Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   THE NAME THAT SATANISTS wouldn't like to guess
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5893 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 16 of 104 (89756)
03-02-2004 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Yaro
03-01-2004 2:37 PM


Re: LOTR
I think Return was much more faithful to the text than Two Towers was. For me, that made the third one the best.
"Tolkein Trivia Expert" Quetzal

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Yaro, posted 03-01-2004 2:37 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Azure Moon
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 104 (89766)
03-02-2004 10:25 AM


Historical Etymology
Subject: Fabulous bit of historical knowledge
Ever wonder where the word "shit" comes from. Well here it is:
Certain types of manure used to be transported (as everything was back then) by ship. In dry form it weighs a lot less, but once water (at sea) hit it. It not only became heavier, but the process of fermentation began again, of which a by-product is methane gas.
As the stuff was stored below decks in bundles you can see what could (and did) happen; methane began to build up below decks and the first time someone came below at night with a lantern. BOOOOM!
Several ships were destroyed in this manner before it was discovered what was happening.
After that, the bundles of manure where always stamped with the term "S.H.I.T" on them which meant to the sailors to "Ship High In Transit." In other words, high enough off the lower decks so that any water that came into the hold would not touch this volatile cargo and start the production of methane.
In the famous introduction of Paul Harvey stance: Now for page 2:
(Flash forward to the modern movie Titanic)
However, when the lower class began to use S.H.I.T. when referring to the Upper Class Nobility during sea voyages, this is when S.H.I.T. was designated a slum slang word with enough power to send the speaker to hell and therefore imperative to be avoided, damned, and shunned by the educated and righteous.
edit: The last part of this is not from a Paul Harvey broadcast, but intended as an introduction to the rest of the story.
[This message has been edited by Azure Moon, 03-02-2004]

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by kjsimons, posted 03-02-2004 10:48 AM Azure Moon has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 18 of 104 (89767)
03-02-2004 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Rand Al'Thor
03-01-2004 9:27 PM


What?
You're actually reading him?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 03-01-2004 9:27 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 9:59 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 19 of 104 (89770)
03-02-2004 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Azure Moon
03-02-2004 10:25 AM


Re: Historical Etymology
Sorry to burst your bubble A. Moon, but this smacked to me of an urban legend and so off to Google I went. Here is a link to Snopes that debunks this tale of shitty origins?
The Etymology of 'Shit' | Snopes.com
: )

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Azure Moon, posted 03-02-2004 10:25 AM Azure Moon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Azure Moon, posted 03-02-2004 11:30 AM kjsimons has not replied
 Message 28 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 10:10 AM kjsimons has not replied

  
Azure Moon
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 104 (89774)
03-02-2004 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by kjsimons
03-02-2004 10:48 AM


Re: Historical Etymology
My bubble is still in tact, thank you. The nicer versions of 'sinful' words, as a rule do not stand up to the test of anthropology.
edit: stupid spelling boo boo
[This message has been edited by Azure Moon, 03-02-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by kjsimons, posted 03-02-2004 10:48 AM kjsimons has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Yaro, posted 03-02-2004 4:11 PM Azure Moon has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1173 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 21 of 104 (89802)
03-02-2004 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Rand Al'Thor
03-01-2004 9:27 PM


DAZED AND CONFUSED
Rand Al'Thor,
You'll be not dazed and confused,
It's very easy to understand,
since you've got an access code of mine.
"...next day I'll have the Queen's child too, I've kept my secret just the same..."
What is the "Queen's child" in this case?
I'm a Gerrutzsalem's child.
Cause, Spiritually, I'm a Seven Years Child.
This topic is about the fact that you too,
the right ones, the elected ones,
CANNOT HAVE PARTICIPATION WITH THE LIES by pronouncing the false names, liar names whose (S)he would like to be called [...satan, beulzebius, lucipher...]
It's Amazing,
The moment arrives,
And you finally see the light,
The solution of this topic,
The Truth that satanists wouldn't like to know,
The real name of a demon,
BY THE LACONIC MODE [The Non-Vulgatha-Translation]
At an IMMEDIATE TIME (S)he cries with a loud voice:
- We have something to do together, oh Gehv-shua the Anointed-son of the Higher? What we have to do together? I beg you, please, for the Higher sake, don't send me to the abyss. Please.
Gehv-shua replies and asks [cause is Part of fulfillness of the Eternal Justice to compel "someone" to say the truth about Itself]:
- Come out of the man. "What Is Your Name?"
and (S)he, the dragon, the ancient serpent,
that have no Truth in Itself
is forced to say one time,
the truth about Itself:
S)he answers:
- "LEGION" Is My Name, because, "WE" is "MANY".
[Heb. Ravb, that means: "To be Many"; the same Ravb (without a "v"-in the vulgatha-vaticah-translations) that is also registered and testified in the book of the prophet ISAIAH].
Have You Guessed Its Name?
If you know the Scripture of the Truth, you don't need to guess.
In these days I've seen,
mercenary pastures telling liable's Legion-truths and saying that the apostles have established the building of temples,
telling lion's eater-truths and saying that the apostles have established the realization of cults,
telling liable-Legion-truths and saying that "...satan, beulzebius, lucipher... are the true name of the real demon.
This topic is part of one of the Wars of Gehavh of the Hosts against the false prophet (the false masters), against the mercenary pastures [dragon mouth in the microphone, praying not silent].
[This message has been edited by Zsafira, 04-05-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 03-01-2004 9:27 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1173 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 22 of 104 (89807)
03-02-2004 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Azure Moon
03-01-2004 9:03 PM


Re:
This topic is about the fact that you too,
the right ones, the elected ones,
CANNOT HAVE PARTICIPATION WITH THE LIES by pronouncing the false names, liar names whose (S)he would like to be called [...satan, beulzebius, lucipher...]
It's Amazing,
The moment arrives,
And you finally see the light,
The solution of this topic,
The Truth that satanists wouldn't like to know,
The real name of a demon,
BY THE LACONIC MODE [The Non-Vulgatha-Translation]
By an IMMEDIATE TIME (S)he cries with a loud voice:
- We have something to do together, oh Gehv-shua the Anointed-son of the Higher? What we have to do together? I beg you, please, for the Higher sake, don't send me to the abyss. Please.
Gehv-shua replies and asks [cause is Part of fulfillness of the Eternal Justice to compel "someone" to say the truth about Itself]:
- Come out of the man. "What Is Your Name?"
and (S)he, the dragon, the ancient serpent,
that have no Truth in Itself
is forced to say one time,
the truth about Itself:
S)he answers:
- "LEGION" Is My Name, because, "WE" is "MANY".
[Heb. Ravb, that means: "To be Many"; the same Ravb (without a "v"-in the vulgatha-vaticah-translations) that is also registered and testified in the book of the prophet ISAIAH].
Have You Guessed Its Name?
If you know the Scripture of the Truth, you don't need to guess.
I've seen mercenary pastures telling lies and saying that the apostles have established the building of temples,
telling lies and saying that the apostles have established the realization of cults,
telling lies and saying that "...satan, belzebius, lucipher... are the true name of the real demon.
This topic is part of one of the Wars of Gehavh of the Hosts against the false prophet, against the mercenary pastures,
and against all the doctrines of the liars.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Azure Moon, posted 03-01-2004 9:03 PM Azure Moon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Azure Moon, posted 03-02-2004 4:10 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 45 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 04-05-2004 7:17 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 23 of 104 (89826)
03-02-2004 3:52 PM


ZZ,
Can you please take a moment, and in a consise paragraph explan what the hell you are talking about?
No one here is listening, nor do they understand your ramblings. Can you simply, in plain english, explain. Pretend we are three year olds, thanx.
[This message has been edited by Yaro, 03-02-2004]

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Quetzal, posted 03-03-2004 11:01 AM Yaro has not replied
 Message 33 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 11:19 AM Yaro has not replied
 Message 42 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 4:25 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Azure Moon
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 104 (89829)
03-02-2004 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by goldenlightArchangel
03-02-2004 2:46 PM


Re:
ZZ,
Your attitude makes me feel like this was an intelluctual slave audition and auction done behind our backs. That attitude doesn't go too well here. Your writing style reeks of deceit on your part.
(I prepare for this by planting my palms firmly on both cheeks,pushing together decidely in fashionable prayer stance) "Take your dictates, double-speak and puppet strings, and return to the Land of Oz or wherever you got this stuff from."
Not interested in joining you.
[This message has been edited by Azure Moon, 03-02-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-02-2004 2:46 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 11:31 AM Azure Moon has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 25 of 104 (89830)
03-02-2004 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Azure Moon
03-02-2004 11:30 AM


Re: Historical Etymology
how you figure?
Do you have any sources that make a case for the S.H.I.T. thing?
i.e. can you back it up?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Azure Moon, posted 03-02-2004 11:30 AM Azure Moon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Azure Moon, posted 03-02-2004 5:03 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Azure Moon
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 104 (89853)
03-02-2004 5:03 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Yaro
03-02-2004 4:11 PM


Re: Historical Etymology
Yaro
Do you have any sources that make a case for the S.H.I.T. thing?
Sorry. My college days were long before the internet invasion. I wouldn't know where to begin to look now, which is one reason I posted it in this specific thread and not out in the cite/debate forums.
Azure Moon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Yaro, posted 03-02-2004 4:11 PM Yaro has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1173 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 27 of 104 (90009)
03-03-2004 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by NosyNed
03-02-2004 10:26 AM


Re: Dear NosyNed, Existence Is Permanence
Dear NosyNed,
Existence is permanence,
There's no knowledge of the existence without the knowledge of the Permanence.
There's none existence without the knowledge of the remaining Word.
All the visible things,
heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths, VERILY ARE IN TRAJECTORY OF EXISTENCE.
All the visible things,
heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths, VERILY DO NOT EXISTS ETERNALLY, NEITHER BY ITSELF.
[are in trajectory (processed movement) of a led intermitence of existence],
And if all the visible things,
heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths, VERILY DO NOT EXISTS ETERNALLY
[Cause the Scripture of the Truth cannot Lie];[are in trajectory (processed movement) of a led intermitence of existence],
Soon, IT MEANS: That all the visible things,
heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths, "ARE NOT",

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by NosyNed, posted 03-02-2004 10:26 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1173 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 28 of 104 (90011)
03-03-2004 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by kjsimons
03-02-2004 10:48 AM


Heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths ARE NOT
IT MEANS: That all the visible things,
heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths, "ARE NOT", ,
And if all the visible things,
heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths, VERILY DO NOT EXISTS ETERNALLY
[Cause the Scripture of the Truth cannot Lie];[are in trajectory (processed movement) of a led intermitence of existence],
In order to call upon the ETERNAL NAME, that is the VERB TO BE, The Unique THAT IS, GE-I HAVH-AM
Soon,
"I AM" the same,
"I AM" the first,
"I AM" also the last, (and with those who comes to remain in permanence).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by kjsimons, posted 03-02-2004 10:48 AM kjsimons has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 10:40 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
MisterOpus1
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 104 (90021)
03-03-2004 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by goldenlightArchangel
03-03-2004 10:10 AM


Re: Heavens, stars, mooncrests, earths ARE NOT
ZZ-
Please take the advice given to you and pretend that you are explaining to 3 yr. olds.
In one simple sentence, can you please explain what the hell you are talking about? Just one sentence, and in the most simplest language possible, please?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 10:10 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 12:12 PM MisterOpus1 has replied

  
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4080 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 30 of 104 (90024)
03-03-2004 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Yaro
03-01-2004 2:37 PM


Re: LOTR
I think TRoK deviated much more than the previous films
Not me. Peter Jackson almost lost me as part of the audience with Two Towers. There were four times in that movie where a major character made a decision exactly the opposite of the book.
1. Faramir decides not to let Frodo go (rectified later)
2. Treebeard (and the entmoot) decide against war (rectified later in a way that made Treebeard look exceptionally stupid)
3. Arwen decides to leave across the sea without marrying Aaragorn (rectified later in a bizarre way)
4. Theoden decides not to go to war (Jackson made the trip to Helm's Deep an avoiding of war rather than a trip to go to war).
I can live with #3. 1,2, and 4 took some or a lot of the nobility away from the characters, and especially with Treebeard and Faramir, irritated me badly.
Ok, that's my vent.
Then, one real gasser in Two Towers was the exorcism of Theoden. I rolled laughing. Was that Bob Tilton playing Gandalf in that scene???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Yaro, posted 03-01-2004 2:37 PM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Asgara, posted 03-03-2004 11:17 AM truthlover has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024