|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Should Evolution and Creation be Taught in School? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Always Curious Junior Member (Idle past 6260 days) Posts: 2 Joined: |
Unfortunatly evolution is being taught even before kids enter school. Evolution is being thrust upon young minds as they began to read. When a boy becomes fascinated by dinosaurs, like many do, they will probably pick up a book and I am willing to bet that 99.5% of the time the words "millions and millions of years ago" will be within the first couple of pages. I strongly believe that such comments as that should be avoided. Evolution, creationism, and everything that pertains to the same basic idea should be explored together in a science class each getting equal attention. This would allow the students to actually think for themselves on a controversial topic instead of being made to learn that evolution is a "fact".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2290 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
"millions and millions of years ago"
Geologists are involved in determining the age of the earth not biologists.
Evolution, creationism, and everything that pertains to the same basic idea should be explored together in a science class each getting equal attention
Why should mythology be in a science class? Whats wrong with having science in science classes and mythology in something else? And what creations myths would you include? Norse? Hindu? Native American? Just a monkey in a long line of kings. If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 419 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
When a boy becomes fascinated by dinosaurs, like many do, they will probably pick up a book and I am willing to bet that 99.5% of the time the words "millions and millions of years ago" will be within the first couple of pages. I strongly believe that such comments as that should be avoided. You only want to avoid stuff like "millions of years" if you want to lie to the kids.
Evolution, creationism, and everything that pertains to the same basic idea should be explored together in a science class each getting equal attention. This would allow the students to actually think for themselves on a controversial topic instead of being made to learn that evolution is a "fact". Of course, evolution IS a fact. That is simply not even in doubt. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lithodid-Man Member (Idle past 2956 days) Posts: 504 From: Juneau, Alaska, USA Joined: |
I take the whole thing very personally. The whole EvC issue was a lot of fun until it became my life. I could very easily in the next few weeks lose my job because I dare teach that the Earth is over 6000 years old.
I am a college professor who teaches at a Christian college. The official stance of the college is scientists teach current science. I am currently teaching a course in Historical Geology. However, I have a student who has petitioned her way up the ladder with the argument that I do not give YEC versions of geology. This was all a bit of a laugh with us. “Silly student”.. and all. Everyone told me not to worry. Then our department head asked me to submit all of my lectures, college transcripts (??!!) and curriculum vitae (cv) to him. She (the student) went from me teaching evolution (which is accepted by our school) to my credentials for teaching geology at all. She mailed a letter to the accreditation board (we are this year under our 10 year accreditation review) saying that we have a biologist teaching geology. The end story of all of this . . My ”nice’ level for creationists has dropped to zero. My patience level for any ignorant retards trying to pass off Bronze age mythology as science is zero. Their ideology might well cost me my job. Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?" Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true" Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?" Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 862 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
Lith writes: Then our department head asked me to submit all of my lectures, college transcripts (??!!) and curriculum vitae (cv) to him. She (the student) went from me teaching evolution (which is accepted by our school) to my credentials for teaching geology at all. She mailed a letter to the accreditation board (we are this year under our 10 year accreditation review) saying that we have a biologist teaching geology. The end story of all of this . . My ”nice’ level for creationists has dropped to zero. My patience level for any ignorant retards trying to pass off Bronze age mythology as science is zero. Their ideology might well cost me my job. I don't know if this is any consolation but when a person's credentials to teach are questioned by one of the half dozen or so national accrediting agencies in the US, the hit is to the administration and not towards the instructor in question. The reason administrators are seeking your credentials is to back up their argument that they are not remiss in allowing you to teach a given class. Obviously, I am unfamiliar with your exact circumstances but from my experience (we went through accrediting last year) I don't believe any problems any accrediting agency may have concerning appropriate credentials should reflect upon you personally. Also, accreditors are usually pretty professional in their judgments, they will consider the source and validity of any cause of any complaints. May your administration realize this and behave in a similar manner.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1430 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Unfortunatly evolution is being taught even before kids enter school. Evolution is being thrust upon young minds as they began to read. When a boy becomes fascinated by dinosaurs, like many do, they will probably pick up a book and I am willing to bet that 99.5% of the time the words "millions and millions of years ago" will be within the first couple of pages. (1) The age of the different geological periods is determined by geologists not evolution biologists. In fact not one thing you talk about involves evolution - other than the fact that dinosaurs once roamed the earth (in significantly greater numbers than today). (2) The earth is old. That is a fact. Whether it is 4.5 billion years or 4.6 billion years is in some dispute, but the fact remains that the earth is OVER 4.5 billion years old. That means that mentioning "millions and millions of years ago" in a book involving the introduction of science to kids is correctly stating known facts when they say this. Do you object to facts being in books for children?
Evolution, creationism, and everything that pertains to the same basic idea should be explored together in a science class each getting equal attention. You mean we should teach science and non-science in science class? You of course realize that "everything that pertains to the same basic idea" includes every myth ever known to man as well as many invalidated theories, such as Lamarkism and the like. I hardly think this is the place to include mythology. This would leave little time to actually address a single element of the factual basis for evolution in the limited time available for such classes.
This would allow the students to actually think for themselves on a controversial topic instead of being made to learn that evolution is a "fact". Evolution IS a fact: speciation HAS occurred. Evolution HAS occurred. It is only "controversial" to people that deny the evidence in favor of mythology. Of course confusing mythological fiction with science fact as being intellectually equals is a great way to teach kids to think clearly. Or do you think you have some scientific evidence for creation? Enjoy. Edited by RAZD, : added compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6146 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
The title of my topic should give you a clue as to what situation you are in. You need a job in a public school. I don't think you have a chance to get a fair hearing. Historical Geography? My personal belief is that altho I am a YECer, I don't think creationism should be taught in public schools. (Moreover, I yet to see where evolution is used in technological applications.)
Edited by fooj, : bad grammar.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
quote: Well, evolution is a fact. The only controversy is political, maintained by people insisting that their discredited Bronze Age mythology be accepted as fact. -
quote: To a point, I agree with this. Seeing how certain religious fanatics insist that their mythologies be accepted as fact, and seeing how these religious fanatics are trying to use the political process to impose their wacky beliefs on the general population, and seeing how a certain discredited Bronze Age mythology is part of these wacky beliefs, I fully support giving a lot of attention to Biblical creationism, showing in gory detail all the evidence that serves to show it is simply not correct, how the major creationist players are nuts, and how the theory of evolution (and the rest of geology) really do provide a detailed history of the world that is consistent with easily observable data. Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
Hey, L-man.
As a college instructor, I fully sympathize with you and hope it all comes out well. Fortunately, I teach math, and there really isn't much controversial in math. But I am in a region that is far more conservative than I am used to, and outside of class there are topics that I don't discuss. Good luck. Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1430 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
She mailed a letter to the accreditation board What accreditation board is that?
I am a college professor who teaches at a Christian college. ...I am currently teaching a course in Historical Geology. ... saying that we have a biologist teaching geology. The other questions are (1) are there any geologists at this school and (2) if so, have they reviewed the class lectures OR (3) if not why not AND (4) isn't this something the college should have done before offering the class? and finally (5) Don't they stand by their teachers they assign to teach the classes? I'm rootin for ya LM compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
Heh. The minutia of accrediting can be astounding, especially since the reviewers themselves may not have any real competency in the field. (We have just gone through our own accreditation process. Ugh.)
That said, I can't see why the accreditation should be a problem. L-man's college doesn't have a Geology program. They only offer a general geology course as part of a degree in Environmental Science. L-man's college is quite small -- they simply cannot hire an expert to teach only one course every term or every other term. Accreditation agencies know this. This is a nuisance suit, just to put pressure on the administration. As you point out, it is really a matter of whether the aministration is going to stand up for their faculty. Also, L-man's college is associated with the Presbyterian Church (USA), who don't have any doctrinal problems with the theory of evolution. Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 419 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
While it is true that private schools do not have to teach Evolution, they really should unless they are committed to imposing a cult of ignorance on the students. The Facts are that Evolution happened, that the Earth is something over 4 billion years old and the universe over 14 billion years old.
Any school which teaches that Evolution is not a fact or that the Universe is young is simply teaching falsehoods. There is no other way to say it. These are not matters of opinion. Reality is not determined by opinion. Reality is. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1492 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
My patience level for any ignorant retards trying to pass off Bronze age mythology as science is zero. Their ideology might well cost me my job. Go through her classwork and start typing parts of it into Google. Doubtless she's committed academic dishonesty along the way. When you find something, petition to have her expelled. She doesn't have the right to launch an ideological crusade to get you fired. Professors aren't the only ones whose academic background can fall under intense scrutiny.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quetzal Member (Idle past 5897 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
Damn, I'm sorry to hear that Lith. If you need to file a countersuit (if it goes that far), try the ACLU.
Another reason to be glad I'm in a field position, rather than academia. I may not have the fancy credentials, but nobody tries to get me fired over ideology. Poor contract management, on the other hand...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fooj Junior Member (Idle past 6146 days) Posts: 22 Joined: |
quote:A theory (aka strong conclusion) which brings with it no discernable technological benefits cannot be a fact. Edited by fooj, : bad posting result.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024