Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is your definition of love
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1151 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 1 of 4 (408760)
07-04-2007 5:30 PM


Nothing emerges from the visible things
Hi,
What is your definition of love,
[__] - a state of mind
[__] - a way of action
[__] - vote in none of the above
------- this might help the investigation,
lef - Nothing emerges from the visible things but from the perspective that one sees them.
-- example, a lot of good actions taken have been done in the name, image and system of religion and doctrines, but the ends do not justify the means -- whatever is done in the name of an institution -- a denomination, a doctrine of faith, or beast, will tend to be viewed as something done 'in the sight': Id Est for a religious or institutional interest, unlike what is done 'not by sight' --not institutional--, but secretly, for emunah--total fidelitate/fidelity.
-------
Bet - Love for friendship -- paraphrase -- There is no love greater than this: that one gives his life for no perspective [or bond] other than friendship.
Holman paraphrased -- No one has greater love than this, that someone would lay down his life for friendship.
Wicliffe -- '..put his life for..'
Douay-Rheims -- '..lay down his life for..'
-------
View the original significance of the word 'Philadelphia' = 'Love of friendship', i.e. the name of the gathering of people -- that is referred at one of the seven letters in the last book of Scriptures --unlike the obscured Greek version 'brotherly'--,
-------
love + no perspective of physical approach = love for friendship
love + supported by the perspective of physical approach = common love
-------
Gmel - In the time that love does flame -- not for a parental bond, neither for the possibility of a flesh and blood approach,
true love shall flame for friendship only, and shall remain and become intense, despite the absence of perspective of physical approach.
Dálet - Love for friendship has nothing to do with the lie that there would be no love greater than that from a mother for her child, or whether a father for his daughter or other parental bonds.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : shortening: less words

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminPD, posted 07-06-2007 6:55 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 2 of 4 (408953)
07-06-2007 6:55 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel
07-04-2007 5:30 PM


Point of the Discussion
I don't see any clear point to this proposal dealing with evolution or creation.
I'm not inclined to promote this proposal and will close this thread on Saturday.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 07-04-2007 5:30 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 07-06-2007 2:12 PM AdminPD has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1151 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 3 of 4 (409002)
07-06-2007 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminPD
07-06-2007 6:55 AM


Re: Point of the Discussion
Hi AdminPD,
The point of the discussion is that one's definition of love will lay out his/her perspective on the existence of an eternal who, since it is said in a certain place that the Eternal is love;
And if love remains not for a parental bond neither for the possibility of a physical approach,
then the constant permanence of Love for friendship is sureness of eternal Justice and evidence of the existence of a first-fruit of I AM's eternity --i.e. spirit; living electricity-- running through the nervous system.
-------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminPD, posted 07-06-2007 6:55 AM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminPD, posted 07-06-2007 2:45 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 4 of 4 (409004)
07-06-2007 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel
07-06-2007 2:12 PM


Re: Point of the Discussion
Unfortunately that's not what your OP says.
The OP does not have a clear statement or question to be addressed or a clear position being supported.
As written, I am still not inclined to promote this topic and will close it on Saturday.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 07-06-2007 2:12 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024