Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Help with Big Bang and String Theory
One_Charred_Wing
Member (Idle past 6174 days)
Posts: 690
From: USA West Coast
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 1 of 8 (100589)
04-17-2004 3:04 PM


To be frank: I don't know much about the Big Bang, could someone either explain it a little or provide a source of up-to-date information about it?
String Theory is constantly brought up at this forum, and I have no idea what it is. I would also appriciate some clarification on this.
Thanks.

Wanna feel God? Step onto the wrestling mat and you'd be crazy to deny the uplifting spirit.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by coffee_addict, posted 04-17-2004 3:56 PM One_Charred_Wing has not replied
 Message 8 by Phobos, posted 05-18-2004 5:21 PM One_Charred_Wing has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 8 (100592)
04-17-2004 3:54 PM


Move and mini-rant
Thread moved here from the Suggestions and Questions forum.
-----
This topic circumvented the new new topic starting procedures. Unlike Rockets case, this may have been something along the lines of "an honest mistake". It seemed pretty silly to move the topic to the "Proposed New Topics" forum at this point, only to (probably) promptly move it to the "Big Bang..." forum.
The "Suggestions and Questions" forum is intended for suggestions to and/or questions about the operation of . It's the tech support topic.
I have a "What the various forums are intended for" type topic in the works.
Summary: This breach of accepted procedure is forgiven. Such is NOT an automatic, when proper topic starting procedures are bypassed.
Adminnemooseus
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-17-2004]

WHERE TO GO TO START A NEW TOPIC (For other than "Welcome, Visitors!", "Suggestions and Questions", "Practice Makes Perfect", and "Short Subjects")
Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
too fast closure of threads

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 495 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 3 of 8 (100595)
04-17-2004 3:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by One_Charred_Wing
04-17-2004 3:04 PM


I think you can find explanations about the big bang in many places.
Here is an oversimplified explanation of what the string theory is.
Refer back to the question that the Greeks had about the atom. They asked that if you break something in half and keep breaking it in half, would you eventually reach a point where you can't break it any further or would you be spending an eternity breaking the pieces in half?
We now know that there are other subatomic particles that are even smaller than the electrons and protons.
The string theory says that everything DOES break down to something that is infinitesimally small that looks like a rubber band. Since it looks like a string, they named this theory the string theory.
Basically, the string's vibration determine the property of matter. So, if you have an electron, then its string would vibrate at frequency A, and proton's string would vibrate at frequency B. In other words, the more energy a string matter has, the higher frequency it will vibrate.
Now, the interesting stuff about the theory. In order for the theory to hold with all the data we have about the subatomic particles, the string must be vibrating in a 10 dimensional universe.
Here is an analogy. If you put a guitar string in a 2 dimensional plane, it can only vibrate right and left. If you put it in a 3-D space, it can vibrate right, left, up and down. In other words, there are more frequencies available in a 3-D space than 2-D plane. The more dimension you have, the more frequencies the string can have.
Mathematically, it takes 10 dimensions for the infinitesimal string to vibrate in for all the data to make sense. Thus, scientists theorize that the universe we live in actually have 10 dimensions instead of 4. However, not a single person in this world could imagine what the missing dimensions look like.
By the way, I recommend the book called Flatland by Edwin A. Abbott. This book explores the problems of understanding perception of different dimensions. I think you'll like it.
{Fixed UBB code. There is no UBB code for "underline". - AM}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-17-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 04-17-2004 3:04 PM One_Charred_Wing has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by RAZD, posted 04-17-2004 6:53 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 4 of 8 (100617)
04-17-2004 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by coffee_addict
04-17-2004 3:56 PM


flatland info (offtopic) only
"Flatland" is available on line at
http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/Flatland/
(it is 'sexist' though)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by coffee_addict, posted 04-17-2004 3:56 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by coffee_addict, posted 04-17-2004 7:17 PM RAZD has not replied
 Message 6 by Chiroptera, posted 04-17-2004 10:53 PM RAZD has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 495 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 5 of 8 (100622)
04-17-2004 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by RAZD
04-17-2004 6:53 PM


Re: flatland info (offtopic) only
quote:
(it is 'sexist' though)
Hahahaha. Yes, but you have to understand that Abbott was a priest in 1880's.
Have you ever wondered why the people of Flatland never use women as soldiers instead of men that have pointy angle?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by RAZD, posted 04-17-2004 6:53 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 8 (100648)
04-17-2004 10:53 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by RAZD
04-17-2004 6:53 PM


Re: flatland info (offtopic) only
Is it really sexist? I recall that Flatland is a satire on Victorian society. I had the impression that the depiction of females, like the lower class triangles, was part of the satire. But perhaps I was reading it with my 21st century sensibilities.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by RAZD, posted 04-17-2004 6:53 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 04-18-2004 1:26 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 7 of 8 (100674)
04-18-2004 1:26 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Chiroptera
04-17-2004 10:53 PM


Re: flatland info (offtopic) only
see
EvC Forum: Flatland is sexist
[This message has been edited by RAZD, 04-18-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Chiroptera, posted 04-17-2004 10:53 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Phobos
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 8 (109095)
05-18-2004 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by One_Charred_Wing
04-17-2004 3:04 PM


Good, basic summary of Big Bang Theory...
Universe: Cosmology 101

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 04-17-2004 3:04 PM One_Charred_Wing has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024