Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,749 Year: 4,006/9,624 Month: 877/974 Week: 204/286 Day: 11/109 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   THE SIGN OF THE BEAST - All the bears do use their right hand
Ricka
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 128 (108596)
05-16-2004 9:11 AM


still waiting Zsafira
Jar,its obvious I am not from Texas. that was funny.
Ok. Zsafira, any comments, answers, modes, dictionaries, decodifying, etc.
What is your proof/evidence?
And while you are gathering your info. Some more questions please...
Are you Gnostic?
Are you Arian?
If you are so sure as to your fidelity, why post here? One would be inclinded to think that you would spread the truth to those who are disallusioned in thier understanding, or fidelity, as you put it. Or is it that you know they are correct, or know that it is easier for you to gather those who are debilitated by coming here where there are no set fidelities by all, and those of varied thinking visit this site?
If you require the names of sites where their fidelity is strong and humble....then I am sure one could provide you with that very needed information. Maybe you could shed some ever needed light to those poor unfortunate souls.
?????
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-16-2004 08:14 AM

  
Cthulhu
Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 273
From: Roe Dyelin
Joined: 09-09-2003


Message 32 of 128 (108624)
05-16-2004 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by MonkeyBoy
05-12-2004 11:14 AM


Nah, some of Brad's posts actually make sense.

Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
Proudly attempting to Google-Bomb Kent "The Idiot" Hovind's website
Idiot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by MonkeyBoy, posted 05-12-2004 11:14 AM MonkeyBoy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by MonkeyBoy, posted 05-16-2004 1:50 PM Cthulhu has replied

  
MonkeyBoy
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 128 (108642)
05-16-2004 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Cthulhu
05-16-2004 12:10 PM


Most, that is to say all of what Brad posts flies 90 feet over my head. No disrespect intended, but it appears that Zsafira is the right wing alter personality of Brad.
I predict that in a few years, Brad will win the Nobel prize for formulating a new and improved Unified Field Theory, making a better model of the current ToE and a cure for male pattern baldness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Cthulhu, posted 05-16-2004 12:10 PM Cthulhu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Cthulhu, posted 05-17-2004 3:31 PM MonkeyBoy has replied

  
Cthulhu
Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 273
From: Roe Dyelin
Joined: 09-09-2003


Message 34 of 128 (108841)
05-17-2004 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by MonkeyBoy
05-16-2004 1:50 PM


Well, granted that the post that Brad made that made sense was about four words long...

Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
Proudly attempting to Google-Bomb Kent "The Idiot" Hovind's website
Idiot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by MonkeyBoy, posted 05-16-2004 1:50 PM MonkeyBoy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by MonkeyBoy, posted 05-18-2004 12:15 PM Cthulhu has replied

  
MonkeyBoy
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 128 (109027)
05-18-2004 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Cthulhu
05-17-2004 3:31 PM


Question:
Cthulhu (great RPG, by the way) -
quote:
Proudly attempting to Google-Bomb Kent "The Idiot" Hovind's website
What does this mean? Surely not a DoS....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Cthulhu, posted 05-17-2004 3:31 PM Cthulhu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Cthulhu, posted 05-18-2004 3:39 PM MonkeyBoy has replied

  
Cthulhu
Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 273
From: Roe Dyelin
Joined: 09-09-2003


Message 36 of 128 (109062)
05-18-2004 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by MonkeyBoy
05-18-2004 12:15 PM


Re: Question:
Do you wnat to know what google-bombing is?
Since Google works based on the number of links to a page when ranking a search, one can boost a page up to the front of the queue with the right links. It's how George W. Bush's bio is the first hit when you google "miserable failure".
I'm attempting to get Hovind's site up as the first hit when one googles "idiot".
This message has been edited by Cthulhu, 05-18-2004 02:39 PM

Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
Proudly attempting to Google-Bomb Kent "The Idiot" Hovind's website
Idiot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by MonkeyBoy, posted 05-18-2004 12:15 PM MonkeyBoy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by MonkeyBoy, posted 05-18-2004 4:36 PM Cthulhu has not replied

  
Ricka
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 128 (109071)
05-18-2004 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by goldenlightArchangel
05-14-2004 5:59 PM


Re: its all in the name
I am still waiting Zsafira, for you to answer my queries.
interesting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-14-2004 5:59 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Ricka
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 128 (109075)
05-18-2004 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by goldenlightArchangel
05-14-2004 5:59 PM


Re: its all in the name
What is your proof/evidence?
And while you are gathering your info. Some more questions please...
Are you Gnostic?
Are you Arian?
If you are so sure as to your fidelity, why post here? One would be inclinded to think that you would spread the truth to those who are disallusioned in thier understanding, or fidelity, as you put it. Or is it that you know they are correct, or know that it is easier for you to gather those who are debilitated by coming here where there are no set fidelities by all, and those of varied thinking visit this site?
If you require the names of sites where their fidelity is strong and humble....then I am sure one could provide you with that very needed information. Maybe you could shed some ever needed light to those poor unfortunate souls.
?????
P.S. I could be wrong here, since I am NOT an expert in Latin but when I checked on the word Fidel,its english translation was and is Faith. its meaning being having faith.
and when I checked on the word fide in latin and visa versa it was translated as belief. so I am trying very hard to understand your arguement but all I am sensing is someone who is angry and resentful to the translations(correct translations) in the Bible. Am I correct? I dont understand you Zsafira, if you have some secret knowledge that others do not possess, then it would be more beneficial to you to give that info than beat around the bush about it. I do understand that you are using some kind of translator in reference to your portuguese language, but you can still get your point across even with that bridge. You (in your translation) seem to dislike the Vatican, then claim to be a friend of the Pope, and that he is fine. Is there a point to your rantings?
Please respond, so that all will know what kind of tree you are from.
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-18-2004 03:23 PM
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-18-2004 05:06 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-14-2004 5:59 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-19-2004 5:58 PM Ricka has replied

  
MonkeyBoy
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 128 (109082)
05-18-2004 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Cthulhu
05-18-2004 3:39 PM


Re: Question:
{Bows to the Great One}
That is some good Haydken'!
Hats off!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Cthulhu, posted 05-18-2004 3:39 PM Cthulhu has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1178 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 40 of 128 (109128)
05-18-2004 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Ricka
05-15-2004 4:01 PM


Hi Ricka
Thank you for the very sincere question.
I'm not online all the time.
I hope you can wait. I will respond to you tomorrow.
The proof/evidence is there in the Scripture of the Truth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Ricka, posted 05-15-2004 4:01 PM Ricka has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1178 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 41 of 128 (109307)
05-19-2004 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Ricka
05-18-2004 4:21 PM


Answers to the ARGUMENTATIONS
QUESTION:
What is your proof/evidence?
I already wrote in these threads. But I still have to bring up the same phrases again. I hope you gathered the whole threads. Nevertheless, it looks as though you did not.
*******
Are you Gnostic? No. - Ctrl/Alt/Enter//"gnostic" means "she who thinks she could bring up the better knowledge by her own ways (or; her own invented ways)".
THE TRUTH: ONLY THE ETERNAL HIGHER YAHWEH OF THE HOSTS CAN BRING UP INSIDE YOUR BRAIN ALL THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE EVERLASTING THINGS WHICH REMAIN ETERNALLY.
Are you Arian? No.
..Maybe you could shed some ever needed light to those poor unfortunate souls.
?????
Yes, the LIGHT IS KNOWLEDGE given to us (you and I and the winners..) from the Holy Spirit. And the LIGHT is not the I. Only the Holy Spirit knows who are the right ones who shall understand and know the TRUTH.
*******
ARGUMENTATION:
..when I checked on the word Fidel,its english translation was and is Faith. its meaning being having faith..
I already wrote in these threads. But I still have to bring up the same phrases again. I hope you gathered the whole threads. Nevertheless, it looks as though you did not:
TELL ME
YOU WHO READS HERE: [?]Can you be faithfull to believe in two governments at the same time?
answer: YES everyone can, if really wants.
Can you keep FIDELITY to remain at two governments at the same time?
answer: NO. The LAMB told that it's not possible for the right ones.
Verily, it would be possible according to beliefs, theology, cults, mary-go-with-others, and beasts, and a trine of frogs too.
*******
TO REMAIN or TO BELIEVE? What's the difference?
FIDELITY or Faith? (FILADHELPHYA, or Pergamus/7DayLaodicea?)
*******
Can you be faithfull to believe in two governments at the same time?
answer: YES everyone can, if really wants.
Can you keep FIDELITY to remain at two governments at the same time?
answer: NO. The LAMB told that it's not possible for the right ones.
Verily, it would be possible according to beliefs, theology, cults, mary-go-with-others, and beasts, and a trine of frogs too.
Which WORD is the TRUE ONE? FIDE (faith) or FIDEL
FIDE - From the VICIOUS-VATICAN-VULGATHA-INSERTED-TRANSLATION - worshiped also by 7DayLaodicea?
Or
FIDEL - From the Ancient ORIGINAL HEBREW MANUSCRYPTS?
What's the difference?
*******
Among others 0,000007% persons, Shall I remain and give permanence to THE SAME ETERNAL FIDELITY for the HIGHER ETERNAL BEING WHO IS MY LOVE GEHAWH OF THE HOSTS?
Or:
Among others 99,99993% persons, shall I believe that "beliefs" and "KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH" are the same thing?
What's the difference?
..when I checked on the word Fidel,its english translation was and is Faith. its meaning being having faith..
[?]Do you know who did create the Medieval Latin Dictionaries?
It’s been elaborated by the Christians, also by the Seminarists under the ministry of Vatican, also by Neo-Protestantists, also by Gnosticists, also by 7Day/Laodicea-JezeHGWbaal’s Followers of her own sabbathanian day, also by mary-go with them false masters and seed of falsehood in..
Because the sons of men invented their dictionaries, telling you about the Medieval Latin word sus, they say that sus means swine. But they did not write to you the TRUE ORIGIN of the suffix SUS which means ABOVE and UP. Because they are BLIND leading blinds, and the PROOF/EVIDENCE: Is that they ALWAYS do IGNORE the TRUE ORIGIN OF THE SUFFIX SUS [which means ABOVE AND UP]. Always Negligence and Ignorance you can hope from them sons of men and their very SWINE DEEDS inside their swine-dictionaries.
In case you do stay like a WINNER who is losing, then,
[?]How can you EXPECT a WISDOM from the sons of men and from their swine-dictionaries?
[?]Do you expect a MERCY from the false masters?
ANSWER: You do exterminate the lie, or the lie shall exterminate you.
*******
and when I checked on the word fide in latin and visa versa it was translated as belief.
DO I GO WITH THEM MARIES?
so I am trying very hard to understand your arguement but all I am sensing is someone who is angry and resentful to the translations(correct translations) in the Bible. Am I correct?
The correct word is not Bible. Bible is a very trading term used by the merceraries.
The correct term is: SANCTIFIED SCRIPTURES; Holy Scriptures.
I dont understand you Zsafira, if you have some secret knowledge that others do not possess..
You shall know what I know
In case you do wish so
Then, you got to perseverate by the narrow. And the narrow is not 99,3333333. [mary-go-with-others]
The narrow is 0,7777777.
then claim to be a friend of the Pope, and that he is fine. Is there a point to your rantings?
I just bless all of them. I say that all are friends to me. I’M NOT AGAINST THE FLESH. The true War is Missive, is not against flesh. Missive War is against the false masters[The Doctrines/not the flesh]
*******Written by Zsafira. - All Rights Reserved.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Ricka, posted 05-18-2004 4:21 PM Ricka has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Ricka, posted 05-22-2004 5:25 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 43 by Ricka, posted 05-23-2004 1:26 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Ricka
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 128 (109910)
05-22-2004 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by goldenlightArchangel
05-19-2004 5:58 PM


Re: Answers to the ARGUMENTATIONS
quote:
What is your proof/evidence?
I already wrote in these threads. But I still have to bring up the same phrases again. I hope you gathered the whole threads. Nevertheless, it looks as though you did not.
Like many others, I did read your threads and your proof/evidence is in itself not. Therefore, the question still stands.
quote:
Are you Gnostic? No. - Ctrl/Alt/Enter//"gnostic" means "she who thinks she could bring up the better knowledge by her own ways (or; her own invented ways)".
THE TRUTH: ONLY THE ETERNAL HIGHER YAHWEH OF THE HOSTS CAN BRING UP INSIDE YOUR BRAIN ALL THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE EVERLASTING THINGS WHICH REMAIN ETERNALLY.
actually....
Gnostic adj. 1. gnostic. Of, relating to, or possessing intellectual or spiritual knowledge
That one still stands as well.
As well as the rest that you didnt answer.
I wonder why you use semantics in your arguements?
semantics n. (used with a sing. or pl. verb). 1. Linguistics. The study or science of meaning in language forms. 2. Logic. The study of relationships between signs and symbols and what they represent.
Another form of Gnosticism, I suppose.
You claim you are against the missive wars on doctrines, not the flesh.
In as few words as possible, you will have to elaborate on that one, since it implies that you practice sola scripture.
Oh and btw, Bible is greek for Biblios...books. Since that is what it is. The books of sacred scripture.
again...
quote:
QUESTION:
What is your proof/evidence?
I already wrote in these threads. But I still have to bring up the same phrases again. I hope you gathered the whole threads. Nevertheless, it looks as though you did not.
Just a bit more please...It is important to point out that even the vast majority of Jews in the time of the New Testament did not speak Hebrew! Most did not even speak Aramaic, as the example of the Maccabees shows. The Maccabees fought very hard against the Helenization (Greek influence) of Judaism in the second century before Christ. They fought and died to preserve their Jewishness. Still, when it was time to record their accomplishments they chose Greek and not Hebrew as the language to use. This was because it was the universal language of their day. They also used the Greek words for God and not the Hebrew words for God. If the anti-Greek Maccabees used Greek, how much more likely it is that the writers of the New Testament also did so.
It is easy to show that most Jews of the first century did not even use a Hebrew Bible for the Old Testament; instead they used the Greek translation of the Old Testament--the Septuagint. How could they use a Hebrew language Bible when most of them did not speak Hebrew? Most quotes in the New Testament from the Old Testament are from the Septuagint. There is no reason that someone writing in Hebrew would quote from a Greek translation of the Old Testament.
The Ryland fragment is a part of the Gospel of John that has been found. It is in Greek and has been dated about 100-150 A.D. (ibid, p. 181). Since scholars believe the book of John was written in the late 90s, this fragment shows conclusively that it was written in Greek. Literally thousands of fragments of the New Testament have been preserved, but not one is written in Hebrew or Aramaic! (The Peshitta [Syriac Bible] is used by sacred name believers to prove that the New Testament was written in Aramaic. But the Peshitta is a translation from the Greek! If there were any Aramaic originals, why was this necessary? While it is possible that a few books were written in Aramaic most of the New Testament was written in Greek.
Most advocates of the doctrine of the sacred name teach that if you are wrong in your pronunciation, then your salvation is in danger! But what if the exact pronunciation of God's name has been lost? This is somewhat humorous since several groups of sacred name believers have different versions of the pronunciation of God's name. They include but are not limited to "Yahweh", "Yehweh", "Yahveh," "Yahvah," "Yahuweh," "Yah" and "YHWH." The two main names chosen by these people for the Messiah are "Yeshuah" and "Yahshua." If you pick the wrong name then most sacred name believers say you cannot be saved! But even if one is convinced of the validity of this doctrine, how does one choose what name to use? The consequences, the doctrine states, are eternal.
and again, I am aware of the meaning of the word/suffix 'sus',anyone can check that out to find that it means above and up... and agian, you are argueing semantics when you state...
quote:
Because the sons of men invented their dictionaries, telling you about the Medieval Latin word sus, they say that sus means swine. But they did not write to you the TRUE ORIGIN of the suffix SUS which means ABOVE and UP. Because they are BLIND leading blinds, and the PROOF/EVIDENCE: Is that they ALWAYS do IGNORE the TRUE ORIGIN OF THE SUFFIX SUS [which means ABOVE AND UP]. Always Negligence and Ignorance you can hope from them sons of men and their very SWINE DEEDS inside their swine-dictionaries.
So that arguement is moot. Also, if you understand Astosnomy then the words up and down are relative. The meaning is there and what it means. Hebrew words have more than one meaning, Greek words have more than one meaning, as well as English words have more than one meaning. All one need do is look it up, and one will find the answer.
The English word BUM has several meanings...for example. 1. a tramp, vagrant. 2. the buttocks.
Or the word ARM...1. an upper limb of the human body.
2. Something, such as a sleeve on a garment or a
support on a chair.
3. an administrative or functional branch
4. a reletively narrow extension jutting out from a
large mass.
5. an idiom..such as "an arm and a leg."
6. a weapon, especially a firearm.
I still wait.
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 12:19 PM
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 03:01 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-19-2004 5:58 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Ricka
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 128 (110006)
05-23-2004 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by goldenlightArchangel
05-19-2004 5:58 PM


Re: Answers to the ARGUMENTATIONS
quote:
The true War is Missive, is not against flesh. Missive War is against the false masters[The Doctrines/not the flesh]
Who are the false masters? Specifically, who are they?
Who's Doctrines? Specifically, who's Doctrines?
If you are at war(arms) with missive(written message)
Then it would be best to whom you speak of, for clarification.
Otherwise, you lead your discussion into dangerous consequenses, since it could imply anyone....or God himself.
It almost seems as if you claim to be at arms with Sacred Scripture. Since you refuse to clarify yourself.
The Holy One of God said "anyone who comes to me I will never drive away..." (John 6;37)
"It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life" (John 6:63)
"Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you" (John 6:53)
"And He said, 'For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father." (John 6:65)
Did the Holy One of God deliberately confuse and scatter His flock? Did He "drive them away" right after He promised He would not do this? Would He deliberately tempt the crowd, the diciples, and even the twelve apostles to abandon Him because of poor communication?
"So Jesus asked the twelve, 'Do you also wish to go away?" (John 6:67)
Your answer Zsafira.
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 01:15 PM
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 10:44 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-19-2004 5:58 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Ricka
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 128 (110014)
05-23-2004 2:37 PM


I.N.R.I.
are the first letters of the Latin inscription which, by Pilate's order, was placed on the cross of Christ's crucifixion (John 19:19) The words "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews" were taken from Pilates's sentence. It was written in Latin, the language of administration in Judaea, and also in Hebrew(Aramaic) and Greek. Because of the irrevocability of a Roman sentence, this inscription stood as written, against the protests of the Jews who wished to disclaim Christ's kingship (John 19:21) Thus it has become the lasting testimony of the kingship of Jesus.
This message has been edited by Ricka, 05-23-2004 10:48 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 05-27-2004 4:06 PM Ricka has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1178 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 45 of 128 (110930)
05-27-2004 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Ricka
05-23-2004 2:37 PM


Re: I.N.R.I.
Are the first letters of the Latin inscription which, by Pontifice Pilatos's order, was placed on the TREE of Gehav-oshuah of Nazareth[NAZARENVS], King[REX] of the Gews[IVDAEORUM]" were taken from Pontifice-Pilatos's sentence. It was written in Latin, the language of administration in Gew-daea, and also in Hebrew(Aramaic) and Greek. Because of the irrevocability of a Roman sentence, this inscription stood as written, against the protests of the Gews who wished to disclaim ANNOINTED's INSTRUCTION ( *19:21kind of number of the beast) Thus it has become the lasting testimony of the INSTRUCTION of YEHAV-OSHUAH (Jesus?)[Jebus? or Iesuas?].
Reality? or; a Version of the Reality?
This message has been edited by Zsafira, 05-28-2004 01:49 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Ricka, posted 05-23-2004 2:37 PM Ricka has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Ricka, posted 05-27-2004 6:44 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024