quote:
the question is do you really? how can modern day 'equations' describe the supernatural or the conditions of the ancient world? they cannot because they are based upon assumption not fact.
The scientific community does not concentrate on the supernatural. Science is about to explain and understand natural phenomena. Why do you care so much? Science do not give a shit about religion. You can worship anyone and they do not give a fuck. Scientists just try to understand this complex world. And yes, scientists have a fairly good understanding of ancient people with respect to the little amount of material that have survived through the ages. However, they probable have a hard time to explain Atlantis since it is probably a myth and there is no clear evidence for such existence. The same goes for when Muhammed visited god in Heaven — no evidence. All of mankind except for seven people died because of a flood? No evidence — they cannot explain how the events in the bible occurred if they do not have any for such events. It is very easy, but again, they do not give a fuck about god, but merely his creation if there is a god. If there is no god, they just want to explore this beautiful universe. Damn kid
quote:
God's 'mentality and morality' are NOT n question as you are not fit to judge that. Yes God can do anything He wants, He is God BUT He has made it faith a requirement because He wants people to truly believe Him. anyone can believe whenthey see the evidence but it takes another type of person to believe and follow when they only have His word.
He is able to make everything happen. You said it yourself. Therefore; god cannot be used in science; he is supernatural. Problem solved — I was right. Understand the paradoxes in Christianity and maybe I accept you as a Christian. As it is now; you are no more than just a philistine.
quote:
evidence has been given, andthere is only so much physical evidence around faith will always be part of the equation. evolutionary evidence is NOT evidence. it is mere speculation, assumption, conjecture and never has been observed.
What are the evidences? Not the bible, it was written by a lot of people that were not godly inspired but had grudges and different ideas of how the events happened. Johannes Slkke explains this very well in dozens of his books. Furthermore, look up the documentary hypothesis if you care about such thing as linguistic — which is probably not the case. There is nu such thing as evolutionary evidence. There are evidence and some of these evidence seems to fit the THEORY OF MOTHER FUCKING EVOLUTION — you know — A THEORY, SCIENTIFIC THEORY just to be specific you damn troll (I really hope you are) -.-
And no, I do not believe in evolution - learn the meaning of words please — I accept the theory of evolution and I am aware of the evolution as a fact. I do not have any supernatural thoughts or deity-like feelings for the theory of evolution since it just explain the diversity of life. It has nothing to do with god. At best (in your perspective), it simply explains an unintelligent process created by god.
Seriously though, if you do only care about preaching, please keep quiet. I am not on a forum to listen to missionaries — it a FORUM, where people DISCUSS and DEBATES about evolution and creationism — not PREACHING. Do you know the differences between; discuss, debate, and preaching? If you do not, just do not reply to this message since you, probably, will not discuss this topic and just keep preaching and insulting people. Show some love for your neighbour, dude..
™ Version 4.2