Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cherry Picking the Bible- Leviticus and Other OT Rules
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4015 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 61 of 82 (328355)
07-02-2006 8:58 PM


Life among the Ignorami
I studied, off and on, with JW`s over twelve months (yes, I`m into pain ), and regardless of how you pointed out the flip-flopping on their beliefs over the last hundred years, the selectivity of picking only those verses that supported their take and ignoring others, they wouldn`t admit a single mistake. They covered their asses by the classic--'The vision is becoming clearer with time'.

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by ramoss, posted 07-02-2006 10:59 PM Nighttrain has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 633 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 62 of 82 (328375)
07-02-2006 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Nighttrain
07-02-2006 8:58 PM


Re: Life among the Ignorami
Tell me, how is that cherry picking different than any other denomination?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Nighttrain, posted 07-02-2006 8:58 PM Nighttrain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Nighttrain, posted 07-02-2006 11:15 PM ramoss has not replied
 Message 64 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2006 12:26 AM ramoss has replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4015 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 63 of 82 (328377)
07-02-2006 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by ramoss
07-02-2006 10:59 PM


Re: Life among the Ignorami
No different, Ram, just pointing out the solution that one branch of Christianity (?) uses to combat the charge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by ramoss, posted 07-02-2006 10:59 PM ramoss has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 64 of 82 (328382)
07-03-2006 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by ramoss
07-02-2006 10:59 PM


question
Tell me, how is that cherry picking different than any other denomination?
do you suppose it's even possible to keep to an entirely literal reading of the bible that is totally inclusive -- and does NOT cherry pick?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by ramoss, posted 07-02-2006 10:59 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by ReverendDG, posted 07-03-2006 3:17 AM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 66 by ramoss, posted 07-03-2006 6:12 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4132 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 65 of 82 (328399)
07-03-2006 3:17 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by arachnophilia
07-03-2006 12:26 AM


Re: question
do you suppose it's even possible to keep to an entirely literal reading of the bible that is totally inclusive -- and does NOT cherry pick?
i think ignorent children might be able to read it literal to the last word, but it would have to be a child with no knowlege but the bible
its impossible even for the most adament christian fundi to read the bible without imposing something
i mean the sky not being a hard shell? or stars not being balls of gas?
there really isn't anything in the bible to explain what stars are other than god made the stars
even the stuff about germs would take out the literal meaning of the text since people believed in demons

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2006 12:26 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2006 9:31 PM ReverendDG has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 633 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 66 of 82 (328439)
07-03-2006 6:12 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by arachnophilia
07-03-2006 12:26 AM


Re: question
do you suppose it's even possible to keep to an entirely literal reading of the bible that is totally inclusive -- and does NOT cherry pick?
I don't think it is possible to look at the entire bible , either entirely literal, or not, and NOT cherry pick. Each an every passage has more than one interpretation about what it truely means, and each and every person who uses the bible as a spiritual guide will chose amoung the various interpretations to pick the viewpoint that will have personal meaning to them.
One of the traditional methods of studying talmud emphasis's this. Someone will have a passage opened up, and then surround the passage with the various commentary, and then follow the various commentary, so the meaning 'opens up like a flower'

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2006 12:26 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Nighttrain, posted 07-03-2006 8:10 AM ramoss has replied
 Message 70 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2006 9:32 PM ramoss has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4015 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 67 of 82 (328471)
07-03-2006 8:10 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by ramoss
07-03-2006 6:12 AM


Re: question
One of the traditional methods of studying talmud emphasis's this. Someone will have a passage opened up, and then surround the passage with the various commentary, and then follow the various commentary, so the meaning 'opens up like a flower'
So the pesher technique as outlined in the Qumran Scrolls is correct for mainstream Judaism? That it operates on two levels, one as a commentary relating past Scripture to current events. And it also provides two methods of instruction, one to the lay reader and a secondary (primary (?)) message to initiates?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by ramoss, posted 07-03-2006 6:12 AM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by ramoss, posted 07-04-2006 9:58 PM Nighttrain has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 68 of 82 (328688)
07-03-2006 9:00 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by macaroniandcheese
06-27-2006 8:22 AM


Re: Purpose is Over, But Still Holds
but you know as well as i how many out of place sentences there are in the bible.
true -- and this MIGHT be an addition by the redactor.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-27-2006 8:22 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 69 of 82 (328698)
07-03-2006 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by ReverendDG
07-03-2006 3:17 AM


Re: question
think ignorent children might be able to read it literal to the last word, but it would have to be a child with no knowlege but the bible
i disagree in part. to a certain degree, that ignorance requires maintainence. because someone reading without pre-text would eventually run into contradictions and problems.
its impossible even for the most adament christian fundi to read the bible without imposing something
right, we are forced to impose our worldview, we no longer see the world through the eyes of genesis, we see genesis through our own eyes.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by ReverendDG, posted 07-03-2006 3:17 AM ReverendDG has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 70 of 82 (328699)
07-03-2006 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by ramoss
07-03-2006 6:12 AM


Re: question
I don't think it is possible to look at the entire bible , either entirely literal, or not, and NOT cherry pick. Each an every passage has more than one interpretation about what it truely means,
well, not just that. some outright contradict each other. at a certain point, interpretation about true meaning becomes disguising the pshat meaning.
Edited by arachnophilia, : typo


This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by ramoss, posted 07-03-2006 6:12 AM ramoss has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by purpledawn, posted 07-05-2006 7:00 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 633 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 71 of 82 (328861)
07-04-2006 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Nighttrain
07-03-2006 8:10 AM


Re: question
That is still in use today, yes. I don't know if all the implications into 'initiation' are the same, but the technique is the same.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Nighttrain, posted 07-03-2006 8:10 AM Nighttrain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Nighttrain, posted 07-05-2006 2:22 AM ramoss has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4015 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 72 of 82 (328870)
07-05-2006 2:22 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by ramoss
07-04-2006 9:58 PM


Re: question
Thanks, Ram. I am still trying to get my head around whether the 'Seven Signs' of Jesus carry a pesher message or not. Or even if they refer to events happening during His life.He throws up lots of odd numbers that seem to be referring to something beyond our understanding.
Edited by Nighttrain, : edited to add divinity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by ramoss, posted 07-04-2006 9:58 PM ramoss has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3479 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 73 of 82 (328886)
07-05-2006 7:00 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by arachnophilia
07-03-2006 9:32 PM


Interpretation Techniques
quote:
well, not just that. some outright contradict each other. at a certain point, interpretation about true meaning becomes disguising the pshat meaning.
I wonder if these interpretation techniques arose from the need to keep the old writings applicable beyond their time.
Just like the "cherry picking" today. People can let go of what they want or feel is obsolete, but hang on to what they want even if it is obsolete. Is that selective reasoning?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by arachnophilia, posted 07-03-2006 9:32 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by arachnophilia, posted 07-05-2006 4:36 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 74 of 82 (329025)
07-05-2006 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by purpledawn
07-05-2006 7:00 AM


Re: Interpretation Techniques
Just like the "cherry picking" today. People can let go of what they want or feel is obsolete, but hang on to what they want even if it is obsolete. Is that selective reasoning?
yes, very.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by purpledawn, posted 07-05-2006 7:00 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
Greatest I am
Member (Idle past 295 days)
Posts: 1676
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 75 of 82 (381287)
01-30-2007 2:10 PM


Leviticus
Jesus came to establish a better law than what was in place.
He would have told Leviticus that anger begets anger and that forgiveness is a better form of law than breaking the law of killing.
It appears that Leviticus was on a power trip when writing some of those laws that clearly show that they are not in any way Christian.
God is a God of Love not Hate.
Regards
DL
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by arachnophilia, posted 01-30-2007 2:22 PM Greatest I am has replied
 Message 80 by ReverendDG, posted 02-04-2007 5:27 AM Greatest I am has not replied
 Message 81 by Nighttrain, posted 02-04-2007 6:11 AM Greatest I am has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024