Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Earths Created Solar System - Planets and Moons
Jaf
Member (Idle past 3695 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 1 of 8 (718276)
02-05-2014 10:34 PM


ALL OF THE FOLLOWING POINTS FOR THE MOST PART ARE NEVER REVEALED PUBLICLY IN TIME MAGAZINE OR NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC, but to be fair they are often admitted is such Evolutionist Publications as "Nature".
BUT THEY ARE ALL IRREFUTABLE PROOF THAT EVOLUTION IS LAUGHABLE AT BEST.
The following are SERIOUS issues that refute the secular evolution model.
Dust clumps can not from into small rocks and then asteroids and then planets in space. This alone refutes the whole theory. From here in I use EV to replace Evolutionists to save time and to of course minimize the carbon foot print.
PLANET MERCURY
1. Mercury has a magnetic field, this refutes EV theory. It is also dense, and there is sulphuric acid. This also refutes EV claims.
3. Also the speed and rate of the decaying magnetic field refutes the EV model.
4. According to the observed and tested evidence Mercury is a young planet 1000s of years old at most, EV claims its at least 500 million years old.
THE PLANET MERCURY CONFOUNDS EVOLUTION THEORY.
PLANET VENUS ( almost exactly the same size as earth)
The hottest planet and yet not the closet to the sun is 900 degrees F. Compared to earth it has 90 atmospheres equal to the pressure of being 3000 feet deep under in the water. EV claim it was created at the same time as earth out of the same materials in the same process and the same regions of space and yet...
1. Venus is covered in Lava flows
2. It rains sulphuric acid
3. It has no tectonic plates and no moon
EV claim it had a moon but an asteroid destroyed it (really where is the evidence of this?) There isn't any.
There is NO evidence of Venus being over 500 million years old AT ALL. It's surface is extremely volatile fresh and severe. The evidence on Venus is consistent with 1000s of years not millions.
PLANET EARTH
The Earth's surface is 70% covered in water. This doesn't fit with the EV model, according to them there should be NO WATER ON EARTH. Some say "where did all Noah's flood waters go? Well Hello, the earth is covered in water.
1. Sea shells on top mountains prove that the whole earth was once under water
2. According to EV the earth was formed with out water, where di all the water come from. ALL OF EVOLUTION THEORY IS BASED ON MAJOR CATACLYSMIC EVENTS OCCURRING ON ALL OTHER PLANETS AND YET when the evidence points to a world wide water deluge on our own planet, the evolutionist mocks. The funny thing is they want to tell you that Mars was once covered by a watery deluge and yet there is no evidence of this at all.
3. EV CAN NOT EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS WATER ON EARTH. Ask them to explain it to you.
4. Earth has a magnetic field but according to EV we shouldn't have a magnetic field, it doesn't fit with the model.
5. EV claim the earth is at least 4.5 billion years old and yet we know every 1400 years the earths magnetic field decays by half. This refutes the 4.5 billion year and yet agrees with a younger earth allowing MAXIMUM aged of 10,000 years.
6. EV HAVE NO EXPLANATION FOR EARTHS MAGNETIC FIELD EVEN 400 YEARS OF RESEARCH, as I said according to them we shouldn't have one.
Earth is completely unique in the solar system
- The magnetic field protects us form solar radiation
- We have air to breath
- It rotates every 24 hours, perfect for avoiding extreme temperature for humans plants and animals.
- 23 degree tilt creates moderate seasons
- we have a stable circular orbit
Earth has clearly been designed to sustain life on earth.
I can go on and on and on, and if I have to I will.
Oh, NEPTUNE AND URANUS, according to Evolutionists they both don't exist or at least should not because they don't fit the Model. You didn't get taught that is science class did you?
THE MOON
Our Moon is alleged to be Old Cold and Dead by EV and yet The Moon and all theories to prove how we got our moon by EV have been made a mockery of by the evidence. There have been 579 special sitings of anomalous events since the 1500 GAS HAS BEEN MEASURED IT IS STILL HIGHLY GEO REACTIVE - Proof of a young moon. EV WONT ADMIT ANY OF THIS.
Hitler said tell a lie often enough, people will believe it. EVOLUTION IS A LIE YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD FOR 100s OF YEARS AND NOW YOU BELIEVE IT.
Source my Own notes Taken from a Spike Psarris B.SC Presentation on NZ television.
I know of a teacher of evolution, very intelligent learned man, when challenged by some creationist students to examine the assumptions in evolution theory, it took him 5 YEARS to change mind after examining the evidence. And he was already a believer in God. I say this knowing that posting this information will probably have less than zero effect on any one trapped in the evolution lie if anything it may even insight you to rage. (but I hope not) That said I fully expect you to have discredited my source Spike Psarris in a 2 second google search. LOL try not that to make this an I hate Spike thread and deal with the facts!
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.
Edited by Jaf, : Source
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminModulous, posted 02-06-2014 11:56 AM Jaf has replied
 Message 4 by AdminModulous, posted 02-06-2014 5:50 PM Jaf has replied
 Message 8 by Adminnemooseus, posted 02-06-2014 8:53 PM Jaf has not replied

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 2 of 8 (718354)
02-06-2014 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jaf
02-05-2014 10:34 PM


Hi Jaf,
Can you give your sources for your numbers.
Thanks

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jaf, posted 02-05-2014 10:34 PM Jaf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Jaf, posted 02-06-2014 5:18 PM AdminModulous has not replied

Jaf
Member (Idle past 3695 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 3 of 8 (718448)
02-06-2014 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminModulous
02-06-2014 11:56 AM


I have added source and added to it
Hi Modulous I have added source and added to it
Edited by Jaf, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminModulous, posted 02-06-2014 11:56 AM AdminModulous has not replied

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 4 of 8 (718455)
02-06-2014 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jaf
02-05-2014 10:34 PM


This was originally a OP about the earth's decaying magnetic field. It's suddenly exploded.
How does the existence of Mercury's magnetic field refute EV? Why does its density or sulphuric acid refute EV?
What evidence suggests it is just 1000s of years old?
Maybe you could start there, and if that doesn't fill out to a full topic you could add discussion of other planets and moons. Or perhaps you could shift back to the earth's magnetic field, if you'd prefer.
Your source ideally needs to be something better than some notes you took watching a creationist's tv show. It's a pretty wide internet out there, and search engines are pretty powerful these days. I'm sure you can find something that helps you out. try this to start with, but I suggest you use varied sources if possible - that took me less than 20 seconds of time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jaf, posted 02-05-2014 10:34 PM Jaf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Jaf, posted 02-06-2014 7:30 PM AdminModulous has replied

Jaf
Member (Idle past 3695 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 5 of 8 (718471)
02-06-2014 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by AdminModulous
02-06-2014 5:50 PM


If my source is not acceptable, then don't ask. Can you link me to that thread. Id rather not debate the topic with you since you pour scorn on my "creationist" source which I find pathetic I might add. What's up with the spots all over your face dude? Surely a better picture is in order for a man in your position? Its not a good look.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by AdminModulous, posted 02-06-2014 5:50 PM AdminModulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by AdminModulous, posted 02-06-2014 7:49 PM Jaf has replied

AdminModulous
Administrator
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 6 of 8 (718474)
02-06-2014 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Jaf
02-06-2014 7:30 PM


another moderator want to try?
The spots are ketchup.
I get the impression you don't want to get the OP into a debatable position from my perspective. So I will step aside and allow another moderator to take a look.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Jaf, posted 02-06-2014 7:30 PM Jaf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Jaf, posted 02-06-2014 8:15 PM AdminModulous has seen this message but not replied

Jaf
Member (Idle past 3695 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 01-30-2014


Message 7 of 8 (718475)
02-06-2014 8:15 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by AdminModulous
02-06-2014 7:49 PM


Re: another moderator want to try?
Fair enough. Glad is ketchup and not swine flu

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by AdminModulous, posted 02-06-2014 7:49 PM AdminModulous has seen this message but not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 8 of 8 (718479)
02-06-2014 8:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jaf
02-05-2014 10:34 PM


Going to reject this one
I don't have much time to blow on this message, and I may well not be in much if any contact with the forum over the nest 3 days.
Your message 1 is a rather massive violation of Forum Rule 3:
quote:
When introducing a new topic, please keep the message narrowly focused. Do not include more than a few points.
You are shotgunning us with many things that could be individual topics. Also sometimes known as "The Gish Gallop" (Google it if you need to).
Start a new Proposed New Topic, and keep message 1 short and focused.
General discussion of topic promotions can be done at the Topic Proposal Issues topic.
Now I need to get back to work on something that people pay me to do.
Adminnemooseus

Or something like that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jaf, posted 02-05-2014 10:34 PM Jaf has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024