Sorry I seem to have missed this yesterday.
Good designs? What is good?
I thought evolution was about change... not good and bad?
When I am talking about "good" I am not talking about evolutionary outcomes. I am talking about human designs. We could spend sometimes developing a list of the characteristics. I wasn't aware that you knew nothing about design.
1. Do the algorithms violate the law and order of the computer system?
2. Do they have a choice to do so?
3. Are you saying that 'good' (an interesting word etymologically btw...) design is symmetrical and perfectly orderly?
4. Does the fact that human beings designed the computer have any bearing on the illustration?
It is not clear that any of these questions have any relevance to the issue. We re talking about the output of design processes. You are discussing the process itself.
1) No the algorithms do not violate any law and order nor do evolutionary processes.
2) There is no choice involved in either process. I have no idea why you included this.
3) No, I am not saying that 'good'is symmetrical and "orderly" (whatever that is). Good designs (among other things, are only as complex as needed for the task, are modular, and use good ideas where ever they can be pulled from )
4) No, the illustration is discussing the operation of the "design" process and the outcome not the establishment of the environment in which it works. The human beings in this case correspond to what a deists god is taken to be. They set up the situation and wait to see what comes out.
There seems to be no relevant content in the rest of the post.
You are also right that this is off-topic here. I will start a "design" topic for it.