Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   what is feminism?
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 136 of 147 (196575)
04-03-2005 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by crashfrog
04-03-2005 2:18 PM


look. i didn't fucking read the other post get your panties out of your ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by crashfrog, posted 04-03-2005 2:18 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-03-2005 11:39 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 137 of 147 (196578)
04-03-2005 11:33 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by crashfrog
04-03-2005 12:35 PM


quote:
I did actually know that. (Assless, and inseam-less as well.) And I do know what they're really for.
oooo, you knew about inseam-less, as well?
How about half-chaps?
I still own a pair of those.
quote:
But isn't that a great phrase to say? I make a point to use it whenever I can.
Yeah, it is a great phrase!
All of those double 'esses'.
I have a manager at work who uses the phrase as often as he can, too.
He's a card.
Of course, at work I have, on two separate occasions, slapped his behind, as well as made a reference to my having sex with a couple of ponies which were on the propery at the time.
I have a really different workplace than most people, I think.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by crashfrog, posted 04-03-2005 12:35 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-03-2005 11:38 PM nator has replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6043 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 138 of 147 (196579)
04-03-2005 11:38 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by nator
04-03-2005 11:33 PM


Of course, at work I have, on two separate occasions, slapped his behind, as well as made a reference to my having sex with a couple of ponies which were on the propery at the time.
Weren't you just the one complaining about the association of riding gear with sex?
Believe me, I love to here about your ass-slapping adventures in beastiality land, it just seems a bit strange given your previous comments. But don't stop on my account...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by nator, posted 04-03-2005 11:33 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by nator, posted 04-04-2005 9:42 AM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6043 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 139 of 147 (196580)
04-03-2005 11:39 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by macaroniandcheese
04-03-2005 10:58 PM


look. i didn't fucking read the other post get your panties out of your ass.
The extraction should be eased by the access provided by the assless chaps. Assless chaps. Squeegee the assless chaps. Assless chaps.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by macaroniandcheese, posted 04-03-2005 10:58 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Ooook!, posted 04-04-2005 11:23 AM pink sasquatch has not replied
 Message 144 by macaroniandcheese, posted 04-04-2005 3:17 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 147 (196637)
04-04-2005 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by crashfrog
04-01-2005 3:17 PM


quote:
You don't see that as a fairly effective example of word reclaimation?
Absolutely not - I'm dubious about the idea of "reclaiming" stereotypes anyway, and am of the view that it mostly comprises pandering to said stereotype rather than challenging it.
But bitch was a term of abuse before it passed out of rap into the mainstream as referring to a pimps bitches. That sense of bitch passed right into the mainstream - demonstrating that this statement of dominance and ownership did not get a rough ride from the main stream at all. And now this is so widespread that "not being so-and-so's bitch" or similar sentiments are commonplace.
If feminism had any grip at all on our popular culture, this should have been resisted. But it fact it was welcomed and disseminated with anti-PC glee. The idea that world is overrun by interventionist feminists is so absurd that I regard people who advance the claim as paranoiacs. Probably the single greatest effect feminism has had on mainstream pop culture was the semi-removal of the Miss World cattleshow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by crashfrog, posted 04-01-2005 3:17 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-04-2005 6:19 PM contracycle has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 141 of 147 (196643)
04-04-2005 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by pink sasquatch
04-03-2005 11:38 PM


The difference is, of course, that this was a national magazine that had their facts completely wrong, compared to some individuals goofing around playing "can you top this?" in an office.
Remember, this equipment doesn't have sexual connotations within the sport. Saying that it does is very inaccurate.
I am well aware that people have "exported" the equipment for sexual use, so much so that it has become part of the popular culture. The author of the magazine article "imported" the sexual imagery back into the sport from the popular culture notions, which was silly.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 04-04-2005 08:48 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-03-2005 11:38 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
Ooook!
Member (Idle past 5836 days)
Posts: 340
From: London, UK
Joined: 09-29-2003


Message 142 of 147 (196658)
04-04-2005 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by pink sasquatch
04-03-2005 11:39 PM


Pink...mate:
...the assless chaps. Assless chaps. Squeegee the assless chaps. Assless chaps.
Isn't it time you took a couple of the nice tablets and found somewhere dark to lie down for a wee bit?
*Backs slowly away from P.S.*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-03-2005 11:39 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5007 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 143 of 147 (196681)
04-04-2005 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by contracycle
04-01-2005 7:45 AM


Hi contracycle,
I think the effects of feminism on popular culture can be discerned from the ease with which "bitch" passed into widely-used acceptable slang: that is, pretty much nil.
First of all the impact of feminism isn't limited to culture. The idea that women should be allowed to have jobs, to vote, etc. now seems pretty mundane but this is a profound achievement of feminism only in the last century - so the impact in economic and political arenas are more impressive than the cultural.
In any case culture (in terms of rap music, TV shows, etc) is pretty much dominated by rich white guys anyway and its the easiest place for them to hit back against the real achievements of feminists. A lot of pop culture is completely fake (rich white capitalist men fear blacks and women, so they promote culture that makes blacks out to be criminals, and women as whores). Watch a movie by a feminist director from algeria or egypt and you will immediately realise that north american culture that is supposed to be culturally feminist, i.e. that show supposedly strong women - I mean sex and the city, etc. - watch a movie by one of these women directors from egypt or algeria and you'll see what a joke north american feminism becomes when it's incorporated into safe mainstream entertainment.
north american and much european "culture" (Tv industry, pop industry, fashion industry) is a whore in itself. notice that these are all cultural arenas that are operated by a very specialized elite, not "normal people". They're the industrial production of corporate culture. Why be surprised when this kind of culture is racist and sexist?
mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by contracycle, posted 04-01-2005 7:45 AM contracycle has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3948 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 144 of 147 (196687)
04-04-2005 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by pink sasquatch
04-03-2005 11:39 PM


haha exactly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-03-2005 11:39 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6043 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 145 of 147 (196720)
04-04-2005 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by contracycle
04-04-2005 9:11 AM


you're referring to the unreclaimed derogatory
But bitch was a term of abuse before it passed out of rap into the mainstream as referring to a pimps bitches. That sense of bitch passed right into the mainstream - demonstrating that this statement of dominance and ownership did not get a rough ride from the main stream at al
I don't believe that is the reclamation referred to; indeed the use you describe is not reclamation at all.
"Bitch" has another connotation entirely that you are ignoring; one of being strong and true to your own personality without apology to those you offend along the way.
If you haven't heard "bitch" used that way, perhaps you leave your computer desk for awhile, (or at least download some episodes of AbFab to watch).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by contracycle, posted 04-04-2005 9:11 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by contracycle, posted 04-05-2005 6:34 AM pink sasquatch has replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 146 of 147 (196862)
04-05-2005 6:34 AM
Reply to: Message 145 by pink sasquatch
04-04-2005 6:19 PM


Re: you're referring to the unreclaimed derogatory
quote:
"Bitch" has another connotation entirely that you are ignoring; one of being strong and true to your own personality without apology to those you offend along the way.
Thats the old usage of bitch as a not-too-offensive term, rather like "bastard" for men. I already acknowledged it had an existing career as an insult.
This message has been edited by contracycle, 04-05-2005 05:38 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-04-2005 6:19 PM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-05-2005 10:23 AM contracycle has not replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6043 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 147 of 147 (196901)
04-05-2005 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by contracycle
04-05-2005 6:34 AM


Re: you're referring to the unreclaimed derogatory
Thats the old usage of bitch as a not-too-offensive term, rather like "bastard" for men. I already acknowledged it had an existing career as an insult.
I'm not talking about the word as an insult; I'm talking about it's post-insult use as a compliment (quite different from not-too-offensive). As I see it the "reclaimed" version of the word bitch has nothing to do with the "ho" connotation that you claim is that version - Taking a derogatory term and using it in a different derogatory way doesn't even qualify as reclamation.
I have a few friends that I call "bitch" occasionally - it has absolutely nothing to do with degradation, ownership, or my mad pimpin' abilities. When I use the term it is referring to their strength in staying true to themselves despite what other people think - it is a compliment, not an insult.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by contracycle, posted 04-05-2005 6:34 AM contracycle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024