of life may be eroding however, only those parts that do not hold up in the maintainence of the greater good of society. Thus, the parts that are inflexible and intolerant are being shorn off as is the case with all things extreme. Instead of focussing on principles and rules of behaviour the push is to compassion and real understanding of the needs of others first as a foundation for discourse and direction. This message has been edited by sidelined, Tue, 2006-04-11 10:33 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
jar writes: First, I don't get where you think "might" has left the stage. This is one of the small pieces of your post which actually deals with the specific issue we have spent a number of posts focussing on. It is your view on the specific role of foregiveness which is being examined - not a generalistic overview of your gospel and certainly not a discussion on mine or even comparing yours to mine. Firstly. The reason I thought 'might' was out was a result of your response to this..
iano writes: You say that everyone has been forgiven. If they had not been, what difference would that make when judgement takes place? you said...
jar writes: You'd approach judgement from the position of Guilty until proven innocent There was no 'might' about it. If there is in fact, a 'might' then can we not equally apply a 'might' to the answer you gave to this...
iano writes: The question was to YOU as to what practical effect forgiveness-for-all had on the day of judgement. jar writes: you will approach judgement from the position of innocent until proven guilty. If a 'might' in the former answer then why not in the latter? And if 'mights' in both, then what use that plank of your gospel (edit: removed reference to 'trying' so as to keep topic focussed on forgiveness) Secondly. If you believe forgiveness results in "innocent until proven guilty" without a 'might' then the corrolary belief must follow (unless you have a reason why it doesn't): if there were no-forgiveness = then "guilty until proven innocent" in which case my question stands.
2 people approach judgement, one who tried as hard as the other but who has not had this forgiveness. The only material difference between them is that the one is presumed innocent and the other guilty. In what way would consideration of the evidence being examined differ so as to result in the presumed guilty receiving a different judgement from the presumed innocent? (It seems to me that presumption of innocence is a tool employed by human courts to give the benefit of the doubt - simply because all the facts cannot be known. But this judge will know all the facts. Hence my wondering what the practical effects are of presumption of innocence (forgiveness)) Edited to tighten up last question This message has been edited by iano, 11-Apr-2006 05:58 PM This message has been edited by iano, 11-Apr-2006 06:02 PM This message has been edited by iano, 11-Apr-2006 06:13 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
content deleted
This message has been edited by iano, 11-Apr-2006 05:54 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1963 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
Whether Jesus himself had a joyful life or not doesn't alter the fact that he taught love, happiness and joy Aren't you forgetting punishment for the wicked? What about the many who take the road that leads to destruction. What about all those who say "Lord Lord" but are refused entry to heaven. Is that your idea of joy?
The part where we're born in sin and live our worthless, self-loathing existence trying to justify ourselves to God didn't come from Jesus! A truly woeful strawman you have going there Legend. Let me help you cast it into the lake of fire We are all sinners. Our lives are not worthless. We were made in his image firstly. That is very significant and places us above any other created thing - sin notwithstanding. He most certainly doesn't think we are worthless. So neither should we think so. He loves us so much he gave his only son so that... Accepting ones state is anything but trying to justify oneself to God. If one is then one is - there is little point in denying it. You will have never ever heard me say anything here but that God is the one who justifies us. "Nothing in my hands I bring simply to thy cross I cling" sums up anything I have ever written about getting right with God. He makes me right with him - not me. This message has been edited by iano, 11-Apr-2006 06:32 PM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024