Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   corroboration of virgin birth, history of medical science
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3068 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 31 of 34 (115235)
06-15-2004 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by PaulK
06-12-2004 7:40 AM


Re: Ken pretends to have evidence again
thank you for your response.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by PaulK, posted 06-12-2004 7:40 AM PaulK has not replied

  
kendemyer
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 34 (139711)
09-03-2004 5:57 PM


to: ALL
This thread gives my opinions on this thread more fully:
Home | CS Lewis

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by kendemyer, posted 09-03-2004 6:00 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
kendemyer
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 34 (139713)
09-03-2004 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by kendemyer
09-03-2004 5:57 PM


Re: to: ALL
I am on christianonnet in this string.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by kendemyer, posted 09-03-2004 5:57 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Rekkr
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 34 (162668)
11-23-2004 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by kendemyer
05-28-2004 2:49 PM


Did you know that the virgin birth is misquoted in the Bible? If you read in Matthew:
quote:
Matthew 1 (NIV)
22All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23"The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel"[4] --which means, "God with us."
Now the footnote [4] says "1:23 Isaiah 7:14" (NIV).
Matthew was referring to the prophet Isaiah. In Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah states that a child will be born to a virgin, but this is not a prediction of Jesus Christ. The baby which was to be born to the virgin has nothing to do with the messiah. He was born while the Jews were under attack by the Assyrians [?]. He was, I think, supposed to end the fighting or be a sign. I am really not sure of the last part, his purpose, but I can assure you he had nothing to do with the Messiah. If you don't believe me, read the passages.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by kendemyer, posted 05-28-2004 2:49 PM kendemyer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024