Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,852 Year: 4,109/9,624 Month: 980/974 Week: 307/286 Day: 28/40 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religion in Government
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3803 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 31 of 303 (111486)
05-29-2004 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by custard
05-28-2004 11:22 PM


The rights of the minority
custard writes:
Part of being in a democracy is that you have to suffer the will of the majority. If the will of the majority creates laws based on religious beliefs - abortion restriction, controlled substances, tax exemptions for religious institutions, then I don't see how one can avoid the influence of religion.
Fortunately, democracies have laws in place to protect minorities from unjust rules by the majority. Democratic laws and institutions protect the freedoms and rights of all individual citizens.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by custard, posted 05-28-2004 11:22 PM custard has not replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3803 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 32 of 303 (111489)
05-29-2004 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by custard
05-29-2004 5:31 AM


Re: interesting
custard writes:
This type of thing seems to bolster the argument our govt was established in the name of Christianity as well as freedom.
The argument that the United States was established in the name of Christianity is complete hogwash.
quote:
The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.
-- John Adams
Adams also signed the Treaty of Tripoli under which article 11 states "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion."
The following from No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.nobeliefs.com/jefferson.htm
quote:
Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious pinions, more than on our opinions in physics and geometry....The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. -- Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782
quote:
Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.
-Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom
{Edited to add URL}
This message has been edited by DBlevins, 05-29-2004 05:50 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by custard, posted 05-29-2004 5:31 AM custard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Chiroptera, posted 05-29-2004 6:50 PM DBlevins has not replied
 Message 40 by custard, posted 05-29-2004 10:11 PM DBlevins has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 303 (111491)
05-29-2004 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by DBlevins
05-29-2004 6:44 PM


Re: interesting
...They meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.
Wow! I really do need to read more! I was always under the impression that the First Amendment was intended to protect the rights of the different Christian denominations.
Thanks, DBlevins.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by DBlevins, posted 05-29-2004 6:44 PM DBlevins has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 34 of 303 (111496)
05-29-2004 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Rrhain
05-29-2004 7:17 AM


Now you are just making stuff up.
The constitution was written way after the first landing of which I speak of. It was then that they placed a cross on the sand, and said a prayer to God, proclaiming this land in his name.
The constitution was written by Christians with God in their hearts, who were smart enough to not include church and state together. They didn't need to write anything about God, because we have the Bible which explains that.
Here is a web-site with some truths about God and our founders.
Angelfire - error 404
Here is a picture of the first landing site with the cross still there, now in stone.
Angelfire - error 404
Here, some more stuff you probably won't read:
CBN.com - The Christian Broadcasting Network
Incorrect. It is because the founding fathers knew the perils of having religion and government intertwined that they specifically and deliberately wrote the Constitution to separate the two.
Not true, it was their believe that brought about the whole thing to begin with. The separation of church and state is not to be confused with God and state. Everywhere you look it is written:
ONE NATION UNDER GOD.
I wonder why?
Did you not "not believe in the Invisible Pink Unicorn" until you were just told about here?
You seem to think that atheists go around constantly ranting, "There is no god! There is no god!" The thing about atheism is that you really don't think about it. What is the point of wasting time cogitating over something that doesn't exist?
That has nothing to do with this thread, keep your thoughts on the subject at hand, and try not to get so emotional.
For the last time, do not put words in my mouth, it dis-respects me, and makes you look foolish.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 7:17 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 8:09 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 44 by JCPalmer, posted 05-29-2004 11:20 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 46 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 11:56 PM riVeRraT has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 444 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 35 of 303 (111501)
05-29-2004 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by jar
05-29-2004 11:19 AM


Are you sure of that? If so, can you provide some idea of when and where this happened?
What was it they were running from? Looking for?
Yes they were smart to separate religion from state. But not God.
In God we trust.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 11:19 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 8:16 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 38 by NosyNed, posted 05-29-2004 8:24 PM riVeRraT has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 36 of 303 (111502)
05-29-2004 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by riVeRraT
05-29-2004 7:46 PM


You need to add a few resources.
First, the Virginia Colonies were not settled for religious freedom, no matter what that site says. They were a commercial venture from beginning to end. As usual, he tries to combine to seperate incidents, the earlier Virginia Settlements which were commercial ventures with the Pilgrim landings much later and further north.
And as to the Mayflower, the Pilgrims were some of the most intolerant, untrustworthy, bigotted people ever to hit our shores. You might just want to check and investigate King Philip's War and the destruction that the Pilgrims brought to the Wampanoag.
But NONE of the Virgina or New England settlements were intended to found America. Nor were they the first settlement in North America. The Spanish had colonized Florida and even moved up into what is today Texas, Arizona and New Mexico before the first English settler set foot on the shore of the James.
You really need to do some research one your own.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by riVeRraT, posted 05-29-2004 7:46 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Chiroptera, posted 05-29-2004 8:35 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 37 of 303 (111503)
05-29-2004 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by riVeRraT
05-29-2004 8:08 PM


Actually, In God We Trust
was first added to the US Coins around the Civil War. It was not in general us as a motto before than and certainly not as a motto by the founding fathers.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by riVeRraT, posted 05-29-2004 8:08 PM riVeRraT has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 38 of 303 (111505)
05-29-2004 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by riVeRraT
05-29-2004 8:08 PM


Try a bit harder?
Please reread your post 35.
You quoted a question. You then made statments that had nothing to do with it.
It has been suggested that you will be recieved better if you are able to write with only the normal number of errors and typos. I suggest that if you want to debate at all you will have to be able to read as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by riVeRraT, posted 05-29-2004 8:08 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by riVeRraT, posted 05-30-2004 5:25 PM NosyNed has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 303 (111506)
05-29-2004 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by jar
05-29-2004 8:09 PM


Re: You need to add a few resources.
quote:
And as to the Mayflower, the Pilgrims were some of the most intolerant, untrustworthy, bigotted people ever to hit our shores.
It is a common myth here in the U.S. that the Pilgrims (those Puritans who settled in New England, starting with the Mayflower) came to this continent for practice relgious freedom. Actually, they left England because they wanted the right to practice religious intolerance. It is interesting that early Massachusetts had very strict laws against what it considered deviant sects. One Quaker, Mary Dyer, was even hanged because she refused to be banished.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 8:09 PM jar has not replied

custard
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 303 (111513)
05-29-2004 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by DBlevins
05-29-2004 6:44 PM


Re: interesting
custard writes:
This type of thing seems to bolster the argument our govt was established in the name of Christianity as well as freedom.
DBlevins write:
The argument that the United States was established in the name of Christianity is complete hogwash.
Yes, my statement is erroneous. Keep reading my posts though, I think you'll see what I was trying to say:
This message has been edited by custard, 05-29-2004 09:11 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by DBlevins, posted 05-29-2004 6:44 PM DBlevins has not replied

custard
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 303 (111514)
05-29-2004 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by JCPalmer
05-29-2004 2:50 PM


Well actually America was first founded by a man who goes by the name of Amerigo Vespucci.
America again was founded by a man named Christopher Columbus in 1492.
Dude, need to hit the history book a bit harder, or simply go back and read the links you posted. Sailing to, and writing about 'the Americas;' and discovering the West Indies are not germaine to this the influence of religion in US govt.
This message has been edited by custard, 05-31-2004 04:18 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by JCPalmer, posted 05-29-2004 2:50 PM JCPalmer has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 42 of 303 (111516)
05-29-2004 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by riVeRraT
05-29-2004 11:07 AM


riVeRraT writes:
quote:
All the laws of the constitution were written in the spirit of God.
Then why do you have a constitutional right to worship some other god? Isn't one of your god's commandments that "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"? Isn't that the first commandment?
How can the constitution be written in the spirit of god if it violates the very first commandment of god?
quote:
Slavery was part of the Bible, so they didn't believe it was wrong.
They most certainly did! You really haven't thought this through, have you? There was a huge debate right from the Declaration of Independence through to the Constitution about what to do regarding slavery. They're talking about freedom and yet enslaving.
quote:
I believe God intended for there to be slaves, but not the way we know it. It was only supposed to be more like a job, not slavery.
(*blink!*)
You did not just say that.
You really have no idea what slavery is, do you?

Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by riVeRraT, posted 05-29-2004 11:07 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by riVeRraT, posted 05-30-2004 5:54 PM Rrhain has replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 43 of 303 (111517)
05-29-2004 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by nator
05-29-2004 4:54 PM


schrafinator writes:
quote:
Fortunately, our Constitutuional rights are NOT determined by majority vote in the US.
Sorta. The Constitution can be amended by popularly elected individuals. It's not a direct line, but it is there. If enough people want to revoke the First Amendment, then it will be revoked.

Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by nator, posted 05-29-2004 4:54 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by jar, posted 05-29-2004 11:28 PM Rrhain has not replied

JCPalmer
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 303 (111518)
05-29-2004 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by riVeRraT
05-29-2004 7:46 PM


riVeRraT writes:
Now you are just making stuff up.
No that is fact.
riVeRraT writes:
The constitution was written by Christians with God in their hearts, who were smart enough to not include church and state together. They didn't need to write anything about God, because we have the Bible which explains that.
If its not written down, it'ts not fact. Also they may have had 'God in their hearts' but the point of comming to the Americas was for freedom of many different things.
riVeRrat as for your research, I'm not so sure if I buy a website with information where the copyright/work cited is followed by links to more Angelfire links (free personal web servers) and this 'Return to Bro. Terry's Home Page!' Check out wikipedia, and then get back to me.
custard writes:
Dude, need to hit the history book a bit harder, or simply go back and read the links you posted. Sailing to, and writing about 'the Americas;' and discovering the West Indies are not germaine to this the influence of religion in US govt.
Meaning no disrespect, I have followed your opinion on this topic and have felt it has been very accurate and resourceful, however, I would have imagined you would have figured the meaning of my post. The point I was trying to convey was it does not matter who found America, and what they said, the cold hard facts are in the Constitution.
more to add I'm in a hurry so I leave this as is. I will add more in a few hours.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by riVeRraT, posted 05-29-2004 7:46 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by custard, posted 05-31-2004 5:21 AM JCPalmer has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 45 of 303 (111519)
05-29-2004 11:28 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Rrhain
05-29-2004 11:16 PM


Well, at least it's made as difficult as possible. While Congress can vote an Amendment, it then has to be ratified by two thirds of the states.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Rrhain, posted 05-29-2004 11:16 PM Rrhain has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024