Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   anyone see the sci-fi channel expose of Kecksburg crash?
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4898 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 1 of 3 (273421)
12-28-2005 1:55 AM


Asqara mentioned something about a conspiracy thread or forum the other day....and then tonight I saw something on a channel I usually avoid.
It was pretty interesting, all sorts of eyewitnesses independently cooroborating one another and John Podesta behind a lawsuit to force the government to disclose the details of the UFO incident/crash?
Apparently the army came and hauled the thing away with a fair number of witnesses watching, though they were trying to keep people away.
This message has been edited by randman, 12-28-2005 02:10 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminBen, posted 12-28-2005 7:15 AM randman has replied

  
AdminBen
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 3 (273433)
12-28-2005 7:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by randman
12-28-2005 1:55 AM


Quick Comment
Hi randman,
This seems to me a discussion that will lead to "Is it Science?"-type discussion, not Coffee House discussion. If that's where you intend the topic to lead, then I'd strongly suggest you open a PNT. In fact, I don't really see how this can lead to any discussion but a discussion of the believability of certain types of evidence--i.e. an "Is it Science?"-type discussion.
Give it a thought and, if so, please run this through PNT.
Thanks.

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
    See also Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC, and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting


  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by randman, posted 12-28-2005 1:55 AM randman has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 3 by randman, posted 12-28-2005 2:04 PM AdminBen has not replied

      
    randman 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 4898 days)
    Posts: 6367
    Joined: 05-26-2005


    Message 3 of 3 (273548)
    12-28-2005 2:04 PM
    Reply to: Message 2 by AdminBen
    12-28-2005 7:15 AM


    Re: Quick Comment
    Thanks for the suggestion but that isn't really where I was heading.
    I don't really see it as strictly a science issue. It's as much a political issue as a science issue in my mind. I don't think a reasonable person, for example, would say science per se or the rules of science rules out such possibilities, whether alien craft, Russian spy satellite, or whatever...but the story is more than that even if that entails science.
    The fact John Podesta has taken up it's cause and that the government denies the army being there when practically a whole town and some from other towns saw the army there is pretty interesting on it's own.
    So imho, this belongs in the Coffee House. About the only area of scientific discussion I can think of would entail the forensic analysis of researchers today in determining the location of the crash site due to the disturbed soil from the cover-up of the incident when they brought different dirt in, and the data used to rule out the Russian spy satellite that fell in Canada that day.
    This message has been edited by randman, 12-28-2005 02:09 PM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 2 by AdminBen, posted 12-28-2005 7:15 AM AdminBen has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024