Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   So help me dog (or god, whatever!).
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 16 of 35 (518680)
08-07-2009 8:49 AM


Jury Duty again!
Well I just received a jury duty notice and so I once again will probably get to be a juror. If selected I am going to try and submit a request to take a secular oath this time. The religious zealots down here started opening Orlando city council meetings and the Juror instruction sessions with the pledge of alleigence with the overly fevrent ones almost shouting "under god" !

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by LinearAq, posted 08-07-2009 9:09 AM kjsimons has replied
 Message 21 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-07-2009 10:01 AM kjsimons has replied
 Message 28 by Capt Stormfield, posted 08-07-2009 1:13 PM kjsimons has replied

  
LinearAq
Member (Idle past 4701 days)
Posts: 598
From: Pocomoke City, MD
Joined: 11-03-2004


Message 17 of 35 (518688)
08-07-2009 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by kjsimons
08-07-2009 8:49 AM


Easy for atheists to get out of jury duty in Maryland
From here
quote:
Art. 36. That as it is the duty of every man to worship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to Him, all persons are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty; wherefore, no person ought by any law to be molested in his person or estate, on account of his religious persuasion, or profession, or for his religious practice, unless, under the color of religion, he shall disturb the good order, peace or safety of the State, or shall infringe the laws of morality, or injure others in their natural, civil or religious rights; nor ought any person to be compelled to frequent, or maintain, or contribute, unless on contract, to maintain, any place of worship, or any ministry; nor shall any person, otherwise competent, be deemed incompetent as a witness, or juror, on account of his religious belief; provided, he believes in the existence of God, and that under His dispensation such person will be held morally accountable for his acts, and be rewarded or punished therefor either in this world or in the world to come.
Nothing shall prohibit or require the making reference to belief in, reliance upon, or invoking the aid of God or a Supreme Being in any governmental or public document, proceeding, activity, ceremony, school, institution, or place.
Nothing in this article shall constitute an establishment of religion
bold emphasis mine
I'm not sure how the judge can ensure the requirements for a juror can be met if he has to follow the requirements of the second paragraph. Seems like a bit of a contradiction to me.
Good luck in performing your civic duty. Hang the guilty bas...um...I mean...Bring to bear all your wisdom and experience in determining the disposition of the accused.
Edited by LinearAq, : Emphasis for quote

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 8:49 AM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 9:35 AM LinearAq has not replied
 Message 19 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 9:39 AM LinearAq has not replied
 Message 20 by Percy, posted 08-07-2009 9:49 AM LinearAq has not replied
 Message 22 by caffeine, posted 08-07-2009 10:12 AM LinearAq has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 18 of 35 (518691)
08-07-2009 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by LinearAq
08-07-2009 9:09 AM


Re: Easy for atheists to get out of jury duty in Maryland
Wow! I wonder when that article was enacted. It clearly is unconstitutional but then again there are lots of laws that are on the books that are unconstitutional and are just not enforced. It does seem to be contradicted by the second paragraph, though the wording "Nothing shall prohibit or require ..." makes it seem that this was more to allow the reference to deities and belief.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by LinearAq, posted 08-07-2009 9:09 AM LinearAq has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 19 of 35 (518692)
08-07-2009 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by LinearAq
08-07-2009 9:09 AM


Re: Easy for atheists to get out of jury duty in Maryland
The article right after it is interesting too!
Art. 37. That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God; nor shall the Legislature prescribe any other oath of office than the oath prescribed by this Constitution.
Basically there will be no religious test except for this one!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by LinearAq, posted 08-07-2009 9:09 AM LinearAq has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22489
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.0


Message 20 of 35 (518693)
08-07-2009 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by LinearAq
08-07-2009 9:09 AM


Re: Easy for atheists to get out of jury duty in Maryland
From the December 10, 1965, issue of Time Magazine (God & Courts):
Time Magazine writes:
Not until this fall did the Maryland Court of Appeals finally bow to the "inevitable result" of the 1961 Torcaso decision. Then it bowed with a vengeance. The court reversed the murder conviction of a Buddhist named Lidge Schowgurow, who claimed that he had been denied equal protection while on trial for killing his wife (TIME, Oct. 22). Since Buddhists do not believe in God, he argued that members of his faith were automatically excluded from his jury. Even though no Buddhist would-be jurors were involved, the court upheld Schowgurow and voided the "belief in God" requirement for jurors throughout the state.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by LinearAq, posted 08-07-2009 9:09 AM LinearAq has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 35 (518695)
08-07-2009 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by kjsimons
08-07-2009 8:49 AM


Re: Jury Duty again!
Well I just received a jury duty notice and so I once again will probably get to be a juror.
Again!?
I've never been contact about jury duty ever, not even once.
What gives?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 8:49 AM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 10:34 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1050 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008


Message 22 of 35 (518696)
08-07-2009 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by LinearAq
08-07-2009 9:09 AM


Linguistic tradition
I'm not sure how the judge can ensure the requirements for a juror can be met if he has to follow the requirements of the second paragraph. Seems like a bit of a contradiction to me.
The wording implies to me that a juror can be judged incompetent for not believing in God, but doesn't have to be. Maybe I'm misinterpreting the meaning of older texts though.
If the idea of swearing to God bothers you, don't think of it as actually swearing to God. Think of it as a formalised piece of language simply meaning that you're making a serious promise.
The long influence of Christianity on English and American culture means that our language is riddled with religious formulations we now use devoid of religious meaning. I don't believe in God, and yet I entreat Him to bless people when they sneeze; and cry His name in anguish when frustrated. I warn people away from schadenfreude by reminding them that only God's grace keeps us from a similar fate to those unfortunates we mock, and I entreat the aid of Heaven when things look bleak.
It all seems less offensive when viewed this way, and even kind of nicely quaint.
Edited by caffeine, : To give a subtopic title

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by LinearAq, posted 08-07-2009 9:09 AM LinearAq has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 23 of 35 (518702)
08-07-2009 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by New Cat's Eye
08-07-2009 10:01 AM


Re: Jury Duty again!
I've been in Florida for the last 19 years and this is about my sixth or seventh jury duty call up. I was selected 3 times. In the previous ten years that I was eligable to be a juror (living in Michigan and then Chicago) I was only called up once for a Federal case but I wasn't selected. It's kind of interesting to watch the process and the more I see the more I don't ever want to be on trial! The Orange County Courthouse in Orlando,FL is pretty nice though and since it's a highrise the view from the jury room is beautiful.
http://www.consultwebs.com/...es/fl/orlando/604/2/occ_73.jpg

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-07-2009 10:01 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-07-2009 12:23 PM kjsimons has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 35 (518717)
08-07-2009 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by kjsimons
08-07-2009 10:34 AM


Re: Jury Duty again!
I've been in Florida for the last 19 years and this is about my sixth or seventh jury duty call up. I was selected 3 times. In the previous ten years that I was eligable to be a juror (living in Michigan and then Chicago) I was only called up once for a Federal case but I wasn't selected.
How's the selection process work? Like I said, I've never heard anything about jury duty at all not even once (I'm 28 years old)
It's kind of interesting to watch the process and the more I see the more I don't ever want to be on trial!
I think I'd make a great juror and would find it interesting.
The Orange County Courthouse in Orlando,FL is pretty nice though and since it's a highrise the view from the jury room is beautiful.
How do they keep people from daydreaming as they stare out the window instead of paying attention to the case?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 10:34 AM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Rahvin, posted 08-07-2009 12:29 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 26 by Perdition, posted 08-07-2009 12:45 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 27 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 12:57 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4042
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.0


Message 25 of 35 (518718)
08-07-2009 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by New Cat's Eye
08-07-2009 12:23 PM


Re: Jury Duty again!
I think I'd make a great juror and would find it interesting.
I found my own jury experience to be extremely interesting and highly rewarding. I learned a lot about human nature as well as the justice system. I'd do it again in a heartbeat.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-07-2009 12:23 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3263 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 26 of 35 (518720)
08-07-2009 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by New Cat's Eye
08-07-2009 12:23 PM


Re: Jury Duty again!
I was sent a Jury Duty mail when I was still 17, about 3 months before my 18th birthday, so I had to tell them I wasn't old enough and haven't received one since. I would really like to be in a jury, I would find it very interesting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-07-2009 12:23 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by xongsmith, posted 08-07-2009 7:31 PM Perdition has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 27 of 35 (518722)
08-07-2009 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by New Cat's Eye
08-07-2009 12:23 PM


Re: Jury Duty again!
Well here it's off the voter registration roles and since they started the motor-voter registration (ie you can register to vote when you renew your drivers license) the supposedly have more people to select from.
You can't look out the windows in the courtroom, only in the jury deliberation room and in the hallways and possibly the judges chambers (I've never been in there so I'm not sure) can you see out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-07-2009 12:23 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Capt Stormfield
Member
Posts: 429
From: Vancouver Island
Joined: 01-17-2009


Message 28 of 35 (518725)
08-07-2009 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by kjsimons
08-07-2009 8:49 AM


Re: Jury Duty again!
If selected I am going to try and submit a request to take a secular oath this time.
Why go out of your way? When the time comes just say something along the lines of "I wish to affirm whatever it is I'm affirming without reference to God". Make them accommodate you on the spot. Why should you have to go to some extra trouble just to exercise a constitutional right?
In my view, the system that is forcing God on a citizen is wrong and sand should be thrown in their gears. By arranging in advance, you facilitate their dysfunction and help hide the problem. Maybe I'm just cantankerous, but I think it is the responsibility of the citizen to publicly mess with the system, if for no other reason than to inform and motivate others who are probably thinking the same thing.
Capt.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 8:49 AM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by kjsimons, posted 08-07-2009 2:12 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 29 of 35 (518733)
08-07-2009 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Capt Stormfield
08-07-2009 1:13 PM


Re: Jury Duty again!
I agree with you but I don't want to invoke the courts wrath or actually delay the court preceedings. All in all the oath thing is mostly an annoyance and it pisses me off because it is clearly an infringement of my rights. Just not a major enough one for me to want to possibly be jailed on contempt of court charges if the judge gets irked at me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Capt Stormfield, posted 08-07-2009 1:13 PM Capt Stormfield has not replied

  
Ragged
Member (Idle past 3578 days)
Posts: 47
From: Purgatory
Joined: 10-26-2005


Message 30 of 35 (518739)
08-07-2009 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by kjsimons
07-13-2006 7:17 PM


Simons,
The way I see it, the "so help me God" thing is nothing but a relic from the past. I'm not religious, but I actually kind of like this little reminder of how old the tradition is. When people yell "Shotgun!", no one is implying that they are gonna carry a shotgun to defend from robbers. All they want to sit at the front passenger seat. The same with the oath. Its there to make it clear that you must tell the truth/be objective and if you are not there will be consequences. There really is nothing religious about it (even if some people chose to believe there is).
The whole process is just a part of an old tradition. Kind of like the 7th inning stretch (7th?) or like an initiation ceremony in a secret society or a fraternity. Something that makes it more fun.
Surely it would be easier if there was no oath at all, but simply a document that you sign. It would be also easier if the judges didn't have to wear those priestly robes and use a gavel. They could just dress in a suit and use an electronic signal. But we keep doing it because there is something comforting about holding on to our past. The same reason why judges in England wear wigs.
So I guess my point is that, to me, there is nothing offensive about it. Even if does offend some people, this God-fearing oath is the least harmful aspect of religion and not worth the effort of trying to change it, not yet anyway. Instead of trying to take God out of a courtroom statement, we should be trying to get "god" out of people’s hearts and minds. We should stop the perpetual cycle of ignorance and fanaticism in the society. Everything else will follow.
Edited by Ragged, : Typos

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by kjsimons, posted 07-13-2006 7:17 PM kjsimons has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Rrhain, posted 08-07-2009 8:13 PM Ragged has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024