Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noahs ark is a physical impossibility
derwood
Member (Idle past 1896 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 31 of 71 (32572)
02-18-2003 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by derwood
02-18-2003 1:47 PM


Forget it - now I know (Ten-sai).
Good bye - been down that road to idiotville before...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by derwood, posted 02-18-2003 1:47 PM derwood has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 71 (34416)
03-14-2003 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by David unfamous
02-17-2003 5:26 AM


Imo, the dinosaurs were the "serpents" of Genesis which were zapped from walkers to belly crawlers when God cursed them as the result of the serpent deceiving Eve. Creatures lived very long before the flood and likely many of the parent serpents/dinosaurs lived up until the flood, but their offspring, when born were born as the cursed belly crawlers. You take an allegator, pump him up and furnish him with a couple of long large hind legs and you've pretty much got a large dinosaur.
1. Dinosaurs and modern serperts are both reptiles.
2. ALL dinosaurs became distinct. No other species has ever became totally extinct.
[This message has been edited by buzsaw, 03-14-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by David unfamous, posted 02-17-2003 5:26 AM David unfamous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 03-14-2003 9:16 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 47 by nator, posted 03-15-2003 11:37 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 754 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 33 of 71 (34422)
03-14-2003 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Buzsaw
03-14-2003 8:34 PM


quote:
No other species has ever became totally extinct.
passenger pigeon
Carolina parakeet
dodo
sea mink
sabre-tooth cat
giant sloth
mammoth
Aldabra tortoise
half the native birds of Hawaii
And I only give a very few because I'm lazy. Many, many more species, genera, and whole families of animals have gone extinct that are currently alive. And the clade Dinosauria isn't extinct - we just call them "birds" these days.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2003 8:34 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2003 9:29 PM Coragyps has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 71 (34425)
03-14-2003 9:29 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Coragyps
03-14-2003 9:16 PM


I'm talkin species, not breeds/members of a species. Calling something a dinosaur doesn't necessarily make it a dinosaur.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 03-14-2003 9:16 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Coragyps, posted 03-14-2003 9:45 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 754 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 35 of 71 (34428)
03-14-2003 9:45 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Buzsaw
03-14-2003 9:29 PM


When's the last time you saw a trilobite? A placoderm? An ammonite?
You have no idea what you're talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2003 9:29 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2003 9:54 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 71 (34429)
03-14-2003 9:54 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Coragyps
03-14-2003 9:45 PM


These are arthropods, are they not? Many arthropods are still with us. I'm talkin vertibrate animals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Coragyps, posted 03-14-2003 9:45 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 37 of 71 (34430)
03-14-2003 9:59 PM


Remember the topic?
Topic door creaking toward "closed"
Adminnemooseus
------------------
{mnmoose@lakenet.com}

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2003 10:20 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 71 (34431)
03-14-2003 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Adminnemooseus
03-14-2003 9:59 PM


Re: Remember the topic?
Sorry bout that. I'm new and the only other forum I post on is NoPC and didn't realize how close you hold to subject here. Thanks for the fair warning.
My point in bringing up the dinosaur theory is to give my reason why dinosaurs weren't in the ark.
[This message has been edited by buzsaw, 03-14-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-14-2003 9:59 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 71 (34433)
03-14-2003 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by John
02-14-2003 1:48 PM


As for the food/crap problem, there would have been little light in the ark and it would be logical that God would have the majority of them in a state of hybernation during the trip, either in a special miraculous fashion or naturally. Either works fine with a god and what limited amount that did need taken care of would give the folks some exercise and something to do besides play checkers or whatever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by John, posted 02-14-2003 1:48 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by John, posted 03-15-2003 9:23 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 71 (34456)
03-15-2003 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by Buzsaw
03-14-2003 10:39 PM


Magic? Your solution is magic?
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2003 10:39 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2003 4:34 PM John has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 71 (34473)
03-15-2003 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by John
03-15-2003 9:23 AM


Well John, your response isn't all that challenging, but for what it's worth, if there's a god, there's the supernatural. Do you claim to understand all that exists in the universe? When I was born in 1935, color digital data flying through thin air would've been considered supernatural as well as space ships flying through space, and to the moon. Levitation and the supernatural exists documentably in paganism, the accult and spiritism. Why must documentable Biblical stuff always be the exception with you folks? Could the answer to that lie in the Biblical contention that the evil and the false exists, via the devil and his army to fight against God, good and truth to explain why things go as they do on earth?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by John, posted 03-15-2003 9:23 AM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by John, posted 03-15-2003 5:14 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 50 by crashfrog, posted 03-23-2003 9:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 71 (34478)
03-15-2003 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Buzsaw
03-15-2003 4:34 PM


quote:
Well John, your response isn't all that challenging
So your answer is magic? ... that isn't much of a challenge.
quote:
if there's a god, there's the supernatural.
Fine. If there is no god, there is no supernatural. Add the two ifs and they poof each other out of existence. If/then statements are only meaningful IF you can support that first clause.
quote:
Do you claim to understand all that exists in the universe?
Nope. So must I believe EVERYTHING on the grounds that it MIGHT be true, or believe what I can reasonably infer to be true?
quote:
When I was born in 1935, color digital data flying through thin air would've been considered supernatural as well as space ships flying through space, and to the moon.
So because we can now send ships into space we should believe that God made thousands of animals sleep for a year in a boat too small to hold them all but too large to hold together?
quote:
Levitation and the supernatural exists documentably in paganism, the accult and spiritism.
ummm..... there ain't no documentation. If there was you'd have a point. None of this stuff has ever been demonstrated under controlled conditions.
quote:
Why must documentable Biblical stuff always be the exception with you folks?
Its not. The Biblical stuff is just more of the same.
quote:
Could the answer to that lie in the Biblical contention that the evil and the false exists, via the devil and his army to fight against God, good and truth to explain why things go as they do on earth?
No.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2003 4:34 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2003 6:38 PM John has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 71 (34481)
03-15-2003 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by John
03-15-2003 5:14 PM


quote:
Fine. If there is no god, there is no supernatural. Add the two ifs and they poof each other out of existence. If/then statements are only meaningful IF you can support that first clause.
Not uite that simple, imo, John. What is observed by multitudes of credible folks is that the supernatural exists. Here are some observable examples of the existence of the supernatural.
1. Fulfilled Biblical prophecy.
2. Archeological evidence of Biblical history, including supernatural events.
3. The observed evidence of the supernatural in the occult, paganism such as voodo, spiritism and others realms of the Biblical evil phenomenon.
3. The observed evidence of the supernatural in areas of Christian fundamentalism.
quote:
Nope. So must I believe EVERYTHING on the grounds that it MIGHT be true, or believe what I can reasonably infer to be true?
So you believe "magic"/supernatural may be true in some fashion?
quote:
So because we can now send ships into space we should believe that God made thousands of animals sleep for a year in a boat too small to hold them all but too large to hold together?
1. Your assessment of the capability of the ark is relative to what you believe about the ark and the state of the animals therein.
2. There is, in the opinion of an ever growing number of credible folk, evidence to the landing site of the ark and evidence to the fact of the flood, an example being the late expeditions of National Geographic's Ballard, the man who found the Titanic, that the flood happened as per his discoveries of the Black Sea once being full of salt water and of civilization 300 or so feet below the surface of the sea.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by John, posted 03-15-2003 5:14 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Coragyps, posted 03-15-2003 7:08 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 45 by Coragyps, posted 03-15-2003 7:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 46 by John, posted 03-15-2003 10:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 754 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 44 of 71 (34482)
03-15-2003 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Buzsaw
03-15-2003 6:38 PM


quote:
that the flood happened as per his discoveries of the Black Sea once being full of salt water and of civilization 300 or so feet below the surface of the sea.
The filling of the Black Sea hardly offers much comfort for a literalist Noah's flood, though. According to Ryan and Pitman's research, popularized in their book called Noah's Flood, the Black Sea was a lake fed by the Danube, etc, until about 7500 years ago, long before your worldview has people existing. Rising sea levels due to melting ice caps finally breached a natural barrier where the Bosporus is now, and the Mediterranean filled the Black to its present size over a few years. Dramatic for the people that had houses by the lake, sure, but hardly "worldwide" or 15 cubits over the highest mountains - they had to walk away from home, maybe sort of quickly - but no 450-foot square boat was necessary or even plausible. That part, in their scenario, was left to oral traditions that surfaced later in the Epic of Gilgamesh and then the Noah story. Oral traditions have a way of getting a little embellished over time....
And yes, after R & P wrote the book, Geographic sponsored a program to find ruins near the old lakeshore. One probable ruin of a building, IIRC, showed up on sonar.
I have yet to see anything remotely resembling evidence for the location of this "ark" - Ron Wyatt's silly website doesn't count as evidence, just as a con job.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2003 6:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 754 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 45 of 71 (34483)
03-15-2003 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Buzsaw
03-15-2003 6:38 PM


quote:
2. Archeological evidence of Biblical history, including supernatural events.
Cite one shred of archaeological evidence for a supernatural event. It doesn't even have to be Biblical: something at Troy or one of Grendel's dam's teeth will do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2003 6:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024