"THE EXODUS REVEALED" VIDEO

Paulk, true or false? The Exodus crossing benefited the Jews and hurt the allies of Arabs?True or false? Islam does not recognize the Jew/Christian god, Jehovah?Why does Saudi Arabia refuse to let anyone research and date the artifacts at the Neweibal crossing and allow research around the burnt mountain?

Dan, I searched google for a Bishop Usher list of geneologies to no avail, but if you can find a Schofield Reference Bible there is an Usher date at the top of each page of the OT. Then there's the geneologies of Matthew and Luke. I have a Schofield Refernce Bible in case you have any specific questions. There must be a complete Usher list somewhere on the www.

Neither the video nor I has said there was any wood left. The video explains that the coral formation had attached to the wheels and whatever wood was there is likely gone. The wood and metal would have likely supported the coral until the coral was strong enough to form the shape of some of the wheels and axles.

Hi Cromwell. If you viewed the video you could readily see that it would be neigh unto impossible to pin all the debris there is down there at this site, especially to have coral formations the shape of axles and wheels pinned down there. It just didn't happen. You should views the video. It's worth the small investment.

..........And a good stopping point is the site of the imperial evidence that the Biblical scriptures are correct about the Hebrews crossing the sea.

Hi Brian. It's late and gotta hit hay, but I'll address this now before retiring. Here's how it likely worked. Note that in verse 8 they "passed through the midst of the sea into the wilderness." This is the crossing of the (un-named) sea. Then the text proceeds to detail every encampment of their itinerary. They went here and there and by the way, they also arrived on the shore of the Red Sea again, but please note that it doesn't say that they crossed it this time. They likely encamped by it again on their looooong wilderness journey, but this time on the East shore of Aqaba.The bottom line to all this is that the imperial evidence is there at the Aqaba sandbar. The chariot junkyard is there and there's no reason under heaven for a mess of chariot debris to be in the middle of any sea. There's the likely evidence on the Arabian side also that Mt Sinai is really over there and there's other stuff near the mountain indicating they were likely there. There's also the split rock with evidence of the water flow. You need to view the video to understand all the evidence there is before debunking it as nonsense.The waters of Egypt were all turned blood red, likely including the Red Sea, according to scripture, not only once, but twice, once by Moses and Aaron and again by the Egyptian magicians and sorcerers. so Red is a likely title for the blood red waters. Your Reed Sea thing is very controversial and nobody has proven it to be credible, imo.I need to be outa town tomorrow, but will try to get back to responding to more when I can.

Paul, this just shows how closed and narrow minded you are being in all this. This video has nothing to do with Wyatt and the research has nothing to do with Wyatt's organization. Yes, Wyatt was there first as I understand it, but this is a more scientific approach which seems to prove some of Wyatt's claims to be credible.What's the matter? Are you afraid viewing the video and getting the whole story right might prove the supernatural dimension to exist in the universe and might affect your own life and thinking?

LOL. Not when that Bible exhonerates and blesses their enemies, Israel and when it prophesies the messianic future to be Jewish headed by Jesus the Jew. Same with this crossing. It was the Jews, enemies of Islam who were helped and Egypt, their ally who was devastated by it. You and others need to come to reality in your thinking on this.

Also Mark, if Muslims are allegedly so intent on proving the Bible true, why is it necessary for Christians to smuggle Bibles into many Islamic nations and why are some severely persecuted for being caught reading or teaching the Bible?? No, Saudi Arabia does not want this Exodus story verified or in the headlines, imo. I understand there's barb wire and guards around the area of the burnt mountain there in Saudi Arabia and that much of what's been researched there was researched covertly.

Before heading outa town, I'm getting in a few responses in the order that the statements came.This is just not so, Brian. Everything has certainly not been thoroughly investigated and like other science, new technology, etc make for much better research. You should know that.You need to view the video before making these bogus statements with total disregard to the imperial evidence. The video begins with the discovery by an Austrian research team of archeologists who've found a city in Egypt which was occupied at that time by foreigners. The truth is finally coming out, Biran. Don't fight it. Look at it objectively before you discount it. That's true science.Gotta run for now.

You have the problem then of how the Egyptians were drowned. The Biblical text is definitely not about a swamp of reeds or some shallows. It specifies a sea, does it not? Where then do you locate this drownable sea, large enough to cover 600 chariots? The footnotes, opinions of readers, don't cut it. There is still a debate about whether it's Sea of Reeds or Red Sea. I'm still with the Red Sea since the waters were all turned blood red. Nearly all the translators are with me on this and they are the professionals, after all. Nothing dodgy about these books and videos, mefriend. This is not good science on your part to label them thus without first viewing or reading them. You know how you people go after creationists in this regard. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Well, hows about doing it like you do in other science. Look at the imperial evidence and interpret accordingly. The point I'm trying to make is that the Red Sea can refer to either the sea proper, or either of the two gulfs in some of these scriptures. The evidence for the crossing now, imo, is clearly the Aqaba sandbar where the wheels are being photographed. That's the scientific approach to this.

Thanks very much for the kind blessings, Brian and Jar. Mighty kind of you both and I do believe blessings do have an effect. My trip was good and productive.

1. It does not say how many made the complete trip to the crossing. Likely for various reasons many did not complete the long rough journey. Pharoah may have ordered a contingent to stay behind and the best chariots to proceed all the way. Nobody knows.2. Pharoah was a very stubborn and opressive dictator to allow his people to suffer so much rather than heed the miraculous warnings. Likely they got along quite well without him. After all, look what the good ole US of A could accomplish if we could get rid of three quarters of our government bureacracy. I beg to differ. They are oppinions of the secularist revisionists who have a problem with the supernatural. ........and, after all, it is a theory. This site link totally blows your reed theory outa the water, pardon the pun. It is the best I could find. Please read it all carefully.[PDF] WHAT AND WHERE WAS THE “RED SEA,” “SEA OF REEDS,” OR “ ...
Access denied -It takes you to Exodus 23:31, I Kings 9:26, Joshua 15:1, I Kings 9:26 and II Chronicles 8:7. These scripture texts document that the Gulf of Aqabah was the Biblical reference to the Red Sea (yom suph) the cited passages which use the term and that Elath at the Northern tip of the Gulf was the southern border of Israel, etc.Gotta run for now. Talk to you later when I can for more responses. I'm slow at this. Off to sabbath church tomorrow which is outa town and back sometime after dinner out. May God bless and enlighten you and yours.

WOW! Talk about strawman city!! This is it!1. There are wheels attached to axles in the video.2. They are scattered coast to coast, thickly scattered in some areas.3. As stated, these wheel designs were contemporaneous only to the 18th dynasty of Egypt, odds nearly nill that there would be any other reason for their presence in any sea or gulf.Jar, you need some better stuff than this for sensible debate here, don't you think? The mods are calling creos on the carpet for lesser strawmen than some of what's being put forth here.

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

.........and scattered them shore to shore? I don't think so. And why the axles attached? Read the thread. It's already been addressed.