Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Non-Biased site or credible source that refutes Evolution?
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 16 of 19 (43286)
06-18-2003 7:11 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Autocatalysis
06-18-2003 6:37 AM


And hey, they did produce all those cloned babies. Hmmm, now where are all those cloned babies, there were supposed to be half a dozen of the little darlings but they all seem to have just vanished of the face of the media, how strange.
If the only people with arguments against the existence of God are evolutionists then what did atheists do before evolution came along? I hope there are better groups arguing against creationism than the Raelians, otherwise we might as well all just give up.
Any one else get the feeling that Rael is an admirer of L Ron Hubbard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Autocatalysis, posted 06-18-2003 6:37 AM Autocatalysis has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 17 of 19 (43507)
06-20-2003 8:03 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by FFGFollower
06-17-2003 11:31 AM


quote:
Keep in mind that all sites which refute creationism are biased towards evolution.
That's because science is biased towards the evidence.
quote:
Science isn't supposed to be biased,
Did you read my message #9? Not all biases are bad. Being biased in favor of reliable evidence is a favorable bias, wouldn't you say?
quote:
but then again, evolution isn't a science, it's a religion which provides a false escape from God.
Um, no.
1) There are many people who accept evoution and believe in God.
2) The Theory of Evolution is the idea, supported by an enormous body of physical, observable evidence, that life on Earth changes over time by descent with modification.
What is religious, in any way, about that?
I mean, if evidence came forth which explained all of the available evidence better than the ToE, then I would have no problem at all rejecting it in favor of this new theory.
Is this how people view their religions; we will accept this explanation because it is strongly supported by evidence, but if the evidence leads us in a different direction, we will modify or abandon our religion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by FFGFollower, posted 06-17-2003 11:31 AM FFGFollower has not replied

  
derwood
Member (Idle past 1897 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 18 of 19 (43730)
06-23-2003 8:34 AM


so, FFG....
Do you actually want to discuss any of the 'links' in your spam posts, or are you just content to spam and do these little hit-and-run empty postings?

  
Mammuthus
Member (Idle past 6496 days)
Posts: 3085
From: Munich, Germany
Joined: 08-09-2002


Message 19 of 19 (43739)
06-23-2003 9:26 AM


been offline a while and see that most of the newer threads are closed and this one has the evolutionists=atheists fundie mantra...looks like I did not miss anything

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024