Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,860 Year: 4,117/9,624 Month: 988/974 Week: 315/286 Day: 36/40 Hour: 2/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Faith and other YEC: why even bother taking part in the discussion?
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 141 (243628)
09-15-2005 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Faith
09-15-2005 12:16 AM


Re: Interpretation
we were all "in" him at the time.
In what sense were we in him? Obviously, not literally.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 12:16 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 1:10 AM robinrohan has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 47 of 141 (243634)
09-15-2005 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by nator
09-15-2005 12:18 AM


Re: Interpretation
Are the people who interpret the Bible today fallable?
Well, I guess I'll put it this way: Unbelievers' interpretations are certainly fallible. Believers, however, have the Holy Spirit, but are still fallible, only that by believing and trusting in Christ they have the essence of the truth of the Bible that unbelievers don't have, and by the Holy Spirit they recognize the Holy Spirit in the Bible.
This message has been edited by Faith, 09-15-2005 12:34 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by nator, posted 09-15-2005 12:18 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by nator, posted 09-15-2005 8:24 AM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 48 of 141 (243644)
09-15-2005 1:10 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by robinrohan
09-15-2005 12:24 AM


Re: Interpretation
we were all "in" him at the time.
In what sense were we in him? Obviously, not literally.
Actually, yes, literally, in that we are literally descended from him physically. This is one of those peculiar Biblical revelations that are found only in the Bible and nowhere else as far as I know. Literally it's even logical, as the genetic potential for every descendant is already present "in the loins of" our ancestors, but this connectedness to them, according to the Bible, extends even to our spiritual nature, to our inheriting the sin nature from Adam, and also spiritual influences from all our closer ancestors. There's a particular passage in the New Testament that states this principle of being literally -- both physically and spiritually -- "in" an ancestor. This is the example of Levi, one of Abraham's grandsons, being said to have "paid tithes" when his grandfather Abraham did though he wasn't yet conceived.
quote:
Hebrews 7:4 Now consider how great this man [Melchizedek] was, to whom even the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils. 5 And indeed those who are of the sons of Levi, who receive the priesthood, have a commandment to receive tithes from the people according to the law, that is, from their brethren, though they have come from the loins of Abraham; 6 but he whose genealogy is not derived from them received tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises. 7 Now beyond all contradiction the lesser is blessed by the greater. 8 Here mortal men receive tithes, but there he receives them, of whom it is witnessed that he lives. 9 Even Levi, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, so to speak, 10 for he was still in the loins of his father when Melchizedek met him.
This message has been edited by Faith, 09-15-2005 01:11 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by robinrohan, posted 09-15-2005 12:24 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Phat, posted 09-15-2005 3:44 AM Faith has replied
 Message 84 by robinrohan, posted 09-15-2005 1:19 PM Faith has replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 49 of 141 (243670)
09-15-2005 3:13 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by AdminJazzlover
09-14-2005 5:09 PM


Re: What debate?
He refers to the part where you said you had evidence of your claims when you said that Christians were lonely people and all that stuff.
I don't think I said that at all, you need to read my post again.
The point is that you said you had evidence but didnt cite it.
I also gave the reason why.
Thats the same thing evo's constantly complain about with YEC assertions when they dont cite their evidence.
I know, annoying isn't it? It also sort of makes any sort of 'debate' pointless.
Cheers.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by AdminJazzlover, posted 09-14-2005 5:09 PM AdminJazzlover has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by cavediver, posted 09-15-2005 4:59 AM Brian has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18346
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 50 of 141 (243674)
09-15-2005 3:18 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by nator
09-15-2005 12:18 AM


Re: Interpretation
Well if you wanna know what I think....
All of the people are fallible some (most) of the time.
Some of the people are fallible all of the time.
Not all of us are fallible all of the time. There are those Holy Spirit moments....even atheists get them!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by nator, posted 09-15-2005 12:18 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by nator, posted 09-15-2005 8:27 AM Phat has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18346
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 51 of 141 (243680)
09-15-2005 3:44 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Faith
09-15-2005 1:10 AM


Re: Interpretation
Faith writes:
Actually, yes, literally, in that we are literally descended from him (Adam)physically. This is one of those peculiar Biblical revelations that are found only in the Bible and nowhere else as far as I know. Literally it's even logical, as the genetic potential for every descendant is already present "in the loins of" our ancestors, but this connectedness to them, according to the Bible, extends even to our spiritual nature, to our inheriting the sin nature from Adam, and also spiritual influences from all our closer ancestors.
The only thing about this that confuses me is why a group of people coming from a common father would then scatter themselves..migrating thousands of miles...away from this father?
Was it human nature to disperse? If so, why then did cities begin?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 1:10 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by TheLiteralist, posted 09-15-2005 5:08 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 83 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 1:04 PM Phat has not replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3671 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 52 of 141 (243691)
09-15-2005 4:59 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Brian
09-15-2005 3:13 AM


Re: What debate?
Brian, you said...
In all seriouness, these people are really to be pitied rather than laughed at.
and
Although it is embarrassing at times to read their posts, we should remember that these people are essentially desperate, lonely, sad individuals who need a higher power to take over the responsibility of their lives for them.
and when asked if you had evidence of this, you said
Of course I do, but I don't humour these types any more.
I just feel so sorry for them.
Well, I'm not a creationist, but I am a Christian and know many many creationists. Your description does not tally with the bulk of my experience.
So I would like to ask for your evidence. If I fall into one of your "types", and thus I am not to be humoured, then may I remind you that we are in an EvC science forum, and it is not for you to decide to withold a request for evidence. Either show your evidence or retract your statement.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Brian, posted 09-15-2005 3:13 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by iano, posted 09-15-2005 5:24 AM cavediver has not replied
 Message 60 by Brian, posted 09-15-2005 6:12 AM cavediver has replied

TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 141 (243692)
09-15-2005 5:08 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by Phat
09-15-2005 3:44 AM


scattered...in clumps?
Aren't most Americans from Europe and Africa (having displaced the original American Indians)? Aren't modern Americans now both scattered across the US and, yet, in cities?
It's not exactly the same thing, I know, but it does demonstrate that people multiply and scatter (but in clumps, if you will).
Hope that helps.
--Jason
This message has been edited by TheLiteralist, 09-15-2005 05:09 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Phat, posted 09-15-2005 3:44 AM Phat has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4155 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 54 of 141 (243694)
09-15-2005 5:13 AM


tut - how could an old hand like Brian go so wrong..
just preface it with it is my belief and then you are bullet-proof.

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Brian, posted 09-15-2005 6:13 AM CK has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 55 of 141 (243695)
09-15-2005 5:16 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Annafan
09-13-2005 4:02 PM


annafan writes:
Really, the more I think about it, the stranger I find it that Faith feels the need to be involved in these discussions at all... Surely, she doesn't have any hope to actually turn some people around, here?
Could it, instead, be that her(their) faith is not quite as pure as she(they) would like it to be? And she(they) therefore somehow needs that little bit more, like some extra justification based on a self-reasoned YEC theory?
There's a couple of verses buried in Romans which kind of answers all this. Romans 1:16-17 "I am not ashamed of the Gospel, for it is the power of God unto salvation for all who believe. For in the Gospel, a righteousness from God is revealed which is from faith to faith...". (that by the way, is (i)faith, the highway along which belief travels enabling knowledge based (ii)faith - not Faith the debater )
These verses (which incidently caused Martin Luther to suddenly 'get it' and led to the Reformation) is what causes Christians to enter into debates like this.
a) Not ashamed of the Gospel. If a Christian is certain of the Gospel then all the slagging and insults and ridicule are by and large so much water off a ducks back. Any frustration comes out of despair - that the person with whom you debate doesn't 'get it'. Although many will see it as misguided meddling - it's their good we're after.
b) The key part is that it is the Gospel which does the business not the person presenting it. Clever argument (were that in any way accepted to occur) isn't what causes a person 'to turn'. The Gospel (which has the power of God behind it) does. Debate is merely a vehicle for the Gospel. Call it subliminal advertising if you like. Now, have a look at the signature at the bottom of this post. Read it. Actually read it. Can you see anything about your behaviour getting you to God. Nope? Good. You've just read a bit of the Gospel. It is now in your brain. Forever. You may turn, you may not. But if you do, the Gospel is what will have done it.
And if you do turn, do look me up in heaven will ya?

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Annafan, posted 09-13-2005 4:02 PM Annafan has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 56 of 141 (243696)
09-15-2005 5:24 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by cavediver
09-15-2005 4:59 AM


Re: What debate?
Cavediver writes:
So I would like to ask for your evidence. If I fall into one of your "types", and thus I am not to be humoured, then may I remind you that we are in an EvC science forum, and it is not for you to decide to withold a request for evidence. Either show your evidence or retract your statement.
Ah CD go easy there. Let he who has not made a brash statement out of frustration etc. cast the first stone. I could understand Brian frustration dealing with Christians given the amount of time he seems to have debated them. He will of course never get an answer on his own terms, so it's understandlable that we can be seen to be evasive and obtuse.
What would Jesus do here (and I don't mean his "white washed tombs" statement)?

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by cavediver, posted 09-15-2005 4:59 AM cavediver has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 57 of 141 (243700)
09-15-2005 5:34 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by DBlevins
09-14-2005 6:00 PM


Re: Uniformatism confusions
Hi DB
I've just read Admins warning on the direction of this thread so will have to end on uniformatism. Am becoming aware of my tendency to pull topics off topic. Some other time thus...
Sorry
iano

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by DBlevins, posted 09-14-2005 6:00 PM DBlevins has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 58 of 141 (243701)
09-15-2005 5:36 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Parasomnium
09-14-2005 6:49 PM


Re: Why bother indeed?
Hoi Parasomnium
Will have to haul off-topic stuff to a halt. Admin warning on the direction of this thread noted.
Groetjes
Iano

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Parasomnium, posted 09-14-2005 6:49 PM Parasomnium has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 59 of 141 (243702)
09-15-2005 5:38 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by nwr
09-14-2005 7:50 PM


Re: Why bother indeed?
Sorry NWR
Admin warning on thread direction. Another day on this off-topic topic perhaps.
Forgive the last-wordism here but it's hard to resist
nwr writes:
There are no absolutes.
...is an absolute statement
This message has been edited by iano, 15-Sep-2005 10:39 AM

Romans 10:9-10: " if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved....."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by nwr, posted 09-14-2005 7:50 PM nwr has not replied

Brian
Member (Idle past 4987 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 60 of 141 (243707)
09-15-2005 6:12 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by cavediver
09-15-2005 4:59 AM


Re: What debate?
Well, I'm not a creationist, but I am a Christian and know many many creationists. Your description does not tally with the bulk of my experience.
You need to get out more then.
So I would like to ask for your evidence.
My experience is my evidence, and my word is final. Whatever I say is true and is not up for debate, I wont debate with anyone who does not first begin the discussion by accepting the premise that I am perfect and everythign I say is true, I won't discuss anything with anyone who says that my word is not true.
If I fall into one of your "types", and thus I am not to be humoured, then may I remind you that we are in an EvC science forum, and it is not for you to decide to withold a request for evidence.
My infallible word is the evidence. Everything I say is true, I have never been shown to be wrong, if you look at it properly.
Either show your evidence or retract your statement.
I've shown my evidence, you just have to accept that my word is flawless, if I say they are sad, and lonely then that isn't up for debate.
Brian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by cavediver, posted 09-15-2005 4:59 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by cavediver, posted 09-15-2005 6:31 AM Brian has replied
 Message 68 by Phat, posted 09-15-2005 8:17 AM Brian has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024