Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 17 of 121 (100503)
04-16-2004 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by wj
04-16-2004 8:12 PM


Re: When did it change? how old the rock?
If this is from relatively recent times (ie - obviously contemporaneous with human) then it should also be after the change in gravity. A chunk of rock by itself proves nothing, for it needs to be tied to a time when the gravity was different. This also means there needs to be a timeline of gravity with age. An example from a strata that is known to include the dinosaurs in question would be more appropriate.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by wj, posted 04-16-2004 8:12 PM wj has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by redwolf, posted 04-17-2004 12:36 AM RAZD has replied
 Message 23 by SRO2, posted 04-17-2004 12:40 AM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 26 of 121 (100572)
04-17-2004 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by redwolf
04-17-2004 12:36 AM


Re: When did it change? how old the rock?
You were asked for evidence that shows it has changed.
as for elephants, a quick google and
News in Science - Running elephants keep their feet on the ground - 03/04/2003
Notice the hind leg position versus your image.
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by redwolf, posted 04-17-2004 12:36 AM redwolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by redwolf, posted 04-18-2004 11:35 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 29 of 121 (100579)
04-17-2004 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by redwolf
04-17-2004 12:29 AM


Re: When did it change?
Ah, pictographs ...
That there were leftover dinosaurs well into the age of man appears certain at this point, from petroglyphs and other iconographic evidence
Left over evidence of dinosaurs maybe ... bones and fossils lying openly on the ground are found to this day.
Notice how the angle of the picture of Mishipishu in your article minimizes the horns that spread like those of a bull from the head -- in fact the whole head shape is not found in any known form of stegosaur, to say nothing of the neck proportions.
they are a little more visible on:
Legends would explain huge beasts with embellished stories, a reconstruction from bones would make mistakes with things like the head and neck, whereas direct evidence would not allow such mistakes. It looks to me like the head and neck were made up, ergo it is actually evidence that it was not contemporaneous with man.
Next up, the "brontosaurus":
has also been described as a tyrannosaurus rex by creatortionistas ... who can't even agree on what is being pictured due to the detail available?
Especially when there is another possibility much more likely in my opinion:
madasafish
... the giant sloth, which was around when early man first moved into North America.
All the pictograph "evidence" objects are no more than playing a "best match" game without any real validity. Thanks for the good laugh on those other "matches" (talk about grasping at straws).
Triceratops? Try Wooly Rhinoceros
Woolly Mammoth | Woolly Rhino | Oil Painting Josef Moravec
COELODONTA antiquitatis - Wooly Rhino
This creature was a huge beast that lived in during the last ice age. The Coelodonta had a massive body and a thick, shaggy coat that protected it against the harsh climate of the tundra and steppe that bordered the great glaciers of the Northern Hemisphere. Coelodonta had a pair of huge horns on its snout that reached lengths of up to 3ft in the largest of males. These creatures were hunted by early humans and they were depicted on the walls of caves in France 30,000 years ago.
For there to be any validity for pictographs all other possible interpretations need to be eliminated, or it is just sensationalism based on incredulity, gullibility and lack of awareness regarding alternates.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by redwolf, posted 04-17-2004 12:29 AM redwolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by redwolf, posted 04-17-2004 9:28 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 35 of 121 (100669)
04-18-2004 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by redwolf
04-17-2004 9:28 PM


Re: When did it change?
Touching up does not solve your problems. I said the neck and the head were wrong.
Compare these pictures:
Note the long neck of the stegosaur would be in an area of unpainted rock on the petroglyph, so there is no way that it could have been altered by "touchups" ... and when you are done with that, compare the lengths of the legs on the (model) skeleton front and back -- rear legs are almost 2x the length of the front legs. On the petroglyph the front legs as long as the rear legs, again like a bull. Finally look at the scale of the plates along the back between the real model and the petroglyph. Orders of magnitude wrong again. These are not errors that would be made by people familiar with the actual creatures.
Like I said before, these kinds of pages rely on sensationalism based on incredulity, gullibility and lack of awareness regarding alternates. Another word is ignorance, which is curable through education of the willing.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by redwolf, posted 04-17-2004 9:28 PM redwolf has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 40 of 121 (100750)
04-18-2004 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by redwolf
04-18-2004 2:17 AM


waiting ...
My usual practice in forums is to reply to intelligent posts and ignore non-intelligent posts. You figure to get ignored a lot by that standard.
So am I supposed to feel insulted if you don't answer my post? Or is it that you just don't have an answer? Or that you don't understand that the pictograph cannot represent a stegosaurus, but is instead is some mythological beast of Native lore, much like a griffin or a flying dragon.
Care for a nail in the coffin for the stego-sorry case? Why would the natives identify a herbivore as a member of the (carnivorous) cat family?
The link just in case you missed it is:
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
Now let's revisit the "triceratops" picture:
Here is a wooly rhino and a triceratops for comparison:
Notice the straight backs of the pictograph and the wooly rhino versus the down-sloping back of the triceratops, also the curvature of the horns, and the lack of the triceratops head "shield" in the pictograph.
enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by redwolf, posted 04-18-2004 2:17 AM redwolf has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 54 of 121 (100912)
04-19-2004 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by redwolf
04-19-2004 2:50 AM


swing bridge
A better example is a swing bridge. These are supported in the middle and turn 90 to allow boat passage. When turned they are totally supported by the center pylon and the bridge structure
Engineering analysis have also been done and found no problem with the structure of even the biggest sauropod. These were done pre-internet, so I have had trouble finding sources to cite here.
Still haven't seen your answer to why the stegosaurus is so WRONG shaped for the water panther ...
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by redwolf, posted 04-19-2004 2:50 AM redwolf has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 59 of 121 (100921)
04-19-2004 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by redwolf
04-18-2004 11:51 PM


Re: When did it change?
You are going to tell me that you feel these pictographs represent the result of actual personal experience with the creature involved, even thought they are distinctly different depictions? You still haven't told me how a "touch-up" can make blank rock appear where the neck and head should be according to actual skeletal construction and the multiple other problems with this being a stegosaurus. These are depictions of mythical creatures and nothing more. These two pictures do not resemble each other let alone a stegosaurus:
You still have not answered:
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity -->EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
Note the long neck of the stegosaur would be in an area of unpainted rock on the petroglyph, so there is no way that it could have been altered by "touchups" ... and when you are done with that, compare the lengths of the legs on the (model) skeleton front and back -- rear legs are almost 2x the length of the front legs. On the petroglyph the front legs as long as the rear legs, again like a bull. Finally look at the scale of the plates along the back between the real model and the petroglyph. Orders of magnitude wrong again. These are not errors that would be made by people familiar with the actual creatures.
Like I said before, these kinds of pages rely on sensationalism based on incredulity, gullibility and lack of awareness regarding alternates. Another word is ignorance, which is curable through education of the willing.
ps -- where are the spikes at the end of the Agawa pictograph tail? Or do the "spikes" refer to all those little spikes along the length of the tail?
Gee, that same criticism holds for your picture #2 as well. Coincidence?
Enjoy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by redwolf, posted 04-18-2004 11:51 PM redwolf has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 61 of 121 (100924)
04-19-2004 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by redwolf
04-18-2004 11:35 PM


Re: When did it change? how old the rock?
see swing bridge.
(add by edit):
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
[This message has been edited by RAZD, 04-19-2004]

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by redwolf, posted 04-18-2004 11:35 PM redwolf has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 62 of 121 (100931)
04-19-2004 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by redwolf
04-19-2004 12:01 PM


Re: When did it change? how old the rock?
Some results of studies of strengths and structure:
Robert T. Bakker, "The Dinosaur Heresies"
William Morrow and Company, Inc
All dinosaurs had bigger cneimal crests than do elephants, even those groups with relatively straight hind legs -- the giant horned dinosaurs, stegosaurs, and brontosaurs. When these systems of oversized knee muscles contracted, the power exerted on the hind paw would have had no equal today.
In addition, the attachment point on the pelvis for the knee extensors is the "ilium", and it, too, is of exaggerated size relative to mass in dinosaurs. Bakker shows the relevant musculature of a ceratopsian leg in a diagram (seen here).
Bakker's position is, the cross section of tendon attachment points implies that dinosaurs limbs were subjected to forces equivalent to those running and walking in 1g. It is rather direct evidence against there having been any lower "felt effect of gravity" as Ted claims necessary.
Hokkanen, J.E.I., 1986. "The Size of the Largest Land Animal"
Journal of Theoretical Biology, v.118, p.491-499.
Abstract: The upper mass limit to terrestrial animals is studied using physical arguments and allometric laws for bone and muscle strength and animal locomotion. The limit is suggested to lie between 10^5 and 10^6 kg. A possibility for a still larger mass, in case of new adaptations, is not excluded.
100,000 kg would be 100 tonnes (~220,000 lbs or 110 tons english, short).
Palaeos Vertebrates 330.200 Sauropodomorpha : Sauropoda
Sauropods were long believed to be semi-aquatic swamp wallowers, relying on the bouyancy of water to support their massive bodies. But analysis of their skeletons, in comparison with those of large terrestrial and semi-aquatic animals, and of sedimentation where their fossils have been found, show that sauropods were fully terrestrial:
"The deep thorax of sauropods is an adaption to problems of terrestrial weight-bearing. Sauropod foot and limb structure is generally comparable to elephants...(S)edimentological evidence does not suport immersion in deep lakes as....frequently pictured..."
[Walter Coombs, p.1]
Not only were sauropods as terrestrial as elephants, but fossil trackways indicate that they lived in herds, again like elephants today. It must have been a truely awesome sight to watch a herd of brontosaurs crossing a Mesozoic floodplain; evoking the same sense of awe, and puniness in one's own being in comparison, as one would feel when observing whales close up.
The Sauropoda include the largest animals ever to walk on land. These gigantic herbivores reaches lengths of 15 to 25 metres or more (the very largest may have reached 45 metres) and weights of 15 to 30 or even 50 or 60 tonnes. Previous estimates of 87 to 150 tonne animals are unrealistic and physiologically impossible. No sauropod ever equalled in size the greatest of the baleen whales.
(indent in original)
Well within the upper limit of structure 100 tonnes.
Not just able to stand, but able to run, and some scientists think the sauropods cracked their tails like whips (but that is a different matter).
Notice specifically that it was the structural analysis that showed the sauropods could stand unaided in 1 gravity that revised thoughts on where and how they lived, from swamp animal to dry land wanderer.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by redwolf, posted 04-19-2004 12:01 PM redwolf has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 64 of 121 (100990)
04-19-2004 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by redwolf
04-19-2004 4:42 PM


Have no reply? pity.
Presumably this same scaling has been done to compare the human weightlifter with the elephant to verify that the scaling used exactly predicts the bone sizes for the elephant and that extras like oversized cneimal crests are not necessary for the elephant to stand and walk.
btw -- unanswered posts now come to
EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
which I take as complete inability on your part to refute them.
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by redwolf, posted 04-19-2004 4:42 PM redwolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by redwolf, posted 04-19-2004 10:22 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 67 of 121 (101068)
04-19-2004 11:22 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by NosyNed
04-19-2004 10:56 PM


Re: Have no reply? pity.
It's okay, I understand. There may be more to it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by NosyNed, posted 04-19-2004 10:56 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by 1.61803, posted 04-20-2004 12:28 AM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 86 of 121 (101291)
04-20-2004 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by redwolf
04-20-2004 11:11 AM


Time to put this idea to bed
So you want to use flying for the proof. Good.
Great Research Advances: Past and Present
Quetzalcoatlus! The largest flying creature of all time
By 1975, studies of the specimen by Lawson and his supervisor, Wann Langston, Jr. Had determined that the animal, a 65 million year old pterodactyl from the Age of Dinosaurs, had a wing spread of about 40 feet, greater than a 4-place Cessna airplane or an F-18 fighter. It was about twice as large as the biggest pterodactyl known up to that time. With the discovery of additional, though smaller, fossilized skeletal remains in the Big Bend in 1973, it was possible to reconstruct the entire skeleton of the pterodactyl which Lawson named Quetzalcoatlus northopi. Based upon what had been learned from these discoveries, the world-renowned aeronautical engineer, Paul MacCready, with the assistance of Professor Langston created a large flying replica of Quetzalcoatlus which performed over the California desert for the Smithsonian Museum's IMAX film "on the Wing" in 1985. Lawson's discovery attracted world-wide attention, being reported in newspapers and magazines and on TV from New York to Tokyo and Canada to Argentina. "On the Wing" was shown around the world. ABC 20-20, the news program, produced a 20 minute segment on MacCready's work, and Sir David Attenborough traveled to Texas to film segments for his BBC series "Lost Worlds - Vanished Lives." Quetzalcoatlus continues to attract attention within scientific circles and the press because of the exciting questions it raises about how the long extinct pterodactyls flew, how big a flying creature can be, and why such successful animals went extinct along with the dinosaurs sixty-five million years ago.
Model of a 65 million year old specimen that flies in today's gravity. If there was a change in gravity as Ted Holden and his gullible cohorts contend, then the model should not be able to get off the ground.
{added by edit: picture of the replica pterodactyl flying:
nice, eh?}
QED. no significant change in gravity.
Thank you.
Enjoy.
[This message has been edited by RAZD, 04-20-2004]

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by redwolf, posted 04-20-2004 11:11 AM redwolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by redwolf, posted 04-20-2004 9:01 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 87 of 121 (101298)
04-20-2004 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by crashfrog
04-20-2004 2:39 PM


Not only that, but if you were going to look at a long neck and ask what it would need for extra support, you would look for spines on the top to seperate the compressive load on the vertebrae from the tensile load on the muscles and tendons. If it formed a notch to keep a tendon in place at the top of the spines, so much the better.
You see this structure on a lot of horizontal orientation necks, but big time on ... sauropods:
Notice how the neck vertebrae (d) is elongated in a verticle direction with a notch for an elastin ligamen to provide extra support for the neck. Definitely a cable system.
One would also expect (from evolution) that such a ligement would be just enough additional support to allow the muscles to do their job but retain all the flexibility and moveability availble with the muscles.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 04-20-2004 2:39 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 97 of 121 (101392)
04-20-2004 11:28 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by redwolf
04-20-2004 9:01 PM


Re: Time to put this idea to bed
Towed or under it's own power it flew, and that is the point. If the gravity was significantly different the lift to drag ratio would not have been enough. As it turns out the area needed to generate enough lift in 1g is present in the prehistoric specimen. I repeat:
If there was a change in gravity as Ted Holden and his gullible cohorts contend, then the model should not be able to get off the ground.
Note that this argument is not concerned with wing span, bone or muscle strength as the aerodynamics shows it was possible and there would be no reason for that to be so for a critter living under reduced gravity, and this critter definitely comes for the time period in question.
For Ted's hypothesis to have any credibility the model should not fly, it does, and that is a problem for any reduced gravity scenario.
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by redwolf, posted 04-20-2004 9:01 PM redwolf has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by RAZD, posted 04-22-2004 12:38 AM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 101 of 121 (101736)
04-22-2004 12:38 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by RAZD
04-20-2004 11:28 PM


Re: Time to put this idea to bed
no reply ...
unanswered posts on this topic alone now come to 8:
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
http://EvC Forum: Dinosaurs and the reduced felt effect of gravity
which I take as complete inability by redwolf to refute them.
looks to me like the "the reduced felt effect of gravity" is a dead concept and Ted Holden is a huckster of old west snake oil proportions.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by RAZD, posted 04-20-2004 11:28 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024