Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christmas Star Explained
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 278 (427489)
10-11-2007 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Dr Adequate
10-11-2007 2:19 PM


Tell us, then how much latin, and Greek were around when the scriptures of Genesis, and numbers were written?? Work on that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-11-2007 2:19 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Jon, posted 10-11-2007 9:46 PM simple has not replied
 Message 54 by arachnophilia, posted 10-13-2007 3:38 AM simple has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 278 (427490)
10-11-2007 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by macaroniandcheese
10-11-2007 2:17 PM


Re: Christmas star
Can you show me where it 'rested' ON the stable??? You can't be serious??
As for your opinion of what you heard the wise men were, add that to the list of unknowns.
Now, I never heard of this mithraic star you refer to. I have heard of the Christmas star, as have most people, I would think.
It could not have been a planet or star, or comet, or etc. Not if you look what this thing did. That is the point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 2:17 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 5:15 PM simple has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 18 of 278 (427491)
10-11-2007 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by simple
10-11-2007 5:08 PM


Re: Christmas star
Now, I never heard of this mithraic star you refer to.
it wasn't a star. it was the normal astrological night sky. you've hear of the age of aquarius? same deal, just the end of the age of tarus and the rise of i think it was mars.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 5:08 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 5:59 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 19 of 278 (427492)
10-11-2007 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by simple
10-11-2007 5:02 PM


quote:
The records of the area were controlled by those that had Jesus killed, and the bible documents the fact they tried to hire liars to say He never arose, and other things. They were known liars, and no doubt their records reflected that. Much the same way that the defeated Egyptians of old likely purged their records of their abject defeat at God's hands!
Rubbish. Firstly if nobody knew that it had happened then the author of Matthew couldn't have known that it happened. Secondly Herod never had that degree of control.
As for the Egyptians if you really think that a crushed Egypt could purge the records of rival states or hide all the archaeological evidence you're just being silly.
So all you've got is lame excuses to try and explain away the fact that the evidence doesn't support you. Even then you have to ignore some of the evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 5:02 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 5:58 PM PaulK has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 278 (427494)
10-11-2007 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by PaulK
10-11-2007 5:19 PM


quote:
Rubbish. Firstly if nobody knew that it had happened then the author of Matthew couldn't have known that it happened. Secondly Herod never had that degree of control.
Rubbish. WE knew, and WE had records coming out the keester. OUR records WE kept, and God kept, and they were not subject to the wily wicked ways of men. We knew just fine, we touched Him saw, and heard Him, and knew Him, and all about the events of the time.
Secondly, Herod was not who I was talking about, if he was even alive when the official records of the star were expunged, if they were.
Like the veil of the temple being rent, that was never put of the Jewish records of the time either. We have the records, though.
quote:
As for the Egyptians if you really think that a crushed Egypt could purge the records of rival states or hide all the archaeological evidence you're just being silly.
Prove it. I don't believe you.
quote:
So all you've got is lame excuses to try and explain away the fact that the evidence doesn't support you. Even then you have to ignore some of the evidence.
If you are talking about the topic, the starship of God, there is no evidence other than the bible, that I have seen. What is there to ignore?? Focus. If you are claiming some evidence show us. Otherwise, what is it you are talking about??

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by PaulK, posted 10-11-2007 5:19 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by PaulK, posted 10-11-2007 6:12 PM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 278 (427495)
10-11-2007 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by macaroniandcheese
10-11-2007 5:15 PM


Re: Christmas star
OK, so the ages of the horoscope you think was the Christmas star now?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 5:15 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 6:06 PM simple has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 22 of 278 (427496)
10-11-2007 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by simple
10-11-2007 5:59 PM


Re: Christmas star
that would be what i said the first time. and it's not something i came up with on my own.
i'm sure an alien saucer is a much better explanation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 5:59 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:28 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 23 of 278 (427498)
10-11-2007 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by simple
10-11-2007 5:58 PM


quote:
Rubbish. WE knew, and WE had records coming out the keester. OUR records WE kept, and God kept, and they were not subject to the wily wicked ways of men. We knew just fine, we touched Him saw, and heard Him, and knew Him, and all about the events of the time.
What records ? If you have so many records where are they ? All you have is one story, that is probably just a fiction.
quote:
Secondly, Herod was not who I was talking about, if he was even alive when the official records of the star were expunged, if they were.
Herod is the only person who fits your description. Later authorities would be in no position to connect the alleged star to Jesus. But then there's no evidence that there were any official records.
quote:
Prove it. I don't believe you.
If Egypt lost a large portion of its army and population (don't forget that the Exodus supposedly took 2,000,000 people out of Egypt - itself a large fraction of the population on top of the supposed deaths) then it would be in no position to force other nations to hide the fact. How could it be ? Rather we should see other nations taking advantage of Egypt's greatly weakened state. And how can you hide a population crash ?
But never mind that. It's up to you to prove that we should trust Matthew's story. Not invent excuses to explain away the evidence against it.
quote:
If you are talking about the topic, the starship of God, there is no evidence other than the bible, that I have seen. What is there to ignore?? Focus. If you are claiming some evidence show us. Otherwise, what is it you are talking about??
The evidence you are ignoring is in the Bible. Luke's Nativity story. It's too different from Matthew's. It is evidence that Matthew's story is fiction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 5:58 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:38 PM PaulK has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 639 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 24 of 278 (427504)
10-11-2007 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by simple
10-11-2007 4:58 PM


Re: Christmas star
I am pointing out that the 'life of Christ' as depicted by Matthew appears to be a political commentary on the life of Augustus.
Can you give me a reason other than 'Satan is a deceiver' or 'God did it' for the strong similarities of the cult of Augustus to the story of Jesus as depicted in the Gospel of Matthew?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 4:58 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:31 PM ramoss has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 278 (427506)
10-11-2007 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by macaroniandcheese
10-11-2007 6:06 PM


Re: Christmas star
Funny you add alien to something that God used to fly around in.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 6:06 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 7:29 PM simple has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 26 of 278 (427507)
10-11-2007 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by simple
10-11-2007 7:28 PM


Re: Christmas star
*blinks*
yeah. weeeooooweeeee!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:28 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:45 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 278 (427508)
10-11-2007 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by ramoss
10-11-2007 7:16 PM


Re: Christmas star
Nonsense. The long awaited Messiah had nothing to do with your whatshisname. The fulfilled scriptures of virgin birth, Bethlehem birth, and etc had to do with God promising stuff, and delivering.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by ramoss, posted 10-11-2007 7:16 PM ramoss has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by AdminPhat, posted 10-12-2007 5:18 AM simple has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 278 (427511)
10-11-2007 7:38 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by PaulK
10-11-2007 6:12 PM


quote:
What records ? If you have so many records where are they ? All you have is one story, that is probably just a fiction.
Our records were eventually compiled into the bible. This is news?
quote:
Herod is the only person who fits your description. Later authorities would be in no position to connect the alleged star to Jesus. But then there's no evidence that there were any official records.
Of course they would, the scribes and pharisees knew all about these things.
quote:
If Egypt lost a large portion of its army and population (don't forget that the Exodus supposedly took 2,000,000 people out of Egypt - itself a large fraction of the population on top of the supposed deaths) then it would be in no position to force other nations to hide the fact. How could it be ? Rather we should see other nations taking advantage of Egypt's greatly weakened state. And how can you hide a population crash ?
What other nations were there in Egypt, while they were getting clobbered??? Who do you think they wanted to hide it FROM??!
quote:
But never mind that. It's up to you to prove that we should trust Matthew's story. Not invent excuses to explain away the evidence against it.
No need to prove the bible here, it is assumed true. You can assume what you like. What we are looking at is the bible Christmas star, and what it really was, not whether it really was.
The only real evidence I can think of outside the bible, is the lack of evidence for the star, which IS evidence it was not a modern sense star!
quote:
The evidence you are ignoring is in the Bible. Luke's Nativity story. It's too different from Matthew's. It is evidence that Matthew's story is fiction.
What in Luke do you think means that the star was not a starship??

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by PaulK, posted 10-11-2007 6:12 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 7:40 PM simple has replied
 Message 39 by PaulK, posted 10-12-2007 1:56 AM simple has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 29 of 278 (427512)
10-11-2007 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by simple
10-11-2007 7:38 PM


starship??
jefferson starship?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:38 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by simple, posted 10-11-2007 7:47 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 278 (427514)
10-11-2007 7:45 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by macaroniandcheese
10-11-2007 7:29 PM


Re: Christmas star
I agree. The size wasn't, if I recall given in Ezekiel. Imagine one of these about 6 times the size of a football field!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 7:29 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-11-2007 7:50 PM simple has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024