Reinstatement

Not to sound mean or anything, but he's probably dead.

---

Disclaimer:

​

Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.

​

He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

why would you assume that? He left with plans to take time off from here.

You've had another year. I'll repeat I suggestion I think has been made before.You might "try out" your evolution killing ideas here before you go to the trouble of writing them up carefully. Given your past demonstration of knowledge and reasoning powers you might not want to waste time unless you've tested out the fundamentals of your idea.A couple of predictions:
You won't produce anything but junk: junk data and junk reasoning. That is IF you produce anything at all.
At least as likely: you won't produce jack squat.But you sure sound important with the potential noble prize winning idea of yours don't you?

And ruin the surprise?What I wouldn't give to see your face the very moment you ascertain that your theory is false! Does your opinion of me have anything to do with the fact that you are an evolutionist and I am a creationist? I detect fear in your words and, of course, genuine curiosity. My evidence is earth shattering.Ray

I detect sarcasm and general uninterest in paulk's voice. And I see you're back to the evolutionist conspiracy stuff again. If there is a conspiracy, it's a conspiracy against quacks of all shapes and sizes, be it a person proposing that the 2nd law of thermodynamics destroys evolution or that someone has found another perpetual energy device. Or a conspiracy against mis/false information.

My opinion is solely based on what you have posted before. It is based on your bragging about this paper a year ago. My opinion is that you are incapable of putting together coherent reasoning of any sort much less one that destroys evolution. lol What you detect in my words is derision and amusement with a tich of annoyance that you would be back to be a nuisance some more.You claim that you want to maintain surprise. Ha! If you actually have "earth shattering" evidence then you run the risk of being beat to publication if you stall.Those with real earth shattering evidence often rush out an early paper to make sure they get priority. You, on the other hand, are stalling because, just maybe, even you know you are dead meat if you dare to put any of it up to scrutiny.Thinking about it there was also a bit of curiosity in my mind but with a bit more thought I realize you will produce nothing new whatsoever so it isn't worth waiting for your "earth shattering" evidence.

Please avoid making members the topic of the discussion.I'm closing this thread.Welcome back, Ray. Keep in mind the Forum Guidelines haven't changed.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director