Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,472 Year: 3,729/9,624 Month: 600/974 Week: 213/276 Day: 53/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   War in Iraq
zephyr
Member (Idle past 4572 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 16 of 23 (145205)
09-27-2004 11:43 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by sidelined
09-27-2004 4:39 PM


Re:
quote:
War sucks of course and I am not a supporter of such actions. I am however a 100% supporter of troops whos lives lead to such places when they are the most cognizant of what such action can entail. In my book of wishful thinking I often would delight in having the commander in chief and his equivlalent from the other side take point in the thick of the worst shit and see how long wars last.
AMEN! Can I get a witness?!
One good reason I tend to favor a candidate who has seen it up close, all else being equal.
quote:
I am curious though to know if there are any local contrctors among the Iraqi people who are securing work there?
We have quite a few as day laborers. It seems the majority of our labor is third-country nationals (TCNs) as it's hard to clear Iraqis, but we do bring plenty of them on base. I really feel for those guys - they have no security and the insurgents hate them at least as much as us, if not more. They get kidnapped and killed occasionally. They also work for the local wage, which is not much to speak of.
There are some local companies that have contracts for various types of work, but I don't know a lot about them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by sidelined, posted 09-27-2004 4:39 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Peal
Member (Idle past 4721 days)
Posts: 64
Joined: 03-11-2004


Message 17 of 23 (145638)
09-29-2004 12:26 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by crashfrog
09-27-2004 2:49 PM


The war is about ideology. Bush and Co. geuninely think that what they're doing is making the world a safer place. Any information that contradicts this view is invalidated, in their eyes, simply by it contradicting the ideology.
This is logical to me and this is what I will accept. I retract my question, is the war in Iraq about oil and big business?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by crashfrog, posted 09-27-2004 2:49 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 09-29-2004 12:28 PM Peal has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 18 of 23 (145641)
09-29-2004 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Peal
09-29-2004 12:26 PM


This is logical to me and this is what I will accept. I retract my question, is the war in Iraq about oil and big business?
I imagine that, behind closed doors, it may have been sold as such. But I don't think that was what Bush and Co. were thinking of when they pushed the button. I don't know that huge profits have been made, yet. Of course, that could just prove how incompetent Bush and Co. are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Peal, posted 09-29-2004 12:26 PM Peal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-29-2004 1:00 PM crashfrog has replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 23 (145650)
09-29-2004 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by crashfrog
09-29-2004 12:28 PM


Halliburton's done all right for themselves in this war. Remember them overcharging the US Government by an ungodly amount for their cleanup jobs?
Plus, let's keep in mind that the profit goal isn't short term. It's about putting an America-friendly government in place that will be happy to sell us oil at a greatly reduced cost.

"If I had to write ten jokes about potholders, I don't think I could do it. But I could write ten jokes about Catholicism in the next twenty minutes. I guess I'm drawn to religion because I can be provocative without harming something people really care about, like their cars."
-George Meyer, Simpsons writer

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 09-29-2004 12:28 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 09-29-2004 1:03 PM Dan Carroll has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 20 of 23 (145653)
09-29-2004 1:03 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Dan Carroll
09-29-2004 1:00 PM


Plus, let's keep in mind that the profit goal isn't short term. It's about putting an America-friendly government in place that will be happy to sell us oil at a greatly reduced cost.
I don't really think that's going to happen. The government that emerges from this is going to be the one that promises to hold us the greatest arm's-length. Or so it seems to me.
Of course, that says nothing about the original motive; only that Bush and Co. are so incompetent they can't even be counted on to succeed in their evil schemes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-29-2004 1:00 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-29-2004 1:13 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 22 by Chiroptera, posted 09-29-2004 4:06 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 23 (145657)
09-29-2004 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by crashfrog
09-29-2004 1:03 PM


Yeah, I'm with you on this one. I think that the biggest flaw in this war as a whole, whatever motive you want to assign, was that if you look in Bush/Rumsfeld's collective mental dictionary, the words "exit plan" are followed by a definition that just reads "Duhhhh..."

"If I had to write ten jokes about potholders, I don't think I could do it. But I could write ten jokes about Catholicism in the next twenty minutes. I guess I'm drawn to religion because I can be provocative without harming something people really care about, like their cars."
-George Meyer, Simpsons writer

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 09-29-2004 1:03 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 23 (145734)
09-29-2004 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by crashfrog
09-29-2004 1:03 PM


Well, remember, for this plan to work, all that needs to happen is the US-friendly government have control of the major oil fields (with American help, of course) and a route to a port.
And will the new government keep the US as arm's length? Chalabi tried, and look how quickly he was put on ice. Does the new government of Afghanistan keep the US at arm's length? And that is another case in point -- the US-friendly government really has control only of Kabul. (And Karzai needs to hire mercenaries for his bodyguards.) My guess is that the new "sovereign" government of Iraq will be in a similar situation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 09-29-2004 1:03 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
zephyr
Member (Idle past 4572 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 23 of 23 (145921)
09-30-2004 8:24 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Rei
09-27-2004 6:11 PM


Re:
Rei,
Did you get my email? It's a gmail address, not the one listed here. Was asking about your friend. This place is basically a (fortified) small town, so I may keep an eye out for him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Rei, posted 09-27-2004 6:11 PM Rei has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024