Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The bible and homosexuality: Round 3
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 106 of 306 (123343)
07-09-2004 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by PecosGeorge
07-09-2004 12:56 PM


Re: Sex without
By holy I mean the angels are allowed to watch when a man and woman love each other. So, while they are watching, sucking on is probably not ideal.
So angels are porno fans! They probably like watching a nice head job, then!
You're twisted, George.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 12:56 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Dan Carroll, posted 07-09-2004 2:09 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 110 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 3:16 PM Coragyps has not replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6893 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 107 of 306 (123347)
07-09-2004 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by crashfrog
07-09-2004 9:18 AM


from the missus
or anyone else, does not negate a HOLY GOD. It is very difficult to understand the concept 'holy'. But we should make an effort to understand and be like him.
Also the places you suggest are for other purposes. Elimination of things harmful to the body, peepee and poopoo. It suggests unclean.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by crashfrog, posted 07-09-2004 9:18 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-09-2004 2:06 PM PecosGeorge has replied
 Message 114 by crashfrog, posted 07-09-2004 6:41 PM PecosGeorge has replied

pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6043 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 108 of 306 (123356)
07-09-2004 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by PecosGeorge
07-09-2004 1:26 PM


Re: from the missus
the places you suggest are for other purposes. Elimination of things harmful to the body, peepee and poopoo. It suggests unclean.
We can't use parts of our body that "peepee" comes out of for sexual purposes?
Goodbye species...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 1:26 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 3:19 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 109 of 306 (123357)
07-09-2004 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Coragyps
07-09-2004 1:08 PM


Re: Sex without
So angels are porno fans!
"God's watchin' me do #2? Oh man... I'm a sinner and God's a pervert."
-Chris Griffin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Coragyps, posted 07-09-2004 1:08 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 3:22 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6893 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 110 of 306 (123375)
07-09-2004 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Coragyps
07-09-2004 1:08 PM


Re: Sex without
nope you are.
the marriage bed is holy, but if your bed is porno, hey, great

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Coragyps, posted 07-09-2004 1:08 PM Coragyps has not replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6893 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 111 of 306 (123379)
07-09-2004 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by pink sasquatch
07-09-2004 2:06 PM


Re: from the missus
the places where peepee and poopoo come out of are designed for peepee and poopoo to come out of - good arrangement, eh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-09-2004 2:06 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-09-2004 3:25 PM PecosGeorge has replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6893 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 112 of 306 (123383)
07-09-2004 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Dan Carroll
07-09-2004 2:09 PM


Re: Sex without
you're both and he is nothing of the kind. He made sex, but #2 is a perversion, therefore, he does not watch.
If you want his blessing while doing your thing, omit door number two. The price is behind door number 1.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Dan Carroll, posted 07-09-2004 2:09 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6043 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 113 of 306 (123385)
07-09-2004 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by PecosGeorge
07-09-2004 3:19 PM


where peepees, and babies, come from
Pecos, perhaps you didn't understand what I was saying.
You've said that body parts where "peepee" comes out are unclean, and shouldn't be used for sex.
Last time I checked, "peepee" comes out of the penis in males.
The penis is a pretty key sexual organ.
Without its use reproduction would be hampered quite a bit.
Do you really think the penis shouldn't be used during sex?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 3:19 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 11:49 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 114 of 306 (123443)
07-09-2004 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by PecosGeorge
07-09-2004 1:26 PM


It suggests unclean.
No, it suggests a pretty juvenile fascination with waste elimination on the part of you and RR.
Seriously why would the God who invented the life cycle - where organisms feast on our wastes, and we inhale theirs - think of elimination as an "unclean" process? God's much, much more mature than you seem to give him credit for.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 1:26 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 11:46 PM crashfrog has replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6893 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 115 of 306 (123507)
07-09-2004 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by crashfrog
07-09-2004 6:41 PM


Yiggy
you are a riot, man!
I apply no human qualities to God. But you may, if you wish.

"Let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit!"
2 Cor. 7:1

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by crashfrog, posted 07-09-2004 6:41 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by crashfrog, posted 07-10-2004 1:52 AM PecosGeorge has replied

PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6893 days)
Posts: 863
From: Texas
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 116 of 306 (123509)
07-09-2004 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by pink sasquatch
07-09-2004 3:25 PM


God almighty
I sure would.

"Let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit!"
2 Cor. 7:1

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-09-2004 3:25 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 117 of 306 (123527)
07-10-2004 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by PecosGeorge
07-09-2004 11:46 PM


I apply no human qualities to God.
So you say, but why then the insistence that God has the same fascination with the poopy holes that a 6-year-old child has?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-09-2004 11:46 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by PecosGeorge, posted 07-11-2004 10:48 AM crashfrog has replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 497 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 118 of 306 (123533)
07-10-2004 2:04 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by riVeRraT
07-09-2004 6:56 AM


the rat writes:
Since as you can see that, punishments have changed over the years,
Exactly!
by God inspired people, just like Moses, and Jesus teaches us that it will change, Jesus must be real.
Is this your personal belief or can I get some kind of reference?
Yes a woman should saty home, and heal and be with her baby, and keep her unclean self out of the church. Thats a really good suggestion.
So, now you're a sexist. Great.
Doesn't matter how we treat a slave if, a person doesn't want to be a slave it is wrong.
The word to acurately describes a person that is a volunteer "slave" is an indentured servant.
By definition, a slave is a slave is a slave: someone that has been forced to be owned by another person.
Again I tell you, Jesus changed all that for us.
Reference please.
IT is apparent, because now the world is different just like Jesus said it would be.
Either you can't stay on top of a topic for long or you are trying to dodge the point. I'll answer to this anyway. IFF there was a Jesus and he said the world would be different, then I am also God, your messiah. I am telling you now that 10 years from now we will see a very different world.
In other words, how does this prove your point, or have anything to do with what we are talking about?
He directly say to us that sexual immorality was against his will, as described in Levitcus.
He was talking about Leviticus, because while he was alive, he was the biggest upholder of the law. But his teachings taught us to change.
Ok, first you said Jesus didn't support some of the laws and now you are saying that he supported the laws.
So you are picking examples of what Jesus changed, and then saying that all of Leviticus is no good.
Specific references, please.
Here's a way that being gay can hurt someone else, according to the bible.
Romans
21 It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.
I am not a bible basher. Care to explain this?
This message has been edited by Lam, 07-10-2004 01:04 AM

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by riVeRraT, posted 07-09-2004 6:56 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by berberry, posted 07-10-2004 2:45 AM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 121 by riVeRraT, posted 07-11-2004 8:37 AM coffee_addict has replied

berberry
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 306 (123539)
07-10-2004 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by coffee_addict
07-10-2004 2:04 AM


Lam writes:
quote:
By definition, a slave is a slave is a slave...
Not exactly. The words the bible uses (at least in the oldest extant versions) could mean slave or indentured servant. The important point to remember is that indentured servitude is no more a voluntary state than is chattel slavery. No one "chooses" to be an indentured servant. One would only "choose" such a thing when no other options are available.
Many of the early settlers of America came here as indentured servants. They wanted to escape a repressive society and make a better life for their children. They did not "choose" servitude as one might choose a career; they saw that there were no other viable options open to them and thus they were forced to make this devil's choice.
Therefore you are technically incorrect. riVeRraT is patently dishonest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by coffee_addict, posted 07-10-2004 2:04 AM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by coffee_addict, posted 07-10-2004 4:11 AM berberry has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 497 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 120 of 306 (123555)
07-10-2004 4:11 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by berberry
07-10-2004 2:45 AM


Thanx for the correction.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by berberry, posted 07-10-2004 2:45 AM berberry has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024