Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8945 total)
30 online now:
dwise1, PaulK, Percy (Admin), RAZD, ringo, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (6 members, 24 visitors)
Newest Member: ski zawaski
Upcoming Birthdays: ONESOlivia, perfect
Post Volume: Total: 865,398 Year: 20,434/19,786 Month: 831/2,023 Week: 339/392 Day: 29/41 Hour: 3/5

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   David Rohl's Research (Re: 'A Test Of Time', re: Egyptian chronology)
Member (Idle past 2750 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003

Message 1 of 50 (101211)
04-20-2004 1:54 PM

Ok this is really for Amlodhi and anyone else more familiar with Egyptology than me - I was re-reading David Rohl's "A Test of Time" a few days ago, and I began to wonder just how relevent his work actually is. The general opinion is that his revision of Egyptian Chronology is unworkable.

I have these questions, then:

Is the New Chronology he proposes unworkable, and why?
If his Chronology is unworkable, are the problems he points out with the current Chronology real or imagined?
Is he actually looking for something to prove the bible or not?


The Rock Hound

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by PaulK, posted 04-20-2004 3:37 PM IrishRockhound has not yet responded
 Message 49 by Cami McCraw, posted 07-07-2009 2:45 PM IrishRockhound has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019