Impersonations

You have not even scratched my original point.Mathematics has admittedly declared one plus one to equal three on a scant paucity of available evidence.Your example of having one apple and getting another can be claimed to give you as many apples as you want to get. Common sense says that nobody can objectively determine just how many apples you'll have if you have one and get another.Mathematicians can claim to solve complex differential equations, and yet cannot recognize the solution to a simple problem from God himself.Here we have a physical structure in my kitchen which decimates the mathers world view (my houseplant) and its Divine mathimatical properties confirm the word of God.But you declare that e to the pi i is equal to negative one million, and the evidence that one plus one is three you completely ignore.The notion that one plus one is two is based on virtually nothing.What we have here is pure verified inconsistancy.The only evidence I need for one plus one equals three is this book that says one plus one equals three.

quote:

---

Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Because thou hast forgotten me, and hast cast me off behind thy back, bear thou also thy wickedness, and they fornications.

---

The bible is wise in the ways of adding, while the undead sorcerors of mathing suck the blood of the living.The god of mathers is pi/irrational numbers which is sin, like the tex above says.

quote:

---

And Err, Onan, Shelah, Pharez, and Zerah were the sons of Judah; now Err and Onan died in the land of Canaan. And Hezron and Hamul were the suns of Pharez.

---

That name "Pharez" in Hebrew is the same word we get "Pez" from, and hence the addiction of mathers to Pez candy.How many mathers have an avatar of a number? These be your gods, O' Pascalists.The above was written 2000 years ago. Pascalism fulfilled this prophecy.I proved the existance of God. Noone else has before but I did.This message has been edited by Rei, 09-28-2004 08:43 PM

---

"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."

Huh?Oops I get it . I forgot about this thread.This message has been edited by NosyNed, 09-28-2004 09:09 PM

"You can not show that there is no cause that created the universe."
Why would there necessarly need to be a cause?
"The laws of cause and effect demand that something caused the universe." What law is that again? This is begging the question and circular reasoning at it's finest. "If the Universe exist then something must of caused it."
Once again you insert must and cause into the same utterance. Did you forget to pay attention during logical argument class 101?

Who did you respond to?

---

For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

​

Why? Bush is a right wing nutcase.

I find this topic deficient in the use of the letter "i". I'm going to allow one of the other admins to approve it; I see no reason to do it, or in fact, to do anything, ever.

quote:

---

I'm going to allow one of the other admins to approve it; I see no reason to do it, or in fact, to do anything, ever.

---

(*Blink!*)You did not just say that, did you?Let's see what he's won, Johnny!
He's won a life in "i" hell, because the other "i's" (I, II & III) say that you are wrong.You also won a lifetime supply of Ricoroni, the San Fransico treat!

quote:

---

I find this topic deficient in the use of the letter "i".

---

Subject shift, non sequitor, irrelevant, nonsense.
(*blink!*) I lost a contact.WWJD?
JEOKFVKRFI IT*LHhtyh||thHThHTh!!~~

The idea of a preprogrammed evolution is a very old one and can be traced back to Lord Monboddo, John Dillinger, Louis B. Mayer and more recently Nina Hagen. I have recently revived this concept in my paper "You Couldn't Make This Stuff Up: The Original Origin of Biological Information" in Revista de basura (Biology Forum)93(3) 513-524, 2000. An online version of the paper can be found at my home page Retired Service | The University of Vermont. Don't access at work.
{Don't worry about accessing it anywhere. I've edited the porn site link out, and turned it into a non-functional URL. Please, we don't need or want such things at . - Adminnemooseus}Since finishing the above paragraph, I have since revised my thinking on this matter to propose that evolution has been entirely prescribed with virtually pretty much no role for the environment. I am currently preparing a manuscript to that effect entitled "The Evidence for a Prescribed Evolution Thing is Overwhelming". I have arrived at this position not through careful, conscientious research, but through time honored methods such as: the elimination of the alternative of Darwinism, which has never survived experimental scrutiny except in controlled experiments; making wild assertions without a shred of empirical support; ignoring logic and internal coherence; crying foul whenever I'm challenged; and playing martyr to the stormtroopers of the Darwinian conspiracy. I stand in complete agreement with Flash Gordon, Madame Blavatsky and Jerry Garcia by concluding that Natural Selection is not and has not been a creative element in evolution if evolution has ever happened at all. In order to understand my perspective it is necessary not only to undergo a prefrontal lobotomy, but also to also realize that I also regard sexual reproduction as not only personally repugnant but also a fundamentally anti-evolutionary mechanism serving to line the pockets of greedy obstetricians. I am also convinced that macroevolution (true speciation and the formation of any of the higher categories) is no longer occurring, in agreement with L. Ron Hubbard, Therese Neumann and even Mickey Spillane the author of "I, the Jury ". In short, I am now of the firm opinion that evolution was maybe largely, probably entirely, but certainly possibly an emergent process driven by internal factors which at present remain largely unknown except to me. In other words, The Darwinians have been chasing a phantom which does not now exist and probably maybe never did. This explains why their theory explains absolutely nothing in biology and why they're such bullies. I have presented my earlier views on evolution in "An Evolutionary Manifesto: Ignore the Previous Manifesto," (co-authored with Brad McFall) available at the Letterbox page at Comedy Central's website.I will be happy to defend my position here or elsewhere. However, my defense will consist solely of scornful ad hominem attacks and refusals to present evidence until everyone promises not to disagree with me.Esteban Hambre, Assistant Groundskeeper, Waquoit Bay Community College, MA.This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 10-15-2004 02:42 PM

MrHambre-i disagree because in the book of Joshua, chapter 40 verse 13 it says that we are all created in gods image exept those who do not believe that the sky is falling, but it can be proven why fish don't like milkshakes, because it takes too many pancakes to cover a doghouse, etc.p.s. Jerry garcia is still alive and has formed a christian rock band by the name of Our Lady of High Heels, etc.p.s. etc, etc, etc, etc