Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,331 Year: 3,588/9,624 Month: 459/974 Week: 72/276 Day: 23/49 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pat Robertson shows again why the Christian Right is such a laughingstock
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2511 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 91 of 232 (236661)
08-25-2005 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by GDR
08-24-2005 2:18 PM


Re: I agree..for example where's...
I'm a Conservative. (At least by Canadian standards.
Hate to break it to you, but conservative Canadian reads pretty much like pinko in the red states

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by GDR, posted 08-24-2005 2:18 PM GDR has not replied

Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2511 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 92 of 232 (236662)
08-25-2005 1:44 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by randman
08-24-2005 3:13 PM


Re: Howard Dean
So the religious right has Pat Robertson and the democrats have Howard Dean.
Right, because Pat is advocating a policy of assassination and plunder and Dean is advocating that we shouldn't be in Iraq on false pretense.
If you call that a wash, I'd hate to see your laundry.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by randman, posted 08-24-2005 3:13 PM randman has not replied

Silent H
Member (Idle past 5837 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 93 of 232 (236687)
08-25-2005 4:26 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by randman
08-24-2005 4:50 PM


Re: Howard Dean
don't you mean a loud yell?
Yeah, that comes close to calling for the US to murder someone. This is exactly what I said with Tal, and you guys keep proving it.
Those who are critics of the right, generally focus on actual issues and criticize that... laugh at that. Those who are apologists focus on mere mannerisms and wording of your opponents to the exclusion of their message.
That's ad hominem.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by randman, posted 08-24-2005 4:50 PM randman has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5695 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 94 of 232 (236697)
08-25-2005 6:55 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by Nuggin
08-25-2005 1:13 AM


Re: I agree..for example where's...
Well how about this -- Karl testified under oath before the investigating committee that he was not the source of the leak.
So he LIED UNDER OATH...
Do you have any proof?
See, that's the difference. Karl has testified under oath, so if he lied, he will be indicted.
Clinton was FOUND GUILTY and lost his law liscence.
This message has been edited by Tal, 08-25-2005 06:57 AM

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 1:13 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by arachnophilia, posted 08-25-2005 7:27 AM Tal has replied
 Message 153 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 11:41 AM Tal has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1362 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 95 of 232 (236701)
08-25-2005 7:27 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Tal
08-25-2005 6:55 AM


Re: I agree..for example where's...
Clinton was FOUND GUILTY and lost his law liscence.
yes, but where you put your penis is not a matter of treason.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 6:55 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 7:30 AM arachnophilia has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5695 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 96 of 232 (236702)
08-25-2005 7:30 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by arachnophilia
08-25-2005 7:27 AM


Re: I agree..for example where's...
yes, but where you put your penis is not a matter of treason.
I didn't say anything about that. The issue was lying under oath.
Try and keep up.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by arachnophilia, posted 08-25-2005 7:27 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by arachnophilia, posted 08-25-2005 7:41 AM Tal has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1362 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 97 of 232 (236704)
08-25-2005 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by Tal
08-25-2005 7:30 AM


Re: I agree..for example where's...
I didn't say anything about that. The issue was lying under oath.
Try and keep up.
you try to keep up. MY point was the seriousness of the issue. i couldn't care less about the personal matters of my politicians. but the actual political concers, stuff that has to do with national security etc, i DO care about. one is gravely more important than the other.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 7:30 AM Tal has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 98 of 232 (236705)
08-25-2005 7:43 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Monk
08-24-2005 9:51 AM


quote:
I really don’t understand why Robertson would make such statements. It flies in the face of a preacher’s mentality and it does not further his cause as a televangelists, (moral ground).
Well maybe he's not really a preacher, then.
He does use the veneer of being a preacher to get conservative Christians to listen to him and trust hiom, though.
quote:
He is not part of the State department
Since when did that ever stop any political hack from saying stuff like that? Ann Coulter said something similar years ago and nobody on the right batted an eye because she said it about Muslims:
quote:
so why promulgate absurd foreign policy statements like that?
Of course, he doesn't think that such statements are absurd.
quote:
OTOH, he has done it before with similar foot-in-mouth comments and it doesn’t seem to hurt his popularity, (or donations). And he is entitled to foment any kind of opinion.
He has advocated violence on numerous occasions, including making comments saying that government buildings aught to be blown up with nuclear bombs. When is the Right going to stand up to this guy and kick his wacko, racist, sexist ass to the curb?
quote:
We’ve certainly seen similar extreme statements from the far left.
Please quote some similar extreme statements from someone on the left (which is really the old middle) who has a similar position of political influence and power in the country as Robertson.
quote:
I don’t know if Robertson was serious about his comments or if it was just rhetoric in response to similar ridiculous statements made by Chavez who said:
If someday they {US}, get the crazy idea of coming to invade us, we’ll make them bite the dust defending the freedom of our land.
Now I don’t think for one minute that Chavez is serious about this statement. It’s just rhetoric. Certainly the administration has not threatened to invade Venezuela nor are they under any sanctions imposed by the US. Chavez is just another dictator who is beating the drums to rally anti-American sentiment among his followers, (subjects).
But, given the war in Iraq, and given the oil that Argentina has, why wouldn't the idea of a US invasion give Chavez a bit of pause?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Monk, posted 08-24-2005 9:51 AM Monk has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 99 of 232 (236707)
08-25-2005 7:49 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by berberry
08-24-2005 10:43 AM


and he's a liar, too
quote:
One thing that gets me about conservative reaction to him is the fact that he gets a pass whenever he works with liberal human rights groups, which he does from time to time. Why isn't that ever used against him? Cindy Sheehan is allied with a number of liberal groups, including human rights groups, and this is taken as a sign that she's nuts.
Conservatives never seem to get upset when Pat suggests that god sends hurricanes to punish people who tolerate homosexuality, or that he sends tsunami to punish people who don't worship him properly (or whatever stupid reason he gave for god sending that wave - I've forgotten what it was now).
But you've given an honest assessment and I appreciate that, especially since so many of the conservatives I know aren't condemning Pat but are rather harping on the MSM for even mentioning it.
I just saw on the news last night a clip of Robertson blaming the national media for "misinterpreting" and "taking out of context" his statements about "taking out" Chavez and that he didn't really mean that we should actually assasinate him.
Then MSNBC rolled the video of Pat saying something like, "Yeah, I think we should assasinate him".
Big.
Fat.
Liar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by berberry, posted 08-24-2005 10:43 AM berberry has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 100 of 232 (236708)
08-25-2005 7:58 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Phat
08-24-2005 12:01 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
quote:
Of course I start these types of arguments merely to stir up controversy! As a Christian, I would never support Pat Robertson or any political Christians in any degree!
Yes you would, Phatboy.
Didn't you just tell us a little while ago that you were listening to some super conservative Christian/political radio program (was it Robertson's?) and you were in support of it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Phat, posted 08-24-2005 12:01 PM Phat has not replied

FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4163 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 101 of 232 (236709)
08-25-2005 7:59 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Tal
08-24-2005 2:58 PM


Re: Retraction?
Tal writes:
Before I answer, tell me where any Mulsim Radical Cleric has ever retracted, corrected, or otherwise attempted to change what they said about killing people.
Who fucking cares? This seems like more typical right-wing "let's quickly change the subject and/or blame someone else" bullshit. Whether or not some radical Muslim Cleric retracts or apologizes or corrects or otherwise attempts to change what they have said has no bearing whatsoever on what Pat Robertson said. Is there some sort of mysteries connection between nut-job religious people such that they all somehow are tied together at the tongue?
All I said was that Pat Roberston retracting what he said by lying about what he said is not really a retraction (and remember, I wrote that before his latest apology). And instead of addressing that issue you bring up a completely unrelated topic to somehow make Pat Robertson look better ("golly gee, he apologized") or some other such pathetic bullshit. You just can't say: "you know what FliesOnly, you're right". No, you've got to fire up the ole the right-wing bullshit spin machine.
God, I despise this kind of shit. I leave this site for the day, come back the next morning and find that people on the right are bringing up Howard Dean, or that the Right is better than the Left, or that it's all ok cuz man is a sinner. WTF...Robertson has lost it...admit it...get over it, and stop shifting the conversation about how the Right is right.
Edited to correct a spelling and typing error
This message has been edited by FliesOnly, 08-25-2005 08:05 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Tal, posted 08-24-2005 2:58 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:05 AM FliesOnly has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 102 of 232 (236710)
08-25-2005 8:02 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by FairWitness
08-24-2005 12:43 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
quote:
It robs the human spirit of the will to excel & achieve, it robs the gains of those who work hard & gives those gains to the idle,
You mean, kind of like the publically-held corporation in which the workers bust their humps so the idle who own the stocks can gain?
What would you say about a country's economy where millions of children go without enough food or any healthcare, yet around 90% of the wealth is controlled by only 2% of the people?
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 08-25-2005 08:04 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 12:43 PM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:27 AM nator has replied
 Message 113 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:16 AM nator has replied
 Message 115 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:21 AM nator has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5695 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 103 of 232 (236711)
08-25-2005 8:05 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by FliesOnly
08-25-2005 7:59 AM


Re: Retraction?
Hey Flies, you are about 89 messages too slow.
Your entire little tirade was answered in message 12.
Try to keep up.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by FliesOnly, posted 08-25-2005 7:59 AM FliesOnly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by FliesOnly, posted 08-25-2005 8:09 AM Tal has replied

FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4163 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 104 of 232 (236713)
08-25-2005 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by Tal
08-25-2005 8:05 AM


Re: Retraction?
Tal writes:
Your entire little tirade was answered in message 12.
Try to keep up.
My "tirade" was in respomse to your post 54
Learn to count.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:05 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:26 AM FliesOnly has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 105 of 232 (236714)
08-25-2005 8:10 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Monk
08-24-2005 12:57 PM


quote:
I'm guessing here, but I think that you don't hear a lot of conservative outcry in situations like this mainly because those in the media who lean left do such a fine job of attacking that it hardly seems worthwhile to throw gas on the fire.
Come on, mok, you know that's not true.
Fox News has honed the fine art of "thowing gas on the fire", what with O'Reilly yelling at his guests and calling them all sorts of names, and calling people in the news "stupid", "idiotic", and worse.
They don't attack one of their own because he's, well, one of their own. He's part of the team, and you never publically criticize part of the team.
quote:
I might add that the same holds for the left when one of your own is spouting nonesense.
Like what, who, and when?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Monk, posted 08-24-2005 12:57 PM Monk has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024