Some new creation evidence

I realize that the evidences for creation are really no evidence at all, but I was brought forth these evidences recently. I've never come accross this one before, so I lack the ability to address it. It is to my understanding that white holes aren't even a real physical manifestation. It only exists within a mathematical equation without inserting matter into the equation. This is a tired old argument that really doesn't make any sense to me. This I believe is one of Hovinds arguments for a young universe being 15,000 to 10,000 years old, yet the estimated age of these short-period comets are dependant on it's size and some have been estimated far beyond 15,000 years. I have no idea how anybody can believe this when such things as star nurserys exist. Perhaps somebody could clarify this agrument for me. This is a really ignorant statement in my eye's. There is nobody in physics who can truly say that there was nothing before the expansion of the universe. Some may speculate, but that is all that can be done as of right now.The creationist statements quoted above were not something copy and pasted. It was an answer to the question "what are some creation evidences" Edited by Arithus, : No reason given.Edited by Arithus, : No reason given.Edited by Arithus, : No reason given.Edited by Arithus, : Just a bit of editing.

---

I only want the truth, whatever it leads to is fine by me...

Welcome to EvC, Arithus:Your thread was a bit too bare to promote it. Generally, we like to see some commentary on some of the topics you listed. It doesn't have to be much, but at least something for the prospective posters to build off of.Browse through the forum guidelines listed below. If you have any further questions, feel free to address them and I or another Admin will tackle your questions accordingly.

---

Thou shalt not have any other Mods before Me

Ok, I can do that. If you mean my own commentary.

---

I only want the truth, whatever it leads to is fine by me...

Yes, your own. For instance, explain briefly why you feel your position is supported scientifically. If your revision is good, we'll promote it to an appropriate thread.