Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1171 of 1498 (844034)
11-24-2018 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 1153 by Tanypteryx
11-22-2018 9:57 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
Just because science didn't know where to look, and misinterpreted what they did see, is no reason to diss the event.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1153 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-22-2018 9:57 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1175 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-24-2018 3:15 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1172 of 1498 (844035)
11-24-2018 2:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1156 by edge
11-22-2018 10:57 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
You thought poor little science has the knowledge or ability to get the knowledge of how deep the fountains of the deep were?? Ha.
They are ignorant of such things. Woefully. Willingly. Gleefully. Totally.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1156 by edge, posted 11-22-2018 10:57 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1186 by edge, posted 11-24-2018 7:59 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1173 of 1498 (844036)
11-24-2018 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1154 by Tanypteryx
11-22-2018 10:06 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
As explained, the flood was a time of great extinction, and a time when stuff reached the surface of the earth from both deep in the earth, and space (where science says iridium is to be found).
Edited by creation, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1154 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-22-2018 10:06 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1182 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-24-2018 3:55 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1174 of 1498 (844038)
11-24-2018 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1155 by AZPaul3
11-22-2018 10:55 PM


Evo demolition expert
quote:
Deep fissures open in the crust of the planet and out explodes, gushes and oozes all manner of ejecta. Regardless of your personal self-serving definitions those are the only fountains of the deep we have ever experienced.
No one asked what you who lived many millennia after there even were fountains of the deep in existence experienced!!! You kidding? Besides, no one says the water brought up had to be limited to the depth of the crust!
Look at the evidence, it seems iridium was with the water, and how deep does science say that is? Ha (as if it had a clue)
quote:
And you know this how? Centuries of study by thousands of experts, both amateur and professional, says you're wrong.
Truth may be a better approach to these issues.
Name ONE of your so called experts that studied any violent rupture of a fountain of the deep, or from a window of heaven!!!!!!!??
By the way, the even was thousands of years ago...not centuries.
Your claims are absolutely destroyed here.
quote:
I'm not such an expert, neither amateur nor professional.
Besides, you probably wouldn't understand or except the properties these experts cited, so I'm not going to waste my efforts on trying to educate a committed anti-intellectual.
Finally. You admit true ignorance. Then of course you follow it with a plea to believe real hard, because somewhere...in hiding apparently...there are experts who know. Hilarious.
quote:
Funny how religious apologists try to use the term "religious" as an insult. Like you know being religious is being wrong.
Again, the science is quite rigorous. Not conducive to the simple-minded religionist.
I think of myself not as some mere apologist, but more of an evo demolition expert!
The point about you peddling beliefs as science, is that you do not offer your religion as such, but commit fraud.
quote:
Except the Earth shows no signs of such flood, but, does show copious points of evidence that a big honking space mountain hit us hard causing an environmental calamity that lead, directly and indirectly, to the mass extinction of some 70% of all life in the ensuing millennia. Tens of thousands of years. Quite contrary to the narrative of your flud fable. I'm sure you can make up an unevidenced fantasy reason for this.
A big extinction is associated with the time of the impact...
Being caused by it is another matter! Whether even the impact was from below orn ot is not studied or apparently known!
quote:
Iridium comes from space rocks in concentrations we find in the K-T boundary layer and iridium only comes from the Earth in trace amounts thousands of times less than what is in the K-T boundary layer. The iridium in the K-T boundary layer came from one rather largish space rock.
Since the flood water came from even deeper space, you are in no position to tell us how much iridium it brought also! No position at all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1155 by AZPaul3, posted 11-22-2018 10:55 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1260 by AZPaul3, posted 12-01-2018 8:19 PM creation has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 1175 of 1498 (844040)
11-24-2018 3:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1171 by creation
11-24-2018 2:50 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
from Message 1153
Tanypteryx writes:
creation writes:
Your claims that the flood is fiction have no basis in reality or fact.
You're so funny. All your posts here demonstrate that you have no clue about reality or facts. There is no evidence of a global flood anywhere in any geological formation. It is fictional just like every other story in your bible. Science has known this for 200 years.
creation writes:
Just because science didn't know where to look, and misinterpreted what they did see, is no reason to diss the event.
So, they didn't know where to look but they misinterpreted it when they did see it. Does that actually make sense to you?
I know you aren't aware of this, but science looks everywhere. If you think science misinterpreted evidence you need to demonstrate exactly what observations were made and why the interpretations of those observations are incorrect and why your interpretations should replace them.
If you mean disregard the fictional flood, then of course we should, because there is absolutely no shred of evidence to support it, so indeed diss the event.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1171 by creation, posted 11-24-2018 2:50 PM creation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1179 by creation, posted 11-24-2018 3:39 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1176 of 1498 (844041)
11-24-2018 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 1157 by vimesey
11-22-2018 10:57 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
For the most part, yes!
However, I happen to know my Friend that made the planet, and have details of the materials He uses in other projects. Material such as Gold and diamonds and rubies, and topaz and amethyst, and spiritual materials, and lapis lazuli, and emerald for example.
The model of the inner earth science offers has us living on fire and dirt in a fluke universe..etc etc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1157 by vimesey, posted 11-22-2018 10:57 PM vimesey has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1188 by edge, posted 11-24-2018 8:06 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1177 of 1498 (844045)
11-24-2018 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 1160 by Pressie
11-23-2018 7:18 AM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
looking at the article on your formation in wiki I see this
"The formation mechanisms of the chromitite seams in the Bushveld Igneous Complex are highly debated: numerous mechanisms have been proposed."
A simple conclusion would be to assume it was formed in the former nature. That would explain why they struggle to cook up explanations now!
The evidence mounts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1160 by Pressie, posted 11-23-2018 7:18 AM Pressie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1213 by Pressie, posted 11-26-2018 5:57 AM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1178 of 1498 (844046)
11-24-2018 3:37 PM
Reply to: Message 1161 by edge
11-23-2018 11:23 AM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
quote:
For instance, we know that iridium is the second most dense natural element on earth and it would logically partition into the core of the earth during early stages of planet formation along with iron (which is instrumental in forming our magnetic field) and other heavy elements. The trend of increasing iridium content with depth in the earth suggests much higher concentrations in the core also."
So there is a trend to find more iridium deeper down. The evidence mounts.
Edited by creation, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1161 by edge, posted 11-23-2018 11:23 AM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1187 by edge, posted 11-24-2018 8:03 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1179 of 1498 (844048)
11-24-2018 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1175 by Tanypteryx
11-24-2018 3:15 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
Iridium and the KT level for example...misinterpreted. Sullied by your religion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1175 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-24-2018 3:15 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1183 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-24-2018 4:21 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1180 of 1498 (844049)
11-24-2018 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1162 by 14174dm
11-23-2018 11:25 AM


Re: Iiridium layer during flood
No? I thought it decreased as one got further from the (fount of the deep remnant?) in Yucatan?
Since there were phases to the flood, we also could expect it to be prevalent at a certain time!
Got any tough questions now?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1162 by 14174dm, posted 11-23-2018 11:25 AM 14174dm has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1185 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-24-2018 4:38 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1181 of 1498 (844050)
11-24-2018 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1165 by 14174dm
11-23-2018 2:14 PM


Re: Evidence of fountain of the deep
Science doesn't know. This is a silence forum. Once we establish science does not know, you can move this thread over to the religious debate area!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1165 by 14174dm, posted 11-23-2018 2:14 PM 14174dm has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1184 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-24-2018 4:32 PM creation has replied
 Message 1190 by 14174dm, posted 11-24-2018 11:14 PM creation has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


(1)
Message 1182 of 1498 (844051)
11-24-2018 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1173 by creation
11-24-2018 2:54 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
As explained, the flood was a time of great extinction, and a time when stuff reached the surface of the earth from both deep in the earth, and space (where science says iridium is to be found).
You didn't explain anything. How is this an answer to Message 1154?
Tanypteryx writes:
creation writes:
This has the earmarks of the flood.
What are those earmarks?
It looks to me like you are making up more BS about your fictional flood.
creation writes:
As for space...the waters resided out beyond where the stars are that came to earth in the flood. This leaves a lot of room for the water picking up iridium!!!
Out beyond where the stars are? You're kidding, right?
So, you still don't know what the earmarks of a flood are, let alone your fictional worldwide flood?
You just keep making up imaginary fantasies about fictional water from Earth's core and more fictional water from "beyond where the stars are."
On top of all your other mistakes, you don't seem to realize that iridium is not soluble in water, leaving you without an explanation how water could deposit iridium in the K-Pg boundary layer in the pattern actually observed.
Your whole imaginary fictional fantasy has been blasted so full of holes by science that there is nothing left to hold it together.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1173 by creation, posted 11-24-2018 2:54 PM creation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1191 by creation, posted 11-25-2018 3:16 AM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 1183 of 1498 (844053)
11-24-2018 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1179 by creation
11-24-2018 3:39 PM


Re: Correlation validation by Egyptian Chronology
Iridium and the KT level for example...misinterpreted.
Can you point to the interpretation that is incorrect? Nope, didn't think so.
So you still have no clue what you are talking about and have nothing but empty bullshit for an answer?
Sullied by your religion.
You sully your religion with your fictional fantasy.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1179 by creation, posted 11-24-2018 3:39 PM creation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1192 by creation, posted 11-25-2018 3:18 AM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


(1)
Message 1184 of 1498 (844054)
11-24-2018 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 1181 by creation
11-24-2018 3:45 PM


Re: Evidence of fountain of the deep
Science doesn't know. This is a silence forum. Once we establish science does not know, you can move this thread over to the religious debate area!
So far, you are doing a great job establishing that you have no knowledge about science or how to demonstrate science is wrong about anything.
It's truly bizarre that you think religion is the worst possible description you can call something.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1181 by creation, posted 11-24-2018 3:45 PM creation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1193 by creation, posted 11-25-2018 3:19 AM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4344
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.9


Message 1185 of 1498 (844056)
11-24-2018 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 1180 by creation
11-24-2018 3:42 PM


Re: Iiridium layer during flood
Got any tough questions now?
I have one.....why do you still believe in your misinterpretation of an imaginary, fictional, fantasy flood story in the face of overwhelming contrary physical evidence?

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1180 by creation, posted 11-24-2018 3:42 PM creation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1194 by creation, posted 11-25-2018 3:20 AM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024