One thing that is important in keeping a discussion a bit focussed is that the opening post not be too broad.
Your OP seems to be trying to do what the whole of EvC Forum is trying to do. How unfocussed can one get?
Your one example of transitionals has been discussed in a number of threads. Maybe it is time for another one, maybe not yet.
In any case, with that as an example I'm afraid that any of the 5 + 5 "explanations" that might be supplied will be worthy of a thread of their own. Including them in one thread would cause the thread to be too broadly definted and difficult to control.
Perhaps before making more proposals you could read over some threads and see if you want to participate in those. You may use the search function of this site or use Google 'advanced' restricted to this site to find interesting topics.
Someone is not telling the truth. Does one side have a particular axe to grind, a hidden agenda and why ultimately is evolution so rejected as out of hand by Creationists.
In many cases this is true; someone is not telling the truth. But that is not the case all the time. Sometimes both sides are using different defintions of terms and looking for different things. It can be a problem of understanding or confusion.