Creation Evidence Museums...

I really really really wished my post of Bible prophecy was allowed through as it really met with your standards of a prophecy. (Is there anyway it could be allowed through,Administrators?)...Im not going to give you evidence because when i do its from AiG and get nothing but bagged out for it but that is the evidence i have.. There is no dating method that proves something to be 65 million yrs!..Its based on assumptions..Assumptions that the earth formed billions of yrs ago therefore layers means millions of yrs,dead bones means they extinct 80 million yrs ago..They are interpreting the facts because the bones do not come with a label telling you the age and a dating method cannot prove something to be 80 million yrs old..Its based on the opinions of evolutionists..Nothing more..Its not based on real scientific facts,Its based on an evolutionary worldview. When creationists give there view on the evidence it is in conflict with evolution but it is not in conflict with facts. As much as you may want them to be proven facts they dont even come close. So when you see evidence for creation you musnt compare them to what evolutionists say because it will always be something else, What you can compare is how consistent it is with what the only person who was there when it happened says!. All dating methods rely heavily on interpretations. Since there is no dating method that can prove these ages where are they getting these ideas from??????????...From an evolutionary interpretation of course.The difference is in the way we interpret the facts. And why do we interpret facts differently? Because we start with different presuppositions. These are things that are assumed to be true, without being able to prove them. These then become the basis for other conclusions. So you guys continue for your whole lives believing what some guy says because he wears a white coat and because he tells you its fact and its proven. I certainly will not believe a person who may be a great scientist but when he comes to saying what happened in the past then im sorry but his methods of experimentation are very limited indeed Does Radiometric Dating Prove the Earth Is Old? | Answers in Genesis

We are arguing over which ones right Evolution or Creation..Yep that should update you to where we are...MARK24 - Creationists arent as much based on assumptions because they can base it on what God says. And when this proves to be right they can almost call it fact. Yes in a way they can. As for science not all science is assumptions. Its pretty much fact that if we jump off a cliff we will go down. Evolution however relies heavily on assumptions because there isnt much experiments to prove such unless theres interpretation of facts and a framework. So if you review AiGs evidence and realise how consistent it is with what God says then you can say yes its true just like God said. What can evolutionists say? Besides there is no truth and we will never know truth. Creationists start with answers so its not science??? . What if the answers are consistent with the evidence? Does that still mean its not science?...

Your assumptions are based to a very high degree?? All yous have are evolutionists opinions..And the facts? well they dont speak for themselves. And just about everything evolutinists say happened cannot be proven. Do you really see evolution in the fossil record? I would of expected a bit more evidence than what there is. But now they have punctuated quilibrium. Wow! thats such a great way to explain the absence of evidence. Makes sense if you ask me!. The fossil evidence actually fits the biblical frame better where animals dont change into complete different animals but stay in there own kind.I really think that jumping off a cliff and going down isnt an assumption. As long as we are here on earth this will be fact. Evolution however cannot be observed or called fact. Just opinions and interpretations.We start with answers so its not science? And you say correct you dont with answers??? I just said we do have answers because were basing it on the God who was there and you say we dont have answers? If the evidence is consistent with what God says which AiG proves then i think we have answers. Evolutionists just have we will never know truth. But creation is wrong! creation is not science!. You never know truth so you will never know evolution is fact or even happened.And for the evidence ill have a topic up soon hopefully.

He.