Neither a theist nor an atheist

I'm agnostic about other people's agnosticism and/or atheism.

How can you be just a little bit atheistic? Either you believe in a deity or set of deities, or you don't. It is just like being pregnant. You are either pregnant, or you aren't. There isn't some middle path where you are a little bit pregnant.

I didn't say there was. I said the question itself makes no sense.

Igtheism.

Surely there are degrees of certainty in a person's beliefs.
I would say that Faith is 100% certain of her positions but I don't think many of us share that level of conviction.I would place myself at about 95% along a scale towards Atheism since I have yet to see any evidence saying otherwise yet I am unable to hold the absolute conviction that God does not exist.Does that make me an Atheist?.In the chart it would place me as a (mostly) gnostic atheist but not all the way into the corner.

Oh? Why's that? Are you privy to the rules of universe-making?
Did you just say that other universes can have different laws from ours, but they must follow the same laws? Other universes (if they exist) do not depend on your ability to fathom their existence.
Just like God and other Spaghetti Monsters.

You can still have a firm belief in the face of 100% uncertainty. I think they call it faith. Atheism does not require a belief in the absence of God. All atheism requires is a lack of a positive belief in God which would make you 100% atheist.

That makes no sense to me. If you have a firm (let's say absolute) belief in something then you are, by definition, 100% certain that you are correct. Take Faith's position about the bible as an example. right or wrong, there is absolutely no doubt in her certainty that the bible is 100% correct All depends on definitions doesn't it?
personally I agree with you that atheism is just a lack of belief. nothing more and nothing less but my experience has been that most people see atheists as having a positive belief in the absence of God. I've often argued that point in the past.

Since I was mentioned I'll answer, yes, that's of course very true. There is no such thing as faith in anything you don't believe is true.

Belief and knowledge are two different things. Belief is what you have in the absence of knowledge, in the absence of certainty. A lack of a belief is enough to get above the bar. Anything additional is just more clearance over that bar.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

There is no faith if you have evidence that it is true. Faith is a belief held in the absence of evidence. Without evidence you do not have certainty. However, you can still have the convictions of your faith based beliefs. The problem seems to be that people are confusing conviction with certainty.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

I'd say, rather, that the strength of your faith correlates to the strength of your belief. If you really, really, really do believe in spooks then you can have a lot of faith in spooks - but if you only kind sorta believe in spooks, you won't put much faith in them.For you, faith may be an on/off switch that goes straight from atheism to fanatical Christianity but for others it's more of a spectrum.

No, I have not stopped beating my wife: I did not start.You're an idiot.Edited by Larni, : Added the last sentence.

The Just shall live by faith....not evidence.

That is just nonsense made up by ancient shamans to keep the sheep in the flock, and well-sheared.If anyone ever tells you, "Trust me, don't bother with any evidence," place one hand on your wallet and exit the area as quickly as possible.