Any takers?
I'm not sure this is exactly on topic, but you seem to be under the impression that biologists consider the
existence of pseudogenes to be evidence of the common descent of organisms.
This isn't exactly true. It's not (for instance) the fact that both apes and humans have pseudogenes that suggests common descent. It's the fact that they have a lot of the
same pseudogenes. For instance apes and humans both have a broken gene that could synthesize Vitamin C if it worked. In both humans and apes, the gene is broken in
the same place.
What process would break the gene in the same way, twice, in a number of seperate species? The obvious conclusion is that apes and humans share heredity to some degree.
If someone was to find those psuedogenes and figure out how to turn them back on, they could prove the bible true and elimiate untold suffering by extending life by hundereds of years!
Or they could kill someone. Even if what you say is true, humans have adapted to the absence of the protiens those pseudogenes code for. Re-introducing them could be fatal. I'd be worried that someone would take your idea so seriously - based on a faith in the Bible that supercedes any conclusion based on evidence in nature - that they would rush ahead to do just what you suggest. They'd be so certain that it would work that they wouldn't stop to consider how to protect the subject in case it didn't.